Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
dfosterf  
#1 Posted : Thursday, December 11, 2008 5:36:30 PM(UTC)
As stated previously many times by myself and other posters, I cannot stand the ZBS and it's results as it pertains to the Green Bay Packers. My intent on this thread and others is to examine and discuss zone blocking.

Zone blocking is touted as being simple and effective. I submit it was never simple, and I will delve into why it has been called simple in a later thread. As to effective, there are so many variables at work on any given ZBS play that are so interdependent upon one another that the effectiveness is easily undermined by the failure of any one of many attempting to execute it, and the physicality of those making the attempt at the NFL level.

Coordination and technique matter more (ostensibly--I argue this point) than muscle in implementing a successful scheme. This is probably the primary tenet of the advantage of utilizing the ZBS.

This first thread is not to argue about the pros and cons of the entire ZBS, but rather to start dissecting one piece of it, hopefully enlightening some that are unfamiliar with that piece of it, and discussing it. It would appear that we have many months for an examination.

The first and foremost concept in the ZBS is "covered" vs. "uncovered".

Each individual lineman identifies whether he has a defensive player in front of him. If he does, he is "covered". If not, he is "uncovered". If the latter is the case, he is asked to help playside on a doubleteam, then reacts to the movement of the defensive linemen as well as the movement of the linebacker. He does this with wide lateral steps and what are called "bucket" steps. The initial movement of these doubleteams is supposed to equalize defensive talent and create cutback lanes. Note strongly the term cutback lane. ZBS is not designed to create a hole for the runningback to run through.

Covered VS. Uncovered Explained:

[youtube]ST1koVGt50I[/youtube]

I would prefer that any discussion look towards what has been presented in this post. Not that I am trying to control the discussion for any agenda, but rather I would like to attempt to delve deeply into the subject at hand, which means multiple threads on the ZBS.

I see many pitfalls with the "covered" vs. "uncovered" scheme, and would welcome discussion in that arena.

Failing that, I'm willing to talk and/or argue about anything, f#ck it, I'm retired. :thumbleft:
MassPackersFan  
#2 Posted : Thursday, December 11, 2008 6:20:01 PM(UTC)
I think you should include a comparison scheme and what the OL's responsibilities are!
warhawk  
#3 Posted : Thursday, December 11, 2008 7:14:39 PM(UTC)
I think some of our problems with consistancyin the ZBS is Mike McCarthy will tend to get away from the run at times and teams that are prolific with this system just keep pounding away. They, like us, don't always get results early on in games but keep pounding the rock until it starts to work.

We won't do that.

I am certainly against the system if that's what it takes to be successful because we are more than likely going to win many more games throwing the ball with our personnel than using some of the best WR's in the game to run block.

I am starting to think the ZBS requires an "all in" mentality to work and with the number of points this offense scores I think making that committment would be a mistake.
We ask Donald Driver and Greg Jennings to run block 35 times a game and I think we lose more games than if we were getting them the ball.
dfosterf  
#4 Posted : Thursday, December 11, 2008 7:24:09 PM(UTC)
Bucket step definition: first step of an offensive lineman or back in which he steps at about 4 oclock or 7 oclock; purpose is to begin moving toward the sideline; backward angle is to clear away from an adjacent player in the case of a lineman or for timing purposes in the case of a back, same as kick step if you ever see that term.
brnt247  
#5 Posted : Thursday, December 11, 2008 7:58:07 PM(UTC)
I really don't see a problem with our running game. If there's something that we specifically don't need to fix, in my opinion it's that. Our lineman have been effective at run blocking since the Indy game and we've faced some prime time run stopping d's.
bozz_2006  
#6 Posted : Thursday, December 11, 2008 9:20:25 PM(UTC)
note: bucket step = backward step. the scheme is all about flow. not the flow of the offense, but rather the flow of the defense. it's intended to get the defense all moving one direction (left or right), then having the RB quickly change direction. this puts the defense in the position of having give chase, negating any advantageous angles they have secured. this works best against gang tackle teams such as Chicago, Baltimore, Tampa, Oakland, Indy, Dallas, and/or San Diego. These teams rely on speed, to reach the corner before the back. By cutting back, you punish them for the speed, and expose their aggression as an over-pursuit.

in theory, it's great. i love zone blocking. i think the problem arises in the generally accepted philosophy that prototypical zone blocking o-linemen are quick and agile, and not as strong as power blocking o-linemen. Quick and agile, yes. They need to be able to mover laterally. but an o lineman does NOT have to be fast. an o-lineman does not have to be fast. they have to be powerful enough to move the other dude. plain and simple. what a lineman can not do, is get put on their heels. it doesn't matter how fast you are, if you get pushed back, you have failed your run-block assignment. i mean, there is a reason we don't have guys like greg jennings and donald driver blocking on the o-line. they just can't get the job done. and neither can our o-line. their goal is to get the defense flowing and over-pursuing to a corner, then allowing the runner to cut back. but flow doesn't matter if the defensive player over-powers the offensive player, gets into the backfield, and interrupts our RB. the reason Ryan Grant always seems to be bumping into the butts of our offensive linemen is because the linemen are not supposed to be in the backfield! They are consistently over-powered. we don't need a steam-roller offensive line; but they need to be powerful enough to not get blown up every play.
brnt247  
#7 Posted : Thursday, December 11, 2008 9:33:52 PM(UTC)
I know I am beating a dead horse, but of all things this team needs to fix in order to be a contender, why try and fix the running game? Maybe because of Grants success last season we are holding him up to such a high standard.
dfosterf  
#8 Posted : Thursday, December 11, 2008 9:37:29 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
I know I am beating a dead horse, but of all things this team needs to fix in order to be a contender, why try and fix the running game? Maybe because of Grants success last season we are holding him up to such a high standard.


Please read part 5 . You have a very legitimate point of view. See what you think of mine in answer to your question over there.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
gbguy20 (22m) : i must be missing something with the bye week comment
Smokey (1h) : Order your Pizza, Now !
Smokey (1h) : Packers
Smokey (1h) : Yes there is a bye week in the Pacers 2018 Schedule.
Zero2Cool (1h) : no charges? so the bomb was a dud??
Zero2Cool (1h) : No charges for WR Davis over LAX bomb joke
Cheesey (1h) : THE WRATH OF KHAN!!
Zero2Cool (1h) : damn caps
Zero2Cool (1h) : yEEHAW!!
Smokey (2h) : "DRAFT CHAT" Baby !
packerfanoutwest (5h) : Packers first pick will be lining up on with the defense
beast (5h) : If Packers trade up, they're grabbing James (or an ILB or CB) ;-P
beast (5h) : Sounds like Khan is moving the team to London in time.
packerfanoutwest (5h) : Here's an idea. Start a thread on who can pick the Packers #1 pick. Just make the pick only. No other comments.
Zero2Cool (6h) : This is NOT good
Zero2Cool (6h) : Shad Khan: I’m buying Wembley to keep the Jaguars stable in both London and Jacksonville
Zero2Cool (6h) : @AndrewBrandt Yes. The best GMs will leverage desperate teams tonight.
Zero2Cool (6h) : Today's Birthdays: StoicFire (30)
Zero2Cool (7h) : The Parlor is better than The Room.
beast (18h) : I believe the Packers seriously want to trade up (if they can find a price they like), I'm guessing for Fitzpatrick or James (though one guy said Ward). But could also be one of the ILBers (Smith or E
Smokey (20h) : Rumors are not money in the bank deals.
gbguy20 (22h) : pft reporting packers trying to trade up
Porforis (22h) : You're just a little chicken. Cheep Cheep Cheep Cheep Cheep Cheep Cheep Cheep Cheep
Nonstopdrivel (22h) : I don't want to talk about it.
Porforis (22h) : You're tearing me apart, Rourke!
Nonstopdrivel (22h) : (See "Moar Randomness" thread.)
Nonstopdrivel (22h) : It's a reference to The Room. I'm sorry, I forgot that not everyone knows about that movie. That's just my favorite line from that movie.
Porforis (25-Apr) : I... Can't tell if serious or The Room reference.
Barfarn (25-Apr) : Perhaps no or inadequte coverage in general
Barfarn (25-Apr) : I’d guess “no help” refers to men not being covered for breast cancer
wpr (25-Apr) : O no. Sorry to hear this NSD.
Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : Rourke, sorry to hear that, but who doesn't want to help you?
Cheesey (25-Apr) : Oh geez, nonstop. Like was said, we have your back.
TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : NSD sorry your post is a bit of a mind fuck, but obviously brother those here have your back.
Nonstopdrivel (25-Apr) : I got the test results back! I definitely have breast cancer.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2018 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 9 @ 7:20 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Sep 16 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Sep 23 @ 12:00 PM
Redskins
Sunday, Sep 30 @ 12:00 PM
BILLS
Sunday, Oct 7 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Monday, Oct 15 @ 7:15 PM
49ERS
Sunday, Oct 28 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Nov 4 @ 7:20 PM
Patriots
Sunday, Nov 11 @ 12:00 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Nov 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Sunday, Nov 25 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Dec 2 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Dec 9 @ 12:00 PM
FALCONS
Sunday, Dec 16 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Dec 23 @ 12:00 PM
Jets
Sunday, Dec 30 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
3m / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

5m / Random Babble / Cheesey

6m / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

13m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Bigbyfan

21m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Bigbyfan

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

24-Apr / Around The NFL / dhazer

24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

24-Apr / Random Babble / Cheesey

24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines