Rodgers talks about facing Favre· Page 5

shield4life
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#41

Hazer, Aaron Rodgers is going to shut you up real good this year 🙂.

Glad To Be A Packers Fan.

MassPackersFan
Member

14 years ago

#42

The only way Rodgers could shut dhazer up is by riding a flying unicycle through his fantasy land, ricocheting footballs off of his dome. He sure can't shut him up by playing well.

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#43

There really is no reason for hazer to hate Aaron Rodgers like that. It's obvious that it's only because Ted Thompson brought him here.

So hazer, would you rather have a 22 TD and 22 INT QB or a 28 TD and a 13 INT QB?

Don't give me that bullshit like "well Brett Favre only did bad because of his bad shoulder." BULLSHIT!!

Brett is always the one saying "I won't go out and play if I don't think I can contribute to my team." So obviously he thought he could contribute.

dhazer
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#44

"go.pack.go." wrote:

To be honest i could careless if my qb threw for 50 ints aslong as we were winning the games. In the end that's all i want is wins. The only stat that matters is the Wins stat plain and simple.

And once again here is my story. I hate TT, do i think Ted Thompson wanted Brett gone? Hell Ya. Do i hate Ted Thompson just because of last year? Nope i hated his conservative style from day 1. Do i hate Rodgers? Nope but i refuse to praise a guy for one good year when the team lost games. Like they say every dog has its day. If he can do it for another 2 years then i will start giving him the praise like most of you people do. So for you people calling me a Favre fister is way off.

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

DakotaT
Select Member

14 years ago

#45

I hate Ted Thompson, do i think Ted Thompson wanted Brett gone? Hell Ya. Do i hate Ted Thompson just because of last year? Nope i hated his conservative style from day 1.

"dhazer" wrote:

You know I do agree with you on Thompson wanting him gone, but you'll never see an adminission of this in the press. I don't think McCarthey wanted him anymore truthfully, and the reason would be his recklessness and Brett's whole aura of being the face of the Packers. I think Brett became uncoachable during his Sherman tenure. Brett became above the Packers and we as fans are as resposible as well as the local and national media.

So I guess we've established, I'll be calling you Tator (yes Cheesey, we will leave it with an or not an er). :icon_smile:

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#46

Is it September yet? IMHO both sides of this argument are somewhat correct. Aaron Rodgers did have a good year, the defense did stink it up, my thinking is Mike McCarthy needs to let Aaron Rodgers loose and see if he is the QB everyone wants him to be.

Instead of sitting on a 3 point lead or just settling for 3 when 7 was very possible, Mike McCarthy needs to let Aaron Rodgers do what he does best, put points on the board. Then if the D falters, maybe the Pack will have a 14 or 17 point lead.

Good point whoever posted last year is last year. Of course some on this forum can't leave anything go, {damn if we only would have drafted Barry Sanders) :icon_smile: :icon_smile: :icon_smile:

I see that the "labelers are still around".
The big srory this year(if it happens)is going to be Brett coming back to play against The Packers, live with it, deal with it, it probably will happen.

I am a huge BF fan, does that mean I don't care about The Packers anymore?

No what it means is I will be enjoying being able to watch #4 at least one more year, but when it come the day he is playing against The Pack, I will treat him like any other qb.

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

14 years ago

#47

"go.pack.go." wrote:

I'd have to ask, when did those 22 and 28 TD's happen as well as when did those 22 INT's and 13 INT's happen in each game and what were the results of said TD's/INT's?

I'd rather have a QB throw 16 game winning TD scores with 32 INT's than lose 12 games with a QB throwing 38 TD's and 10 INT's.

MassPackersFan
Member

14 years ago

#48

A QB who doesn't throw 32 INTs wouldn't have to throw 16 game winning TDs. Plus the rest of the supporting cast would be amazing to go 16-0 with a QB throwing 16 TDs and 32 INTs.

Blank402
Registered

14 years ago

#49

Have a better passer rating of 46.6 in the last 5 minutes of a game and be able to substain a drive so the defense don't have to be on the field :p

"dhazer" wrote:

While we're on the subject of stats in the last five minutes of games, I ran across an interesting one the other day. Teams down by one score driving against our defense with five minutes or less on the clock had a 76% success rate. :p

And you know what helps sustain drives? A good running game, which we didn't have last year, especially at the end of games.

As a whole, I think it's safe to say our team in general was very unclutch last year, but if you want to go on blaming Aaron Rodgers for that I'm not going to stop you.

blank

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

14 years ago

#50

A QB who doesn't throw 32 INTs wouldn't have to throw 16 game winning TDs. Plus the rest of the supporting cast would be amazing to go 16-0 with a QB throwing 16 TDs and 32 INTs.

"MassPackersFan" wrote:

Wow, c'mon. You GET the point I'm making here, geez.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Mucky Tundra (8m) : Adds most of the information this time of year comes from agents.

Mucky Tundra (8m) : @RealAlexBarth Bill Belichick says accurate draft information doesn't leak from teams until about 12 hours before the draft. Adds most of th

Mucky Tundra (9m) : I am very happy that for moment, Jordan Love seems like a normal human being

Zero2Cool (11h) : Belichick * whatever

Zero2Cool (11h) : "There's a lot of depth at Offensive Tackle and Wide Receiver." Bill Bellichick

Zero2Cool (17h) : Thanks! I can't believe it's over haha

Martha Careful (16-Apr) : Congratulations

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Boom. Student Loan. $0.00. Only took about 20 years.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : Packers DT Kenny Clark: New defensive coordinator Jeff Hafley will 'allow us to be way more disruptive'

Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : Saints have agreed to terms on a contract with former Packers wide receiver Equanimeous St. Brown.

beast (12-Apr) : No, but of it's for legislation, then half of the country will find it evil, not good, whatever it says....

Mucky Tundra (12-Apr) : Draft is still 2 weeks away. UGH

dhazer (11-Apr) : Does anyone know of a good AI generator to create letters of Support for legislation?

Zero2Cool (11-Apr) : Gordon "Red" Batty retires as equipment manager

Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Sounds like that's pretty certain now.

Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Packers "at" Eagles in Brazil. Week One

dfosterf (10-Apr) : Va' Fazer As Malas Va' !

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy tipping us off?

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : “We’re either the first- or second-most popular team in Brazil.”

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Christian Watson got married. Wife better be careful with those hamstrings!! 😂😂

dfosterf (9-Apr) : Those poor bastards

Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Falcons have signed former Packers CB Kevin King, who has been out of football since 2021.

dfosterf (8-Apr) : Collectively, we need to spend more time in what we have, when analyzing ostendible needs and historical proclivities

dfosterf (8-Apr) : I say he is better than so many of these draft picks

dfosterf (8-Apr) : Question of the week for me: Has anyone besides me done any deep dive into the potential of Alex McGough, our 3rd string qb?

Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Or in Tunsil's case, something gets released day of draft or day before lol

Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Seems every year someone does something pre-draft.

dfosterf (8-Apr) : Falling down drunk. The draft board

dfosterf (8-Apr) : Allright! Potential character guy/f#×k up pickup in D'Vondre Sweat!

Zero2Cool (7-Apr) : Go Badgers!!!

Martha Careful (6-Apr) : Go Boilermakers!!!

Martha Careful (5-Apr) : Diggs has not stepped up in the playoffs and has a high cost

beast (5-Apr) : Probably not going to let Diggs walk away unless he's horrible... but according to reports he also might not be as good as he used to be.

beast (5-Apr) : The 25th pick in the draft has been an offensive player since 2017, 2 TE, 2 WR, 1 RB, 1 OC

Mucky Tundra (5-Apr) : Odd, why give up a 2025 2nd Rounder for him if you're just gonna let him walk?

Zero2Cool (4-Apr) : Texans to let Diggs be free agent in '25

buckeyepackfan (4-Apr) : 49r's aign RB Patrick Taylor.

Martha Careful (4-Apr) : Reversion to the mean would indicate we will keep it

Zero2Cool (4-Apr) : It's also been utilized in a trade in 14 of the past 20 years

Zero2Cool (4-Apr) : The 25th pick in the draft hasn't been made by it's original holder since 2016.

Mucky Tundra (4-Apr) : Gotta imagine that Green Bay vs Houston will be a primetime game this upcoming season

Zero2Cool (3-Apr) : No. Kill QB. No worries. 😁

Mucky Tundra (3-Apr) : Diggs, Collins, Dell and Schultz is gonna be tough to cover

Zero2Cool (3-Apr) : Stefon Diggs' trade will not be processed as a post-June 1 designation, so that is just over $31 million in dead cap this year.

Zero2Cool (3-Apr) : Bills trading WR Stefon Diggs to the Texans in exchange for a 2025 2nd-round pick. (via @rapsheet)

beast (3-Apr) : Using Patterson as RB and RB/WR tweener... so I think they also signed Patterson as a 3rd down RB, not just a kick returner as articles are

beast (3-Apr) : I think PFT missed the real Steelers/Patterson connection, Steelers new OC Arthur Smith has been Patterson's head coach the last 3 years

wpr (2-Apr) : It has Martha. I was stunned when I was in HS to learn Iowa was still playing half court BB in the 70's.

Martha Careful (2-Apr) : Caitlin Clark, Angel Reese...women's sports has come a long way. GREAT TO SEE!!

Martha Careful (31-Mar) : Happy Easter everyone. I hope you all have a great day.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2023 Packers Schedule

Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM

Bears

38 - 20

Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM

Falcons

24 - 25

Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM

SAINTS

18 - 17

Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM

LIONS

20 - 34

Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM

Raiders

13 - 17

Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM

Broncos

17 - 19

Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

10 - 24

Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM

RAMS

20 - 3

Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM

Steelers

19 - 23

Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM

CHARGERS

23 - 20

Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM

Lions

29 - 22

Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM

CHIEFS

27 - 19

Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM

Giants

22 - 24

Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM

BUCCANEERS

20 - 34

Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM

Panthers

33 - 30

Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM

Vikings

33 - 10

Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM

BEARS

17 - 9

Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM

Cowboys

48 - 32

Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM

49ers

21 - 24