Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
4 Pages<1234>

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
jdlax  
#21 Posted : Sunday, March 13, 2011 8:14:58 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
There has never before been, and never in the future will be, an elite running back besides Barry James Sanders.

Better aks someone, bitch.


There was no correlation between having Barry Sanders, and winning, so no, he is also not an elite running back.


I was just looking to have a little fun with Z2C .
Greg C.  
#22 Posted : Sunday, March 13, 2011 10:07:00 PM(UTC)
So we have to go all the way back to Terrell Davis 12 years ago to find an elite RB who won a Super Bowl. When you think of it that way, Zombie's argument is looking even better.
macbob  
#23 Posted : Sunday, March 13, 2011 10:18:49 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
So we have to go all the way back to Terrell Davis 12 years ago to find an elite RB who won a Super Bowl. When you think of it that way, Zombie's argument is looking even better.


If a Elway & the Broncos lose 3 before they get one, then win 2 after they get one, then he was irrelevant???

I am seriously having difficulty following the logic.
zombieslayer  
#24 Posted : Sunday, March 13, 2011 10:25:29 PM(UTC)
As per RP, Broncos have to cheat to win the Super Bowl. Which fits into my argument that elite RBs are a waste of money.

My point is you have a salary cap (which the Broncos cheated to get around. Note that they lost draft picks because they were caught cheating, a la Belichick's spygate). You have limited funds. Spending on an elite RB is a waste of money because it doesn't matter who is back there.

I think my argument is looking better and better. Now I need to find a university that will give me a million dollars to research this and write a paper on it. Wade?
Zero2Cool  
#25 Posted : Sunday, March 13, 2011 10:31:51 PM(UTC)
I'm not following how the broncos cheated helped them win any super bowl. they cheated on Davis and elways contract.
macbob  
#26 Posted : Sunday, March 13, 2011 11:07:19 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
As per RP, Broncos have to cheat to win the Super Bowl. Which fits into my argument that elite RBs are a waste of money.

My point is you have a salary cap (which the Broncos cheated to get around. Note that they lost draft picks because they were caught cheating, a la Belichick's spygate). You have limited funds. Spending on an elite RB is a waste of money because it doesn't matter who is back there.

I think my argument is looking better and better. Now I need to find a university that will give me a million dollars to research this and write a paper on it. Wade?


Whether legally or illegally acquired, they couldn't win one until they got the running game. I don't see the relevancy of the salary cap argument.

Matter of fact, I don't see the relevancy of the entire thread.

Zombie, it's obvious from your posts that you're smart enough to understand that QB > RB does not mean RB = 0, yet you persist in making those arguments for whatever reason.

In any event, I realize those statements don't follow, and borrowing from the title, this thread's a waste of time.
Greg C.  
#27 Posted : Sunday, March 13, 2011 11:51:08 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
So we have to go all the way back to Terrell Davis 12 years ago to find an elite RB who won a Super Bowl. When you think of it that way, Zombie's argument is looking even better.


If a Elway & the Broncos lose 3 before they get one, then win 2 after they get one, then he was irrelevant???

I am seriously having difficulty following the logic.


No, I didn't mean to suggest that Davis was irrelevant. I see that you really don't like the word "irrelevant" in Zombie's original post. I was just agreeing with Zombie's point that in the NFL these days there's no correlation between having a big-time RB and being a successful team. Davis was very important to those Broncos teams, but twelve years is a long time in NFL terms. The league has become more pass-oriented since then.
zombieslayer  
#28 Posted : Monday, March 14, 2011 2:22:53 AM(UTC)
Yeah, you get what I'm saying Greg. I'm not saying running is irrelevant and RBs = 0. I'm saying there's no correlation between an elite RB and success. Big difference.

I even went as far as saying that elite RBs are a waste of money because with a salary cap, you can spend your money elsewhere that's more important.

You still need to run the ball, but it doesn't matter who's back there. The difference between the best RB in the NFL and a mediocre back is not that significant when it comes to the success of your football team.

That's my point.

I do think that when a RB asks for more money, you let him go.

Let me give real life examples. If you have the choice between Reggie White, Charles Woodson, Clay Matthews 3, and Barry Sanders, all in their prime, Sanders falls on the bottom of the list. An elite defender > an elite RB. Save your money. Spend it on D.

I'd rather have Dmitri Nance with the $450k we pay him than Barry Sanders who will probably make > $10 million in today's market.

Zero - I'm not ignoring you. Have that discussion with RP. He knows it 10 times better than I do.
macbob  
#29 Posted : Monday, March 14, 2011 2:46:55 AM(UTC)
zombieslayer said:
I'm not saying running is irrelevant


Sorry, I must have misread your first post in this thread, where you said:

zombieslayer said:
rushing success is irrelevant
Zero2Cool  
#30 Posted : Monday, March 14, 2011 2:58:06 AM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
I'd rather have Dmitri Nance with the $450k we pay him than Barry Sanders who will probably make > $10 million in today's market.

Zero - I'm not ignoring you. Have that discussion with RP. He knows it 10 times better than I do.


First part, moron, sorry my bias trumps my tact on that one. I can count several ways Barry Sanders helps far more than Nance could dream of, even at 7 to 10 million a year.


Broncos, RP wouldn't know anything about it, which was proven by his comments on the subject already. I did some reading and they deferred $29 million dollars of payments to John Elway and Terrell Davis.

From the comments from the Packers on that Super Bowl, they weren't going to win. Two of the DL weren't giving it their all and the Packers weren't adjusting to Steve Atwaters blitzing well enough. Not to mention the last play of the Packers offense was a play they've never practiced (or ran) before.

Bronco's were the better team, regardless of what the salaries were for Elway and Davis. Hell, Davis had migraine issues and still ran over the Packers. Saying the Broncos cheated to win against the Packers or Falcons is just being a plain sore loser.
Dexter_Sinister  
#31 Posted : Monday, March 14, 2011 3:07:12 AM(UTC)
Rushing success doesn't equal rushing either.

Of course he was talking about success at an elite level. Which has proven to be a non factor. Specially if you look at recent trends.

Yes it was important 20 years ago. It isn't 20 years ago now though.

Were there any other changes in the Bronco's after they got Davis? If he was the only factor that changed including luck, who opponents are and they didn't change one bit, then people can say he was the reason they went from a super bowl team to a super bowl winning team. Otherwise it could easily be dismissed as coincidence. Statistically speaking.
Zero2Cool  
#32 Posted : Monday, March 14, 2011 6:41:31 AM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
It isn't 20 years ago now though.


I do not believe this at all.
zombieslayer  
#33 Posted : Monday, March 14, 2011 2:30:51 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
It isn't 20 years ago now though.


I do not believe this at all.


That's fine, then give us some facts to back this up.

Even though I disagree with Macbob and Pack93z on this issue, I have utmost respect for both of them for trying to prove their points with facts.

You only seem to reply with name calling.
doddpower  
#34 Posted : Monday, March 14, 2011 2:48:58 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
You only seem to reply with name calling.



Zing! :whipitgood: :whipitgood:
User is suspended until 5/28/2018 11:54:40 AM(UTC) DakotaT  
#35 Posted : Monday, March 14, 2011 6:41:34 PM(UTC)
Rember the time we held that whimp Barry Sanders to -1 rushing yards in a playoff game?

The Broncos should have been stripped of those titles because without cheating the cap system in place, they would not have been able to sign some of the veteran players necessary to win those championships. A third round pick and some cash was cheap for two Lombardis.
Zero2Cool  
#36 Posted : Monday, March 14, 2011 8:45:29 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
It isn't 20 years ago now though.


I do not believe this at all.


That's fine, then give us some facts to back this up.

Even though I disagree with Macbob and Pack93z on this issue, I have utmost respect for both of them for trying to prove their points with facts.

You only seem to reply with name calling.


How can you disagree that it's not 20 years ago? You want facts, look at a damn calendar!

Barry Sanders gets thrown under the bus, with comments ensuing it was done to rile me up, so I like normal, jokingly respond over the top in his defense and suddenly I'm accused of ONLY seeming to reply with name calling?

Wow, maybe I am too hard on myself and perhaps its not me who needs to lighten up after all.
Packers_Finland  
#37 Posted : Monday, March 14, 2011 9:08:52 PM(UTC)
I don't think zombie got your joke Zero.

And as for me baiting you, it's all in good fun as you surely know.
Zero2Cool  
#38 Posted : Monday, March 14, 2011 9:17:01 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
I don't think zombie got your joke Zero.

And as for me baiting you, it's all in good fun as you surely know.


I was going to say maybe that's because zombies are dead inside, but there I go name calling again!


I figured it was in good fun as was my response. But whatever, like I've said many times, less posting by me, the site is better. Examples to support that abound! :)
User is suspended until 5/28/2018 11:54:40 AM(UTC) DakotaT  
#39 Posted : Monday, March 14, 2011 9:39:33 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
I don't think zombie got your joke Zero.

And as for me baiting you, it's all in good fun as you surely know.


I was going to say maybe that's because zombies are dead inside, but there I go name calling again!


I figured it was in good fun as was my response. But whatever, like I've said many times, less posting by me, the site is better. Examples to support that abound! :)


I think people enjoy fvcking with you just as much as me. I enjoy seeing you get riled up, but I'm demented.
Zero2Cool  
#40 Posted : Monday, March 14, 2011 10:08:34 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
I think people enjoy fvcking with you just as much as me. I enjoy seeing you get riled up, but I'm demented.


And I'm perfectly fine with that, especially when it comes to Barry Sanders. I was just tying to tow the joking line, but guess I went to far.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages<1234>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
beast (7h) : I believe the Packers seriously want to trade up (if they can find a price they like), I'm guessing for Fitzpatrick or James (though one guy said Ward). But could also be one of the ILBers (Smith or E
Smokey (8h) : Rumors are not money in the bank deals.
gbguy20 (10h) : pft reporting packers trying to trade up
Porforis (11h) : You're just a little chicken. Cheep Cheep Cheep Cheep Cheep Cheep Cheep Cheep Cheep
Nonstopdrivel (11h) : I don't want to talk about it.
Porforis (11h) : You're tearing me apart, Rourke!
Nonstopdrivel (11h) : (See "Moar Randomness" thread.)
Nonstopdrivel (11h) : It's a reference to The Room. I'm sorry, I forgot that not everyone knows about that movie. That's just my favorite line from that movie.
Porforis (13h) : I... Can't tell if serious or The Room reference.
Barfarn (17h) : Perhaps no or inadequte coverage in general
Barfarn (17h) : I’d guess “no help” refers to men not being covered for breast cancer
wpr (19h) : O no. Sorry to hear this NSD.
Zero2Cool (20h) : Rourke, sorry to hear that, but who doesn't want to help you?
Cheesey (25-Apr) : Oh geez, nonstop. Like was said, we have your back.
TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : NSD sorry your post is a bit of a mind fuck, but obviously brother those here have your back.
Nonstopdrivel (25-Apr) : I got the test results back! I definitely have breast cancer.
Nonstopdrivel (25-Apr) : Everything goes wrong at once. Nobody wants to help me, and I'm dying!
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : Zone defenses always must answer this question: is it better to invest in top CBs, or better to invest in pass rushers who can make a CB’s job easier?
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : Packers giving away $500 Pro Shop gift card and 11 2018 Official Draft Caps
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : can't restrict
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : you did it now
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : 123456
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : too bad you gonna cry
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : don't break it
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : something here
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : You can do it too!
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : Who the hell gives a shit about Sat/Sun now? 3rd to 7th round? F U
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : I thought Sat/Sun was great. You make a weekend of it. Have buddies over, cookout, etc.
TheKanataThrilla (24-Apr) : During the afternoons I tend to get caught up in family routines. I don't mind that for the later rounds.
TheKanataThrilla (24-Apr) : I now take Friday off work. It is a bit annoying, but I do find it fun at night as I can crack a few beers and enjoy. Sucks if they trade out of the first round though.
wpr (24-Apr) : I liked the Sat Sun version.
beast (23-Apr) : HELL YEAH! ... the draft was SOOOO MUCH BETTER in the ol Saturday/Sunday format... only people that I've heard disagree are those that don't really follow the draft and just random get updates on thei
beast (23-Apr) : Key word there is "proven"... not if they're true, but if you can prove it. Jerry Jones said the same thing for Greg Hardy, it wasn't "proven".
Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : Flat out honesty from 49ers GM
Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : John Lynch: “if these charges are proven true, if Reuben did hit this young lady, he won’t be part of our organization moving forward.”
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2018 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 9 @ 7:20 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Sep 16 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Sep 23 @ 12:00 PM
Redskins
Sunday, Sep 30 @ 12:00 PM
BILLS
Sunday, Oct 7 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Monday, Oct 15 @ 7:15 PM
49ERS
Sunday, Oct 28 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Nov 4 @ 7:20 PM
Patriots
Sunday, Nov 11 @ 12:00 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Nov 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Sunday, Nov 25 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Dec 2 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Dec 9 @ 12:00 PM
FALCONS
Sunday, Dec 16 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Dec 23 @ 12:00 PM
Jets
Sunday, Dec 30 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
6h / Random Babble / wpr

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

24-Apr / Around The NFL / dhazer

24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

24-Apr / Random Babble / Cheesey

24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / warhawk

20-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

20-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

Headlines