13 years ago
I would like Westbrook. The problem is that we already have 2 backs we most likely need to keep, and the draft is very deep in RBs. I guess I'd wait to see how the draft panned out and then, if we don't get a back, sign him up.

What's he like picking up blitzes? Anyone know? He's undersized and I can't imagine he's going to want to dive at legs after taking that knee to the helmet.
UserPostedImage
all_about_da_packers
13 years ago

What's he like picking up blitzes? Anyone know? He's undersized and I can't imagine he's going to want to dive at legs after taking that knee to the helmet.

"MassPackersFan" wrote:




I'm reminded of an article from Sports Illustrated on concussions, where they interviewed Michael Strahan when he was still playing. He talked about an incident with Westbrook, where he was rushing and saw Westbrook staying back to block him. He says the next thing he (Strahan) remembered was trying to get up off his behind while Westbrook stood over him taunting him.

He added that in the game today, you have guys like that (referring to Westbrook) who are much stronger than they look (and went to talk about how the speed at which the game is played and these more explosive players all work to produce an environment where concussions are getting more common).

So from that, I'd have to think he's at least a decent blocker, and would be alright in blitz pick-up.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
all_about_da_packers
13 years ago
Also... people are actually worried that we may overpay for Westbrook.

REALLY? Are you serious? Do you even remember that Ted is still the GM of this team?

Yes Ted has made some bad signings in the past, but ... the dude is notorious for not over paying. If the price tag for Westbrook is high, you really think Ted will pull the trigger?

As NSD said, for years Westbrook was the entire Eagles' offense. He is pretty versatile, I mean you're talking about a RB who routinely motioned out to become a WR. And he regularly ran routes, made catches.

When people talk about finding a weapon like Harvin... I'd say that Westbrook was doing what Harvin did long before Harvin did it last year. If you believe all we are missing is a versatile WR/RB weapon ... you have to have your eyes light up when you hear the Packers are kicking the tires on signing Westbrook.


Now there are concerns, like Rock has repeatedly mentioned, on whether Westbrook can remain healthy and whether he has the legs to play at a high level. Those are valid concerns, and I expect the Packers to do their due diligence to make sure he can still contribute something. If Westbrook has something left in the tank, then I'm all for this signing.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
Dulak
13 years ago

Also... people are actually worried that we may overpay for Westbrook.

REALLY? Are you serious? Do you even remember that Ted is still the GM of this team?

Yes Ted has made some bad signings in the past, but ... the dude is notorious for not over paying. If the price tag for Westbrook is high, you really think Ted will pull the trigger?

As NSD said, for years Westbrook was the entire Eagles' offense. He is pretty versatile, I mean you're talking about a RB who routinely motioned out to become a WR. And he regularly ran routes, made catches.

When people talk about finding a weapon like Harvin... I'd say that Westbrook was doing what Harvin did long before Harvin did it last year. If you believe all we are missing is a versatile WR/RB weapon ... you have to have your eyes light up when you hear the Packers are kicking the tires on signing Westbrook.


Now there are concerns, like Rock has repeatedly mentioned, on whether Westbrook can remain healthy and whether he has the legs to play at a high level. Those are valid concerns, and I expect the Packers to do their due diligence to make sure he can still contribute something. If Westbrook has something left in the tank, then I'm all for this signing.

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:



liked what you had to say - a few comments thou. As far as Ted and him paying ...

I wouldnt doubt if some people started to change their minds on what Ted will pay.

We can take a look at jennings, chillars, the salary we gave to collins, pickett, and clifton. Heck didnt he double bush's salary last year when most of us hated him and wanted him off the team and would of been happy if st lois or (forgot whom else was looking at him) would take him off our hands.

Im not sure we can say that Ted is a real skimper when it comes to signing peeps. Or maybe just new peeps ... who knows. Only thing I know we spent alot of money recently when previously we were one of the few teams well below the cap (ie I know there is no cap this year).
porky88
13 years ago
Westbrook wouldn't make more than Grant so find his numbers this year and you can figure something out probably a lot easier. It'd be incentive base.

I would like the move. It gives the Packers a veteran who has been there before and he's legit third down back. He could be a real factor in the passing game. Rodgers checks down a lot so he needs that safety valve. Grant isn't that type of player.
zombieslayer
13 years ago



I'm reminded of an article from Sports Illustrated on concussions, where they interviewed Michael Strahan when he was still playing. He talked about an incident with Westbrook, where he was rushing and saw Westbrook staying back to block him. He says the next thing he (Strahan) remembered was trying to get up off his behind while Westbrook stood over him taunting him.

He added that in the game today, you have guys like that (referring to Westbrook) who are much stronger than they look (and went to talk about how the speed at which the game is played and these more explosive players all work to produce an environment where concussions are getting more common).

So from that, I'd have to think he's at least a decent blocker, and would be alright in blitz pick-up.

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:



Whoa. Did not know that. That changes my views on Westbrook big time, as I want to see Aaron touched a heck of a lot less in '10.

Then if the price is right and if he's healthy, let's get him. I've always liked Westbrook as a pass catcher. After all, that's what RBs should be used for anyways. 😉
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
13 years ago
I think if we fail to add a scat back type in the draft.. Westbrook will be our safety value.

Not a bad plan B in that case.. under the right contract numbers and understanding of his role in the offense.. something Green did very well last season.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Rockmolder
13 years ago
Brian Westbrook will take a physical in St. Louis 

by Mike Florio

After a couple of months on the shelf, running back Brian Westbrook could soon be getting a chance to continue his career.

Jason La Canfora of NFLN reports that Westbrook will go to St. Louis today for a physical with the Rams.

Of course, it remains to be seen whether he can pass a physical. Westbrook's knee has been a major problem of late. He also missed multiple games due to concussions in 2009.

The Packers also reportedly are interested.

zombieslayer
13 years ago
Bummer.

So I guess there goes that idea. 😞
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Rockmolder
13 years ago
Rams in "way, way early" stages of evaluating Westbrook 

by Michael David Smith

The St. Louis Rams brought free agent running back Brian Westbrook in for a physical this weekend, but head coach Steve Spagnuolo said that doesn't mean a signing is imminent.

"Brian's in here because we want to do the physical, we want to do that part of it," Spagnuolo said, per the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. "But then we'll see where it goes from there. It's way, way early in the stage."

It wasn't long ago that Westbrook would have been considered a major free-agent acquisition for any NFL team, let alone the worst team in the league. But at age 30, and coming off a season in which he had just 274 rushing yards, Westbrook seems like more of an afterthought than a priority for the Rams.

Of course, it's a moot point if Westbrook, who has a history of knee problems and concussions, can't pass the physical.

Fan Shout
dfosterf (14h) : Maybe
Mucky Tundra (14h) : Yes
Zero2Cool (15h) : No.
Mucky Tundra (18h) : End of a Degu-era
dhazer (18h) : Steelers sign Patterson because of new kickoff rule interesting
Zero2Cool (21h) : Former #Packers TE Josiah Deguara is signing a 1-year deal with the Jaguars, per source.
Zero2Cool (22h) : They do not do it for "content sake".
dfosterf (28-Mar) : For the record, I enjoy Beast and Mucky drafts
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Haha
Mucky Tundra (27-Mar) : No time for talking! Back to work beast!
beast (27-Mar) : You saw only 4,201 of my mocks? 🥺 I think that means you missed more than half of them 😢
dfosterf (27-Mar) : Does anyone know what Lambeau field improvements got put on hold? My guess would be for the 2025 draft
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : It's like listen, you made 4,201 mocks, no shit.
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Cuz during the draft "I had them mocked there!" as if it's amazing.
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : They're fun to do once in awhile. It's people who think they are "content" that annoy me.
dfosterf (27-Mar) : Against tbd
dfosterf (27-Mar) : Answer to your question is yes, it's a Thursday, will be the Chiefs aga
dfosterf (27-Mar) : Luckily for all concerned, I don't post them. I did one, but that was like 25 mocks ago
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : NFL 2024 gonna start Sept 5th isn't it???
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Ugh... kids these days!
dfosterf (27-Mar) : I'm gonna go do some more mock draft hell instead 🤪
Zero2Cool (27-Mar) : Did we do one of those prediction threads yet for 2024 season?
dfosterf (27-Mar) : In my city, they are playing the nimby game, in order to keep some railroad tracks vs. 2 professional sports teams and a concert venue.
dfosterf (27-Mar) : And/Or a city council, of which I haven't seen a good one in a very long time
dfosterf (27-Mar) : That sounds like a Mayor, not a city.
buckeyepackfan (26-Mar) : Packers halt scheduled 80mil upgrade of stadium until lease agreement talks are restarted
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : City of Green Bay puts Packers' Lambeau Field lease talks on hold
buckeyepackfan (26-Mar) : Packers 1 of 3 teams to vote no on new kickoff rule.
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Packers sign another Kicker
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Lengthy explanation at PFF if you click the link
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Kickoff rules officially changed.ngthy explan
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : lol
Cheesey (26-Mar) : 2009? No thanks! One open heart surgery is enough!
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Good for you!
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Yes. That's the one.
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Is that "Lady Dugan" per chance?
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Crystal?
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Please refresh my memory
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Alan posts. Crystal back in my life. It's 2009 all over again! Lol
Mucky Tundra (26-Mar) : BAH GAWD! THAT'S CHEESEYS MUSIC!
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Gutekunst said early stages of Jordan Love contract being discussed.
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Shouldn't be penalized cuz official screwed up
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Yeah, challenge until you are incorrect twice.
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : Fining them is the goal, per the people who made the rule anyway.
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Still waiting on the kickoff rule changes. Did hear yesterday that the touchback proposal will now be the 30 yard line, not the 35
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Probably speed of game issues with your proposal
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Hopefully the refs don't get in the habit of throwing flags on this
beast (25-Mar) : I think when it comes to Challenges should get two strikes, so unlimited challenges as long as they keep winning them, but 2 wrong then done
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Still subject to the fines etc
dfosterf (25-Mar) : Yes, I should have been more specific. Also, they are now saying it would be a 15 yard penalty. That makes more sense .
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2023 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
Bears
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
LIONS
Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
Raiders
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
CHARGERS
Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
CHIEFS
Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
Giants
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
Panthers
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
Cowboys
Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
49ers
Recent Topics
1h / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

28-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

28-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Mar / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

24-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.