Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
3 Pages<123>

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
hos327  
#21 Posted : Tuesday, December 7, 2010 2:44:54 PM(UTC)
Great here! I never noticed many probs before though, either.
Nonstopdrivel  
#22 Posted : Tuesday, December 7, 2010 2:57:44 PM(UTC)
I've noticed some hotlinks to outside-hosted graphics have been working sporadically in the past few days. Does this new host frown upon hotlinking?
Pack93z  
#23 Posted : Tuesday, December 7, 2010 3:13:04 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
I've noticed some hotlinks to outside-hosted graphics have been working sporadically in the past few days. Does this new host frown upon hotlinking?


I haven't noticed this issue at all..
Zero2Cool  
#24 Posted : Tuesday, December 7, 2010 3:13:15 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
I've noticed some hotlinks to outside-hosted graphics have been working sporadically in the past few days. Does this new host frown upon hotlinking?


Doubtful. But that would be great. I very much dislike members linking their sigs/avatars from other sites. It slows PH.com down.

Any graphic can be uploaded via attachment.
Pack93z  
#25 Posted : Tuesday, December 7, 2010 3:51:56 PM(UTC)
Well.. then make it more user friendly to upload pictures.. example.. I just uploaded a picture to my gallery.. I now have to wait for approval.. other sites I can upload it without a delay. This feature is about as close to site like Photobucket... however they handle the admin post upload by deleting unsuitable content. But it doesn't restrict those that stay within the guidelines.

Other options require you to add the image to a thread.. which then you can link from.. but that seems cumbersome.

Of course I had a different setup.. but I don't think that is a global option for all users to utilize.

Not bitchin'.. just stating why some choose alternative sites to upload. It is simply faster and easier.
Wade  
#26 Posted : Tuesday, December 7, 2010 4:04:18 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
I've noticed some hotlinks to outside-hosted graphics have been working sporadically in the past few days. Does this new host frown upon hotlinking?


Doubtful. But that would be great. I very much dislike members linking their sigs/avatars from other sites. It slows PackersHome.com down.

Any graphic can be uploaded via attachment.


Does this refer to me? I thought i asked if it was ok when i first joined, but i can disable my sig.
Pack93z  
#27 Posted : Tuesday, December 7, 2010 4:07:01 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
I've noticed some hotlinks to outside-hosted graphics have been working sporadically in the past few days. Does this new host frown upon hotlinking?


Doubtful. But that would be great. I very much dislike members linking their sigs/avatars from other sites. It slows PackersHome.com down.

Any graphic can be uploaded via attachment.


Does this refer to me? I thought i asked if it was ok when i first joined, but i can disable my sig.


Actually Wade.. it is folks that host graphics at say a photobucket/imageshack and link them back to here. Then this site sort of becomes a slave to their bandwidth availability..
Zero2Cool  
#28 Posted : Tuesday, December 7, 2010 4:29:03 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Well.. then make it more user friendly to upload pictures.. example.. I just uploaded a picture to my gallery.. I now have to wait for approval.. other sites I can upload it without a delay. This feature is about as close to site like Photobucket... however they handle the admin post upload by deleting unsuitable content. But it doesn't restrict those that stay within the guidelines.

Other options require you to add the image to a thread.. which then you can link from.. but that seems cumbersome.

Of course I had a different setup.. but I don't think that is a global option for all users to utilize.

Not bitchin'.. just stating why some choose alternative sites to upload. It is simply faster and easier.


It's easier to navigate to another site, upload it, then get the link rather than creating a thread, add attachment and use the link from that? I think that's far easier.

The coppermine deal, just a test thing that I forgot to disable long time ago and when I remembered it seen lots of people using it so just left it.

There's no auto approve option for it, sadly.
Pack93z  
#29 Posted : Tuesday, December 7, 2010 4:35:02 PM(UTC)
Some of us use that single say photobucket account for hosting past PH.com.

But if you desire.. I will create a thread, upload my graphics and link them from there. ;)

See.. I used the coppermine feature. lol.

UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool  
#30 Posted : Tuesday, December 7, 2010 4:40:27 PM(UTC)
Ha. It's not a BIG deal, it's just a preference of mine, that's all. If it was inherently and issue, I'd have posted a user friendly method for uploading graphics.
Nonstopdrivel  
#31 Posted : Tuesday, December 7, 2010 5:47:40 PM(UTC)
I wasn't referring to signatures and avatars specifically. I don't see any reason to hotlink those, since all you have to do is upload it using the appropriate menu. I was referring to graphics in threads that are hotlinked using the [img] tag. Some of them haven't been showing up periodically.

EDIT: Wow, I just now realized for the first time that MY signature graphic is hosted at Photobucket. It never occurred to me to check before. Now I feel dumb.
Pack93z  
#32 Posted : Tuesday, December 7, 2010 6:01:38 PM(UTC)
Avatar... no problem.. a convinent way to post and host.

Signature.. well a bit more cumbersome.. however with a dedicated thread, as such, to dump them in..

It isn't terrible. Well that is now that the host is snappy again.. that is. ;)
Zero2Cool  
#33 Posted : Tuesday, December 7, 2010 6:08:09 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
I wasn't referring to signatures and avatars specifically. I don't see any reason to hotlink those, since all you have to do is upload it using the appropriate menu. I was referring to graphics in threads that are hotlinked using the [img] tag. Some of them haven't been showing up periodically.

EDIT: Wow, I just now realized for the first time that MY signature graphic is hosted at Photobucket. It never occurred to me to check before. Now I feel dumb.


If a hotlinked graphic doesn't show up, I don't think that's an issue with PH.com rather more possibly the item has a refusal for allowance of being hotlinked.
Nonstopdrivel  
#34 Posted : Tuesday, December 7, 2010 10:22:10 PM(UTC)
Since the change to the new host the subdomain http://forum.packershome.com no longer maps to the forum.
Zero2Cool  
#35 Posted : Tuesday, December 7, 2010 10:23:32 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Since the change to the new host the subdomain http://forum.packershome.com no longer maps to the forum.


I'll fix this when I get home.
hos327  
#36 Posted : Wednesday, December 15, 2010 6:36:50 AM(UTC)
Thanks for the update. Was wondering what the status was.
Zero2Cool  
#37 Posted : Saturday, December 25, 2010 10:21:37 PM(UTC)
I've been cleaning the database and changing a few things all day ... apparently disabling the user agents yields that response.
Zero2Cool  
#38 Posted : Monday, October 24, 2011 7:18:23 PM(UTC)
1and1.com - 200MB database limit and we're near 500MB
GoDaddy.com - 200MB database limit and has more than 4,000 websites on a server
Arvixe.com - Inconsistent and unreliable customer service, if they even answer.

Must check these two out.
http://www.winhost.com/windows-hosting-plans.aspx
https://www.discountasp.net/features.aspx
http://www.hostgator.com/windows-hosting.shtml - More Info
Nonstopdrivel  
#39 Posted : Monday, October 24, 2011 7:41:12 PM(UTC)
GoDaddy is not an option for a forum, as you well know.

I liked DreamHost when I was with them.
rabidgopher04  
#40 Posted : Monday, October 24, 2011 8:02:36 PM(UTC)
I'd recommend my host, Site5, but you are dependent upon Windows with the forum software you chose.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
hardrocker950 (44m) : But I put it mostlt on the offense and poor playcalling
hardrocker950 (45m) : I have seen the defense take a lot of flak over the loss..
Cheesey (1h) : Rodgers would have hit open guys. The game plan wouldn't have killed us. Less 3 and outs, and maybe some scores.
beast (2h) : Rodgers wouldn't of abandon attepting to get the ball to Nelson and Adams.
Zero2Cool (2h) : Rodgers with that game plan would have came up short too.
beast (3h) : Yeah the Packers defense got wore out... being on the field so long. Giving longer breathers than 3&out would of helped a lot IMO.
Cheesey (4h) : There wouldn't have been so many 3 and outs, thus keeping our D off the field.
Cheesey (4h) : True, but with the low score we would have had a chance with Rodgers behind center.
Zero2Cool (4h) : Brees is a damn good QB, not giving Capers a pass, not even close.
Zero2Cool (4h) : Saints kicked Packers ass with Rodgers too.
Cheesey (5h) : That's just it. Rodgers needs a DEFENSE as well. And without him, there is NO chance.
beast (6h) : Just fire everyone! Rodgers can do it without them! Hell trade for the healthy Browns players!
Cheesey (8h) : Capers needs to GO. So do players that can't cut it.
Zero2Cool (9h) : Capers presser summed up? INjuries are why we suck. (shut up, coach and adapt)
Zero2Cool (9h) : nearly crapped myself hearing dom capers talk, forgot to close the tab after mccarthy haha
Zero2Cool (9h) : McCarthy said the communication was not good enough on defense yesterday. Injuries in secondary have complicated substitution patterns.
Zero2Cool (9h) : McCarthy again says "I believe in him"... sorry, BS, we saw how you believe in him yesterday.
Zero2Cool (9h) : @The_Green_Gold Highest graded players Kenny Clark & Blake Martinez. It wouldn't be possible to grade an entire defense
Porforis (10h) : Well, it WAS clean until someone 'shouted' in it...
Zero2Cool (10h) : QB Brett Hundley when targeting a WR against Saints: 6-for-15, 54 yards.
Zero2Cool (10h) : clean?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
46m / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

49m / Green Bay Packers Talk / hardrocker950

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

22-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

22-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

22-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

Headlines