Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
3 Pages<123
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline strobl2  
#31 Posted : Monday, August 18, 2008 10:45:44 PM(UTC)
strobl2

Rank: Fresh Cheesehead

Posts: 45
Joined: 8/11/2008(UTC)


Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
We could always pick up Craig Nall again ;)


Don't be surprised if CN is signed.
He knows the system,if something would happen to AR, or if management decides that Brohm and Flynn are not ready by the start of the season, Craig Nall will be the guy to come in.

IMHO he needs to be signed now, Brohm can be back-up, Flynn can be put on the PS.

A veteran back-up qb is hard to find, CN is a perfect fit.


If you put flynn on the practice squad he'll be picked up by another team.
blank
Offline porky88  
#32 Posted : Tuesday, August 19, 2008 1:41:07 AM(UTC)
porky88

Rank: Pro Bowl

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2012Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2013Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2014

Posts: 3,040
Joined: 4/26/2007(UTC)

Applause Given: 181
Applause Received: 346

Matt Flynn has quietly put together a couple of nice pre season games. I'm not saying he's good enough to be the backup QB but he's done better than I think a lot of us would of expected out of a 7th round pick. He's been good enough to earn a roster spot on another team in my opinion.

Brohm has struggled and clearly doesn't look good enough to be the #2. You can't cut Brohm or put him on the practice squad. To much upside and he was a 2nd round pick after all. If you place Flynn on the practice squad he's going to probably get claimed off of it and put on someone's roster as a #3 quarterback.

That means the Packers might have to keep all three or simply risk losing Flynn.

Personally I think you have to make the risk. If you see a quality backup QB on the market then losing Flynn might have to be a necessary sacrifice.

He was just a 7th round pick so placing him on the practice squad is what I would do.

A guy like Luke McCown or Josh McCown would make sense to sign if they get released. Brad Johnson could be on the market if Dallas gets Chris Simms like people are suggesting. Even Chris Simms makes a little sense.

I thought the Packers intentions were to get Brohm and Flynn as many reps as they can and to do that they'd carry only 3 quarterbacks for most of training camp. Afterwards Flynn would be practice squad and Brohn to #3 and then a veteran would come in.

It turns out that plan may of backfired because the 7th round pick is playing better than the 2nd round pick. That puts the Packers in a tough spot.
Offline Zero2Cool  
#33 Posted : Tuesday, August 19, 2008 1:42:19 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Rank: Legend

Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Posts: 25,720
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI

Applause Given: 1,861
Applause Received: 2,023

Matt Flynn wouldn't make it to the Practice Squad. Someone would snap him up.

UserPostedImage
Click here and find the LATEST Packers News!
Offline Pack93z  
#34 Posted : Tuesday, August 19, 2008 1:54:34 AM(UTC)
Pack93z

Rank: Hall of Famer

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

United States
Posts: 12,755
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin

Applause Given: 381
Applause Received: 1,027

Well thought out Porky.. and I agree having your late round QB play better than expected in this case has backfired a bit.. but the pain it may cause this season should pay a nice little reward in the future.
I think when there's enough will and aggression, there's no shortage of talent either.

UserPostedImage
Offline TheEngineer  
#35 Posted : Tuesday, August 19, 2008 5:38:33 AM(UTC)
TheEngineer

Rank: 5th Round Draft Pick

Posts: 1,621
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)


Which team would be willing to put Matt Flynn on their 53 man roster?
blank
Offline Packers_Finland  
#36 Posted : Tuesday, August 19, 2008 6:06:40 AM(UTC)
Packers_Finland

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Posts: 2,623
Joined: 8/11/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 88
Applause Received: 45

I for one thought Matt would be drafted way higher than that. Like on the 4th round actually. I think we should just keep these guys and not change anything. A-Rod goes down, Flynn does his best.
This is a placeholder
Offline Greg C.  
#37 Posted : Tuesday, August 19, 2008 8:40:36 AM(UTC)
Greg C.

Rank: Pro Bowl

Posts: 3,591
Joined: 8/9/2008(UTC)
Location: Marquette, Michigan

Applause Received: 48

This is not a big concern for me. If you draft a QB in the first round, isn't it pretty much expected that he will be your backup as a rookie? Well, Brohm was drafted in the second round, but he was regarded by many as first round material and as a QB who was as NFL ready as any others last year. He's struggled a bit in training camp, but so do most rookie QB's, including Aaron Rodgers.

I would not have minded if Thompson went out and got an experienced backup, but as long as the rookies are looking okay, it's fine to go with them. You can't expect your backup QB to lead you deep into the playoffs if the starter goes down for the season. It happens sometimes, but it's rare. But you do want a backup who can win a couple games if your starter is out for part of the season. And Brohm or Flynn might be able to do that. They are still raw, but they should be improving week-by-week. It also helps that we have one of the better QB coaches in the league in Mike McCarthy.

My bottom line is that I'll take talent over experience almost any day.
blank
Offline minnypacker  
#38 Posted : Tuesday, August 19, 2008 1:21:05 PM(UTC)
minnypacker

Rank: Fresh Cheesehead

Posts: 151
Joined: 8/12/2008(UTC)


I'd be chatting with Tim Rattay. He would be a solid back up and knows the system. If Rodgers goes down, sign Rattay imediately. Craid Nall would be okay as well.
blank
Offline Packnic  
#39 Posted : Tuesday, August 19, 2008 2:02:44 PM(UTC)
Packnic

Rank: Fresh Cheesehead

Posts: 363
Joined: 6/19/2007(UTC)


forget a Vet. like Greg said. If the starter goes down so does a teams hope of a deep playoff run. might as well start grooming the successor right then and there in my opinion.


Think about this. Romo, Brady, Favre. All three were young inexperienced QB's on their teams roster that got their position because of injury to the proclaimed starter. Not one of those guys was expected to lead his team, and when they were called upon they answered the bell.

Am I saying that Brohm is Brady... no. What I am saying is that the potential of these two young QB's is higher than the potential of winning a Super Bowl with an aging vet QB who is ok with being a backup.
blank
Offline Gravedigga  
#40 Posted : Tuesday, August 19, 2008 2:57:28 PM(UTC)
Gravedigga

Rank: Fresh Cheesehead

Posts: 945
Joined: 8/16/2008(UTC)


Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
forget a Vet. like Greg said. If the starter goes down so does a teams hope of a deep playoff run. might as well start grooming the successor right then and there in my opinion.


Think about this. Romo, Brady, Favre. All three were young inexperienced QB's on their teams roster that got their position because of injury to the proclaimed starter. Not one of those guys was expected to lead his team, and when they were called upon they answered the bell.

Am I saying that Brohm is Brady... no. What I am saying is that the potential of these two young QB's is higher than the potential of winning a Super Bowl with an aging vet QB who is ok with being a backup.


I agree with this. I say, coaches need to get Flynn and Brohm ready to start a game this season. We've already invested too much in Brohm to get rid of him and Flynn is ahead of him at this point.

Whatever it takes, get extra quarterback coaches in there and get all 3 guys ready to play a game. Spend some resources training these guys. Bottom line, the season is not over but it's highly questionable if we make the playoffs even with a healthy Rodgers all season. This team is all about young guys and building for the future so really, what purpose would it serve to bring in a guy like Rattay or Cullpepper or whoever. No free agent qb out there is gonna lead us to a playoff run especially since they have no chemistry with our guys. Lets not pretend that Rattay or anyone can come in and do what Favre did last year.

Not that anyone wants to see Rodgers go down but if it happens, it would be good for all involved to have Brohm and Flynn get some game experience for evaluation purposes just in case Rodgers does not work out.

I got a chance to see Brohm play a lot in college and i was very impressed. Flynn may be ahead of him now but I think once Brohm gets "it", he could be the best guy we currently have on our roster.
--------------------------------------------
UserPostedImage


A wise man once said
---------------------------------------------
You are weak, pathetic and immature..............I would have d
Offline JNelson87  
#41 Posted : Tuesday, August 19, 2008 4:02:35 PM(UTC)
JNelson87

Rank: Fresh Cheesehead

Posts: 214
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)


IMO, This is the wrong time to get a vet QB.. even after the preseason. We should have gotten our vet QB on like the first or second week of FA. We could have gotten Gray,Rosenfels, even Ferrotte.. I'm somewhat content with what we have now, If Rodgers gets hurt. I say play Flynn over Brohm n jus let the season go down the drain. Sad to say but I think that's what we should do. Hopefully Rodgers will play the full season but I have a feeling he'll miss a couple games here n there.
UserPostedImage
Offline zombieslayer  
#42 Posted : Wednesday, August 20, 2008 5:32:46 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Most Valuable Player

Posts: 9,919
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco

Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495

Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
Which team would be willing to put Matt Flynn on their 53 man roster?


da Bears. Probably already better than Wrecks.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)

2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. Ted Thompson Mike McCarthy Aaron Rodgers
Offline zombieslayer  
#43 Posted : Wednesday, August 20, 2008 5:34:14 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Most Valuable Player

Posts: 9,919
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco

Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495

Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
forget a Vet. like Greg said. If the starter goes down so does a teams hope of a deep playoff run. might as well start grooming the successor right then and there in my opinion.


Think about this. Romo, Brady, Favre. All three were young inexperienced QB's on their teams roster that got their position because of injury to the proclaimed starter. Not one of those guys was expected to lead his team, and when they were called upon they answered the bell.

Am I saying that Brohm is Brady... no. What I am saying is that the potential of these two young QB's is higher than the potential of winning a Super Bowl with an aging vet QB who is ok with being a backup.


Agreed. If Rodgers goes down, the season's done. Might as well see what Brohm's made of and get him ready for the future.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)

2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. Ted Thompson Mike McCarthy Aaron Rodgers
Offline gakko  
#44 Posted : Wednesday, August 20, 2008 5:37:07 PM(UTC)
gakko

Rank: Practice Squad

Posts: 131
Joined: 1/17/2007(UTC)

Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 1

Flynn > Wrecks Glassman
blank
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Recent Topics
54m / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / musccy

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / voiceofreason

1h / Random Babble / porky88

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / musccy

19-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / mi_keys

19-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

19-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

19-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

18-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

18-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / millertime

18-Aug / Around The NFL / wpr

18-Aug / Random Babble / DoddPower


Tweeter

Copyright © 2006-2014 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.