Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
11 Pages123>»

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Zero2Cool  
#1 Posted : Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:11:08 AM(UTC)
Two leagues, One winner.

Winner of League 'Zero' will face winner of League 'Ninja'. The winner will be determined by overall point totals for the entire season, including playoff points. If there's a tie, I shoot the owner of both leagues in the face.


PackersHome Zero can hold up to 12 members.
If this is exceeded we will then add to PackersHome Ninja.
Each league will have an even amount of participants.

No changes will be made to the rules, scoring or transactions after September 6th, 2010.

Scoring breakdown can be read HERE

Roster Requirements
UserPostedImage

League Rules
UserPostedImage

Click HERE to sign up with FleaFlicker.com

PM me the email address you used and I'll send you an invite. Yes, I'm asking you to PM me. ;)


After you are logged in, you can click the "Draft" tab on the far right and click the "Rank" link to rank your players in case you miss the draft. I suggest doing this regardless if you able to attend.



I've been playing around on FleaFlicker for sometime now and I think it's smooth, easy GUI and I think you'll like it too.




Please share any thoughts or concerns with the rules, transaction settings or scoring.
TengoJuego  
#2 Posted : Sunday, April 25, 2010 2:25:12 PM(UTC)
Definitely in.
TwinkieGorilla  
#3 Posted : Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:16:40 PM(UTC)
i'd love to.
bozz_2006  
#4 Posted : Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:24:59 PM(UTC)
I'm in
Brettizzle  
#5 Posted : Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:37:15 PM(UTC)
I'm in for sure.
dhazer  
#6 Posted : Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:52:33 PM(UTC)
im out I wont play in a league with 24 teams makes for a very boring league and alot of non activity. Sorry guys we had 2 leagues last year and by 1/2 way thru the year we only had like 5 active players in one league and like 3 in the other
Zero2Cool  
#7 Posted : Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:58:04 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
im out I wont play in a league with 24 teams makes for a very boring league and alot of non activity. Sorry guys we had 2 leagues last year and by 1/2 way thru the year we only had like 5 active players in one league and like 3 in the other


24 teams is the most it would be. If we have a total of 28 teams between the leagues, then it'll be 14 team one league, 14 team another league.

I'm expecting 12-14 for a league.


The concept is what is being thrown down for a vote. Two leagues, one champion. Similar to how the NFL operates. There's a AFC Champ, NFC Champ and then the World Champ.


I was looking forward to finishing in front of you, again, oh well.
buckeyepackfan  
#8 Posted : Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:05:56 PM(UTC)
I would put the max qb and def. at 1, then an owner would have to make a decision when the bye week came for their qb and D whether to play without or release them with the chance of another team pickng the player up.
This way if a QB goes down ith injury there would always be players out there to replace the injury.

Just a suggestion.

I am editing this after reading the whole thread, if there are more than 16 teams in each league, I would strongly suggest max of 1 qb and 1 D.
Packers_Finland  
#9 Posted : Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:39:08 PM(UTC)
As long as the draft is not before August, I'm in.
tonyagnese  
#10 Posted : Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:04:20 PM(UTC)
I'd be up for this
doddpower  
#11 Posted : Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:11:30 PM(UTC)
I would probably play, although I've never been a fan of bigger leagues. As Hazer says it leads to inactivity because a few teams have mostly low profile players and can't hardly get any good players for the rest of the year. Just creates minimal interest in my past experience.

It will end up a few teams seriously playing, especially considering those guaranteed few teams that miss the draft, lol
cheeseheads123  
#12 Posted : Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:25:56 PM(UTC)
Count me in
The_Green_Ninja  
#13 Posted : Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:42:20 PM(UTC)
I found a really good website for what we are doing - www.myfantasyleague.com. Yet the damn software cost 127$. I wonder if there is anything close to this for free...
Nonstopdrivel  
#14 Posted : Sunday, April 25, 2010 6:04:17 PM(UTC)
I've no interest in playing in a league where we're limited to one QB, and I find leagues where I can't customize my defense boring. I don't understand why in most fantasy leagues, it's all about offense, and defense is tacked on as an afterthought. I find the strategy and nuances of defense just as interesting as offense. I want to be able to choose my DL, LBs, CBs, Ss, etc. I don't want to put all my eggs in one team's basket. If someone gets the Steelers' D, they might dominate all year, while I am left with the Cardinals' D and suck the entire year. It's more fair to let everyone pick and choose from among the best players available.
Kingkoopa  
#15 Posted : Sunday, April 25, 2010 6:07:11 PM(UTC)
I'd be in if you guys would want me.
dhazer  
#16 Posted : Sunday, April 25, 2010 6:16:29 PM(UTC)
Ive been playing Fantasy football since 2000 and I have found the best leagues consist of 8 teams, more than that you end up with alot of people not paying attention or just not caring. I really don't see you getting 24 guys to stay active. Like I stated we had what between 2 leagues last year maybe 10 guys stay active.

But thats just me from my experience, granted i won the huge league last year but thats because I was drafting backup players that happen to become starters. But there was no fun in it because there was no waiver because everyone was drafted.
Nonstopdrivel  
#17 Posted : Sunday, April 25, 2010 6:18:08 PM(UTC)
Only because defensive players were completely taken out of the equation. It was an offense-only league, so there was no way to compensate for a sub-par offense with a better defense.
The_Green_Ninja  
#18 Posted : Sunday, April 25, 2010 6:46:39 PM(UTC)
As much as seperate defensive players are fun, with a huge league like this it can get very confusing.
Nonstopdrivel  
#19 Posted : Sunday, April 25, 2010 7:29:32 PM(UTC)
Confusing? How is it confusing? Why are you underestimating the intelligence of the people who frequent this board? We have some great football minds on this board. If confusion is the issue, why are there no leagues in which you select a team offense and choose your defensive players? No, the reality is that offense is considered sexier than defense, so that is what these leagues cater to.

Obviously, set this up how you want to -- it's your league. To each his own. That's what makes this game great. I just personally have no interest in being stuck with a bad defense whose deficiencies I can't mitigate by choosing from among the best players available. Particularly since you're talking about limiting D and QB to one roster slot, meaning I have to bench or cut them on their bye weeks.
LambeauEast  
#20 Posted : Sunday, April 25, 2010 8:39:00 PM(UTC)
Count me out fellas, too much for my pea brain to take in.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
11 Pages123>»
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
hardrocker950 (22m) : But I put it mostlt on the offense and poor playcalling
hardrocker950 (22m) : I have seen the defense take a lot of flak over the loss..
Cheesey (1h) : Rodgers would have hit open guys. The game plan wouldn't have killed us. Less 3 and outs, and maybe some scores.
beast (2h) : Rodgers wouldn't of abandon attepting to get the ball to Nelson and Adams.
Zero2Cool (2h) : Rodgers with that game plan would have came up short too.
beast (3h) : Yeah the Packers defense got wore out... being on the field so long. Giving longer breathers than 3&out would of helped a lot IMO.
Cheesey (4h) : There wouldn't have been so many 3 and outs, thus keeping our D off the field.
Cheesey (4h) : True, but with the low score we would have had a chance with Rodgers behind center.
Zero2Cool (4h) : Brees is a damn good QB, not giving Capers a pass, not even close.
Zero2Cool (4h) : Saints kicked Packers ass with Rodgers too.
Cheesey (4h) : That's just it. Rodgers needs a DEFENSE as well. And without him, there is NO chance.
beast (6h) : Just fire everyone! Rodgers can do it without them! Hell trade for the healthy Browns players!
Cheesey (8h) : Capers needs to GO. So do players that can't cut it.
Zero2Cool (8h) : Capers presser summed up? INjuries are why we suck. (shut up, coach and adapt)
Zero2Cool (8h) : nearly crapped myself hearing dom capers talk, forgot to close the tab after mccarthy haha
Zero2Cool (8h) : McCarthy said the communication was not good enough on defense yesterday. Injuries in secondary have complicated substitution patterns.
Zero2Cool (8h) : McCarthy again says "I believe in him"... sorry, BS, we saw how you believe in him yesterday.
Zero2Cool (9h) : @The_Green_Gold Highest graded players Kenny Clark & Blake Martinez. It wouldn't be possible to grade an entire defense
Porforis (9h) : Well, it WAS clean until someone 'shouted' in it...
Zero2Cool (9h) : QB Brett Hundley when targeting a WR against Saints: 6-for-15, 54 yards.
Zero2Cool (9h) : clean?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
23m / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

27m / Green Bay Packers Talk / hardrocker950

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

22-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

22-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

22-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

Headlines