Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
3 Pages<123>

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Gravedigga  
#21 Posted : Sunday, February 7, 2010 5:48:31 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
They got Favred this season and they're begging to get Favred next season too? Boy, Vikings fans are seriously masochistic. It's tragic.... but it does wonders for us sadistic Packer fans! :grin:



If by Favred you mean they had one of the best seasons in franchise history and were about 32 fumbles away from making a superbowl, I guess you're right.
Gravedigga  
#22 Posted : Sunday, February 7, 2010 5:50:32 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post

LOL I love it!!

sniff, sniff, sniff......





That sign makes me want to puke
:pukeright:


Think vikes, your whole team and its fans are basically sucking Brett's "ego". That must suck you're apart of that. :thumbright:


For real, i can hear that sucking/popping sound from all the way down here in Florida. It's awesome
bozz_2006  
#23 Posted : Sunday, February 7, 2010 6:28:51 PM(UTC)
Oh don't get your panties in a twist. I'm talking about the make-or-break moves that Favre pulls on a regular basis. Yes they had an amazing season. Favre was a huge part of it. But, he ended his team's last possession of the season with an interception on a bonehead throw.
Cheesey  
#24 Posted : Sunday, February 7, 2010 6:35:40 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
They got Favred this season and they're begging to get Favred next season too? Boy, Vikings fans are seriously masochistic. It's tragic.... but it does wonders for us sadistic Packer fans! :grin:



If by Favred you mean they had one of the best seasons in franchise history and were about 32 fumbles away from making a superbowl, I guess you're right.

True......if your goal is to get CLOSE to being in a Super Bowl, then "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!!!" :thumbright:
Gravedigga  
#25 Posted : Sunday, February 7, 2010 7:27:40 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Oh don't get your panties in a twist. I'm talking about the make-or-break moves that Favre pulls on a regular basis. Yes they had an amazing season. Favre was a huge part of it. But, he ended his team's last possession of the season with an interception on a bonehead throw.


Gotta be in it to win it right?

Also, anyone who saw that game, i mean come on. Every drive was killed by a freaking fumble. Dirty hits on Favre. BS penalties at the end. If it makes people feel better to blame favre for it all, more power to ya.
Gravedigga  
#26 Posted : Sunday, February 7, 2010 7:29:57 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
They got Favred this season and they're begging to get Favred next season too? Boy, Vikings fans are seriously masochistic. It's tragic.... but it does wonders for us sadistic Packer fans! :grin:



If by Favred you mean they had one of the best seasons in franchise history and were about 32 fumbles away from making a superbowl, I guess you're right.

True......if your goal is to get CLOSE to being in a Super Bowl, then "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!!!" :thumbright:


I'm not an all or nothing kind of guy. Superbowl is great and all but I got to enjoy watching 18 games. It cant be ALL about getting a ring. It's entertainment for me. Seeing him sweep the packers means more to me than one superbowl game.
Cheesey  
#27 Posted : Sunday, February 7, 2010 8:05:34 PM(UTC)
Hey....if that is what entertains you, so be it.
I myself, enjoy my team winning a Super Bowl.
But hey.....setting your goals low makes them MUCH more attainable!
bozz_2006  
#28 Posted : Sunday, February 7, 2010 8:15:04 PM(UTC)
Are you implying that I'm blaming the loss on Favre? Hardly.
Gravedigga  
#29 Posted : Sunday, February 7, 2010 8:45:21 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Are you implying that I'm blaming the loss on Favre? Hardly.


yes
Gravedigga  
#30 Posted : Sunday, February 7, 2010 8:46:12 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Hey....if that is what entertains you, so be it.
I myself, enjoy my team winning a Super Bowl.
But hey.....setting your goals low makes them MUCH more attainable!



Oh snap, you got me
Cheesey  
#31 Posted : Sunday, February 7, 2010 8:53:52 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Hey....if that is what entertains you, so be it.
I myself, enjoy my team winning a Super Bowl.
But hey.....setting your goals low makes them MUCH more attainable!



Oh snap, you got me

Yup! Sure did!!!LOLOLOL!!!

Anyway.......Favre cost his team the game at the end. Do you disagree?
He doesn't throw that dumb pass, they have a shot at a makeable fieldgoal, right? If Longwell misses it, i'd put the blame on him. But he never got a chance, did he?
So WHO'S fault was it? WHO threw the "lame duck" pass?
He had his shot at the end to win it, by just running the 5 yards. Byt he didn't.

What makes me laugh is this: Aaron Rodgers got constantly blamed by a few for not "winning a game in the last 2 minutes". And here BF had to only NOT throw a dumb pass, and he probably gets the win. And the same ones that are holding him blameless would be bragging how BF won the game for the Queens in the last seconds.
Oh....the IRONY!!!
dhazer  
#32 Posted : Monday, February 8, 2010 2:01:26 AM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Hey....if that is what entertains you, so be it.
I myself, enjoy my team winning a Super Bowl.
But hey.....setting your goals low makes them MUCH more attainable!



Oh snap, you got me

Yup! Sure did!!!LOLOLOL!!!

Anyway.......Favre cost his team the game at the end. Do you disagree?
He doesn't throw that dumb pass, they have a shot at a makeable fieldgoal, right? If Longwell misses it, i'd put the blame on him. But he never got a chance, did he?
So WHO'S fault was it? WHO threw the "lame duck" pass?
He had his shot at the end to win it, by just running the 5 yards. Byt he didn't.

What makes me laugh is this: Aaron Rodgers got constantly blamed by a few for not "winning a game in the last 2 minutes". And here Brett Favre had to only NOT throw a dumb pass, and he probably gets the win. And the same ones that are holding him blameless would be bragging how Brett Favre won the game for the Queens in the last seconds.
Oh....the IRONY!!!


I thought we covered this Longwell said it was out of his range. Favre wasn't going to run because he nevers runs and would never run with that ankle
Gravedigga  
#33 Posted : Monday, February 8, 2010 2:39:00 AM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Hey....if that is what entertains you, so be it.
I myself, enjoy my team winning a Super Bowl.
But hey.....setting your goals low makes them MUCH more attainable!



Oh snap, you got me

Yup! Sure did!!!LOLOLOL!!!

Anyway.......Favre cost his team the game at the end. Do you disagree?


I'll answer that one with a question of my own.

Uhhm, the Packers gave up 51 points to the Cardinals. We all know this, yea yea yea whatever. Bottom line, the Packers lost to the Cardinals because of Aaron Rodgers. His horrible protection of the ball, holding on to it for too long and not protecting it is why we lost. I put the loss squarely on him. Do you disagree?

Chew that one real nice and wash it down with a coke and a smile.
Gravedigga  
#34 Posted : Monday, February 8, 2010 2:42:30 AM(UTC)
Actually, now that I think of it.......the Packers really lost that game because of Ted Thompson. I blame him for drafting Rodgers in the first place. Had he kept Favre, picked up randy moss at garage sale pricing and made a couple other additions, we may have a super bowl or 2 right now. That loss is squarely on the shoulders of Ted Thompson. Do you disagree?
doddpower  
#35 Posted : Monday, February 8, 2010 2:59:21 AM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Actually, now that I think of it.......the Packers really lost that game because of Ted Thompson. I blame him for drafting Rodgers in the first place. Had he kept Favre, picked up randy moss at garage sale pricing and made a couple other additions, we may have a super bowl or 2 right now. That loss is squarely on the shoulders of Ted Thompson. Do you disagree?




lol, that's some pretty lame bait there. Man . . . . you are dumb.


Enjoy getting Favre'd all off season again there buddy. I know I won't miss it. Not one bit.
Gravedigga  
#36 Posted : Monday, February 8, 2010 10:28:09 AM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Actually, now that I think of it.......the Packers really lost that game because of Ted Thompson. I blame him for drafting Rodgers in the first place. Had he kept Favre, picked up randy moss at garage sale pricing and made a couple other additions, we may have a super bowl or 2 right now. That loss is squarely on the shoulders of Ted Thompson. Do you disagree?




lol, that's some pretty lame bait there. Man . . . . you are dumb.




Yea, i've always been a master-baiter
Stevetarded  
#37 Posted : Monday, February 8, 2010 12:48:17 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Hey....if that is what entertains you, so be it.
I myself, enjoy my team winning a Super Bowl.
But hey.....setting your goals low makes them MUCH more attainable!



Oh snap, you got me

Yup! Sure did!!!LOLOLOL!!!

Anyway.......Favre cost his team the game at the end. Do you disagree?
He doesn't throw that dumb pass, they have a shot at a makeable fieldgoal, right? If Longwell misses it, i'd put the blame on him. But he never got a chance, did he?
So WHO'S fault was it? WHO threw the "lame duck" pass?
He had his shot at the end to win it, by just running the 5 yards. Byt he didn't.

What makes me laugh is this: Aaron Rodgers got constantly blamed by a few for not "winning a game in the last 2 minutes". And here Brett Favre had to only NOT throw a dumb pass, and he probably gets the win. And the same ones that are holding him blameless would be bragging how Brett Favre won the game for the Queens in the last seconds.
Oh....the IRONY!!!


I thought we covered this Longwell said it was out of his range. Favre wasn't going to run because he nevers runs and would never run with that ankle


He threw that interception while he was running...
Nonstopdrivel  
#38 Posted : Monday, February 8, 2010 1:05:56 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
I'm not an all or nothing kind of guy. Superbowl is great and all but I got to enjoy watching 18 games. It cant be ALL about getting a ring. It's entertainment for me.


This I agree with and have said so on this board many times.

" said: Go to Quoted Post
Seeing him sweep the packers means more to me than one superbowl game.


The juxtaposition of these words with your green-and-gold sig annoys the piss out of me.
RedSoxExcel  
#39 Posted : Monday, February 8, 2010 2:29:17 PM(UTC)
Why does someone have to "cost" someteam the game. Isn't it possible that people "contribute" to losses (some more than others)?

Brett Favre was not THE reason why the Vikings lost to the Saints. He was a SIGNIFICANT part of the reason, yes.

Aaron Rodgers was not THE reason why the Packers lost to the Cardinals. He was a SIGNIFICANT part of the reason, yes.

(Take off your Packers goggles for a second, he had a horrible first half and had the ball in his hands in OT and missed Jennings wide open and had the game winning turnover).

Peyton Manning was not THE reason why the Colts lost to the Saints. He was a SIGNIFICANT part of the reason, yes.

Its kind of silly I think that we put ENTIRE games on one person. For example, if Favre doesn't complete that third down pass after two runs at the start of the last 4th quarter drive, the Vikings punt it. Maybe the Saints score at the end and then Favre isn't as "much" to blame? Is that make any sense?

But it at the same its kind of silly to NOT put some blame on the QB that throws a costly INT that prevented a FG chance or a pick 6 in the SB or misses a wide open receiver for the OT win.

Bottom line, IMO, there is little if any, difference between Rodgers, Favre and Manning. Bottom line, Drew Brees was better than all of them this year and may be even better next year.
Pack93z  
#40 Posted : Monday, February 8, 2010 2:47:26 PM(UTC)
RedSox... in any talks that revolve around Brett in Packer/Viking nations more so than not, the talks are dripping with emotion instead of reason.

Once you get to the point where you understand that and accept it as an immovable force.. you can state your opinion on the matter from a neutral point and understand that some (both side, pro or anti Favre) are going to take your opinion and either ignore it or twist it into their angle.

Wise men, when in doubt whether to speak or to keep quiet, give themselves the benefit of the doubt, and remain silent. - Napolean Hill

It is a battle than cannot be won.

Oh and the Viking fans that are wishing it upon themselves another year of Favre and hoping for the same success..

When you are winning a war almost everything that happens can be claimed to be right and wise. - Winston Churchill.

Favre had a remarkable year.. expecting a repeat without the wheels coming off earlier isn't a healthy wager.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
FLORIDA PACKER88 (2h) : 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
buckeyepackfan (12h) : THAT BAAAAAAAAD MAN IS BACK!!!!!
cheeseheads123 (13h) : 12 is back baby lets go!!!
Zero2Cool (22h) : WR Davante Adams nominated for Clutch Performer of the Week
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : lol coach with jokes MM: "If i don't know tomorrow, they'll be putting Pat McKenzie on IR."
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : Rod of Airs here to fook you up!
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : Packers gonna play coy until Saturday night and go SURPRISE BITCHES
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : Mike McCarthy on Rodgers timetable: "This is in the hands of the experts. ... Let's just wait until the experts make their decision."
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : You can freaking localize ads too to region. This is NOT hard. Lazy asses.
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : I think so too, but it's time they get with it. You can have ads in streaming too.
Nonstopdrivel (11-Dec) : You've been able to stream postseason games for a few years now, I think.
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : last 4 games played, Packers have worst pass efficency, Browns 2nd worst
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : On @oath @YahooSports and @NFL Apps
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : Good news for NFL fans: starting with this season’s playoffs you can stream games on your phone. All phones. All carriers. For free. On
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : Verizon to pay NFL $500 million a year to stream games
beast (11-Dec) : Packers can't catch Eagles so it doesn't directly effect our playoff chances.
Nonstopdrivel (11-Dec) : yoffs?
Nonstopdrivel (11-Dec) : So . . . could in theory be a severe sprain. Which might still sideline him for the rest of the season, but perhaps he'd be back for the pla
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : That's regarding Carson Wentz
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : @AlbertBreer Doctors determined with manual test there was damage to ACL, extent unknown until MRI tomorrow.
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : Read reports that's what is feared and yes, you're right, usually if that's the fear = done
Nonstopdrivel (11-Dec) : MRI would me mostly a formality. He walked off on his own power, so possibly just a sprain? But I doubt it.
Nonstopdrivel (11-Dec) : Provocative tests on scene are pretty sensitive. If they fear his ACL is torn, it probably is.
Zero2Cool (11-Dec) : He has an ACL? I only heard there were running tests ... tomorrow.
Nonstopdrivel (11-Dec) : Depends on which Nick Foles arises from the ashes. If it's the 2013 Foles, Eagles could still be a powerhouse.
gbguy20 (11-Dec) : carson wentz torn acl. is that good or bad for our playoff chances?
nerdmann (10-Dec) : It's definitive, Davante is BETTER than Janis.
Zero2Cool (10-Dec) : can't believe some don't want Adams re-signed... what is wrong with you!!
Zero2Cool (10-Dec) : @WesHod The #Packers turned to Davante Adams several times during the final series and he came through each time. The evolution of a playmak
buckeyepackfan (10-Dec) : Packer Fans will take over Stadium today!
Zero2Cool (10-Dec) : @AaronNagler Packers just took the field to cheers. No Browns fans here to boo yet.
buckeyepackfan (10-Dec) : DILLY DILLY!
Zero2Cool (10-Dec) : Williams though, to answer your question :D
Zero2Cool (10-Dec) : First snap of the day don't mean didly
Zero2Cool (10-Dec) : Starting? who cares?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Barfarn

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Barfarn

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

12-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / hardrocker950

Headlines