Pack93z
14 years ago

I say before we trade Kampman, we unleash him. I say we do this.

1st Down - Kampman KILL QB/RB!
2nd Down - KAMPMAN KILL QB!
3rd Down - KAMPMAN KILL QB!


If that fails after 6 games, then consider trading him. But don't trade him because he can't cover a freaking TE. Let him play like DeMarcus Ware.

Kampmans job, DESTROY QB. See how it works.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Not disagreeing, but we have yet to see it.. so if your going to piss away his best asset, getting after the passer from a down position.. then get the value returned from the player before we are put into a squeeze.

BTW.. Kampy is struggling engaging from the two point stance.. badly.. unless that changes I don't see him getting a ton of pressure anyway.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
PackFanWithTwins
14 years ago

not sure how trading a premiere pass rushing defensive end makes your team better. To say, this player is to good, so we can't sign him is the most negative attitude a person could have.

"pack93z" wrote:



Not saying we can't sign him.. we have the cap room to do it.

Saying, simply paying him premium money while playing a unnatural position might not be the most financially effective.

Capers in the offseason stated we would mix some 4 man fronts in.. I have seen little of that to date.. even in a Viking game that this franchise wanted badly.

We committed to the 3-4.. right or wrong remains to be determined in the big picture here...

"dhpackr" wrote:



They have been using 4 man front more than 3 man. That 4 man front is Kampman, Jolly, Jenkins, Matthews/Poppinga. And I have not been impressed. Would prefer to drop Matthews or Poppinga in us a Dlineman instead.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
dhpackr
14 years ago

not sure how trading a premiere pass rushing defensive end makes your team better. To say, this player is to good, so we can't sign him is the most negative attitude a person could have.

"pack93z" wrote:



Not saying we can't sign him.. we have the cap room to do it.

Saying, simply paying him premium money while playing a unnatural position might not be the most financially effective.

Capers in the offseason stated we would mix some 4 man fronts in.. I have seen little of that to date.. even in a Viking game that this franchise wanted badly.

We committed to the 3-4.. right or wrong remains to be determined in the big picture here...

"dhpackr" wrote:



u-no-i haven't seen Kampman get beat in pass coverage. I don't see that being the problem. He just is not getting a chance to pressure the qb when he is 20 yards downfield covering a TE or RB.

If Kampman has a big year, he'll be do a huge pay increase. He'll have proven he can play 3-4 or 4-3.
So if you meet me Have some courtesy, Have some sympathy, and some taste
Use all your well-learned politesse, Or I'll lay your soul to waste
dhpackr
14 years ago


BTW.. Kampy is struggling engaging from the two point stance.. badly.. unless that changes I don't see him getting a ton of pressure anyway.

"pack93z" wrote:



Kampy, is the only Packer I see even remotely close to getting pressure on the QB.
So if you meet me Have some courtesy, Have some sympathy, and some taste
Use all your well-learned politesse, Or I'll lay your soul to waste
Pack93z
14 years ago



u-no-i haven't seen Kampman get beat in pass coverage. I don't see that being the problem. He just is not getting a chance to pressure the qb when he is 20 yards downfield covering a TE or RB.

If Kampman has a big year, he'll be do a huge pay increase. He'll have proven he can play 3-4 or 4-3.

"dhpackr" wrote:



Said it a couple of times.. I am impressed with the part of the transition I thought Kampman would struggle with.. that is playing in space.

What I didn't expect, that he would struggle with engaging people out of the two point stance.. it has been very noticeable when a Tight end has been standing Kampman up.. he used to eat TE for breakfast and crap them out by the fourth quarter.

Will that come.. maybe, but if it doesn't we have lost leverage going into the offseason with a franchise tag on a player that isn't a fit for this defense as we are running it.

Now put your self in Kampman's shoes for a moment.. you are arguably a top 5 talent at DE in this league.. are you in the class at linebacker? Probably not.. so if you have a choice at the end of this season, do you suck it up for the team or find a location that fits your skill set and money as well?

Don't know the player personally, but if I was in his shoes, as much as I love this franchise, I would have to consider what is best for me.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Pack93z
14 years ago
Just so I am clear, I think between Jenkins and Kampman.. they are in the discussion for the best front 7 talent we have.. I just think that the money he will command might out weight the return he get from Kampman at OLB..

He will have the leverage hammer come the offseason.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
yooperfan
14 years ago
The trade deadline is only 5 days away.
We don't have the luxury of waiting to see if the coaches devise something to let him reach his potential.
I doubt he will be traded so in the end we will probably get screwed since he is in his contract year.
Would the Packers tag him based on his performance as a linebacker?
Pack93z
14 years ago

The trade deadline is only 5 days away.
We don't have the luxury of waiting to see if the coaches devise something to let him reach his potential.
I doubt he will be traded so in the end we will probably get screwed since he is in his contract year.
Would the Packers tag him based on his performance as a linebacker?

"yooperfan" wrote:



Bravo.. +1.

It isn't that he isn't a talented player.. we all know that Aaron is very talented.. but we are not taking advantage of his most valuable asset and something he prides himself on..

In the end, I don't think they move him, we are stubborn as all get out.. we will be going into the offseason with a storm of questions brewing around Kampman.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
and I stand by comments.

use kampman like ware is used. not sure why that's so hard to do.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
14 years ago



And to be clear.. Peppers for Kampman won't help us..

"pack93z" wrote:



Oh, it'll help us. This board is always in need of some laughter and the sight of you in a skirt and pom poms would be welcomed by all.

Kampmann isn't getting traded, but he may not be resigned. I'm pretty happy with what I've seen so far from CIII so it might not be that big of a hit, unless he jumps the border to play for the purple.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
dfosterf (56m) : Maybe
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yes
Zero2Cool (2h) : No.
Mucky Tundra (4h) : End of a Degu-era
dhazer (5h) : Steelers sign Patterson because of new kickoff rule interesting
Zero2Cool (7h) : Former #Packers TE Josiah Deguara is signing a 1-year deal with the Jaguars, per source.
Zero2Cool (8h) : They do not do it for "content sake".
dfosterf (19h) : For the record, I enjoy Beast and Mucky drafts
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Haha
Mucky Tundra (27-Mar) : No time for talking! Back to work beast!
beast (27-Mar) : You saw only 4,201 of my mocks? 🥺 I think that means you missed more than half of them 😢
dfosterf (27-Mar) : Does anyone know what Lambeau field improvements got put on hold? My guess would be for the 2025 draft
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : It's like listen, you made 4,201 mocks, no shit.
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Cuz during the draft "I had them mocked there!" as if it's amazing.
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : They're fun to do once in awhile. It's people who think they are "content" that annoy me.
dfosterf (27-Mar) : Against tbd
dfosterf (27-Mar) : Answer to your question is yes, it's a Thursday, will be the Chiefs aga
dfosterf (27-Mar) : Luckily for all concerned, I don't post them. I did one, but that was like 25 mocks ago
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : NFL 2024 gonna start Sept 5th isn't it???
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Ugh... kids these days!
dfosterf (27-Mar) : I'm gonna go do some more mock draft hell instead 🤪
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Did we do one of those prediction threads yet for 2024 season?
dfosterf (27-Mar) : In my city, they are playing the nimby game, in order to keep some railroad tracks vs. 2 professional sports teams and a concert venue.
dfosterf (27-Mar) : And/Or a city council, of which I haven't seen a good one in a very long time
dfosterf (27-Mar) : That sounds like a Mayor, not a city.
buckeyepackfan (26-Mar) : Packers halt scheduled 80mil upgrade of stadium until lease agreement talks are restarted
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : City of Green Bay puts Packers' Lambeau Field lease talks on hold
buckeyepackfan (26-Mar) : Packers 1 of 3 teams to vote no on new kickoff rule.
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Packers sign another Kicker
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Lengthy explanation at PFF if you click the link
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Kickoff rules officially changed.ngthy explan
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : lol
Cheesey (26-Mar) : 2009? No thanks! One open heart surgery is enough!
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Good for you!
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Yes. That's the one.
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Is that "Lady Dugan" per chance?
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Crystal?
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Please refresh my memory
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Alan posts. Crystal back in my life. It's 2009 all over again! Lol
Mucky Tundra (26-Mar) : BAH GAWD! THAT'S CHEESEYS MUSIC!
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Gutekunst said early stages of Jordan Love contract being discussed.
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Shouldn't be penalized cuz official screwed up
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Yeah, challenge until you are incorrect twice.
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Fining them is the goal, per the people who made the rule anyway.
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Still waiting on the kickoff rule changes. Did hear yesterday that the touchback proposal will now be the 30 yard line, not the 35
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Probably speed of game issues with your proposal
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Hopefully the refs don't get in the habit of throwing flags on this
beast (25-Mar) : I think when it comes to Challenges should get two strikes, so unlimited challenges as long as they keep winning them, but 2 wrong then done
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Still subject to the fines etc
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Yes, I should have been more specific. Also, they are now saying it would be a 15 yard penalty. That makes more sense .
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2023 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
Bears
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
LIONS
Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
Raiders
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
CHARGERS
Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
CHIEFS
Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
Giants
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
Panthers
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
Cowboys
Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
49ers
Recent Topics
59m / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Mar / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

24-Mar / Around The NFL / dhazer

24-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.