Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
3 Pages<123>

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Packnic  
#21 Posted : Tuesday, January 27, 2009 7:37:38 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Basically this thread confirms that it was a crap draft year. If they were coming out this year I'm not sure a name mentioned other than Beason even smells the first round.


I was waiting for that response.. no real true impact players beyond the top 15 other than Beason to date.

Solid contributing players for sure were around.. but none that have taken the NFL by storm.

Then look at James Jones numbers compared to TE and WR taken ahead of him.. not bad value eh.



so wouldn't this negate the "bust" label thats put on Justin? I mean if no one else around his area is making noise, and Justin proves to help even a little bit next year... I mean then you are still getting value for where you picked because the market was so low then. right?
pack_in_black  
#22 Posted : Tuesday, January 27, 2009 7:38:46 PM(UTC)
Dwayne Bowe. Can you imagine?

1. DD
2. GJ
3. Bowe
4. JJ/Jordy (only one would've been added if we had picked Bowe..)


That's three WRs who could arguably be #1s for alot of teams. Yowza.
zombieslayer  
#23 Posted : Tuesday, January 27, 2009 7:47:31 PM(UTC)
Greg Olson's receiving stats in '08: 54 receptions for 574 yards and five touchdowns.

Donald Lee's receiving stats in '08: 39 receptions for 303 yards and five TDs.

OK, anyone who says da Bears have a better QB than we do, you need to stop smoking crack immediately.

Olson contributes. Bustin sits on a bench. I've always loved it when we had a twin-TE attack. Remember '95 and '96 with both Chmura and Jackson being good? Imagine if Aaron had Greg Olson and Donald Lee. Would give opposing Ds nightmares. Now imagine playing Madden with Gregorious, Driver, Lee, and Olson the field at the same time.
go.pack.go.  
#24 Posted : Tuesday, January 27, 2009 7:54:15 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post

OK, anyone who says da Bears have a better QB than we do, you need to stop smoking crack immediately.


Ok, I hope you know that I wasn't saying that the bears' quarterbacks are better than Rodgers...I was saying that Olsen wasn't doing great, because of their QBs. It's not the complete problem, but a huge contributer.
porky88  
#25 Posted : Tuesday, January 27, 2009 7:56:38 PM(UTC)
Reggie Nelson, Ben Grubbs, Greg Olsen, and Jon Beason all look pretty good. Aaron Ross too.

Knowing what we know now though LarMarr Woodley would look pretty good in green and gold considering the move to the 3-4.

I wanted Marshawn Lynch at the time, but he wasn't there so my No. 2 would have been Greg Olsen and I think he'd be the pick right now. Considering he had 54 catches on the Bears offense makes him a little undervalued.
zombieslayer  
#26 Posted : Tuesday, January 27, 2009 8:00:13 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post

OK, anyone who says da Bears have a better QB than we do, you need to stop smoking crack immediately.


Ok, I hope you know that I wasn't saying that the bears' quarterbacks are better than Rodgers...I was saying that Olsen wasn't doing great, because of their QBs. It's not the complete problem, but a huge contributer.


Oh no. I was adding to what you were saying. Believe me, I knew what you meant.
bakler5  
#27 Posted : Tuesday, January 27, 2009 8:01:12 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post

OK, anyone who says da Bears have a better QB than we do, you need to stop smoking crack immediately.


Ok, I hope you know that I wasn't saying that the bears' quarterbacks are better than Rodgers...I was saying that Olsen wasn't doing great, because of their QBs. It's not the complete problem, but a huge contributer.


Oh no. I was adding to what you were saying. Believe me, I knew what you meant.


I didn't see anyone write anything about how good the Bear QB is? Maybe I am confused here.
zombieslayer  
#28 Posted : Tuesday, January 27, 2009 8:01:26 PM(UTC)
Go - Whoops. I hit the send button too fast.

Yes, had Olson had a REAL Quarterback throwing to him, his stats would be much better. I think that's what you meant and that's what I was trying to say too.
zombieslayer  
#29 Posted : Tuesday, January 27, 2009 8:02:53 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post

I didn't see anyone write anything about how good the Bear QB is? Maybe I am confused here.


Never mind. I was just trying to make a joke slamming how bad the Bears' QBs are. It's leftover hatred on my part from losing a lot of money on the SB a few years back, but also adding to what Go implied - had Olson had a REAL QB throwing to him, his stats would be much better.
go.pack.go.  
#30 Posted : Tuesday, January 27, 2009 8:10:46 PM(UTC)
Ok, ZS, I just wanted to make sure you knew what I was talking about. :)
blueleopard  
#31 Posted : Tuesday, January 27, 2009 11:38:07 PM(UTC)
Reggie Nelson.
JNelson87  
#32 Posted : Wednesday, January 28, 2009 4:21:31 AM(UTC)
Aaron Ross.
MassPackersFan  
#33 Posted : Wednesday, January 28, 2009 11:59:04 AM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Reggie Nelson, Ben Grubbs, Greg Olsen, and Jon Beason all look pretty good. Aaron Ross too.

Knowing what we know now though LarMarr Woodley would look pretty good in green and gold considering the move to the 3-4.

I wanted Marshawn Lynch at the time, but he wasn't there so my No. 2 would have been Greg Olsen and I think he'd be the pick right now. Considering he had 54 catches on the Bears offense makes him a little undervalued.


I don't really buy that argument. They had crap for WR's so the TE becomes the easy/go-to pass.

Greg Olsen in 2008: 574 yards, 5 TD's
Desmond Clarke in 2007: 545 yards, 4 TD's
Desmond Clarke in 2006: 626 yards, 6 TD's

That position on the Bears will yield those numbers. Olsen is just a warm body on the football field. Obviously a better pick than Harrell if Harrell never gets ON the field, but if he does and contributes even a little bit, it's at the very worst a draw.
dhpackr  
#34 Posted : Wednesday, January 28, 2009 10:13:28 PM(UTC)
Greg Olsen, DD is THE ONLY threat we have over the middle of the field for the past 7 seasons.
go.pack.go.  
#35 Posted : Wednesday, January 28, 2009 10:16:10 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Greg Olsen, DD is THE ONLY threat we have over the middle of the field for the past 7 seasons.


Is Donald Lee not good enough for the middle or something? He's pretty big and from what I've seen, he's not afraid to do it.
dhpackr  
#36 Posted : Wednesday, January 28, 2009 10:19:56 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Greg Olsen, DD is THE ONLY threat we have over the middle of the field for the past 7 seasons.


Is Donald Lee not good enough for the middle or something? He's pretty big and from what I've seen, he's not afraid to do it.


No, Donald Lee is not good enough, not even close. His stats are terrible over the last few years.
go.pack.go.  
#37 Posted : Wednesday, January 28, 2009 10:23:18 PM(UTC)
He just needs to be thrown to more often. Stats don't dictate whether or not you are good over the middle...I agree though, DD is our best over the middle receiver we've had in a long time, but I think Donald Lee can do it as well. Also, I don't think Jordy or Greg would be afraid to do it, you just haven't seen it yet BECAUSE of DD doing it FOR them.
dhpackr  
#38 Posted : Wednesday, January 28, 2009 10:27:02 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
He just needs to be thrown to more often. Stats don't dictate whether or not you are good over the middle...I agree though, DD is our best over the middle receiver we've had in a long time, but I think Donald Lee can do it as well. Also, I don't think Jordy or Greg would be afraid to do it, you just haven't seen it yet BECAUSE of DD doing it FOR them.


well I think Donald Lee's time has past. He will see even less playing time in '09 because J. Finley is going to have a breakout season.
millertime  
#39 Posted : Thursday, January 29, 2009 1:30:15 PM(UTC)
I liked Dwayne Bowe and Leon Hall back then. Olson seemed like his stock rose too much (3rd round to 1st round) because of his great 40 time. I also thought Alan Branch was a better prospect than Harrell. Both look like busts now.

Hindsight being 20-20, I think that LaMarr Woodley OLB/DE would be the best fit for our team right now. He has been a beast for Pittsburgh, but then again everyone on that defense is a beast. Ryan Harris, the tackle for Denver has also developed into a good player.
millertime  
#40 Posted : Thursday, January 29, 2009 1:31:44 PM(UTC)
James Jones will go across the middle. Remember the Bengals preseason game where his helmet got knocked off and he still scored???
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
gbguy20 (4h) : hot wife and he chases old women
Nonstopdrivel (18h) : Oh, and one count of felony first-degree burglary.
Nonstopdrivel (18h) : He's also charged with at least one count on kidnapping and two counts of attempted rape.
nerdmann (18h) : Yeah, wtf Kellen?
Nonstopdrivel (18h) : Kellen Winslow accused of raping and sexually assaulting several women between the ages of 54 and 86.
Zero2Cool (15-Jun) : Today's Birthdays: Toddy (26)
Cheesey (11-Jun) : Thanks Kevin.
Cheesey (11-Jun) : Ok.
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : Alan, it's an online stream.
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : McCarthy speaks at 10am, so probably 11am for practice start.
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : McCarthy speaks at 10am, so probably 11am for practice start.
Cheesey (11-Jun) : I don’t know if I can get that station.
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : Listen to 107.5 the fan they'll tell you. I'm at airport.
Cheesey (11-Jun) : Thanks for trying WPR! I guess I’ll have to just wing it.
wpr (11-Jun) : Cheesey, The Packer's site says Nitschke Field. 12 am to 11:59 pm. I don't think they know
Cheesey (11-Jun) : Come on!! U smart guys can help me on this!
Cheesey (11-Jun) : Do any of you know what time the Packers mini camp practice is tomorrow?
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : Vince Lombardi would have been 105 today
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : If I were Owens, after reading what some of the voters have said. I'd say F YOU too. Shady process.
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : Apparently it costs the inductees a LOT of money to attend.
beast (10-Jun) : Or if Owens is avoiding all HoF activity? Or if he's trying to figure a way to make money off this. Simply saying he's not going to be there doesn't tell me enough
beast (10-Jun) : I feel as if I need more details. Owens said he's not physical showing up, but he could still give a speech via video.
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : Using 32 reporter votes is wrong.
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : They held grudges against him, and ignored his excellence on the field. Bogus shit. Political garbage.
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : Owens has a point. Absolutely garbage how voters acted, and have responded.
buckeyepackfan (9-Jun) : The HOF needs to conveniently forget to include Owen's in the ceremonies, then fake apologize after.
gbguy20 (8-Jun) : Kevin, suggestion box. move the applaud button to the bottom of the post so i don't have to scroll back up after reading a good post. same goes for quote button i suppose
Cheesey (7-Jun) : Well...I wonder what HE is protesting. Maybe that he made WAY too much money?
Nonstopdrivel (7-Jun) : Wait, what? He bitches for years about not having been selected, and now he won't attend the ceremony?
Zero2Cool (7-Jun) : Hall of Fame announces that Terrell Owens has informed them he will NOT attend the enshrinement ceremony in August.
Nonstopdrivel (5-Jun) : Looking at some of the multiyear rookie UDFA contracts made me think of it. But now I see it's standard to sign them for three years.
packerfanoutwest (4-Jun) : Tavais or Tyrell,,,what's your question/point and why?
Nonstopdrivel (3-Jun) : Probably I was thinking about Tyrell Sutton (Northwestern -- went to the Panthers).
Nonstopdrivel (3-Jun) : Apparently, I'm full of shit. The amount of money teams are allowed to spend on UDFA signing bonuses is extremely small.
Nonstopdrivel (3-Jun) : He's not named in any list of 2012 Green Bay UDFA signings, I mean.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2018 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 9 @ 7:20 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Sep 16 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Sep 23 @ 12:00 PM
Redskins
Sunday, Sep 30 @ 12:00 PM
BILLS
Sunday, Oct 7 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Monday, Oct 15 @ 7:15 PM
49ERS
Sunday, Oct 28 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Nov 4 @ 7:20 PM
Patriots
Sunday, Nov 11 @ 12:00 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Nov 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Sunday, Nov 25 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Dec 2 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Dec 9 @ 12:00 PM
FALCONS
Sunday, Dec 16 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Dec 23 @ 12:00 PM
Jets
Sunday, Dec 30 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

18h / Around The NFL / Nonstopdrivel

16-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

16-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

16-Jun / Random Babble / Cheesey

15-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

15-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / blueleopard

15-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

14-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

13-Jun / Random Babble / wpr

13-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

12-Jun / Random Babble / CFB Risk

12-Jun / Random Babble / Cheesey

11-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / KRK

11-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

Headlines