Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
3 Pages<123>

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Gravedigga  
#21 Posted : Sunday, February 7, 2010 5:48:31 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
They got Favred this season and they're begging to get Favred next season too? Boy, Vikings fans are seriously masochistic. It's tragic.... but it does wonders for us sadistic Packer fans! :grin:



If by Favred you mean they had one of the best seasons in franchise history and were about 32 fumbles away from making a superbowl, I guess you're right.
Gravedigga  
#22 Posted : Sunday, February 7, 2010 5:50:32 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post

LOL I love it!!

sniff, sniff, sniff......





That sign makes me want to puke
:pukeright:


Think vikes, your whole team and its fans are basically sucking Brett's "ego". That must suck you're apart of that. :thumbright:


For real, i can hear that sucking/popping sound from all the way down here in Florida. It's awesome
bozz_2006  
#23 Posted : Sunday, February 7, 2010 6:28:51 PM(UTC)
Oh don't get your panties in a twist. I'm talking about the make-or-break moves that Favre pulls on a regular basis. Yes they had an amazing season. Favre was a huge part of it. But, he ended his team's last possession of the season with an interception on a bonehead throw.
Cheesey  
#24 Posted : Sunday, February 7, 2010 6:35:40 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
They got Favred this season and they're begging to get Favred next season too? Boy, Vikings fans are seriously masochistic. It's tragic.... but it does wonders for us sadistic Packer fans! :grin:



If by Favred you mean they had one of the best seasons in franchise history and were about 32 fumbles away from making a superbowl, I guess you're right.

True......if your goal is to get CLOSE to being in a Super Bowl, then "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!!!" :thumbright:
Gravedigga  
#25 Posted : Sunday, February 7, 2010 7:27:40 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Oh don't get your panties in a twist. I'm talking about the make-or-break moves that Favre pulls on a regular basis. Yes they had an amazing season. Favre was a huge part of it. But, he ended his team's last possession of the season with an interception on a bonehead throw.


Gotta be in it to win it right?

Also, anyone who saw that game, i mean come on. Every drive was killed by a freaking fumble. Dirty hits on Favre. BS penalties at the end. If it makes people feel better to blame favre for it all, more power to ya.
Gravedigga  
#26 Posted : Sunday, February 7, 2010 7:29:57 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
They got Favred this season and they're begging to get Favred next season too? Boy, Vikings fans are seriously masochistic. It's tragic.... but it does wonders for us sadistic Packer fans! :grin:



If by Favred you mean they had one of the best seasons in franchise history and were about 32 fumbles away from making a superbowl, I guess you're right.

True......if your goal is to get CLOSE to being in a Super Bowl, then "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!!!" :thumbright:


I'm not an all or nothing kind of guy. Superbowl is great and all but I got to enjoy watching 18 games. It cant be ALL about getting a ring. It's entertainment for me. Seeing him sweep the packers means more to me than one superbowl game.
Cheesey  
#27 Posted : Sunday, February 7, 2010 8:05:34 PM(UTC)
Hey....if that is what entertains you, so be it.
I myself, enjoy my team winning a Super Bowl.
But hey.....setting your goals low makes them MUCH more attainable!
bozz_2006  
#28 Posted : Sunday, February 7, 2010 8:15:04 PM(UTC)
Are you implying that I'm blaming the loss on Favre? Hardly.
Gravedigga  
#29 Posted : Sunday, February 7, 2010 8:45:21 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Are you implying that I'm blaming the loss on Favre? Hardly.


yes
Gravedigga  
#30 Posted : Sunday, February 7, 2010 8:46:12 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Hey....if that is what entertains you, so be it.
I myself, enjoy my team winning a Super Bowl.
But hey.....setting your goals low makes them MUCH more attainable!



Oh snap, you got me
Cheesey  
#31 Posted : Sunday, February 7, 2010 8:53:52 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Hey....if that is what entertains you, so be it.
I myself, enjoy my team winning a Super Bowl.
But hey.....setting your goals low makes them MUCH more attainable!



Oh snap, you got me

Yup! Sure did!!!LOLOLOL!!!

Anyway.......Favre cost his team the game at the end. Do you disagree?
He doesn't throw that dumb pass, they have a shot at a makeable fieldgoal, right? If Longwell misses it, i'd put the blame on him. But he never got a chance, did he?
So WHO'S fault was it? WHO threw the "lame duck" pass?
He had his shot at the end to win it, by just running the 5 yards. Byt he didn't.

What makes me laugh is this: Aaron Rodgers got constantly blamed by a few for not "winning a game in the last 2 minutes". And here BF had to only NOT throw a dumb pass, and he probably gets the win. And the same ones that are holding him blameless would be bragging how BF won the game for the Queens in the last seconds.
Oh....the IRONY!!!
dhazer  
#32 Posted : Monday, February 8, 2010 2:01:26 AM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Hey....if that is what entertains you, so be it.
I myself, enjoy my team winning a Super Bowl.
But hey.....setting your goals low makes them MUCH more attainable!



Oh snap, you got me

Yup! Sure did!!!LOLOLOL!!!

Anyway.......Favre cost his team the game at the end. Do you disagree?
He doesn't throw that dumb pass, they have a shot at a makeable fieldgoal, right? If Longwell misses it, i'd put the blame on him. But he never got a chance, did he?
So WHO'S fault was it? WHO threw the "lame duck" pass?
He had his shot at the end to win it, by just running the 5 yards. Byt he didn't.

What makes me laugh is this: Aaron Rodgers got constantly blamed by a few for not "winning a game in the last 2 minutes". And here Brett Favre had to only NOT throw a dumb pass, and he probably gets the win. And the same ones that are holding him blameless would be bragging how Brett Favre won the game for the Queens in the last seconds.
Oh....the IRONY!!!


I thought we covered this Longwell said it was out of his range. Favre wasn't going to run because he nevers runs and would never run with that ankle
Gravedigga  
#33 Posted : Monday, February 8, 2010 2:39:00 AM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Hey....if that is what entertains you, so be it.
I myself, enjoy my team winning a Super Bowl.
But hey.....setting your goals low makes them MUCH more attainable!



Oh snap, you got me

Yup! Sure did!!!LOLOLOL!!!

Anyway.......Favre cost his team the game at the end. Do you disagree?


I'll answer that one with a question of my own.

Uhhm, the Packers gave up 51 points to the Cardinals. We all know this, yea yea yea whatever. Bottom line, the Packers lost to the Cardinals because of Aaron Rodgers. His horrible protection of the ball, holding on to it for too long and not protecting it is why we lost. I put the loss squarely on him. Do you disagree?

Chew that one real nice and wash it down with a coke and a smile.
Gravedigga  
#34 Posted : Monday, February 8, 2010 2:42:30 AM(UTC)
Actually, now that I think of it.......the Packers really lost that game because of Ted Thompson. I blame him for drafting Rodgers in the first place. Had he kept Favre, picked up randy moss at garage sale pricing and made a couple other additions, we may have a super bowl or 2 right now. That loss is squarely on the shoulders of Ted Thompson. Do you disagree?
doddpower  
#35 Posted : Monday, February 8, 2010 2:59:21 AM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Actually, now that I think of it.......the Packers really lost that game because of Ted Thompson. I blame him for drafting Rodgers in the first place. Had he kept Favre, picked up randy moss at garage sale pricing and made a couple other additions, we may have a super bowl or 2 right now. That loss is squarely on the shoulders of Ted Thompson. Do you disagree?




lol, that's some pretty lame bait there. Man . . . . you are dumb.


Enjoy getting Favre'd all off season again there buddy. I know I won't miss it. Not one bit.
Gravedigga  
#36 Posted : Monday, February 8, 2010 10:28:09 AM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Actually, now that I think of it.......the Packers really lost that game because of Ted Thompson. I blame him for drafting Rodgers in the first place. Had he kept Favre, picked up randy moss at garage sale pricing and made a couple other additions, we may have a super bowl or 2 right now. That loss is squarely on the shoulders of Ted Thompson. Do you disagree?




lol, that's some pretty lame bait there. Man . . . . you are dumb.




Yea, i've always been a master-baiter
Stevetarded  
#37 Posted : Monday, February 8, 2010 12:48:17 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Hey....if that is what entertains you, so be it.
I myself, enjoy my team winning a Super Bowl.
But hey.....setting your goals low makes them MUCH more attainable!



Oh snap, you got me

Yup! Sure did!!!LOLOLOL!!!

Anyway.......Favre cost his team the game at the end. Do you disagree?
He doesn't throw that dumb pass, they have a shot at a makeable fieldgoal, right? If Longwell misses it, i'd put the blame on him. But he never got a chance, did he?
So WHO'S fault was it? WHO threw the "lame duck" pass?
He had his shot at the end to win it, by just running the 5 yards. Byt he didn't.

What makes me laugh is this: Aaron Rodgers got constantly blamed by a few for not "winning a game in the last 2 minutes". And here Brett Favre had to only NOT throw a dumb pass, and he probably gets the win. And the same ones that are holding him blameless would be bragging how Brett Favre won the game for the Queens in the last seconds.
Oh....the IRONY!!!


I thought we covered this Longwell said it was out of his range. Favre wasn't going to run because he nevers runs and would never run with that ankle


He threw that interception while he was running...
Nonstopdrivel  
#38 Posted : Monday, February 8, 2010 1:05:56 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
I'm not an all or nothing kind of guy. Superbowl is great and all but I got to enjoy watching 18 games. It cant be ALL about getting a ring. It's entertainment for me.


This I agree with and have said so on this board many times.

" said: Go to Quoted Post
Seeing him sweep the packers means more to me than one superbowl game.


The juxtaposition of these words with your green-and-gold sig annoys the piss out of me.
RedSoxExcel  
#39 Posted : Monday, February 8, 2010 2:29:17 PM(UTC)
Why does someone have to "cost" someteam the game. Isn't it possible that people "contribute" to losses (some more than others)?

Brett Favre was not THE reason why the Vikings lost to the Saints. He was a SIGNIFICANT part of the reason, yes.

Aaron Rodgers was not THE reason why the Packers lost to the Cardinals. He was a SIGNIFICANT part of the reason, yes.

(Take off your Packers goggles for a second, he had a horrible first half and had the ball in his hands in OT and missed Jennings wide open and had the game winning turnover).

Peyton Manning was not THE reason why the Colts lost to the Saints. He was a SIGNIFICANT part of the reason, yes.

Its kind of silly I think that we put ENTIRE games on one person. For example, if Favre doesn't complete that third down pass after two runs at the start of the last 4th quarter drive, the Vikings punt it. Maybe the Saints score at the end and then Favre isn't as "much" to blame? Is that make any sense?

But it at the same its kind of silly to NOT put some blame on the QB that throws a costly INT that prevented a FG chance or a pick 6 in the SB or misses a wide open receiver for the OT win.

Bottom line, IMO, there is little if any, difference between Rodgers, Favre and Manning. Bottom line, Drew Brees was better than all of them this year and may be even better next year.
Pack93z  
#40 Posted : Monday, February 8, 2010 2:47:26 PM(UTC)
RedSox... in any talks that revolve around Brett in Packer/Viking nations more so than not, the talks are dripping with emotion instead of reason.

Once you get to the point where you understand that and accept it as an immovable force.. you can state your opinion on the matter from a neutral point and understand that some (both side, pro or anti Favre) are going to take your opinion and either ignore it or twist it into their angle.

Wise men, when in doubt whether to speak or to keep quiet, give themselves the benefit of the doubt, and remain silent. - Napolean Hill

It is a battle than cannot be won.

Oh and the Viking fans that are wishing it upon themselves another year of Favre and hoping for the same success..

When you are winning a war almost everything that happens can be claimed to be right and wise. - Winston Churchill.

Favre had a remarkable year.. expecting a repeat without the wheels coming off earlier isn't a healthy wager.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : Tiger?
gbguy20 (18-Jun) : hot wife and he chases old women
Nonstopdrivel (18-Jun) : Oh, and one count of felony first-degree burglary.
Nonstopdrivel (18-Jun) : He's also charged with at least one count on kidnapping and two counts of attempted rape.
nerdmann (18-Jun) : Yeah, wtf Kellen?
Nonstopdrivel (18-Jun) : Kellen Winslow accused of raping and sexually assaulting several women between the ages of 54 and 86.
Zero2Cool (15-Jun) : Today's Birthdays: Toddy (26)
Cheesey (11-Jun) : Thanks Kevin.
Cheesey (11-Jun) : Ok.
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : Alan, it's an online stream.
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : McCarthy speaks at 10am, so probably 11am for practice start.
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : McCarthy speaks at 10am, so probably 11am for practice start.
Cheesey (11-Jun) : I don’t know if I can get that station.
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : Listen to 107.5 the fan they'll tell you. I'm at airport.
Cheesey (11-Jun) : Thanks for trying WPR! I guess I’ll have to just wing it.
wpr (11-Jun) : Cheesey, The Packer's site says Nitschke Field. 12 am to 11:59 pm. I don't think they know
Cheesey (11-Jun) : Come on!! U smart guys can help me on this!
Cheesey (11-Jun) : Do any of you know what time the Packers mini camp practice is tomorrow?
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : Vince Lombardi would have been 105 today
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : If I were Owens, after reading what some of the voters have said. I'd say F YOU too. Shady process.
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : Apparently it costs the inductees a LOT of money to attend.
beast (10-Jun) : Or if Owens is avoiding all HoF activity? Or if he's trying to figure a way to make money off this. Simply saying he's not going to be there doesn't tell me enough
beast (10-Jun) : I feel as if I need more details. Owens said he's not physical showing up, but he could still give a speech via video.
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : Using 32 reporter votes is wrong.
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : They held grudges against him, and ignored his excellence on the field. Bogus shit. Political garbage.
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : Owens has a point. Absolutely garbage how voters acted, and have responded.
buckeyepackfan (9-Jun) : The HOF needs to conveniently forget to include Owen's in the ceremonies, then fake apologize after.
gbguy20 (8-Jun) : Kevin, suggestion box. move the applaud button to the bottom of the post so i don't have to scroll back up after reading a good post. same goes for quote button i suppose
Cheesey (7-Jun) : Well...I wonder what HE is protesting. Maybe that he made WAY too much money?
Nonstopdrivel (7-Jun) : Wait, what? He bitches for years about not having been selected, and now he won't attend the ceremony?
Zero2Cool (7-Jun) : Hall of Fame announces that Terrell Owens has informed them he will NOT attend the enshrinement ceremony in August.
Nonstopdrivel (5-Jun) : Looking at some of the multiyear rookie UDFA contracts made me think of it. But now I see it's standard to sign them for three years.
packerfanoutwest (4-Jun) : Tavais or Tyrell,,,what's your question/point and why?
Nonstopdrivel (3-Jun) : Probably I was thinking about Tyrell Sutton (Northwestern -- went to the Panthers).
Nonstopdrivel (3-Jun) : Apparently, I'm full of shit. The amount of money teams are allowed to spend on UDFA signing bonuses is extremely small.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2018 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 9 @ 7:20 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Sep 16 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Sep 23 @ 12:00 PM
Redskins
Sunday, Sep 30 @ 12:00 PM
BILLS
Sunday, Oct 7 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Monday, Oct 15 @ 7:15 PM
49ERS
Sunday, Oct 28 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Nov 4 @ 7:20 PM
Patriots
Sunday, Nov 11 @ 12:00 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Nov 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Sunday, Nov 25 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Dec 2 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Dec 9 @ 12:00 PM
FALCONS
Sunday, Dec 16 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Dec 23 @ 12:00 PM
Jets
Sunday, Dec 30 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

5h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Smokey

18-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

18-Jun / Around The NFL / Nonstopdrivel

16-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

16-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

16-Jun / Random Babble / Cheesey

15-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

15-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / blueleopard

15-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

14-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

13-Jun / Random Babble / wpr

13-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

12-Jun / Random Babble / CFB Risk

12-Jun / Random Babble / Cheesey

Headlines