beast
6 years ago

Objectivity is better than no objectivity. Yes. I don't consider myself a better person. No.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 


So you have said,
1) You can form objective opinions
2) While Homers can’t form objective opinions
3) And objectivity is better than no objectivity
Therefor you are saying you’re physically able to form better opinions, while homers are NOT physically able to.

And if one is physically able to do something (say win) that makes them better than those who can’t… does it not?

So many times, you have implied that you are BETTER than Homers!
But according to you who is a homer?

I have to watch the majority here gush and I've blocked nobody and won't. Why can I stand a whole mass of homers and you can't take a single dissenter?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 


Your calling the mass majority of us homers
So you have implied that YOU ARE BETTER THAN the mass majority of US!

I'm tolerant and most aren't. I can handle those who want to lock horns. Most can't.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 


Once again, you are implying that you can do something that most can’t and therefore you are implying that you are better.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
6 years ago
Geez...every thread turns into a pissing contest.
Once again, just like the rest of the country, "ME FIRST and SCREW YOU!"
UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
6 years ago

So you have said,
1) You can form objective opinions
2) While Homers can’t form objective opinions
3) And objectivity is better than no objectivity
Therefor you are saying you’re physically able to form better opinions, while homers are NOT physically able to.

And if one is physically able to do something (say win) that makes them better than those who can’t… does it not?

So many times, you have implied that you are BETTER than Homers!
But according to you who is a homer?


Your calling the mass majority of us homers
So you have implied that YOU ARE BETTER THAN the mass majority of US!


Once again, you are implying that you can do something that most can’t and therefore you are implying that you are better.

Originally Posted by: beast 



Are you ever going to comprehend and stipulate to what the definition of a homer is? What is a homer to you? This is where all your belligerence emanates. You don't like a term that I didn't make up that speaks to many on this forum.

What does the word "homer" in the context of this board mean? Once you give your answer maybe we can build some bridges?


UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


beast
6 years ago

Are you ever going to comprehend and stipulate to what the definition of a homer is? What is a homer to you? This is where all your belligerence emanates. You don't like a term that I didn't make up that speaks to many on this forum.

What does the word "homer" in the context of this board mean? Once you give your answer maybe we can build some bridges?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 


You keep saying I don't like the term, there is nothing wrong with the term. The term doesn't matter... not at all... the term could be "x" for all I care...

What matters is you said most of the board is "x", and that you are better than "x"

You won't own up to that fact!

UserPostedImage
yooperfan
6 years ago

I don't mind being called a homer. I like the Brewers, Badgers and Bucks because they are within my home state. If I was born elsewhere, I would still root for the Packers because I got hooked on the tradition and lengthy history. That's why I like the Red Sox. I like the Penguins because my dad talked about them and the more I watched them play, the more I liked Mario. And then Sidney came along. I also like the Gamblers for homer reasons, they are my local Hockey team.

If anyone has a problem with me being a homer, they can go fuck themselves raw and bleed out.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 


Like I said, this thread should be locked.
It’s getting uglier by the minute.
uffda udfa
6 years ago

You keep saying I don't like the term, there is nothing wrong with the term. The term doesn't matter... not at all... the term could be "x" for all I care...

What matters is you said most of the board is "x", and that you are better than "x"

You won't own up to that fact!

Originally Posted by: beast 



Like I've posted time and time again...I have not said I'm better than anyone, ever. You make conjured allegations to debate against them. Straw men R U.

Do I think I'm more knowledgeable than most? Absolutely. Better? Never.

You don't like to answer questions and endeavor to control the narrative here. This would've been put to bed had you embraced my post with the definition of a homer and just apologized for your years of misunderstanding. You're not a big enough person to do that, though. I think it's you who strongly desires to feel better than me but really doesn't. No reason for you to stay after this. The word means what it means and I stand by what I've said on the subject from years ago to this thread. Consistent all day every day just like your misunderstanding and childish inability to let this go.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


beast
6 years ago

Like I said, this thread should be locked.
It’s getting uglier by the minute.

Originally Posted by: yooperfan 


I could be wrong, but this seems to be nicer than some of the other things we've said to each other. Which did get locked or modified.

Why not attempted to keep this on a single thread instead of locking it and moving it to even more threads?

UserPostedImage
beast
6 years ago

Like I've posted time and time again...I have not said I'm better than anyone, ever. You make conjured allegations to debate against them. Straw men R U.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 


I'm just putting together things you have said.

Fine, I give in, you and your objective is not better than any of the homers. I'm glad we agree.

UserPostedImage

UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
6 years ago

I'm just putting together things you have said.

Fine, I give in, you and your objective is not better than any of the homers. I'm glad we agree.

UserPostedImage

Originally Posted by: beast 



Your 2 and 2 isn't equaling 4, though.

Good. Took long enough. Not lost on me you're being sarcastic. :)


UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


beast
6 years ago

Good. Took long enough. Not lost on me you're being sarcastic. :)

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 


Not really, if you not better (which you're not)
then your objective has built-in biases which
blocks you, like everyone else on here.

UserPostedImage

UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
dfosterf (now) : Maybe
Mucky Tundra (13m) : Yes
Zero2Cool (1h) : No.
Mucky Tundra (3h) : End of a Degu-era
dhazer (4h) : Steelers sign Patterson because of new kickoff rule interesting
Zero2Cool (6h) : Former #Packers TE Josiah Deguara is signing a 1-year deal with the Jaguars, per source.
Zero2Cool (7h) : They do not do it for "content sake".
dfosterf (18h) : For the record, I enjoy Beast and Mucky drafts
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Haha
Mucky Tundra (27-Mar) : No time for talking! Back to work beast!
beast (27-Mar) : You saw only 4,201 of my mocks? 🥺 I think that means you missed more than half of them 😢
dfosterf (27-Mar) : Does anyone know what Lambeau field improvements got put on hold? My guess would be for the 2025 draft
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : It's like listen, you made 4,201 mocks, no shit.
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Cuz during the draft "I had them mocked there!" as if it's amazing.
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : They're fun to do once in awhile. It's people who think they are "content" that annoy me.
dfosterf (27-Mar) : Against tbd
dfosterf (27-Mar) : Answer to your question is yes, it's a Thursday, will be the Chiefs aga
dfosterf (27-Mar) : Luckily for all concerned, I don't post them. I did one, but that was like 25 mocks ago
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : NFL 2024 gonna start Sept 5th isn't it???
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Ugh... kids these days!
dfosterf (27-Mar) : I'm gonna go do some more mock draft hell instead 🤪
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Did we do one of those prediction threads yet for 2024 season?
dfosterf (27-Mar) : In my city, they are playing the nimby game, in order to keep some railroad tracks vs. 2 professional sports teams and a concert venue.
dfosterf (27-Mar) : And/Or a city council, of which I haven't seen a good one in a very long time
dfosterf (27-Mar) : That sounds like a Mayor, not a city.
buckeyepackfan (26-Mar) : Packers halt scheduled 80mil upgrade of stadium until lease agreement talks are restarted
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : City of Green Bay puts Packers' Lambeau Field lease talks on hold
buckeyepackfan (26-Mar) : Packers 1 of 3 teams to vote no on new kickoff rule.
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Packers sign another Kicker
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Lengthy explanation at PFF if you click the link
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Kickoff rules officially changed.ngthy explan
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : lol
Cheesey (26-Mar) : 2009? No thanks! One open heart surgery is enough!
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Good for you!
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Yes. That's the one.
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Is that "Lady Dugan" per chance?
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Crystal?
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Please refresh my memory
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Alan posts. Crystal back in my life. It's 2009 all over again! Lol
Mucky Tundra (26-Mar) : BAH GAWD! THAT'S CHEESEYS MUSIC!
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Gutekunst said early stages of Jordan Love contract being discussed.
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Shouldn't be penalized cuz official screwed up
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Yeah, challenge until you are incorrect twice.
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Fining them is the goal, per the people who made the rule anyway.
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Still waiting on the kickoff rule changes. Did hear yesterday that the touchback proposal will now be the 30 yard line, not the 35
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Probably speed of game issues with your proposal
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Hopefully the refs don't get in the habit of throwing flags on this
beast (25-Mar) : I think when it comes to Challenges should get two strikes, so unlimited challenges as long as they keep winning them, but 2 wrong then done
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Still subject to the fines etc
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Yes, I should have been more specific. Also, they are now saying it would be a 15 yard penalty. That makes more sense .
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2023 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
Bears
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
LIONS
Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
Raiders
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
CHARGERS
Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
CHIEFS
Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
Giants
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
Panthers
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
Cowboys
Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
49ers
Recent Topics
2m / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Mar / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

24-Mar / Around The NFL / dhazer

24-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.