Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
3 Pages<123>

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
doddpower  
#21 Posted : Wednesday, August 4, 2010 7:07:57 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
I wouldn't hold that against any man, especially since getting married is basically just making a commitment to make it rain -- with your entire paycheck -- for life.


I really feel for you and yours if this is your true outlook of what marriage is all about.. not sure if it is in tongue and cheek or not.


He and his wife have multiple sexual partners. I don't feel sorry for the bastid at all.




Monogamy is HIGHLY dated and over rated. +1 for that sir!!
Nonstopdrivel  
#22 Posted : Wednesday, August 4, 2010 7:08:05 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
not sure if it is in tongue and cheek or not.


Of course it's tongue in cheek. Almost everything I say on this site is tongue in cheek. :P

And Kevin, I'm actually off the market at the moment. I met an amazing young woman a couple months ago and haven't really been interested in looking since.
RedSoxExcel  
#23 Posted : Wednesday, August 4, 2010 7:21:55 PM(UTC)
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, if this is true, that is one of the funniest things I've ever read, CROCS?!

Of course all of this is a little TMZ and who knwos what to believe but even if its fake, I love the creativity.

Overall, my view with these kind of things is, does it affect his performance on the field? If no, who really cares other than for jokes. Tiger's stuff matters because it is clearly affecting his game. Maybe Croc-gate will throw off Favre and we'll take the North!
Nonstopdrivel  
#24 Posted : Wednesday, August 4, 2010 7:26:34 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Monogamy is HIGHLY dated and over rated. +1 for that sir!!


I've discovered that if you're up front and honest from the beginning about the fact you're not a monogamist, many women don't have much a problem with it. Most women I've talked to seem to have a pretty realistic appraisal of male nature and not only understand but also accept that not all men are hardwired for monogamy. (That doesn't mean, of course, they're necessarily willing to have a relationship with such men, though a surprising number are.)

It's the guys who hide the truth and sneak around they hate so much. That makes sense to me: gaining sexual favors under false pretenses is essentially a form of fraud.
Pack93z  
#25 Posted : Wednesday, August 4, 2010 7:42:30 PM(UTC)
The basis of a healthy marriage depends on much more than the physical.. albeit important.. a truly solid and lasting relationship/marriage is deeper than that.
doddpower  
#26 Posted : Wednesday, August 4, 2010 7:49:20 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Monogamy is HIGHLY dated and over rated. +1 for that sir!!


I've discovered that if you're up front and honest from the beginning about the fact you're not a monogamist, many women don't have much a problem with it. Most women I've talked to seem to have a pretty realistic appraisal of male nature and not only understand but also accept that not all men are hardwired for monogamy. (That doesn't mean, of course, they're necessarily willing to have a relationship with such men, though a surprising number are.)

It's the guys who hide the truth and sneak around they hate so much. That makes sense to me: gaining sexual favors under false pretenses is essentially a form of fraud.


This is true. I've been in relationships where I wasn't completely honest in the beginning and then it makes things MUCH MUCH more difficult to own up to later in the relationship. At least if you get everything out in the very beginning, and they still decide to date you, you don't have anything to hide.

I know a few woman that aren't all about monogamy. A few couples actually. I'm all about having a deep, loving, beyond physical type of relationship, but that still doesn't change the monogamy aspect of this conversation.

=)
all_about_da_packers  
#27 Posted : Wednesday, August 4, 2010 8:59:35 PM(UTC)
Getting back onto the topic (and away from this quasi-philosphical discussion on the subject of what marriage is and is not), this story is pretty funny.


However, soon after I finished reading the article today I had Leroy Butler's ambiguous words from last year play in my head, something about how "you haven't heard anything yet" in reference to Brett Favre stories.

Hmmmm.......
djcubez  
#28 Posted : Wednesday, August 4, 2010 10:54:13 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, if this is true, that is one of the funniest things I've ever read, CROCS?!

Of course all of this is a little TMZ and who knwos what to believe but even if its fake, I love the creativity.

Overall, my view with these kind of things is, does it affect his performance on the field? If no, who really cares other than for jokes. Tiger's stuff matters because it is clearly affecting his game. Maybe Croc-gate will throw off Favre and we'll take the North!


Funny you bring up Tiger Woods...
Quote:
And there's no real evidence that Favre's been horndoggin' it throughout the latter part of his NFL career. Maybe he was just lonely while he spent time in New York and sought some companionship with Sterger who, if you hadn't noticed, does resemble his wife, Deanna. One thing that is notable is this: it turns out that Brett watched last year's Super Bowl at home in Mississippi. He didn't watch it alone, however. According to one source, he watched the Saints miraculously defeat the Colts in the company of one special guest: Tiger Woods. I wonder what those guys talked about?


DeadSpin Link
Dexter_Sinister  
#29 Posted : Thursday, August 5, 2010 2:11:31 AM(UTC)
Brings new meaning to "Crocks rock".
Since69  
#30 Posted : Thursday, August 5, 2010 2:47:39 PM(UTC)
Completely uncorroborated claims from a professional attention whore. I'd rate the chances of this being true as next to nil.

But I really, really hope it is!
Cheesey  
#31 Posted : Thursday, August 5, 2010 2:53:36 PM(UTC)
Heck.....every year when Brett says "I'm retired....i have no more to give.....i'm done, really" we know that that means nothing. So what DO we believe? This goofy story? Could it be true? Sure. Is it? Who knows.
Does it matter? Nope.
Is it funny? Yup.
Only Brett knows if it's true.
Oh....and Deanna......cause SHE would "recognize" Brett, i'm SURE!
Yerko  
#32 Posted : Thursday, August 5, 2010 3:37:52 PM(UTC)
I can't speak on behalf of what happens behind the scenes of Brett/Deanna's marriage, but I can say I would never cheat on Deanna or send out wiener pics to others...ha ha.
Nonstopdrivel  
#33 Posted : Thursday, August 5, 2010 5:58:32 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Oh....and Deanna......cause SHE would "recognize" Brett, i'm SURE!


I'm not so sure of that. She strikes me as the kind of control-freak prude who only has sex in the dark.
User is suspended until 5/28/2018 11:54:40 AM(UTC) DakotaT  
#34 Posted : Thursday, August 5, 2010 6:55:26 PM(UTC)
I hope they don't "Ron Mexico" this story cause it damn funny.
Dexter_Sinister  
#35 Posted : Friday, August 6, 2010 3:09:23 AM(UTC)
Then Favre said "Oh, you said picture of my Crocks. My bad"
RedSoxExcel  
#36 Posted : Friday, August 6, 2010 3:57:18 AM(UTC)
I REALLY REALLY do not want to see these pics because I can never look at Favre again, lol. But I assume by now, she's released the pics? Is it clear its Favre, like is his face in it or something so its for sure not fake? The report I saw, she had not released the pics but that was 48 hours ago.

Also, this site is smart for waiting to release this news on the day of the Favre "retirement" news. Well timed, good move, now it has legs.
Zero2Cool  
#37 Posted : Friday, August 6, 2010 4:08:41 AM(UTC)
I think it'll get fizzled out and nothing will come from it. PFT wrote up on it, but didn't seem to give it much legitimacy of being real. And if they're not even going to try running with it, I doubt anyone will.
Nonstopdrivel  
#38 Posted : Friday, August 6, 2010 4:16:01 AM(UTC)
Amazing how much discretion an under-the-table cash settlement can buy. ;)
wils0646  
#39 Posted : Friday, August 6, 2010 2:18:49 PM(UTC)
[youtube]pGMayjMbB24&[/youtube]

I guess you really can't count this as completely credible, but this woman claims she saw the pics. Starts at about 2:16.
RedSoxExcel  
#40 Posted : Friday, August 6, 2010 2:38:04 PM(UTC)
Don't you guys see how this all works! Everything fits. Favre finds out that this chick is going to release these pics. Favre must devise a plan to come up with extra cash because 13 million isn't enough. So he makes the threat to retire to get more cash. He gets an extra $4 million and gives it to this chick!
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
DarkaneRules (1h) : looking forward to the long week to recover after thursday. coming out with a win would be a bonus
beast (1h) : MM said those that aren't practicing today (I believe Bulaga/House) probably aren't gonna play against the Bears.
beast (1h) : Panky too... who is listed as a G/T, but I think he was 3rd string LT in the preseason
uffda udfa (1h) : Bakh is back at practice and is in line to play. Bulaga and John the only other T's. McCray?
Mucky Tundra (2h) : So uh, do we actually have any OTs left? Like, real ones and not practice squad fodder?
Zero2Cool (4h) : Vince Lombardi, on protesters, from 1970: ‘They have a right to say what they want, and it behooves us to listen.’
uffda udfa (4h) : Kyle Murphy to IR for Ulrick John
Zero2Cool (8h) : Bass Pro's $4 billion acquisition of Cabela's is complete, but it leaves a small western Nebraska town in suspense:
Zero2Cool (8h) : "Aaron Rodgers is keeping Mike McCarthy employed the same way AJ Green keeps Andy Dalton employed.” - @LeBatardShow
Zero2Cool (10h) : King, Kendricks and Bennett.
gbguy20 (10h) : which packers sat during the anthem?
Porforis (21h) : Noooo, not Goode!
Zero2Cool (25-Sep) : The #Packers place Brett Goode on IR and re-sign LS Taybor Pepper
Zero2Cool (25-Sep) : Packers signing Ulrick John to active roster off Cardinals practice squad today, according to a source
Porforis (25-Sep) : Agreed. HOW ABOUT THEM PACKERS?!
greengold (25-Sep) : i.e. keep politics out of football!
greengold (25-Sep) : Let the players who want to honor the flag along with the vast majority of fans do so. Don't celebrate those who don't.
greengold (25-Sep) : Rule, practice, suggestion? Whatever supposedly changed in 2009. Go back to the way it was. Let the players who want to honor the flag an
Zero2Cool (25-Sep) : Roethlisberger regrets Steelers' decision to skip anthem
Zero2Cool (25-Sep) : Chmura: "#Packers by 10-14. The Bears already played their good game. I have absolutely no fear for Thursday's game."
Zero2Cool (25-Sep) : The NFL Rulebook does not mention the anthem.
Zero2Cool (25-Sep) : There is no rule.
greengold (25-Sep) : The NFL needs to enforce the rule or get rid of the rule.
greengold (25-Sep) : Players stood for the National Anthem long before 2009. There just was no *rule* requiring them to stand.
steveishere (25-Sep) : How many fans are in the restroom taking a dump or in line for nachos during anthem. Same people probably mad at players
Porforis (25-Sep) : Yup.
Zero2Cool (25-Sep) : You know why
Porforis (25-Sep) : NFL players weren't even on the field for the anthem until 2009 - Why all of a sudden is not participating such a big deal?
Zero2Cool (25-Sep) : Former Seahawks/Packers HC Mike Holmgren on President Trump: “He’s uninformed”.
steveishere (25-Sep) : Funny how you were apparently fine with seeing guys who abuse women or do/sell drugs out there but god forbid they kneel lol
steveishere (25-Sep) : you had 1 foot out the door since Favre left anyways... bye
dhazer (25-Sep) : well so much for watching Packer games, I saw the 3 sitting on the bench and i turned the channel to the race, No more NFL games for me
beast (25-Sep) : Who are the longshots? Jags? Saints? Redskins? and who?
SINCITYCHEEZE (25-Sep) : Buckeye closing in on 4 Longshots in Pickem today....Son you need to hook me up we could make a killing on some parlays next weekend. Lol
beast (25-Sep) : Bears ran it 60% of the time...
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Barfarn

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Barfarn

2h / Around The NFL / PackFanWithTwins

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

6h / Around The NFL / Smokey

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

25-Sep / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

Headlines