Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Since69  
#1 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 3:22:04 PM(UTC)
I hate seeing any team lose an overtime game without ever getting the chance to touch the ball in the extra period - moreso when it happens to our beloved Packers. Ridiculous that two teams play each other to a standstill for 60 minutes only to have the game decided by a coin toss. Without getting too college-like, I think I can make overtime a little more fair.

Currently existing overtime rules would still apply, but after one team scores, the other team gets one (and only one) possession to try and win. They can't tie - say, by responding to a field goal with one of their own - they have to win.

Assume that Team A is the first to score in overtime:
- If Team A settled for a field goal, Team B can win with a touchdown.
- If Team A scored a touchdown and kicked an extra point, then Team B would need a TD of their own and a successful 2-point conversion.
- If Team A scored a TD and converted a 2-pointer, the game would end immediately, because there's no chance that Team B could score more points with only one possession.

How much more crucial did offensive overtime decisions just get? How much more interesting (and fair) did overtime itself just get?

Whaddya think?
longtimefan  
#2 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 3:27:37 PM(UTC)
your idea is good, but you still have the issue of team B not being able to try to come back with your last option of A with a Td and 2 pointer

that is not different then what we have now, a coin toss is the fate of Team B
McPack  
#3 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 3:54:03 PM(UTC)
I'd prefer just about anything over what we have now...a college style overtime, a 5 minute quarter, a jousting match between the coaches. Both teams deserve an equal shot. It shouldn't be decided by the luck of the coin toss.
El3ment12  
#4 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 3:54:27 PM(UTC)
I say make it like college. Its retarded how the packers had no chance on offense. Think About it. If they get a return to about the 30, then all they have to do is go about 40 yards. Thats it, then they win. Real fair eh?..
flep  
#5 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 4:14:55 PM(UTC)
Sorry to put a dampener on this but it's the rules.

If we had won the toss, driven down field and scored would this thread exist.?

We couldn't have cared less for Tennessee.

We had the chance to win in last years NFC Championship and lost despite having the ball first.

We played a great game last night and but for 2 - 3 dropped interceptions the game would have been out and site and won before the 4th quarter.
Since69  
#6 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 4:59:35 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Sorry to put a dampener on this but it's the rules.

If we had won the toss, driven down field and scored would this thread exist.?

We couldn't have cared less for Tennessee.


No. Of course not. :D

But I think the current system could be inproved by adding a little more competition to the game.

And BTW, I hate the college system - taking turns on a short field over and over for as long as necessary. 21-21 after 4 quarters and someone winds up winning 73-70. Besides, the networks would hate games that dragged on that long. My way avoids that, mostly.
bigfog  
#7 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 5:06:58 PM(UTC)
I'm all for adopting the NCAA's version of overtime. It's fair, it's exciting and dammit - people like it!
flep  
#8 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 5:11:28 PM(UTC)
The only other way is to do it like soccer.

In a cup competion (like the World Cup), knock out games where winner goes though, has an extra time period of 30 minutes (2 periods of 15 minutes each) if the score is tied (drawn) after the initial period of 90 minutes. All 30 minutes is played regardless of whether a team scores or not. For instance if the game finished 1 - 1 and team A scores after 5 minutes of extra time the game would still continue. If team B scores it is then 2 - 2 and the game continues. If however team B does not score team A wins at the end of extra time.

They experimented in having a "Golden Goal" i.e first team to score wins, but for some reason in soccer it was a bit of a downer suddenly ending the game when a team scord so this idea was dropped after a few seasons.

So what I am saying is play the whole 15 minutes and whoever is leading at the end of the 15 is the winner. It would probably be a lot more strategic.

To be honest though I think it isn't broke as it is now so don't fix it.
bigfog  
#9 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 5:57:26 PM(UTC)
Expanding on Since 69's idea - you could have an overtime that was basically a 10 minute quarter. It wouldn't end when someone scored, only when time was up.

Allow FGs, but for touchdowns, eliminate the PAT and require that teams go for two.

At least there's a fair chance that both teams would get the ball. Still might have ties, but at least both teams get a shot.
TengoJuego  
#10 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 6:01:21 PM(UTC)
I just want the college OT rules, BUT a little different, I want a kickoff, that team getting their one possession, if they score(doesn't matter how) then the other team gets their chance to best that. And if neither score, it goes back and forth until one team scores.
agopackgo4  
#11 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 6:36:37 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Sorry to put a dampener on this but it's the rules.

If we had won the toss, driven down field and scored would this thread exist.?

We couldn't have cared less for Tennessee.

We had the chance to win in last years NFC Championship and lost despite having the ball first.

We played a great game last night and but for 2 - 3 dropped interceptions the game would have been out and site and won before the 4th quarter.


It would exist on a Titans forum
bozz_2006  
#12 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 7:37:51 PM(UTC)
Rock. Paper. Scissors. That would play right into our team's strengths too. I've heard whispers that John Kuhn is the most feared rock, paper, scissors competitor in the entire league. He's fierce.
blueleopard  
#13 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 7:49:05 PM(UTC)
They should've called Tails.

Plain and simple.
bozz_2006  
#14 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 7:50:54 PM(UTC)
tails never fails. what were they thinking?
gbpfan  
#15 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 7:56:29 PM(UTC)
i think both teams should have a chance but it is what it is :ramboface:
bozz_2006  
#16 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 8:00:29 PM(UTC)
both teams have a chance with rock paper scissors.
Since69  
#17 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 8:20:44 PM(UTC)
I understand that Scissors can beat Paper, and I get how Rock can beat Scissors, but there's no way in hell Paper can beat Rock! Is Paper supposed to magically "wrap around" Rock, rendering it immobile and ineffective? Why the hell couldn't Paper do this to Scissors?

And screw Scissors; why can't Paper do this to people? Why aren't sheets of notebook paper constantly suffocating students as they attempt to take notes in class?

I'll tell you why - because paper can't beat anything!

When I play Rock/Paper/Scissors, I always choose Rock. Then when somebody claims to have beaten me with their Paper, I can punch them in the face with my already-clenched fist and say, "Oh, I'm sorry. I thought your Paper would protect you, you shithead."
Zero2Cool  
#18 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 8:51:34 PM(UTC)
I am still, pissed.
bozz_2006  
#19 Posted : Monday, November 3, 2008 9:10:47 PM(UTC)
hahaha. "shithead!"
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (43m) : NFL. Done. 2018 I wait.
hardrocker950 (46m) : Raiders lose due to fumble in the end zone
Zero2Cool (2h) : @zachkruse2 Nick Perry has almost as many injuries (4) as sacks (7) in the first year of his $60M deal. Hand, foot, shoulder and now ankle.
Zero2Cool (3h) : sommbitch ... my game feed crapped out
Zero2Cool (4h) : Allison wasn't going to the ground though.
beast (4h) : Allison fumble, and that touchdown were the same play... either both should be catches or both should be drops
beast (4h) : That's a touchdown! ... he lost control of the ball after crosing the goaline
beast (4h) : He caught the ball and crossed the goaline UNTOUCHED!
dhazer (4h) : well we made the Panthers owner sell the team lol
dhazer (4h) : beast it did not take a touchdown away, by the rule you must maintain control of the ball so he didnt catch the ball so it was not a td
Zero2Cool (4h) : And there it is... Panthers up for sale after end of season
beast (5h) : NFL catch rule screwed the Steelers... took a TD away from them
beast (5h) : Steelers got screwed by the NFL rule...
hardrocker950 (7h) : Antonio Brown injured
TheKanataThrilla (8h) : If this is an incomplete pass in the Seahawks game I am pissed
hardrocker950 (12h) : That number will likely shrink a lot after this weekend
Zero2Cool (12h) : Damarious Randall and Josh Hawkins as the defense's top cornerbacks today.
Zero2Cool (13h) : 24 teams are still alive for playoffs in week 15...
buckeyepackfan (13h) : We have a winner! Zero tell Smokey what he has won! :)
Zero2Cool (14h) : that's the guy who wanted chagne of scenery i suppose
Zero2Cool (14h) : Marvin Lewis’ plans to leave his job as Bengals’ HC after this season
Zero2Cool (14h) : Packers have been using the 4-3 for awhile on defense.
Smokey (14h) : Tears for Fears
buckeyepackfan (14h) : Shout! Shout! Let it all out! Who sang it?
yooperfan (18h) : Game time weather: 48, PC wind sw at 4mph
yooperfan (18h) : "RUN THE TABLE"
yooperfan (18h) : Rise and shine Packers fans!
buckeyepackfan (20h) : THAT BAAAAAAAD MAN IS BACK!
buckeyepackfan (20h) : GAMEDAY! #assesagainstthewall!
buckeyepackfan (20h) : GOOD MORNING PACKER FANS!
Mucky Tundra (23h) : when did Saturday games become a thing again?
gbguy20 (17-Dec) : Fucking game isn't on tv in MN
beast (17-Dec) : Wait, why are you starting Christmas shopping early? ;p
Smokey (17-Dec) : Been there, finished that .
Zero2Cool (17-Dec) : if i were smarter, i would have started Christmas shopping before now'
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
38m / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / rabidgopher04

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DarkaneRules

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / rabidgopher04

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

Headlines