Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
21 Pages«<1718192021>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Wade  
#181 Posted : Thursday, August 12, 2010 9:52:56 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 8/1/2009(UTC)
Location: nowhere of importance
Applause Given: 891
Applause Received: 923
Re: subjunctive.

Jessica Biel likes some men enough to have sex with them. I'm a man. I could someday have sex with Jessica Biel.

Major and minor premise I would argue are true statements. They are also necessary conditions for the "could" in the third statement being accurate.

They are, however, not sufficient conditions for the "could" becoming "will".

If Voldemort lies, he shows himself capable of lying. That's all Rourke is saying. Right?
Offline RedSoxExcel  
#182 Posted : Thursday, August 12, 2010 9:53:21 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 9/30/2007(UTC)
Applause Received: 3
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
The theory must be


Your saying it's so doesn't make it so.


Ok, what is the theory, I'm curious.
Offline Dexter_Sinister  
#183 Posted : Friday, August 13, 2010 1:36:55 AM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 6/12/2010(UTC)
Applause Given: 292
Applause Received: 266
That Favre has been proven to be dishonest in this instance changes his credibility. Or for Favre apologists it takes away plausible deniability.

The defenders have always said the it is Favre's word agains Glazer's in the Lionsgate story. Glazer put his employer's butts on the line with his story and if he lied, he and they could be sued. His claim that Favre went to several of the Packers opponents and divulged privileged information is actually against trade secret laws. Opponents including the Lions, who went on record, and some that didn't. (I read an article in a legal journal about it) Favre could sue if the story were a fabrication. Glazer stood by the story and Favre denied it. Since this is a more significant issue than some leaked texts and Favre was obviously willing to lie about them. The conclusion could be reached that Favre did indeed leak his reads and keys to several of the Packers opponents in '08. Sabotaging them and Rodgers in his first year.

Since Bevel admitted that the Vikings were also in contact with Favre before his demand to be reinstated, one could also infer that they were one of the other off the record teams Favre tried to help beat the Packers.

That is why Favre's credibility matters. Nothing he claims can be believed as true. Not that is is believed to be a lie, but not credible. So if someone says Favre is not telling the truth. The conclusion is that unless the other party has proven to be as big of a liar as Favre, it is credible.
Offline Zero2Cool  
#184 Posted : Friday, August 13, 2010 1:44:32 AM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,500
Applause Received: 4,044
You pricks take me off ignore. As I've said before, Brett is a known liar, it was documented on this very site!!!

Get over it, dayum!
Offline Pack93z  
#185 Posted : Friday, August 13, 2010 1:57:24 AM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

United States
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Applause Given: 437
Applause Received: 1,233
" said: Go to Quoted Post
You pricks take me off ignore. As I've said before, Brett is a known liar, it was documented on this very site!!!

Get over it, dayum!


Why whine about it.. you have a Brett section let this shit play out.. sounds like just bitching to bitch about something constantly trying to stop the Brett debates. ;)

Being a dick aside.. lol.

Brett section, his own damn section speaks volume about the effect he has on people.. no other player has a dedicated section.. so what else is expected past nonstop debates about him?
Offline Pack93z  
#186 Posted : Friday, August 13, 2010 2:16:06 AM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

United States
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Applause Given: 437
Applause Received: 1,233
And BTW.. so you know.. I am mostly giving you grief.. I know the intended purpose for this section.. but much like these debates over his actions of the past and present.. it may be time to get past it.
Offline longtimefan  
#187 Posted : Friday, August 13, 2010 2:45:34 AM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 11/30/2006(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 21
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Anyone is capable of lying about anything (including Ted Thompson/Mike McCarthy), so thats not the theory. The theory must be that Favre is more likely to have lied about 2008 because of what he said about these texts in 2010.

I just think if LT is on this mission to discredit Favre about this texts in order to lead into something about the 2008 off season, I think that has many holes. You don't know people's motivations, thats my whole point. What if Favre was told by his Coach to not mention the texts, is that still mean you can draw something about 2008?

The reverse to all this is that Ted Thompson/Mike McCarthy are less likely to lie about 2008 because they didn't lie about these text messages. I just don't get it, I think its all a bit of a stretch.


Nope read what Non has said...He has said it perfectly, but yet "people" cant even put the IDEA in their heads that maybe Brett COULD have done something...

Even hypothetical situations people still will say Brett can't do that or wont..

That is unbelievable
Offline Formo  
#188 Posted : Friday, August 13, 2010 6:52:56 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 8/12/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 216
Applause Received: 159
Great points Nonstop and LTF bring up.. I think RedSox brings up just as valid points. In fact, he brings more objective points. Not because he's 'defending' Favre.. but with the 'woulda coulda' debate.

Wow.. Agreeing with a BoSox fan is almost as hard as siding with a Yankees fan.. And to add he's a Puker fan?! BLEH!
Offline RedSoxExcel  
#189 Posted : Friday, August 13, 2010 1:39:22 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 9/30/2007(UTC)
Applause Received: 3
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Anyone is capable of lying about anything (including Ted Thompson/Mike McCarthy), so thats not the theory. The theory must be that Favre is more likely to have lied about 2008 because of what he said about these texts in 2010.

I just think if LT is on this mission to discredit Favre about this texts in order to lead into something about the 2008 off season, I think that has many holes. You don't know people's motivations, thats my whole point. What if Favre was told by his Coach to not mention the texts, is that still mean you can draw something about 2008?

The reverse to all this is that Ted Thompson/Mike McCarthy are less likely to lie about 2008 because they didn't lie about these text messages. I just don't get it, I think its all a bit of a stretch.


Nope read what Non has said...He has said it perfectly, but yet "people" cant even put the IDEA in their heads that maybe Brett COULD have done something...

Even hypothetical situations people still will say Brett can't do that or wont..

That is unbelievable


Where did I say that hypothetically Favre couldn't have lied? I DON'T CARE IF HE LIES OR NOT. I do not like Favre for being a great human being. I don't care. All I am saying is that even IF IF IF IF (so your in a subjunctive mood or whatever) Favre lied, it does not necessarilymake any inference about 2008. You don't know why he lied and most importantly EVERY SINGLE F'N PERSON (including your beloved TT/MM) have lied at some point.

All I was saying was that I don't understand the point of throwing out all these hypotheticals. Why don't you just want until you have facts, like proof of what the texts said or the motivation behind lying, etc. Tahts its, thats my point. Right now, you are all making inferences about him based on theories. Why do you care so much and why don't you just wait until you have solid information.

Its like the whole thing with that Jets cheerleader or whatever. Everyone jumped all over it and guess what, nothing, no proof yet. Its like the Schism thing, its like Ed Werder's reports last year, etc.

All I am saying is taking everything you read about Favre with a grain of salt. Or a pound of salt.
Offline RedSoxExcel  
#190 Posted : Friday, August 13, 2010 1:42:26 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 9/30/2007(UTC)
Applause Received: 3
" said: Go to Quoted Post
You pricks take me off ignore. As I've said before, Brett is a known liar, it was documented on this very site!!!

Get over it, dayum!


Thats my whole point, if you are bringing up all these hypotheticals to prove that Favre has the capability of lying, all of you are making an underlying assumption that FAVRE HAS NEVER BEEN PROVEN TO HAVE BEEN CAPABLE OF LYING BEFORE!

If the last 6 pages of this thread are about hypotheticals to say that Favre is capable of lying, then I am very sad that I even posted in this thread. Everyone is capable of lying and if this text thing is the thing that proves to you that Favre is capable of lying, thats lame, I'm sure you can do better (and probably have done so in the past).
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
21 Pages«<1718192021>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
uffda udfa (3h) : Favorite GM candidate... Wolf or Gutekunst?
uffda udfa (3h) : I'd rather sit them than play them too compromised.
uffda udfa (3h) : Yeah, Z. More pressure cooker talk and smoked turkeys.
Zero2Cool (3h) : If this were a regular-season game, Nelson, Adams and Allison probably would not play, MM says.
Smokey (4h) : Mason Crosby is ill, hope it's not the Flu.
Smokey (4h) : Great, can we move past that story and get back to the Atlanta game ?
Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers exec Eliot Wolf has withdrawn his name for 49ers' GM job, as @TomPelissero reported. He didn't feel it was the right time.
TheKanataThrilla (5h) : We'll just have to score TDs then.
Zero2Cool (5h) : That's what we know.
Zero2Cool (5h) : Crosby, Mason K Illness
Smokey (6h) : Is He ill or not ?
Smokey (6h) : Raiderpride asked, "Anyone know what Crosby's illness is?"
Zero2Cool (6h) : Davante Adams expected to play- KFFL
Porforis (7h) : Alright, my opinion on Jordy has changed. If he's medically cleared to play, play him.
hardrocker950 (8h) : By Sunday we won't have any WRs
Zero2Cool (9h) : Geronimo hamstring, Janis quad. BEAUTIFUL.
Smokey (9h) : Mason Crosby, is his health OK ?
Smokey (9h) : Hello
FLORIDA PACKER88 (9h) : Davis, G-Mo, and Janis will need to step up, but all three did score last time we played ATL!
FLORIDA PACKER88 (9h) : Does Janis become a playoff hero second year in a row? Looks we're gonna have to find out either way regardless. Thank God for a healthy Cob
Smokey (9h) : Is Mason Crosby's health OK ?
Smokey (10h) : What's in your Coffee ?
uffda udfa (22h) : Sit Davante if he has a bad ankle. We remember 2015.
uffda udfa (22h) : Davante is not going to practice until SAT at earliest.
uffda udfa (22h) : Davante and Jordy may be inactive at ATL.
Smokey (23h) : ROFL !!
Cheesey (23h) : The Packers SMOKED the COWBOYS!!!LOL!
Smokey (23h) : Ever Smoke a Turkey, it takes lots of rolling papers. LOL
Smokey (23h) : Thanks Cheesey. LOL
Cheesey (23h) : Smokey, it was chicken gizzards (and hearts)!
Cheesey (23h) : So let's just start by saying, I love you!
Zero2Cool (18-Jan) : Great, Geronimo Allison is on the injury report.
Zero2Cool (18-Jan) : Most irritating tweets/tweet starters: 1) This >>> 2) Yep, ...3) There it is.... 4) Not good 5) XX doing XX things 6) Because xxx
Zero2Cool (18-Jan) : Belichick when asked to discuss the importance of having the home crowd behind them: “I don’t know. Go ask Dallas and Kansas City.” …Oof.
Smokey (18-Jan) : BRAVO, ZERO !
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
8m / Green Bay Packers Talk / The_Green_Ninja

18m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Dulak

34m / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

52m / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

2h / Around The NFL / wpr

2h / Around The NFL / wpr

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

4h / Around The NFL / Smokey

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa


Packers Headlines