The_Green_Ninja
14 years ago

I don't like the new rule, if its a bad trade veto it, also do like alot of the leagues i get into have a vote on if it should go thru. With your new rule you will actually take away from alot of trading thus not much is done now but what team in contention is going to want to trade to help someone else in contention? But i have bitched about this league from day 1 with to many players drafted with this many teams.

"dhazer" wrote:



A lot? Out of contention means there is NO possible way to get to the playoffs. Right now that means only 1 and 2 teams are out right now, so my suggestions, any trade you want to do with some other team, do it now. And if you think having teams help others teams by giving their good players seems "fair" to you, I'd love to know your other thoughts.
UserPostedImage
The_Green_Ninja
14 years ago

I don't like the new rule, if its a bad trade veto it, also do like alot of the leagues i get into have a vote on if it should go thru. With your new rule you will actually take away from alot of trading thus not much is done now but what team in contention is going to want to trade to help someone else in contention? But i have bitched about this league from day 1 with to many players drafted with this many teams.

"Formo" wrote:



I haven't hear someone whine so much in the position you are in, ever!

Shut up dude, you are beating the shit out of everything. You lose your right to complain.

And Zero.. You missed the train on this one.. That's on you, dawg. Now wipe away your tears and move along, little doegy..

"dhazer" wrote:



Lol the only thing I agree with Formo with, ever.
UserPostedImage
djcubez
14 years ago

I don't like the new rule, if its a bad trade veto it, also do like alot of the leagues i get into have a vote on if it should go thru. With your new rule you will actually take away from alot of trading thus not much is done now but what team in contention is going to want to trade to help someone else in contention? But i have bitched about this league from day 1 with to many players drafted with this many teams.

"The_Green_Ninja" wrote:



A lot? Out of contention means there is NO possible way to get to the playoffs. Right now that means only 1 and 2 teams are out right now, so my suggestions, any trade you want to do with some other team, do it now. And if you think having teams help others teams by giving their good players seems "fair" to you, I'd love to know your other thoughts.

"dhazer" wrote:


If it's obviously a bad trade all of us owners can veto it. At least that's how most fantasy leagues I've been in work. I was in fantasy baseball over the summer and this guy was trying to trade Pujols for Russel Branyan. Obviously this guy was just selling off his roster so we all vetoed it. Unfair or bad trades will get vetoed, the status of the teams should have nothing to do with it.
The_Green_Ninja
14 years ago

I don't like the new rule, if its a bad trade veto it, also do like alot of the leagues i get into have a vote on if it should go thru. With your new rule you will actually take away from alot of trading thus not much is done now but what team in contention is going to want to trade to help someone else in contention? But i have bitched about this league from day 1 with to many players drafted with this many teams.

"djcubez" wrote:



A lot? Out of contention means there is NO possible way to get to the playoffs. Right now that means only 1 and 2 teams are out right now, so my suggestions, any trade you want to do with some other team, do it now. And if you think having teams help others teams by giving their good players seems "fair" to you, I'd love to know your other thoughts.

"The_Green_Ninja" wrote:


If it's obviously a bad trade all of us owners can veto it. At least that's how most fantasy leagues I've been in work. I was in fantasy baseball over the summer and this guy was trying to trade Pujols for Russel Branyan. Obviously this guy was just selling off his roster so we all vetoed it. Unfair or bad trades will get vetoed, the status of the teams should have nothing to do with it.

"dhazer" wrote:



Exactly... because even if I had not made an announcement I would have vetoed a trade between a team in contention and a team not in contention. So I thought "Hell, might as well tell them unless they were planning something with a team out of contention..." Yet, people will find any way to get in a argument...lol.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
Pretty damn lame that you operate like that and using PackersHome. That's shady and wrong.

What a crock of shit.
UserPostedImage
The_Green_Ninja
14 years ago

Pretty damn lame that you operate like that and using PackersHome. That's shady and wrong.

What a crock of shit.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Yeah, fairness and balance doesn't follow the PackersHome way, right?
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
What the fuck is the problem with a trade between a team in contention and one not in contention? I don't follow that logic any more than I follow those dumb no-trade lists.
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
14 years ago

What the fuck is the problem with a trade between a team in contention and one not in contention? I don't follow that logic any more than I follow those dumb no-trade lists.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Because it's a concrete way to outlaw ridiculous 'friend' trades. I mean, what's in it for the team that isn't in contention?

And if anyone wanted an only Packers team, he could've started doing that about 8 weeks ago.

Yes, you can veto trades as well, but who will decide what an unfair trade is? Formo traded Andre Johnson away for Larry Johnson in the beginning of the season. I surely would've veto'd that, if I could, later on. In Formo's opinion, though, it was just a good trade for a RB-desperate team.

Why on earth would a team that's out of contention trade or release its entire roster, besides helping someone else to victory?
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
Again, I ask, so what? Sounds like sour grapes to me.

Buncha whiners, the lot o' ya. 😛
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
14 years ago

Again, I ask, so what? Sounds like sour grapes to me.

Buncha whiners, the lot o' ya. :P

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Competitive Nature.
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    dfosterf (18h) : Maybe
    Mucky Tundra (18h) : Yes
    Zero2Cool (19h) : No.
    Mucky Tundra (22h) : End of a Degu-era
    dhazer (22h) : Steelers sign Patterson because of new kickoff rule interesting
    Zero2Cool (28-Mar) : Former #Packers TE Josiah Deguara is signing a 1-year deal with the Jaguars, per source.
    Zero2Cool (28-Mar) : They do not do it for "content sake".
    dfosterf (28-Mar) : For the record, I enjoy Beast and Mucky drafts
    Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Haha
    Mucky Tundra (27-Mar) : No time for talking! Back to work beast!
    beast (27-Mar) : You saw only 4,201 of my mocks? 🥺 I think that means you missed more than half of them 😢
    dfosterf (27-Mar) : Does anyone know what Lambeau field improvements got put on hold? My guess would be for the 2025 draft
    Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : It's like listen, you made 4,201 mocks, no shit.
    Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Cuz during the draft "I had them mocked there!" as if it's amazing.
    Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : They're fun to do once in awhile. It's people who think they are "content" that annoy me.
    dfosterf (27-Mar) : Against tbd
    dfosterf (27-Mar) : Answer to your question is yes, it's a Thursday, will be the Chiefs aga
    dfosterf (27-Mar) : Luckily for all concerned, I don't post them. I did one, but that was like 25 mocks ago
    Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : NFL 2024 gonna start Sept 5th isn't it???
    Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Ugh... kids these days!
    dfosterf (27-Mar) : I'm gonna go do some more mock draft hell instead 🤪
    Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Did we do one of those prediction threads yet for 2024 season?
    dfosterf (27-Mar) : In my city, they are playing the nimby game, in order to keep some railroad tracks vs. 2 professional sports teams and a concert venue.
    dfosterf (27-Mar) : And/Or a city council, of which I haven't seen a good one in a very long time
    dfosterf (27-Mar) : That sounds like a Mayor, not a city.
    buckeyepackfan (26-Mar) : Packers halt scheduled 80mil upgrade of stadium until lease agreement talks are restarted
    Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : City of Green Bay puts Packers' Lambeau Field lease talks on hold
    buckeyepackfan (26-Mar) : Packers 1 of 3 teams to vote no on new kickoff rule.
    Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Packers sign another Kicker
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Lengthy explanation at PFF if you click the link
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Kickoff rules officially changed.ngthy explan
    Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : lol
    Cheesey (26-Mar) : 2009? No thanks! One open heart surgery is enough!
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Good for you!
    Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Yes. That's the one.
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Is that "Lady Dugan" per chance?
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Crystal?
    dfosterf (26-Mar) : Please refresh my memory
    Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Alan posts. Crystal back in my life. It's 2009 all over again! Lol
    Mucky Tundra (26-Mar) : BAH GAWD! THAT'S CHEESEYS MUSIC!
    Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Gutekunst said early stages of Jordan Love contract being discussed.
    Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Shouldn't be penalized cuz official screwed up
    Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Yeah, challenge until you are incorrect twice.
    Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Fining them is the goal, per the people who made the rule anyway.
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : Still waiting on the kickoff rule changes. Did hear yesterday that the touchback proposal will now be the 30 yard line, not the 35
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : Probably speed of game issues with your proposal
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : Hopefully the refs don't get in the habit of throwing flags on this
    beast (25-Mar) : I think when it comes to Challenges should get two strikes, so unlimited challenges as long as they keep winning them, but 2 wrong then done
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : Still subject to the fines etc
    dfosterf (25-Mar) : Yes, I should have been more specific. Also, they are now saying it would be a 15 yard penalty. That makes more sense .
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2023 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Falcons
    Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
    SAINTS
    Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
    LIONS
    Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
    Raiders
    Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
    RAMS
    Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
    CHARGERS
    Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
    CHIEFS
    Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
    BUCCANEERS
    Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
    Panthers
    Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
    Vikings
    Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
    Cowboys
    Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
    49ers
    Recent Topics
    13m / Around The NFL / beast

    18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

    28-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    28-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    27-Mar / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    24-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    24-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    22-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.