Welcome Guest! You can login or register.
Login or Register.
#21
Posted
:
Wednesday, August 4, 2010 7:07:57 PM(UTC)
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA
Applause Given: 3,741
Applause Received: 1,111
" said: 
" said: " said: I wouldn't hold that against any man, especially since getting married is basically just making a commitment to make it rain -- with your entire paycheck -- for life.
I really feel for you and yours if this is your true outlook of what marriage is all about.. not sure if it is in tongue and cheek or not.
He and his wife have multiple sexual partners. I don't feel sorry for the bastid at all.
Monogamy is HIGHLY dated and over rated. +1 for that sir!!
#22
Posted
:
Wednesday, August 4, 2010 7:08:05 PM(UTC)
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Location: Stratford, New Jersey
Applause Given: 505
Applause Received: 538
" said: not sure if it is in tongue and cheek or not.
Of course it's tongue in cheek. Almost everything I say on this site is tongue in cheek. :P
And Kevin, I'm actually off the market at the moment. I met an amazing young woman a couple months ago and haven't really been interested in looking since.
#23
Posted
:
Wednesday, August 4, 2010 7:21:55 PM(UTC)
Joined: 9/30/2007(UTC)
Applause Received: 3
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, if this is true, that is one of the funniest things I've ever read, CROCS?!
Of course all of this is a little TMZ and who knwos what to believe but even if its fake, I love the creativity.
Overall, my view with these kind of things is, does it affect his performance on the field? If no, who really cares other than for jokes. Tiger's stuff matters because it is clearly affecting his game. Maybe Croc-gate will throw off Favre and we'll take the North!
#24
Posted
:
Wednesday, August 4, 2010 7:26:34 PM(UTC)
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Location: Stratford, New Jersey
Applause Given: 505
Applause Received: 538
" said: Monogamy is HIGHLY dated and over rated. +1 for that sir!!
I've discovered that if you're up front and honest from the beginning about the fact you're not a monogamist, many women don't have much a problem with it. Most women I've talked to seem to have a pretty realistic appraisal of male nature and not only understand but also accept that not all men are hardwired for monogamy. (That doesn't mean, of course, they're necessarily willing to have a relationship with such men, though a surprising number are.)
It's the guys who hide the truth and sneak around they hate so much. That makes sense to me: gaining sexual favors under false pretenses is essentially a form of fraud.
#25
Posted
:
Wednesday, August 4, 2010 7:42:30 PM(UTC)
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Applause Given: 444
Applause Received: 1,252
The basis of a healthy marriage depends on much more than the physical.. albeit important.. a truly solid and lasting relationship/marriage is deeper than that.
#26
Posted
:
Wednesday, August 4, 2010 7:49:20 PM(UTC)
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA
Applause Given: 3,741
Applause Received: 1,111
" said: " said: Monogamy is HIGHLY dated and over rated. +1 for that sir!!
I've discovered that if you're up front and honest from the beginning about the fact you're not a monogamist, many women don't have much a problem with it. Most women I've talked to seem to have a pretty realistic appraisal of male nature and not only understand but also accept that not all men are hardwired for monogamy. (That doesn't mean, of course, they're necessarily willing to have a relationship with such men, though a surprising number are.)
It's the guys who hide the truth and sneak around they hate so much. That makes sense to me: gaining sexual favors under false pretenses is essentially a form of fraud.
This is true. I've been in relationships where I wasn't completely honest in the beginning and then it makes things MUCH MUCH more difficult to own up to later in the relationship. At least if you get everything out in the very beginning, and they still decide to date you, you don't have anything to hide.
I know a few woman that aren't all about monogamy. A few couples actually. I'm all about having a deep, loving, beyond physical type of relationship, but that still doesn't change the monogamy aspect of this conversation.
=)
#27
Posted
:
Wednesday, August 4, 2010 8:59:35 PM(UTC)
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 24
Applause Received: 144
Getting back onto the topic (and away from this quasi-philosphical discussion on the subject of what marriage is and is not), this story is pretty funny.
However, soon after I finished reading the article today I had Leroy Butler's ambiguous words from last year play in my head, something about how "you haven't heard anything yet" in reference to Brett Favre stories.
Hmmmm.......
#28
Posted
:
Wednesday, August 4, 2010 10:54:13 PM(UTC)
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Madison
Applause Given: 11
Applause Received: 17
" said: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, if this is true, that is one of the funniest things I've ever read, CROCS?!
Of course all of this is a little TMZ and who knwos what to believe but even if its fake, I love the creativity.
Overall, my view with these kind of things is, does it affect his performance on the field? If no, who really cares other than for jokes. Tiger's stuff matters because it is clearly affecting his game. Maybe Croc-gate will throw off Favre and we'll take the North!
Funny you bring up Tiger Woods...
Quote:And there's no real evidence that Favre's been horndoggin' it throughout the latter part of his NFL career. Maybe he was just lonely while he spent time in New York and sought some companionship with Sterger who, if you hadn't noticed, does resemble his wife, Deanna. One thing that is notable is this: it turns out that Brett watched last year's Super Bowl at home in Mississippi. He didn't watch it alone, however. According to one source, he watched the Saints miraculously defeat the Colts in the company of one special guest: Tiger Woods. I wonder what those guys talked about?
DeadSpin Link
#29
Posted
:
Thursday, August 5, 2010 2:11:31 AM(UTC)
Joined: 6/12/2010(UTC)
Applause Given: 292
Applause Received: 266
Brings new meaning to "Crocks rock".
#30
Posted
:
Thursday, August 5, 2010 2:47:39 PM(UTC)
Joined: 11/2/2006(UTC)
Applause Given: 83
Applause Received: 83
Completely uncorroborated claims from a professional attention whore. I'd rate the chances of this being true as next to nil.
But I really, really hope it is!
#31
Posted
:
Thursday, August 5, 2010 2:53:36 PM(UTC)
Joined: 7/28/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1,168
Applause Received: 1,297
Heck.....every year when Brett says "I'm retired....i have no more to give.....i'm done, really" we know that that means nothing. So what DO we believe? This goofy story? Could it be true? Sure. Is it? Who knows.
Does it matter? Nope.
Is it funny? Yup.
Only Brett knows if it's true.
Oh....and Deanna......cause SHE would "recognize" Brett, i'm SURE!
#32
Posted
:
Thursday, August 5, 2010 3:37:52 PM(UTC)
Joined: 10/15/2008(UTC)
Location: Chicago, IL
Applause Given: 219
Applause Received: 395
I can't speak on behalf of what happens behind the scenes of Brett/Deanna's marriage, but I can say I would never cheat on Deanna or send out wiener pics to others...ha ha.
#33
Posted
:
Thursday, August 5, 2010 5:58:32 PM(UTC)
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Location: Stratford, New Jersey
Applause Given: 505
Applause Received: 538
" said: Oh....and Deanna......cause SHE would "recognize" Brett, i'm SURE!
I'm not so sure of that. She strikes me as the kind of control-freak prude who only has sex in the dark.
#34
Posted
:
Thursday, August 5, 2010 6:55:26 PM(UTC)
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1,069
Applause Received: 2,136
I hope they don't "Ron Mexico" this story cause it damn funny.
#35
Posted
:
Friday, August 6, 2010 3:09:23 AM(UTC)
Joined: 6/12/2010(UTC)
Applause Given: 292
Applause Received: 266
Then Favre said "Oh, you said picture of my Crocks. My bad"
#36
Posted
:
Friday, August 6, 2010 3:57:18 AM(UTC)
Joined: 9/30/2007(UTC)
Applause Received: 3
I REALLY REALLY do not want to see these pics because I can never look at Favre again, lol. But I assume by now, she's released the pics? Is it clear its Favre, like is his face in it or something so its for sure not fake? The report I saw, she had not released the pics but that was 48 hours ago.
Also, this site is smart for waiting to release this news on the day of the Favre "retirement" news. Well timed, good move, now it has legs.
#37
Posted
:
Friday, August 6, 2010 4:08:41 AM(UTC)
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,803
Applause Received: 4,985
I think it'll get fizzled out and nothing will come from it. PFT wrote up on it, but didn't seem to give it much legitimacy of being real. And if they're not even going to try running with it, I doubt anyone will.
#38
Posted
:
Friday, August 6, 2010 4:16:01 AM(UTC)
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Location: Stratford, New Jersey
Applause Given: 505
Applause Received: 538
Amazing how much discretion an under-the-table cash settlement can buy. ;)
#39
Posted
:
Friday, August 6, 2010 2:18:49 PM(UTC)
Joined: 12/15/2006(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 4
[youtube]pGMayjMbB24&[/youtube]
I guess you really can't count this as completely credible, but this woman claims she saw the pics. Starts at about 2:16.
#40
Posted
:
Friday, August 6, 2010 2:38:04 PM(UTC)
Joined: 9/30/2007(UTC)
Applause Received: 3
Don't you guys see how this all works! Everything fits. Favre finds out that this chick is going to release these pics. Favre must devise a plan to come up with extra cash because 13 million isn't enough. So he makes the threat to retire to get more cash. He gets an extra $4 million and gives it to this chick!
Users browsing this topic
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.