Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
3 Pages<123>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Nonstopdrivel  
#16 Posted : Monday, February 7, 2011 5:49:36 PM(UTC)
Nonstopdrivel

Rank: Registered
United States
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Location: Germany
Applause Given: 364
Applause Received: 263
" said: Go to Quoted Post
As I said before, the Crabtree penalty looked like a blatant screw-up.


A prime example of exactly the kind of officiating call that needs to be made subject to challenge. I am of the belief that any and all calls should be subject to review. It's ridiculous that such an obvious gaffe -- with such strong consequences -- can't be overturned when even a quick glance at the replay reveals it to have been wrong. That isn't even matter of a judgment call. He unambiguously did not touch the facemask.
Offline Pack93z  
#17 Posted : Monday, February 7, 2011 5:52:33 PM(UTC)
Pack93z

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

Rank: Select Member
United States
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Applause Given: 409
Applause Received: 1,112
" said: Go to Quoted Post
the facemask WAS a horrible call...but again, I'm in no way saying that affected the outcome. There were probably a few PIs the Packers could have been called for in the first half, so it all came out in the laundry, I'm bringing this up to question the RULES rather than the refs.


Here is the problem.. by looks without zooming in, by the body language of the returner it looked like a facemask.. at first glace I thought it is on.

Officials are human.. and it wasn't the flagrant of a mistake.

Unless you can challenge a penalty, I don't think you can crucify the official in this call.
Offline musccy  
#18 Posted : Monday, February 7, 2011 5:54:31 PM(UTC)
musccy

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 5/7/2009(UTC)
Location: Pennsylvania
Applause Given: 380
Applause Received: 355
" said: Go to Quoted Post

What the rules say aside, how can anyone say Collins' celebration was excessive and Mendenhall's was not? It's a display of elation, it's not offensive or over the top. That should never be a penalty in any game.


I get the letter of the law, but this is like the K-State/Syracuse thing, you have to consider the moment. Honestly, I was too busy running around my apartment screaming at the top of my lungs to see there was a flag. It was only on the kickoff, and subsequent replays of his celebration that I realized what had happened...so if I was that jubliant, how do you think the players felt?

It's a shades of grey issue, but c'mon, you need to allow for some emotional outlet!
Offline musccy  
#19 Posted : Monday, February 7, 2011 6:01:08 PM(UTC)
musccy

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 5/7/2009(UTC)
Location: Pennsylvania
Applause Given: 380
Applause Received: 355
" said: Go to Quoted Post


Here is the problem.. by looks without zooming in, by the body language of the returner it looked like a facemask.. at first glace I thought it is on.

Officials are human.. and it wasn't the flagrant of a mistake.

Unless you can challenge a penalty, I don't think you can crucify the official in this call.


I tried to make this point in my post that I'm not trying to question the refs in this game...I used to ref 10 year old soccer games and had soccer moms f-bomb me left and right. Hated ever second of it, and developed a new respect for what refs deal with. I'm just trying to call a spade a spade on the FM penalty (and acknowledge not an easy call) and am questioning the RULES more than anything. Letter of the law, Collins could have been flagged, it's just been a rule that has allowed for some leeway for interpretation which is my beef with it.

I'm in no way saying the refs affected the outcome. As I said, I think there were some PIs that went uncalled that worked in GB's favor.
Offline RedSoxExcel  
#20 Posted : Monday, February 7, 2011 7:22:34 PM(UTC)
RedSoxExcel

Rank: Registered
Joined: 9/30/2007(UTC)
Applause Received: 3
Who cares now, we won the Super Bowl!
Offline TOPackerFan  
#21 Posted : Monday, February 7, 2011 7:28:03 PM(UTC)
TOPackerFan

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/13/2008(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
I thought Swain was a catch, but that's probably only because Jennings recovered. If the Steelers had recovered, I'd have been screaming no football move therfore no catch.


I just gave you an applaud point for a very rare demonstration of honesty by a fan.


It's the truth! Said pretty much the same thing to my wife during the game last night.
Offline millertime  
#22 Posted : Monday, February 7, 2011 7:37:54 PM(UTC)
millertime

Rank: Member
Joined: 8/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3
Applause Received: 10
Common sense tells me it was a catch.

But according to the "rules" there was some bobbling. Also, it was called incomplete on the field, so there would have to be INDISPUTABLE evidence to overturn the call (especially in a game of this magnitude).

If it was originally ruled a catch and fumble and Pittsburgh challenged it, I think they would have upheld the fumble. Just goes to show that there are still "gray areas" that the league needs to clear up in the rulebook.
Offline TwinkieGorilla  
#23 Posted : Monday, February 7, 2011 7:39:49 PM(UTC)
TwinkieGorilla

Rank: Rookie
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 19
Applause Received: 42
re: Collins

NoFunLeague indeed. Yellow Rolleyes
Offline porky88  
#24 Posted : Tuesday, February 8, 2011 1:05:04 AM(UTC)
porky88

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2012Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2013Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2014

Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 4/26/2007(UTC)
Applause Given: 235
Applause Received: 467
Swain dropped the ball. I never saw possession. I saw him struggling to control the ball and you really need control. He never had control and took a step.

Hate the celebration penalty. It is the Super Bowl, so both teams deserve a little slack. God forbid you get excited because, you know, youre a human being with emotions.

The Crabtree call was awful and that was the only one that stands out.

Tramon Williams call was correct in my view. Williams needs to get away from the ball. The Steelers did what they should have and tried to make him touch it. That is on him.
Offline Zero2Cool  
#25 Posted : Tuesday, February 8, 2011 1:06:29 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Premier Member
United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,064
Applause Received: 2,554
Crabtree the "facemask" call?
Offline TwinkieGorilla  
#26 Posted : Tuesday, February 8, 2011 4:10:30 AM(UTC)
TwinkieGorilla

Rank: Rookie
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 19
Applause Received: 42
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Crabtree the "facemask" call?


Yeah, that was shite. Was almost exactly the other way around. I remember going..."Oh, great. Last year it was the game against the Cards. Now this?"
Offline Yerko  
#27 Posted : Tuesday, February 8, 2011 4:17:36 AM(UTC)
Yerko

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 10/15/2008(UTC)
Location: Chicago, IL
Applause Given: 176
Applause Received: 296
One thing I did notice...and correct me if I am wrong, but were there ZERO holding penalties called?
Offline Since69  
#28 Posted : Tuesday, February 8, 2011 4:35:33 AM(UTC)
Since69

Rank: Registered
Joined: 11/2/2006(UTC)
Applause Given: 83
Applause Received: 83
" said: Go to Quoted Post
And can anyone explain to me why the NFL sees a substantive difference between kneeling on one knee versus kneeling on two knees in the end zone? Both can be expressions of prayer or exultation. It makes no sense.


Because going to one knee is considered a religious gesture, and the league doesn't want to go there. Stupid, stupid rule, either way. Who gives a shit about excessive TD celebrations (so long as they don't hold up the game, of course)?
Offline go.pack.go.  
#29 Posted : Tuesday, February 8, 2011 4:41:29 AM(UTC)
go.pack.go.

Rank: Registered
Joined: 11/12/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 44
" said: Go to Quoted Post
One thing I did notice...and correct me if I am wrong, but were there ZERO holding penalties called?


I do remember one holding call on us. I can't remember who it was on, but I do remember that I didn't agree with the call.

--edit--

Wow I just realized how many times I said "remember" in 2 sentences there.
Offline Greg C.  
#30 Posted : Tuesday, February 8, 2011 4:41:38 AM(UTC)
Greg C.

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/9/2008(UTC)
Location: Marquette, Michigan
Applause Received: 48
" said: Go to Quoted Post
One thing I did notice...and correct me if I am wrong, but were there ZERO holding penalties called?


The only one I remember for the Packers was the one by Donald Lee, when he failed to get out of his stance on time on a running play and then hooked the linebacker.

The Steelers had at least two holding penalties. Clay Matthews got held by the tight end on one play, then there was the hold later in the game by number 71 I think, when he tackled Cullen Jenkins.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (19h) : ctrl + f5 to see gooder tablet layout
gbguy20 (23-Apr) : woops
gbguy20 (23-Apr) : oh LOL
Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : u started a thread for another site seeking fans an writers :)
gbguy20 (23-Apr) : welp, i don't even know what you are referring to zero. So yes, it must have been an accident :)
Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : thanks, hectic right now tho
dhazer (22-Apr) : 1-0 pens
dhazer (22-Apr) : kevin you got pens
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : gbguy20 - assuming you created that by accident lol
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Early Thanksgiving!! haha
Smokey (20-Apr) : Sorry to hear about your Turkey encounter. The bird was killed and tenderized ? Clean it, pluck it , and freeze it. Tastey Eating roasted !
Zero2Cool (20-Apr) : Schedule will be available tomorrow.
Smokey (20-Apr) : Eagles to sign TEBOW !
Mucky Tundra (19-Apr) : TEBOW
Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : Wow, the site is freaking smoking fast
Smokey (17-Apr) : Gilbert, \_/ !!
Smokey (17-Apr) : Zero, drink one shot with me pal !
Smokey (17-Apr) : Who will drink with me ? \_/
Smokey (17-Apr) : \_/, Cheers !
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : you did it!
Mucky Tundra (16-Apr) : i guess the packernews link really was buggy
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : lol oops... those should be img and img not im and url... nm im tired bed time
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : each tag has to have a closing tag . [img]url[/url] like that
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : When a link takes over the whole post, it's because the link tags were not terminated properly.
Mucky Tundra (16-Apr) : Plus I couldn't understand why a direct copy+paste was linking somewhere else entirely...that link took over the whole post
Mucky Tundra (16-Apr) : oh okay. I was sort of panicking thinking it was something wrong with my computer
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : the packersnews stuff carries junk with it that you have to remove sometimes
Mucky Tundra (16-Apr) : hey Zero, thanks. Was it something wrong with the site or something on my end?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Darryn Colledge To Retire. NOOOOO!!!!
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Maybe we should lower the registration fee's to get them folks signed up an posting!!
Smokey (15-Apr) : GUESTS, JOIN US AND BECOME MEMBERS !
Smokey (15-Apr) : Red Bull gives you wings !
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : nah, i had wings today
Smokey (14-Apr) : Isn't everyone enjoying a large healthy salad ?
Smokey (13-Apr) : Spieth wins Masters with -18 score.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2015 Schedule
Sunday, Sep 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Sep 20 @ 7:30 PM
SEAHAWKS
Monday, Sep 28 @ 7:30 PM
CHIEFS
Sunday, Oct 4 @ 3:25 PM
at 49ers
Sunday, Oct 11 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Oct 18 @ 3:25 PM
CHARGERS
Sunday, Oct 25 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Sunday, Nov 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Broncos
Sunday, Nov 8 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Sunday, Nov 15 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 22 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Thursday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
BEARS
Thursday, Dec 3 @ 7:25 PM
at Lions
Sunday, Dec 13 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Sunday, Dec 20 @ 3:05 PM
at Raiders
Sunday, Dec 27 @ 3:25 PM
at Cardinals
Sunday, Jan 3 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS

Recent Topics
59m / Green Bay Packers Talk / RaiderPride

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / RaiderPride

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

23-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

23-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / warhawk

23-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey


Tweeter