Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
3 Pages<123>

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Gravedigga  
#21 Posted : Sunday, February 7, 2010 5:48:31 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
They got Favred this season and they're begging to get Favred next season too? Boy, Vikings fans are seriously masochistic. It's tragic.... but it does wonders for us sadistic Packer fans! :grin:



If by Favred you mean they had one of the best seasons in franchise history and were about 32 fumbles away from making a superbowl, I guess you're right.
Gravedigga  
#22 Posted : Sunday, February 7, 2010 5:50:32 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post

LOL I love it!!

sniff, sniff, sniff......





That sign makes me want to puke
:pukeright:


Think vikes, your whole team and its fans are basically sucking Brett's "ego". That must suck you're apart of that. :thumbright:


For real, i can hear that sucking/popping sound from all the way down here in Florida. It's awesome
bozz_2006  
#23 Posted : Sunday, February 7, 2010 6:28:51 PM(UTC)
Oh don't get your panties in a twist. I'm talking about the make-or-break moves that Favre pulls on a regular basis. Yes they had an amazing season. Favre was a huge part of it. But, he ended his team's last possession of the season with an interception on a bonehead throw.
Cheesey  
#24 Posted : Sunday, February 7, 2010 6:35:40 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
They got Favred this season and they're begging to get Favred next season too? Boy, Vikings fans are seriously masochistic. It's tragic.... but it does wonders for us sadistic Packer fans! :grin:



If by Favred you mean they had one of the best seasons in franchise history and were about 32 fumbles away from making a superbowl, I guess you're right.

True......if your goal is to get CLOSE to being in a Super Bowl, then "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!!!" :thumbright:
Gravedigga  
#25 Posted : Sunday, February 7, 2010 7:27:40 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Oh don't get your panties in a twist. I'm talking about the make-or-break moves that Favre pulls on a regular basis. Yes they had an amazing season. Favre was a huge part of it. But, he ended his team's last possession of the season with an interception on a bonehead throw.


Gotta be in it to win it right?

Also, anyone who saw that game, i mean come on. Every drive was killed by a freaking fumble. Dirty hits on Favre. BS penalties at the end. If it makes people feel better to blame favre for it all, more power to ya.
Gravedigga  
#26 Posted : Sunday, February 7, 2010 7:29:57 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
They got Favred this season and they're begging to get Favred next season too? Boy, Vikings fans are seriously masochistic. It's tragic.... but it does wonders for us sadistic Packer fans! :grin:



If by Favred you mean they had one of the best seasons in franchise history and were about 32 fumbles away from making a superbowl, I guess you're right.

True......if your goal is to get CLOSE to being in a Super Bowl, then "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!!!" :thumbright:


I'm not an all or nothing kind of guy. Superbowl is great and all but I got to enjoy watching 18 games. It cant be ALL about getting a ring. It's entertainment for me. Seeing him sweep the packers means more to me than one superbowl game.
Cheesey  
#27 Posted : Sunday, February 7, 2010 8:05:34 PM(UTC)
Hey....if that is what entertains you, so be it.
I myself, enjoy my team winning a Super Bowl.
But hey.....setting your goals low makes them MUCH more attainable!
bozz_2006  
#28 Posted : Sunday, February 7, 2010 8:15:04 PM(UTC)
Are you implying that I'm blaming the loss on Favre? Hardly.
Gravedigga  
#29 Posted : Sunday, February 7, 2010 8:45:21 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Are you implying that I'm blaming the loss on Favre? Hardly.


yes
Gravedigga  
#30 Posted : Sunday, February 7, 2010 8:46:12 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Hey....if that is what entertains you, so be it.
I myself, enjoy my team winning a Super Bowl.
But hey.....setting your goals low makes them MUCH more attainable!



Oh snap, you got me
Cheesey  
#31 Posted : Sunday, February 7, 2010 8:53:52 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Hey....if that is what entertains you, so be it.
I myself, enjoy my team winning a Super Bowl.
But hey.....setting your goals low makes them MUCH more attainable!



Oh snap, you got me

Yup! Sure did!!!LOLOLOL!!!

Anyway.......Favre cost his team the game at the end. Do you disagree?
He doesn't throw that dumb pass, they have a shot at a makeable fieldgoal, right? If Longwell misses it, i'd put the blame on him. But he never got a chance, did he?
So WHO'S fault was it? WHO threw the "lame duck" pass?
He had his shot at the end to win it, by just running the 5 yards. Byt he didn't.

What makes me laugh is this: Aaron Rodgers got constantly blamed by a few for not "winning a game in the last 2 minutes". And here BF had to only NOT throw a dumb pass, and he probably gets the win. And the same ones that are holding him blameless would be bragging how BF won the game for the Queens in the last seconds.
Oh....the IRONY!!!
dhazer  
#32 Posted : Monday, February 8, 2010 2:01:26 AM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Hey....if that is what entertains you, so be it.
I myself, enjoy my team winning a Super Bowl.
But hey.....setting your goals low makes them MUCH more attainable!



Oh snap, you got me

Yup! Sure did!!!LOLOLOL!!!

Anyway.......Favre cost his team the game at the end. Do you disagree?
He doesn't throw that dumb pass, they have a shot at a makeable fieldgoal, right? If Longwell misses it, i'd put the blame on him. But he never got a chance, did he?
So WHO'S fault was it? WHO threw the "lame duck" pass?
He had his shot at the end to win it, by just running the 5 yards. Byt he didn't.

What makes me laugh is this: Aaron Rodgers got constantly blamed by a few for not "winning a game in the last 2 minutes". And here Brett Favre had to only NOT throw a dumb pass, and he probably gets the win. And the same ones that are holding him blameless would be bragging how Brett Favre won the game for the Queens in the last seconds.
Oh....the IRONY!!!


I thought we covered this Longwell said it was out of his range. Favre wasn't going to run because he nevers runs and would never run with that ankle
Gravedigga  
#33 Posted : Monday, February 8, 2010 2:39:00 AM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Hey....if that is what entertains you, so be it.
I myself, enjoy my team winning a Super Bowl.
But hey.....setting your goals low makes them MUCH more attainable!



Oh snap, you got me

Yup! Sure did!!!LOLOLOL!!!

Anyway.......Favre cost his team the game at the end. Do you disagree?


I'll answer that one with a question of my own.

Uhhm, the Packers gave up 51 points to the Cardinals. We all know this, yea yea yea whatever. Bottom line, the Packers lost to the Cardinals because of Aaron Rodgers. His horrible protection of the ball, holding on to it for too long and not protecting it is why we lost. I put the loss squarely on him. Do you disagree?

Chew that one real nice and wash it down with a coke and a smile.
Gravedigga  
#34 Posted : Monday, February 8, 2010 2:42:30 AM(UTC)
Actually, now that I think of it.......the Packers really lost that game because of Ted Thompson. I blame him for drafting Rodgers in the first place. Had he kept Favre, picked up randy moss at garage sale pricing and made a couple other additions, we may have a super bowl or 2 right now. That loss is squarely on the shoulders of Ted Thompson. Do you disagree?
doddpower  
#35 Posted : Monday, February 8, 2010 2:59:21 AM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Actually, now that I think of it.......the Packers really lost that game because of Ted Thompson. I blame him for drafting Rodgers in the first place. Had he kept Favre, picked up randy moss at garage sale pricing and made a couple other additions, we may have a super bowl or 2 right now. That loss is squarely on the shoulders of Ted Thompson. Do you disagree?




lol, that's some pretty lame bait there. Man . . . . you are dumb.


Enjoy getting Favre'd all off season again there buddy. I know I won't miss it. Not one bit.
Gravedigga  
#36 Posted : Monday, February 8, 2010 10:28:09 AM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Actually, now that I think of it.......the Packers really lost that game because of Ted Thompson. I blame him for drafting Rodgers in the first place. Had he kept Favre, picked up randy moss at garage sale pricing and made a couple other additions, we may have a super bowl or 2 right now. That loss is squarely on the shoulders of Ted Thompson. Do you disagree?




lol, that's some pretty lame bait there. Man . . . . you are dumb.




Yea, i've always been a master-baiter
Stevetarded  
#37 Posted : Monday, February 8, 2010 12:48:17 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Hey....if that is what entertains you, so be it.
I myself, enjoy my team winning a Super Bowl.
But hey.....setting your goals low makes them MUCH more attainable!



Oh snap, you got me

Yup! Sure did!!!LOLOLOL!!!

Anyway.......Favre cost his team the game at the end. Do you disagree?
He doesn't throw that dumb pass, they have a shot at a makeable fieldgoal, right? If Longwell misses it, i'd put the blame on him. But he never got a chance, did he?
So WHO'S fault was it? WHO threw the "lame duck" pass?
He had his shot at the end to win it, by just running the 5 yards. Byt he didn't.

What makes me laugh is this: Aaron Rodgers got constantly blamed by a few for not "winning a game in the last 2 minutes". And here Brett Favre had to only NOT throw a dumb pass, and he probably gets the win. And the same ones that are holding him blameless would be bragging how Brett Favre won the game for the Queens in the last seconds.
Oh....the IRONY!!!


I thought we covered this Longwell said it was out of his range. Favre wasn't going to run because he nevers runs and would never run with that ankle


He threw that interception while he was running...
Nonstopdrivel  
#38 Posted : Monday, February 8, 2010 1:05:56 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
I'm not an all or nothing kind of guy. Superbowl is great and all but I got to enjoy watching 18 games. It cant be ALL about getting a ring. It's entertainment for me.


This I agree with and have said so on this board many times.

" said: Go to Quoted Post
Seeing him sweep the packers means more to me than one superbowl game.


The juxtaposition of these words with your green-and-gold sig annoys the piss out of me.
RedSoxExcel  
#39 Posted : Monday, February 8, 2010 2:29:17 PM(UTC)
Why does someone have to "cost" someteam the game. Isn't it possible that people "contribute" to losses (some more than others)?

Brett Favre was not THE reason why the Vikings lost to the Saints. He was a SIGNIFICANT part of the reason, yes.

Aaron Rodgers was not THE reason why the Packers lost to the Cardinals. He was a SIGNIFICANT part of the reason, yes.

(Take off your Packers goggles for a second, he had a horrible first half and had the ball in his hands in OT and missed Jennings wide open and had the game winning turnover).

Peyton Manning was not THE reason why the Colts lost to the Saints. He was a SIGNIFICANT part of the reason, yes.

Its kind of silly I think that we put ENTIRE games on one person. For example, if Favre doesn't complete that third down pass after two runs at the start of the last 4th quarter drive, the Vikings punt it. Maybe the Saints score at the end and then Favre isn't as "much" to blame? Is that make any sense?

But it at the same its kind of silly to NOT put some blame on the QB that throws a costly INT that prevented a FG chance or a pick 6 in the SB or misses a wide open receiver for the OT win.

Bottom line, IMO, there is little if any, difference between Rodgers, Favre and Manning. Bottom line, Drew Brees was better than all of them this year and may be even better next year.
Pack93z  
#40 Posted : Monday, February 8, 2010 2:47:26 PM(UTC)
RedSox... in any talks that revolve around Brett in Packer/Viking nations more so than not, the talks are dripping with emotion instead of reason.

Once you get to the point where you understand that and accept it as an immovable force.. you can state your opinion on the matter from a neutral point and understand that some (both side, pro or anti Favre) are going to take your opinion and either ignore it or twist it into their angle.

Wise men, when in doubt whether to speak or to keep quiet, give themselves the benefit of the doubt, and remain silent. - Napolean Hill

It is a battle than cannot be won.

Oh and the Viking fans that are wishing it upon themselves another year of Favre and hoping for the same success..

When you are winning a war almost everything that happens can be claimed to be right and wise. - Winston Churchill.

Favre had a remarkable year.. expecting a repeat without the wheels coming off earlier isn't a healthy wager.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
beast (22m) : Na, they're going to trade this year's 1st to the Patriots for two 1st round picks (one next year and one this year).
Zero2Cool (27m) : Packers might draft Saquon Barkley
beast (2h) : He's actions said, he's going to tease the #1 pick choice as long as he can
Zero2Cool (3h) : How so? What did he say?
beast (3h) : John Dorsey is just messing with people now... which QB he'll take... I partly love it, partly annoyed by it.
Zero2Cool (3h) : You can make your NFL Pick's (Fantasy > NFL Pick'em)
Smokey (3h) : bye week is not listed in this forum's posting.
Zero2Cool (3h) : You don't follow the Pacers, do you?
gbguy20 (4h) : i must be missing something with the bye week comment
Smokey (5h) : Order your Pizza, Now !
Smokey (5h) : Packers
Smokey (5h) : Yes there is a bye week in the Pacers 2018 Schedule.
Zero2Cool (5h) : no charges? so the bomb was a dud??
Zero2Cool (5h) : No charges for WR Davis over LAX bomb joke
Cheesey (5h) : THE WRATH OF KHAN!!
Zero2Cool (5h) : damn caps
Zero2Cool (5h) : yEEHAW!!
Smokey (5h) : "DRAFT CHAT" Baby !
packerfanoutwest (8h) : Packers first pick will be lining up on with the defense
beast (9h) : If Packers trade up, they're grabbing James (or an ILB or CB) ;-P
beast (9h) : Sounds like Khan is moving the team to London in time.
packerfanoutwest (9h) : Here's an idea. Start a thread on who can pick the Packers #1 pick. Just make the pick only. No other comments.
Zero2Cool (10h) : This is NOT good
Zero2Cool (10h) : Shad Khan: I’m buying Wembley to keep the Jaguars stable in both London and Jacksonville
Zero2Cool (10h) : @AndrewBrandt Yes. The best GMs will leverage desperate teams tonight.
Zero2Cool (10h) : Today's Birthdays: StoicFire (30)
Zero2Cool (11h) : The Parlor is better than The Room.
beast (22h) : I believe the Packers seriously want to trade up (if they can find a price they like), I'm guessing for Fitzpatrick or James (though one guy said Ward). But could also be one of the ILBers (Smith or E
Smokey (23h) : Rumors are not money in the bank deals.
gbguy20 (25-Apr) : pft reporting packers trying to trade up
Porforis (25-Apr) : You're just a little chicken. Cheep Cheep Cheep Cheep Cheep Cheep Cheep Cheep Cheep
Nonstopdrivel (25-Apr) : I don't want to talk about it.
Porforis (25-Apr) : You're tearing me apart, Rourke!
Nonstopdrivel (25-Apr) : (See "Moar Randomness" thread.)
Nonstopdrivel (25-Apr) : It's a reference to The Room. I'm sorry, I forgot that not everyone knows about that movie. That's just my favorite line from that movie.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2018 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 9 @ 7:20 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Sep 16 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Sep 23 @ 12:00 PM
Redskins
Sunday, Sep 30 @ 12:00 PM
BILLS
Sunday, Oct 7 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Monday, Oct 15 @ 7:15 PM
49ERS
Sunday, Oct 28 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Nov 4 @ 7:20 PM
Patriots
Sunday, Nov 11 @ 12:00 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Nov 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Sunday, Nov 25 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Dec 2 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Dec 9 @ 12:00 PM
FALCONS
Sunday, Dec 16 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Dec 23 @ 12:00 PM
Jets
Sunday, Dec 30 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
6m / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

14m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4h / Random Babble / Cheesey

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Bigbyfan

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

24-Apr / Around The NFL / dhazer

24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

24-Apr / Random Babble / Cheesey

Headlines