IronMan
14 years ago
That helmet to helmet hit on Rodgers was about as blatant as you can get. Pathetic officiating.
marstc09
14 years ago

Anybody have a screen capture or picture of the helmet to helmet hit in OT?

"4PackGirl" wrote:



UserPostedImage

Picture 2 

"Rockmolder" wrote:



THIS is the non-call that dinked me off the most! he clearly lifted up & hit him helmet to helmet. so mars - kiss my whiny ass - i don't really care that much about the facemask one cuz i was so mad about the helmet hit!!

"MassPackersFan" wrote:



I am too. That was a terrible non-call. You should be pissed.
UserPostedImage
PurplePride.org
marstc09
14 years ago

That helmet to helmet hit on Rodgers was about as blatant as you can get. Pathetic officiating.

"IronMan" wrote:



Agreed.
UserPostedImage
PurplePride.org
PackFanWithTwins
14 years ago
I am just as pissed about the Fitzgerald TDs running over Woodson.


Anybody who watches football, knows if Fitz is the one falling down. Woodson gets flagged 100% of the time. But of course offense doesn't
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Since69
14 years ago
The thing that really burns my ass is that you know damned well if that had been Old Man Winter or Tom Terrific getting hit like that there would have been flags flying in from Missouri.

Bad calls/non calls happen in every game, but damn! it sucks to lose a game like that.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
14 years ago
It adds to the frustration, for sure.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago

I just had the feeling while in the game chat, that we scored to soon that the end of the game. I was hoping for about 45 seconds remaining instead of 1:45.

"hardrocker950" wrote:


I was thinking the same thing, but also need to consider that the TD was essential to stay alive in the game. They saw an opportunity to pick up the points, and did so when they had their chance, rather than trying to wind the clock down and taking a risk on a turnover or settling for 3 (which would have done no good.)

"PackFanWithTwins" wrote:



That is exactly the same kind of logic that contributed to their loss in Pittsburgh.

I was clamoring for two or three runs to burn time off the clock before punching it in with less than a minute to go.
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
14 years ago

I just had the feeling while in the game chat, that we scored to soon that the end of the game. I was hoping for about 45 seconds remaining instead of 1:45.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:


I was thinking the same thing, but also need to consider that the TD was essential to stay alive in the game. They saw an opportunity to pick up the points, and did so when they had their chance, rather than trying to wind the clock down and taking a risk on a turnover or settling for 3 (which would have done no good.)

"hardrocker950" wrote:



That is exactly the same kind of logic that contributed to their loss in Pittsburgh.

I was clamoring for two or three runs to burn time off the clock before punching it in with less than a minute to go.

"PackFanWithTwins" wrote:



Would have been perfect, but I am not expecting anyone to stop drop and roll at the goal line when behind. If leading sure. Not when behind. Get it in when we can.

I had the same feeling last year 2nd MN game. AD 2 minutes left. To much time.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
gopackers08
14 years ago
While it WAS a missed call and a MAJOR missed call by the refs, our defense decided not to show up the entire game. Whenever you are relying on refs to win a game you know something went wrong. Had the early turnovers not happened or the MAJOR lack of defense we would have had the game in the bag.
blank
porky88
14 years ago

I live in Wisconsin and I am sick of the wine and cheese. Let me clear things up for Packer fans.

The grabbing of the face mask happened after the fumble. Rodgers is no longer a passer. When the ball is loose, there is no possession. The right call would be hands to the face. Even if that was called it would still be Arizona ball 15 yards from the spot of the foul.

One final tweet on end-of-game controversy -- there was no penalty because, by rule, roughing the passer cannot be called on a fumble.

"marstc09" wrote:



http://twitter.com/Adam_Schefter/status/7613866340 

Key point: Prior to the 2008 season, a rule change was approved that eliminated the foul for the incidental grasp of the facemask.



http://twitter.com/Adam_Schefter/status/7635041235 

Maybe next year.



Big Schef fan went it comes to getting insider news, but he's wrong.

The last play was not roughing the passer like he said. It was a facemask and that's a penalty. You don't have to twist it or do anything now. Just grabbing it is 15 yards and a first down. That's the new rule.

There is talk that the penalty should have been 15 yards from the spot of the foul and Cardinals ball. That would've placed it at like the Packers 25 yard line.

That again is wrong.

Possession didn't change. It's clear on the replay that Rodgers either just loss possession or still had possession while his facemask is being grabbed. The possession of the football did not change. You only gain possession when you recover and Arizona didn't do that prior to the foul.

The correct call is 15 yards and a Packer first down. The ref missed it and he also missed the helmet to helmet call two plays prior to that.

I personally hate both the rules. I think you should judge intent like they do with pass interferences and I don't think there is any intent on either play, but that's not how the rule is written and I didn't write the rules.

I don't want to sound like I'm complaining. I'm just saying what should have been called. The Packers did not deserve to win the game because of their defense, but it's worth saying that neither did the Cardinals. Their defense stunk too. The offenses were great and deserved to win. My view is Dom Capers deserves a little heat for not coming up with away to answer the Cardinals' offense, but that doesn't take away from the fact that their should've been some yellow on the last play.
Fan Shout
beast (2h) : Family? That's Deadpool's F word
Nonstopdrivel (2h) : Not THAT f-word.
Zero2Cool (2h) : fuck
beast (3h) : 49ers are Cap Tight
beast (3h) : Fuck
Mucky Tundra (3h) : Kanata, I will be when I'm on my lunch later
TheKanataThrilla (3h) : Love you NSD
Nonstopdrivel (3h) : Huh. I guess the F-word is censored in this fan shout.
Nonstopdrivel (3h) : Anyone who doesn't hang out in the chat probably smokes pole.
TheKanataThrilla (3h) : GoPackGo Thinking CB is the pick tonight
TheKanataThrilla (3h) : Anyone hanging out in the chat tonight?
Zero2Cool (4h) : whoa...49ers have had trade conversations about both Deebo Samuel and Brandon Aiyuk
Zero2Cool (5h) : I hope they take a Punter at 9th overall. Be bold!
Mucky Tundra (5h) : I may end up eating those words but I think they need a lot more talent then their 4 picks can provide
Mucky Tundra (5h) : I really hope they stand pat and Draft a WR
Mucky Tundra (5h) : @DMRussini
Mucky Tundra (5h) : The Chicago Bears are very open for business at 9 and telling teams they are ready to move for the right price, per source
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : Lions extend Penei Soul 4yrs - 112mil
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : Lions extend St. Brown 4 years 120mil and
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : Now look, trading up to 13 to take a TE might not seem like a good idea later but it will be later!
dfosterf (24-Apr) : (Your trade up mock post)
dfosterf (24-Apr) : Mucky- The only thing fun to watch would be me flipping the f out if Gute goes up to 13 and grabs Brock Bowers, lol
beast (24-Apr) : DT Byron Murphy II, Texas... whom some believe is the next Aaron Donald (or the closest thing to Donald)
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : What? And who?
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : *sad Mucky noises*
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : @JoeJHoyt Murphy said he’s been told he won’t slide past pick No. 16.
wpr (23-Apr) : Just about time to watch Sonny Weaver stick it to the seahags. I never get tired of it.
Martha Careful (23-Apr) : *game plan
Martha Careful (23-Apr) : IMHO, not even close. He is not a guy you game play around.
Mucky Tundra (23-Apr) : is Aiyuk worth a 1st rounder?
Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : 49ers are seeking a 1st round pick in exchange for WR Brandon Aiyuk
Mucky Tundra (22-Apr) : Based on Gutes comments, now I don't feel as silly having 13 picks in my mock the other day
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Zach Wilson to Broncos.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Gutekunst says he'd love to have 13 or 14 picks. He's trading back huh lol
beast (22-Apr) : Someday we'll have a draft betting scandal
beast (21-Apr) : Sometimes looking extremely amazing, sometimes looking extremely lost
beast (21-Apr) : I haven't looked into the QBs, but some have suggested Maye has some of the most extremely inconsistent tape they've seen
beast (21-Apr) : Well it also sounds like Patriots are listening to trade offers, not that seriously considering any, but listening means they aren't locked
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Maye needs to be AFC
Mucky Tundra (21-Apr) : Not liking the idea of the Vikings getting Maye
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Vikings HC joked that he may or may not have sent flowers to Bob Kraft. That's where rumor came from.
beast (21-Apr) : Can't tell if this is real or BS, but some rumors about a possible Patriots/Vikings trade for #3 overall
dfosterf (21-Apr) : One playbook to my knowledge. I was shooting for facetious.
beast (20-Apr) : I'm not sure they have different playbooks for different OL positions, and Dillard run blocking is supposedly worse than his pass blocking..
dfosterf (19-Apr) : The only problem with that is he isn't a guard either.
dfosterf (19-Apr) : Put him at right guard. That is where he will be coached. That is where he will compete. He is not even allowed to look at the LT playbook.
dfosterf (18-Apr) : Kidding aside, I hope the best for him.
dfosterf (18-Apr) : Went to a Titans board. One comment there. Not very long. I quote: "LOL" They don't sound overly upset about our aquisition.
beast (18-Apr) : OT Dillard has been absolutely horrible... like OG Newman levels
dfosterf (18-Apr) : Suit him up and have him stand in front of the big board as a draft day cautionary tale.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2023 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
Bears
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
LIONS
Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
Raiders
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
CHARGERS
Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
CHIEFS
Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
Giants
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
Panthers
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
Cowboys
Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
49ers
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

24-Apr / Random Babble / beast

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Apr / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

19-Apr / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18-Apr / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

18-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.