Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
5 Pages«<45

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
MassPackersFan  
#101 Posted : Tuesday, November 11, 2008 3:07:28 PM(UTC)
That works too. :lol:
4PackGirl  
#102 Posted : Tuesday, November 11, 2008 5:26:07 PM(UTC)
i understand completely where you're coming from iron - i truly agree that the penalties are INEXCUSABLE!!! but i'm not gonna allow the comparisons to infante go unchecked - that's just silly.
Mike McCarthy needs to light a fire under these guys asses & make them understand that this type of play is NOT acceptable in green bay - period. does that mean i think he's a bad coach? hell no!
Cheesey  
#103 Posted : Tuesday, November 11, 2008 6:21:45 PM(UTC)
Something Pack93 said earlier in the season that i at the time dissagreed with.
That Mike McCarthy was too conservative this year. I have agreed with that for several weeks now. It seems he's playing not to win, but to not lose. At the end of the Viking game he should have been more aggressive to get a first down, instead of depending on a LONG FG attempt.
He seems to have lost that "pit bull" attitude.
If we screw up and lose this coming weekend, i think "Doom and Gloom" will pretty much have come true.
macbob  
#104 Posted : Tuesday, November 11, 2008 6:38:06 PM(UTC)
Coaches have these guys out there fighting hard every game. They're competitive--they just lost two games by a grand total of 4 points, and one of those two was the only remaining unbeaten team in the NFL. I thought the Pack played poorly, but they are only one play in both games from being 6-3.
macbob  
#105 Posted : Tuesday, November 11, 2008 6:50:09 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Something Pack93 said earlier in the season that i at the time dissagreed with.
That Mike McCarthy was too conservative this year. I have agreed with that for several weeks now. It seems he's playing not to win, but to not lose. At the end of the Viking game he should have been more aggressive to get a first down, instead of depending on a LONG FG attempt.
He seems to have lost that "pit bull" attitude.
If we screw up and lose this coming weekend, i think "Doom and Gloom" will pretty much have come true.


I don't think McCarthy's changed his play calling that much from previous years. I think he's always been more conservative toward the end of the 2nd (passing on shots at the end zone with time still left on the clock and settling for a field goal attempt) and 4th (last year Pack would be ahead by 7 with 6 minutes left and they'd run 3 times trying to use up clock and punt, leaving 3 1/2 minutes left). I thought the end of the Vikings game was classic McCarthy, and if Crosby had hit the field goal we'd be singing his praises instead of cursing him.
Yerko  
#106 Posted : Tuesday, November 11, 2008 7:57:19 PM(UTC)
One thing I didn't understand is why not go for 2? We go up 26-21, kick a field goal putting us up by 6 and still giving the Vikings some time to score. Yes, you should be able to rely on your defense, but look what happened. I mean worst case scenario, you go for 2, you miss and you lose by 2 points instead of 1 after the Vikings score. Now, you go for 2...get in, go up 28-21. Vikings score, go into overtime and hope for the best.
I am not worried. I read most posts in this topic, some need to relax.
bozz_2006  
#107 Posted : Tuesday, November 11, 2008 8:11:00 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
need to relax.


no argument there.
Cheesey  
#108 Posted : Tuesday, November 11, 2008 8:17:30 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Something Pack93 said earlier in the season that i at the time dissagreed with.
That Mike McCarthy was too conservative this year. I have agreed with that for several weeks now. It seems he's playing not to win, but to not lose. At the end of the Viking game he should have been more aggressive to get a first down, instead of depending on a LONG FG attempt.
He seems to have lost that "pit bull" attitude.
If we screw up and lose this coming weekend, i think "Doom and Gloom" will pretty much have come true.


I don't think McCarthy's changed his play calling that much from previous years. I think he's always been more conservative toward the end of the 2nd (passing on shots at the end zone with time still left on the clock and settling for a field goal attempt) and 4th (last year Pack would be ahead by 7 with 6 minutes left and they'd run 3 times trying to use up clock and punt, leaving 3 1/2 minutes left). I thought the end of the Vikings game was classic McCarthy, and if Crosby had hit the field goal we'd be singing his praises instead of cursing him.

I'm not cursing Crosby. Just dissapointed in him. It was in a dome, under perfect conditions. He just plain missed. And THAT is what a kicker is paid for, to make the big kick when it counts the most. Had it been outside in bad weather, you can understand the miss. But in those conditions you should make it.
Oh well....can't change it now.
We may end up at the end of the season feeling even worse about it if it ends up costing us a playoff spot.
We were lucky to be in a position to win the game as bad as we played.
macbob  
#109 Posted : Tuesday, November 11, 2008 10:42:12 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
We were lucky to be in a position to win the game as bad as we played.


Yeah, the Packers looked pretty bad in the third down 21-10. But I don't know that I'd say they were lucky--the Packers have returned more than one interception and punt for TDs this year, and that's not luck. But it did put a lot of pressure on our playmakers to make those plays--if either one was tackled before the goal line, I don't know that we'd have scored a TD either time.
tromadz  
#110 Posted : Wednesday, November 12, 2008 12:02:14 AM(UTC)
Outcoached?

Childress was 0-5 vs. the Packers coming into that game.

Keep reaching.
Cheesey  
#111 Posted : Wednesday, November 12, 2008 4:33:22 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
We were lucky to be in a position to win the game as bad as we played.


Yeah, the Packers looked pretty bad in the third down 21-10. But I don't know that I'd say they were lucky--the Packers have returned more than one interception and punt for TDs this year, and that's not luck. But it did put a lot of pressure on our playmakers to make those plays--if either one was tackled before the goal line, I don't know that we'd have scored a TD either time.

I meant lucky from an offensive position. Our offense is the group thats SUPPOSED to score the points, and they were downright awful. Our D and special teams kept is in the game. But at the end our O couldn't get Crosby into better FG position. They had their chance to pull their heads out of their collective butts, and DO something in the game. But when it was on the line, they still couldn't muster enough to get the job done.
Yes.....Crosby SHOULD have made the FG anyway. But the O SHOULD have made it an easier distance.
JMO of course.
Packnic  
#112 Posted : Monday, November 17, 2008 2:09:56 AM(UTC)
crickets.
IronMan  
#113 Posted : Monday, November 17, 2008 4:25:09 AM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
crickets.

Reminds me of when Shaquille O'Neal would go half the season shooting 45% from the line. Then he would have one game where he goes 10 for 10, then he'd say that he proved all his critics wrong. LOL

This was a great win and I am happy. But my criticism of McCarthy after 9 games was justified.
Cheesey  
#114 Posted : Monday, November 17, 2008 11:07:10 AM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
crickets.

Go figure.......Crosby can't make a 53 yarder in a dome, but NAILS his kicks in the cold and wind at Lambeau.
The kid showed he can also rebound from one bad kick.
That of course is a VERY good sign!
Pack93z  
#115 Posted : Monday, November 17, 2008 1:43:18 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
crickets.


No Crickets what so ever... there was a noticeable difference in the intensity of this team this week.. no question about it.

We heard a few of the changes that Mike McCarthy and staff made this week in regards to preparation for this game.. whatever the entire scope of all those changes were we don't know... but one thing is for sure.. this team came out on a mission.. even the play calling seemed a little more balanced..

I know alot of people think the attitude and fire of a team has little direct influence from the head coach.. I disagree.. if the head coach and staff are fired up it catches on to the team..

Several laid back players had a extra snap to them yesterday.. guys like Tauscher, Kampman and Hawk.. all seemed to have had the fire in the belly burning a little hotter yesterday... know what I mean.

Personally game day coaching.. I don't think Mike McCarthy has been out coached.. did I think he played more to not lose than to win in some games this year.. without a doubt.. additionally I think we have been flat a couple of games.. to me.. that falls on the staff to keep these guys tuned in and fired up.

A+ for yesterday.
gbpfan  
#116 Posted : Monday, November 17, 2008 1:47:39 PM(UTC)
They played an A game yesterday,sure hope the coaches have a good one this week.
porky88  
#117 Posted : Monday, November 17, 2008 4:32:57 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Personally game day coaching.. I don't think Mike McCarthy has been out coached.. did I think he played more to not lose than to win in some games this year.. without a doubt.. additionally I think we have been flat a couple of games.. to me.. that falls on the staff to keep these guys tuned in and fired up.

A+ for yesterday.


I don't think it's a mystery that when you look at the last three games the Packers actually won, they ran the ball and it's not that they ran it well, but they stayed with it. Now against the Bears they actually stayed with it and did it well.

I think sometimes McCarthy out coaches himself. He's so stubborn that he sticks with his gameplan without making adjustments. We actually saw it again against the Bears except it was working and now was the time to stick with it. McCarthy and the coaching staff's true test will come when their gameplan isn't working and they need to make adjustments to win the game.

The team was well coached this week and I thought the fire they represented was a direct reflection of their coach. I think that much can be said.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
5 Pages«<45
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
beast (3h) : Packers can't catch Eagles so it doesn't directly effect our playoff chances.
Nonstopdrivel (3h) : yoffs?
Nonstopdrivel (3h) : So . . . could in theory be a severe sprain. Which might still sideline him for the rest of the season, but perhaps he'd be back for the pla
Zero2Cool (3h) : That's regarding Carson Wentz
Zero2Cool (3h) : @AlbertBreer Doctors determined with manual test there was damage to ACL, extent unknown until MRI tomorrow.
Zero2Cool (3h) : Read reports that's what is feared and yes, you're right, usually if that's the fear = done
Nonstopdrivel (3h) : MRI would me mostly a formality. He walked off on his own power, so possibly just a sprain? But I doubt it.
Nonstopdrivel (3h) : Provocative tests on scene are pretty sensitive. If they fear his ACL is torn, it probably is.
Zero2Cool (3h) : He has an ACL? I only heard there were running tests ... tomorrow.
Nonstopdrivel (3h) : Depends on which Nick Foles arises from the ashes. If it's the 2013 Foles, Eagles could still be a powerhouse.
gbguy20 (4h) : carson wentz torn acl. is that good or bad for our playoff chances?
nerdmann (7h) : It's definitive, Davante is BETTER than Janis.
Zero2Cool (8h) : can't believe some don't want Adams re-signed... what is wrong with you!!
Zero2Cool (8h) : @WesHod The #Packers turned to Davante Adams several times during the final series and he came through each time. The evolution of a playmak
buckeyepackfan (12h) : Packer Fans will take over Stadium today!
Zero2Cool (12h) : @AaronNagler Packers just took the field to cheers. No Browns fans here to boo yet.
buckeyepackfan (12h) : DILLY DILLY!
Zero2Cool (13h) : Williams though, to answer your question :D
Zero2Cool (13h) : First snap of the day don't mean didly
Zero2Cool (13h) : Starting? who cares?
Zero2Cool (13h) : Browns getting 1st win
dhazer (13h) : who is starting at rb today ?
buckeyepackfan (13h) : Perry innactive! Fackrell & Biegal step up today!
Zero2Cool (13h) : Both undrafted rookies, Lenzy Pipkins and Donatello Brown, are active for the #Packers. They join Randall, House and Hawkins as the active c
buckeyepackfan (14h) : GO! PACK! GO!
buckeyepackfan (14h) : GAMEDAY! #assesagainstthewall!
buckeyepackfan (14h) : GOOD MORNING PACKER FANS!
buckeyepackfan (14h) : Yes Packers will be done if they lose today.
beast (15h) : Packers might be done even if they go undefeated the rest of the way ,so any loss and they're out of playoff chase
dhazer (15h) : If GB loses today should mean end of TT and MM. The Browns are going for perfect season
gbguy20 (16h) : if we lose today are we done?
Zero2Cool (10-Dec) : Rodgers also lines up LB during practices. Fun they does have
buckeyepackfan (10-Dec) : Pipkin & Brown!!!! = Packer Win!!! BOOK IT!!!!
Cheesey (10-Dec) : GO Arvy, beat Namy! Lol!
wpr (9-Dec) : GO ARMY BEAT NAVY
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Nonstopdrivel

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

15h / Fantasy Sports Talk / dhazer

10-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

9-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Nonstopdrivel

Headlines