Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
I find the games teams play with the salary cap to be hilarious, and the Packers seem to be masters at them. Here's an example :

Rolling it over: In effect, the Packers rolled over $7.278 million onto their 2009 cap by signing guard Nevin McCaskill to a bogus new deal three days before the deadline for obtaining salary-cap credit next year.

On Dec. 26, the Packers added a likely-to-be-earned incentive clause for that amount on McCaskills two-year contract, which he originally signed Dec. 11 after being plucked off Philadelphias practice squad.

Thus, the Packers were able to finish the 2008 season just $116,284 under their adjusted salary cap of $126.16 million.

The bottom line is, we let football make decisions on whatever they think will help us win, Murphy said. I think weve managed between Ted (Thompson) and Russ (Ball) in a way to give us as much flexibility in the future as possible.

The requirements for McCaskill to have earned the $7.278 million incentive were tied to special-teams exploits such as blocking six punts. He never got into a game.

Under NFL rules, the Packers were able to designate the amount under the likely-to-be-earned incentive category. Therefore, it was charged immediately against their cap.

By the start of the league year in March, NFL officials will know that the incentive to McCaskill wasnt earned. Thus, the $7.278 million will be debited back against the Packers cap and added to their adjusted cap for 2009.

Ten teams decided to complete 2008 with more than $1 million of cap room, none of which could be used next year. Kansas City left the season with $21.87 million of cap room, followed by Cincinnati ($10.76 million), Buffalo ($5.14 million), Atlanta ($4.99 million) and Arizona ($2.91 million).

Currently, the Packers have $105.157 million of committed salary-cap expenses for 2009, which ranks 16th. The NFL salary cap, which was $116.7 million in 2008, is expected to increase about $7 million in 2009.

The agent for a player that agreed to a dummy clause with another team said his client was given $10,000 for his trouble. The Packers didnt give McCaskill anything.

Thats fine, agent Paul Sheehy said. It was a good pickup from our perspective going to the Packers, so I had no problem working with them to accommodate them on that. They took a shot at the kid and activated him and guaranteed him three games.


UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
Former Packers' salary-cap guru Andrew Brandt's comments :

Monday Money Matters

This week will be a busy one for general managers and Cap managers throughout the NFL. As of 4 p.m. EST Saturday, team Salary Caps will freeze (appropriate word for this time of year) until they re-open for business under the new 2009 Salary Cap number projected to be around $123M when franchise players are named in mid-February. And, as mentioned here often, the NFL Salary Cap operates in a use-it-or-lose-it manner, meaning that any leftover Cap room at the end of the year (Saturday) goes wasted. Therefore, there are maneuvers that teams will use to ensure they are not leaving money on the table. With $170M in available Cap room around the league as of this weekend an average of $5.3M per team there will be a lot of maneuvering before Saturday.

The most obvious way of using Cap room is to extend key players for future years of contract. However, despite the momentary discussion in November about the prospect of more deals being done to ensure the pre-Obama tax rate, this has not happened to any degree. The only notable extensions since the Bills re-upped Lee Evans on Oct. 2 have been those of Aaron Rodgers of the Packers and the two large cornerback deals, Chris Gamble of the Panthers and Corey Webster of the Giants. There does not appear to be a rush for more of these this week.

Another way leftover Cap room is soaked up is through earned incentives. Without getting too technical, NFL teams go through a netting process at the end of the season where unearned LTBE (Likely To Be Earned) incentives are netted out against earned NLTBE (Not Likely To Be Earned) incentives, creating a debit or credit toward the 2009 Salary Cap. Some teams are more incentive-oriented than others. At the Packers, I did not negotiate many incentive-laden deals unless they were for players coming off injuries, as experience showed that incentive-laden deals tend to lead players toward selfish rather than team-based goals.

Finally, the most common way of using up leftover Cap room at the end of the season is through a somewhat silly but allowable mechanism of phony incentives. By including a new incentive in a renegotiated contract at the end of the season, the incentive is by rule considered LTBE, thereby immediately counting against the Cap. Thus, when the incentive is not earned, and it never is, the money is then credited toward the next years cap, resulting in the double benefit of using up current Cap room and crediting new Cap room toward the next year.

As to how the above works, consider the following: A team will approach its third-string quarterback with one game left in the season and negotiate a clause that gives the player $5M for throwing 6 touchdown passes during the season. The $5M comes off the existing Cap, and when unearned, credits against the coming Cap.

I did this a couple of times with Craig Nall, bless his heart although I had a couple heart palpitations one year when we wrapped up a playoff berth moments before our last game against the Bears, making it entirely meaningless. Brett Favre only played a series or two, then Doug Pederson played the rest of the half. Then, to my surprise, Craig was to play the entire second half. After he threw a touchdown, I laughed. If he had thrown another, I would have started to worry a bit. If he had thrown a third, I may have come down to the sideline and pulled him out of the game myself!

Teams take various forms with this tactic. There are some 5 blocked punt incentives or 10 sacks incentives for players who rarely play. Due to the fact it is use-it-or-lose-it with Cap room, this becomes an allowable way for teams to push it out.

Thus, although the Cap this year is set at $116M and next year at $123M, few, if any, teams actually have that number as their Cap number. Due to the netting process and this form of phony incentive credits, most teams had a lot more room than $116M this year and will have more than $123M next year. Their Adjusted Cap number can be much larger, as much as $130M for this year and $145M next year for some teams.

The only rub with this tactic is the NFL Players Association. As this mechanism is not a real use of Cap room toward actually paying players, there have been questions about it and warnings to agents about letting their players do this. However, the union has now taken the position that as long as a team has spent to its minimum Cap-spending limits around $100M this year there is no problem with agents and players doing this. As the minimum is not a problem for any team now, we will see this technique used prevalently over the next few days.

Hope you enjoyed NFL Salary Cap 101 for today


UserPostedImage
Packers_Finland
15 years ago
Haha, that is just genious. There we're two part's that especially made me laugh. From the first post:

"The requirements for McCaskill to have earned the $7.278 million incentive were tied to special-teams exploits such as blocking six punts. He never got into a game."

"The agent for a player that agreed to a dummy clause with another team said his client was given $10,000 for his trouble. The Packers didnt give McCaskill anything."
This is a placeholder
longtimefan
15 years ago
I have known this has gone on for years..

but why is the nfl allowing that to happen?
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    dfosterf (9h) : For the record, I enjoy Beast and Mucky drafts
    Zero2Cool (16h) : Haha
    Mucky Tundra (17h) : No time for talking! Back to work beast!
    beast (18h) : You saw only 4,201 of my mocks? 🥺 I think that means you missed more than half of them 😢
    dfosterf (21h) : Does anyone know what Lambeau field improvements got put on hold? My guess would be for the 2025 draft
    Zero2Cool (23h) : It's like listen, you made 4,201 mocks, no shit.
    Zero2Cool (23h) : Cuz during the draft "I had them mocked there!" as if it's amazing.
    Zero2Cool (23h) : They're fun to do once in awhile. It's people who think they are "content" that annoy me.
    dfosterf (23h) : Against tbd
    dfosterf (23h) : Answer to your question is yes, it's a Thursday, will be the Chiefs aga
    dfosterf (23h) : Luckily for all concerned, I don't post them. I did one, but that was like 25 mocks ago
    Zero2Cool (23h) : NFL 2024 gonna start Sept 5th isn't it???
    Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Ugh... kids these days!
    dfosterf (27-Mar) : I'm gonna go do some more mock draft hell instead 🤪
    Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Did we do one of those prediction threads yet for 2024 season?
    dfosterf (27-Mar) : In my city, they are playing the nimby game, in order to keep some railroad tracks vs. 2 professional sports teams and a concert venue.
    dfosterf (27-Mar) : And/Or a city council, of which I haven't seen a good one in a very long time
    dfosterf (27-Mar) : That sounds like a Mayor, not a city.
    buckeyepackfan (26-Mar) : Packers halt scheduled 80mil upgrade of stadium until lease agreement talks are restarted
    Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : City of Green Bay puts Packers' Lambeau Field lease talks on hold
    buckeyepackfan (26-Mar) : Packers 1 of 3 teams to vote no on new kickoff rule.
    Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Packers sign another Kicker
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Lengthy explanation at PFF if you click the link
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Kickoff rules officially changed.ngthy explan
    Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : lol
    Cheesey (26-Mar) : 2009? No thanks! One open heart surgery is enough!
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Good for you!
    Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Yes. That's the one.
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Is that "Lady Dugan" per chance?
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Crystal?
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Please refresh my memory
    Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Alan posts. Crystal back in my life. It's 2009 all over again! Lol
    Mucky Tundra (26-Mar) : BAH GAWD! THAT'S CHEESEYS MUSIC!
    Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Gutekunst said early stages of Jordan Love contract being discussed.
    Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Shouldn't be penalized cuz official screwed up
    Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Yeah, challenge until you are incorrect twice.
    Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Fining them is the goal, per the people who made the rule anyway.
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : Still waiting on the kickoff rule changes. Did hear yesterday that the touchback proposal will now be the 30 yard line, not the 35
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : Probably speed of game issues with your proposal
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : Hopefully the refs don't get in the habit of throwing flags on this
    beast (25-Mar) : I think when it comes to Challenges should get two strikes, so unlimited challenges as long as they keep winning them, but 2 wrong then done
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : Still subject to the fines etc
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : Yes, I should have been more specific. Also, they are now saying it would be a 15 yard penalty. That makes more sense .
    beast (25-Mar) : Simply fined in the week to follow
    beast (25-Mar) : I agree with one NFL official, it'll probably be like some of the helmets hits, not really called by the refs on the field but simply fined
    Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Hip drop is not. Super confusing. Referees job is harder
    Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Swivel hip drop is banned
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : The hip drop enforcement will be in the form of fines, etc. Not flags
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : A major foul will be enforced on the offense if there are offsetting penalties in a change of possession situation
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : Teams will receive a 3rd challenge if 1 was successful. Previously, it took 2
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2023 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Falcons
    Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
    SAINTS
    Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
    LIONS
    Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
    Raiders
    Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
    RAMS
    Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
    CHARGERS
    Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
    CHIEFS
    Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
    BUCCANEERS
    Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
    Panthers
    Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
    Vikings
    Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
    Cowboys
    Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
    49ers
    Recent Topics
    10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    22h / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    24-Mar / Around The NFL / dhazer

    24-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    24-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    22-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.