Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
7 Pages<12345>»
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline jdlax  
#21 Posted : Sunday, March 13, 2011 8:14:58 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Joined: 10/23/2006(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 1
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
There has never before been, and never in the future will be, an elite running back besides Barry James Sanders.

Better aks someone, bitch.


There was no correlation between having Barry Sanders, and winning, so no, he is also not an elite running back.


I was just looking to have a little fun with Z2C .
Offline Greg C.  
#22 Posted : Sunday, March 13, 2011 10:07:00 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 8/9/2008(UTC)
Location: Marquette, Michigan
Applause Received: 48
So we have to go all the way back to Terrell Davis 12 years ago to find an elite RB who won a Super Bowl. When you think of it that way, Zombie's argument is looking even better.
Offline macbob  
#23 Posted : Sunday, March 13, 2011 10:18:49 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2013Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2016PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2012FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2014

Joined: 10/12/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 371
Applause Received: 322
" said: Go to Quoted Post
So we have to go all the way back to Terrell Davis 12 years ago to find an elite RB who won a Super Bowl. When you think of it that way, Zombie's argument is looking even better.


If a Elway & the Broncos lose 3 before they get one, then win 2 after they get one, then he was irrelevant???

I am seriously having difficulty following the logic.
Offline zombieslayer  
#24 Posted : Sunday, March 13, 2011 10:25:29 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
As per RP, Broncos have to cheat to win the Super Bowl. Which fits into my argument that elite RBs are a waste of money.

My point is you have a salary cap (which the Broncos cheated to get around. Note that they lost draft picks because they were caught cheating, a la Belichick's spygate). You have limited funds. Spending on an elite RB is a waste of money because it doesn't matter who is back there.

I think my argument is looking better and better. Now I need to find a university that will give me a million dollars to research this and write a paper on it. Wade?
Offline Zero2Cool  
#25 Posted : Sunday, March 13, 2011 10:31:51 PM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,490
Applause Received: 4,012
I'm not following how the broncos cheated helped them win any super bowl. they cheated on Davis and elways contract.
Offline macbob  
#26 Posted : Sunday, March 13, 2011 11:07:19 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2013Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2016PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2012FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2014

Joined: 10/12/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 371
Applause Received: 322
" said: Go to Quoted Post
As per RP, Broncos have to cheat to win the Super Bowl. Which fits into my argument that elite RBs are a waste of money.

My point is you have a salary cap (which the Broncos cheated to get around. Note that they lost draft picks because they were caught cheating, a la Belichick's spygate). You have limited funds. Spending on an elite RB is a waste of money because it doesn't matter who is back there.

I think my argument is looking better and better. Now I need to find a university that will give me a million dollars to research this and write a paper on it. Wade?


Whether legally or illegally acquired, they couldn't win one until they got the running game. I don't see the relevancy of the salary cap argument.

Matter of fact, I don't see the relevancy of the entire thread.

Zombie, it's obvious from your posts that you're smart enough to understand that QB > RB does not mean RB = 0, yet you persist in making those arguments for whatever reason.

In any event, I realize those statements don't follow, and borrowing from the title, this thread's a waste of time.
Offline Greg C.  
#27 Posted : Sunday, March 13, 2011 11:51:08 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 8/9/2008(UTC)
Location: Marquette, Michigan
Applause Received: 48
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
So we have to go all the way back to Terrell Davis 12 years ago to find an elite RB who won a Super Bowl. When you think of it that way, Zombie's argument is looking even better.


If a Elway & the Broncos lose 3 before they get one, then win 2 after they get one, then he was irrelevant???

I am seriously having difficulty following the logic.


No, I didn't mean to suggest that Davis was irrelevant. I see that you really don't like the word "irrelevant" in Zombie's original post. I was just agreeing with Zombie's point that in the NFL these days there's no correlation between having a big-time RB and being a successful team. Davis was very important to those Broncos teams, but twelve years is a long time in NFL terms. The league has become more pass-oriented since then.
Offline zombieslayer  
#28 Posted : Monday, March 14, 2011 2:22:53 AM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
Yeah, you get what I'm saying Greg. I'm not saying running is irrelevant and RBs = 0. I'm saying there's no correlation between an elite RB and success. Big difference.

I even went as far as saying that elite RBs are a waste of money because with a salary cap, you can spend your money elsewhere that's more important.

You still need to run the ball, but it doesn't matter who's back there. The difference between the best RB in the NFL and a mediocre back is not that significant when it comes to the success of your football team.

That's my point.

I do think that when a RB asks for more money, you let him go.

Let me give real life examples. If you have the choice between Reggie White, Charles Woodson, Clay Matthews 3, and Barry Sanders, all in their prime, Sanders falls on the bottom of the list. An elite defender > an elite RB. Save your money. Spend it on D.

I'd rather have Dmitri Nance with the $450k we pay him than Barry Sanders who will probably make > $10 million in today's market.

Zero - I'm not ignoring you. Have that discussion with RP. He knows it 10 times better than I do.
Offline macbob  
#29 Posted : Monday, March 14, 2011 2:46:55 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2013Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2016PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2012FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2014

Joined: 10/12/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 371
Applause Received: 322
zombieslayer said:
I'm not saying running is irrelevant


Sorry, I must have misread your first post in this thread, where you said:

zombieslayer said:
rushing success is irrelevant
Offline Zero2Cool  
#30 Posted : Monday, March 14, 2011 2:58:06 AM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,490
Applause Received: 4,012
" said: Go to Quoted Post
I'd rather have Dmitri Nance with the $450k we pay him than Barry Sanders who will probably make > $10 million in today's market.

Zero - I'm not ignoring you. Have that discussion with RP. He knows it 10 times better than I do.


First part, moron, sorry my bias trumps my tact on that one. I can count several ways Barry Sanders helps far more than Nance could dream of, even at 7 to 10 million a year.


Broncos, RP wouldn't know anything about it, which was proven by his comments on the subject already. I did some reading and they deferred $29 million dollars of payments to John Elway and Terrell Davis.

From the comments from the Packers on that Super Bowl, they weren't going to win. Two of the DL weren't giving it their all and the Packers weren't adjusting to Steve Atwaters blitzing well enough. Not to mention the last play of the Packers offense was a play they've never practiced (or ran) before.

Bronco's were the better team, regardless of what the salaries were for Elway and Davis. Hell, Davis had migraine issues and still ran over the Packers. Saying the Broncos cheated to win against the Packers or Falcons is just being a plain sore loser.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
7 Pages<12345>»
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (35m) : Damn-Falcons coach Dan Quinn tells reporters that WR Julio Jones (foot) will be limited this week but will be “ready to rock” on Sunday.
Zero2Cool (45m) : Packers defense has a red zone INT in each of the last 3 games... Hyde with two of them. (One being the clutch 4thQ INT vs DET in Week 17)
Zero2Cool (2h) : Randall Cobb, Damarious Randall, Quentin Rollins, James Starks, Clay Matthews, Ty Montgomery & Jared Cook. OUT
Zero2Cool (2h) : Packers inactive list when they lost 33-32 to the Falcons week 8.
Zero2Cool (3h) : There is no emphasis, it's just a little bit of info. Take it or leave it. No harm.
Smokey (3h) : Zero, I believe that you and some others place too much emphasis upon data. no harm intended.
Zero2Cool (3h) : It’s the 1st time since 1970 all 4 conference championship teams finished the regular season on winning streaks of 4+ games
TheKanataThrilla (3h) : Salt mine. Love it.
TheKanataThrilla (3h) : The refs kept that game close. We should have blown them out early.
DarkaneRules (3h) : Hyde and Gunter are special and I'm hopeful D Ran gets back to where he can be
mi_keys (4h) : That whole forum is a salt mine. It's beautiful.
Zero2Cool (4h) : Burnett's back up, Kentrell Brice lead team in tackles.
uffda udfa (8h) : Hilarious reading below. I like Carter. Only guy who gets it.
uffda udfa (8h) : http://boards.dallascowboys.com/topic/71647-so-we-are-supposed-to-believe/#entry3978081
uffda udfa (9h) : Great news.
Zero2Cool (13h) : Jordy has "legitimate hope" to play, per @RobDemovsky.
Zero2Cool (14h) : Packers had one call on defense if called, no issue, wans't called. I didn't watch OL so dunno. I watched WR's
Zero2Cool (14h) : Dallas OL had some holds weren't called and 2 defensive holds, not called.
uffda udfa (14h) : I think the Pi vs just a holding call is a legit complaint. Terrible call.
GoPack1984 (14h) : Dallas can't complain about the officials. They got away with so many defensive holding calls.
uffda udfa (14h) : Dallas radio postgame: Dallas wins 7 out of 10 times.
uffda udfa (14h) : Brice led Pack w/ 6 tackles including the hardest of the game.
uffda udfa (14h) : Post game show said same thing. Everyone wondering how it didn't stay left.
Zero2Cool (14h) : Tornado warning forces players, fans to stay put at AT&T Stadium
Zero2Cool (14h) : Skip:More I see winning FG, more I see a very weird thing: It hooked hard left, then straightened out. Obviously no wind. Like meant to be
Zero2Cool (14h) : @RealSkipBayless: More I see winning FG, more I see a very weird thing: It hooked hard left, then straightened out. Obviously no wind. Like
uffda udfa (14h) : I don't believe Dallas is better than us. When Aaron is on we're the best.
beast (14h) : The huddle penalty was an odd one. Without Burnett and Nelson.
uffda udfa (14h) : Cowboys radio team initially called Crosby GW NO GOOD. Lol.
DarkaneRules (15h) : we beat an arguably better team at their place without morgan burnett. still can't believe it
uffda udfa (15h) : Re emphasized we aren't the better team. Sour grapes are sweet to me.
uffda udfa (15h) : Complaining of PI call and huddle penalty.
uffda udfa (15h) : Dallas play by play guy said we aren't best team.
uffda udfa (15h) : NBC is off the air down here. This is an OTA broadcast signal.
uffda udfa (15h) : Tornado warnings in Dallas area. Sign of aPACKalypse to Cowboys fans.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
1m / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

6m / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

11m / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

15m / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17m / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

24m / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

29m / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

1h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / shield4life

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

4h / Around The NFL / Smokey

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra


Packers Headlines