Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Zero2Cool  
#1 Posted : Tuesday, August 23, 2011 11:18:51 AM(UTC)
We suspected this moment would eventually happen and thanks to some whiny little prick contacting a company who had their articles posted here, today was that day. Woohoo!

PackersHome was initially founded because (this is one of the two major reasons) of my increasing frustrations with "blog" and "newspaper" sites that fail miserably in maintaining content integrity and availability when changing platforms. Remember when we went from php to asp, we didn't lose any posts or members and that's going from Linux to Windows, yet these big shot companies can't find developers to maintain their content? Perhaps they could and didn't care to?

Either way, one company is unhappy and I do not wish to have my site ruffle any feathers. Therefore, this change is to be IMMEDIATE and you will like it!! If you don't like it, I'll contact Mrs Colledge and have her chew your ass off.

All good things must come to an end and you must adapt to willing to accept that as a web developer. PackersHome has gotten a bit more "popular" than I had ever anticipated and we have to be more tactful with infringing upon ones copyright, rights.

I realized this awhile ago and said that I felt more comfortable with posting articles similarly as how sites like ProFootballTalk.com carries their business. They link the source, add some of their own input and quote some of the article content.

I've always been transparent with what's going on with the site, so if you're interested in what I responded with, read the spoiler.


What You Need To Know!
So you found an article that you want to share, what the hell do you do now? Simple, you create a new thread using the articles title as the subject, you copy ONLY a PORTION of the article and provide the link to the source. Then I'd appreciate it greatly if you gave your opinion on what was said to generate discussion.

Example:
Subject (thread title/topic): Earthquake hits!!
Quote:
The epicenter was in Virginia. Did you feel it? Send CNN an iReport.

The quake was felt in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; New York City and on Martha's Vineyard where President Barack Obama is vacationing. Cell phone service has been disrupted in New York City where parts of Manhattan have been evacuated.

"Everybody was told to take the stairs," Wolf Blitzer said, speaking live at 2 p.m. E.T. from CNN's D.C. bureau.

http://news.blogs.cnn.co...its-near-washington-d-c/





Any questions?



PS, if you could edit a decent portion out of your full article portions, we'd appreciate that effort.
wpr  
#2 Posted : Tuesday, August 23, 2011 11:36:04 AM(UTC)
It was bound to happen.
Will do my best to comply.
Don't suppose you will tell us the website that was offended? (so we can be extra extra extra careful not to piss them off more.)
Pack93z  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, August 23, 2011 11:39:18 AM(UTC)
How far back do you want us to edit our posts?

Sort of looking for a guideline...
Zero2Cool  
#4 Posted : Tuesday, August 23, 2011 11:54:17 AM(UTC)
Pack93z said: Go to Quoted Post
How far back do you want us to edit our posts?

Sort of looking for a guideline...


This wasn't something they required or even implied needed to be done, rather something that would make me a bit more comfortable.

Therefore, simply editing the first page of topics if necessary would be sufficient. If they require this, then I'll have to waste my time to accommodate them.


wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
It was bound to happen.
Will do my best to comply.
Don't suppose you will tell us the website that was offended? (so we can be extra extra extra careful not to piss them off more.)


No sir, I will not disclose whom it was. I feel their stance on this issue is that of ignorance and actually hurts them more than it helps, I won't disclose their identity and have them subjected to potential backlash.

No worries on pissing them off as long as we collectively do not post full articles off any site (unless given permission to do so) we'll be good to go with them and every other website.
wpr  
#5 Posted : Tuesday, August 23, 2011 12:08:31 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
This wasn't something they required or even implied needed to be done, rather something that would make me a bit more comfortable.

Therefore, simply editing the first page of topics if necessary would be sufficient. If they require this, then I'll have to waste my time to accommodate them.




No sir, I will not disclose whom it was. I feel their stance on this issue is that of ignorance and actually hurts them more than it helps, I won't disclose their identity and have them subjected to potential backlash.

No worries on pissing them off as long as we collectively do not post full articles off any site (unless given permission to do so) we'll be good to go with them and every other website.


as you wish.
wpr  
#6 Posted : Tuesday, August 23, 2011 12:53:04 PM(UTC)
I went back 3 pages on most forums. that was about 2 months. 4 pages on the packer forum. that is about 2 weeks.
I lost count but I was somewhere around 40 posts.
Do you want more? I will if you say so.

BTW I was not thinking of any kind of backlash against their website. I was just going to do extra for them. (If I had used their info.)
Zero2Cool  
#7 Posted : Tuesday, August 23, 2011 12:57:35 PM(UTC)
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
I went back 3 pages on most forums. that was about 2 months. 4 pages on the packer forum. that is about 2 weeks.
I lost count but I was somewhere around 40 posts.
Do you want more? I will if you say so.

BTW I was not thinking of any kind of backlash against their website. I was just going to do extra for them. (If I had used their info.)


Thank you, that was more than needed, but thanks.

They don't need any special treatment from anyone, nor any backlash either. If we just post a portion of the article and link to it, there won't be any problem with anyone because that's within the copyright "laws".

You just wanna know who it was so you can toilet paper their headquarters.
wpr  
#8 Posted : Tuesday, August 23, 2011 1:01:12 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
.

You just wanna know who it was so you can toilet paper their headquarters.


no sir. [-(

:-k :-k :-k

8-[ that WOULD be fun. :-"

Zero2Cool  
#9 Posted : Friday, September 9, 2011 11:16:57 AM(UTC)
This needs to be updated... I'll throw something together. I've kind of waffled on what direction to take and have come to a conclusion. It'll confuse the balls off all of you, even the girls.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
beast (2h) : Yeah it's weird, if anything goes wrong the defense and OL get blamed, even if passing game fault
hardrocker950 (4h) : But I put it mostlt on the offense and poor playcalling
hardrocker950 (4h) : I have seen the defense take a lot of flak over the loss..
Cheesey (5h) : Rodgers would have hit open guys. The game plan wouldn't have killed us. Less 3 and outs, and maybe some scores.
beast (6h) : Rodgers wouldn't of abandon attepting to get the ball to Nelson and Adams.
Zero2Cool (6h) : Rodgers with that game plan would have came up short too.
beast (7h) : Yeah the Packers defense got wore out... being on the field so long. Giving longer breathers than 3&out would of helped a lot IMO.
Cheesey (8h) : There wouldn't have been so many 3 and outs, thus keeping our D off the field.
Cheesey (8h) : True, but with the low score we would have had a chance with Rodgers behind center.
Zero2Cool (8h) : Brees is a damn good QB, not giving Capers a pass, not even close.
Zero2Cool (8h) : Saints kicked Packers ass with Rodgers too.
Cheesey (8h) : That's just it. Rodgers needs a DEFENSE as well. And without him, there is NO chance.
beast (10h) : Just fire everyone! Rodgers can do it without them! Hell trade for the healthy Browns players!
Cheesey (12h) : Capers needs to GO. So do players that can't cut it.
Zero2Cool (12h) : Capers presser summed up? INjuries are why we suck. (shut up, coach and adapt)
Zero2Cool (12h) : nearly crapped myself hearing dom capers talk, forgot to close the tab after mccarthy haha
Zero2Cool (12h) : McCarthy said the communication was not good enough on defense yesterday. Injuries in secondary have complicated substitution patterns.
Zero2Cool (12h) : McCarthy again says "I believe in him"... sorry, BS, we saw how you believe in him yesterday.
Zero2Cool (13h) : @The_Green_Gold Highest graded players Kenny Clark & Blake Martinez. It wouldn't be possible to grade an entire defense
Porforis (13h) : Well, it WAS clean until someone 'shouted' in it...
Zero2Cool (13h) : QB Brett Hundley when targeting a WR against Saints: 6-for-15, 54 yards.
Zero2Cool (13h) : clean?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
33m / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

22-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

22-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

22-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

Headlines