Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
4 Pages<1234>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline DakotaT  
#21 Posted : Friday, October 14, 2011 12:55:58 PM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

United States
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1,049
Applause Received: 2,116
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
Who the fuck is using the Vikings as an example on HOW TO build a winner? In my post briefly explaining a top level core structure I did not mention the Vikings.



Page 1.
Offline Zero2Cool  
#22 Posted : Friday, October 14, 2011 1:06:19 PM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,499
Applause Received: 4,035
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
Page 1.

Wow, that is helpful. Good work! You really proved your point there. Holy tooters do I see all of those posts saying the Vikings are an example on how to build a winner!! I did not see anyone say what the Vikings SHOULD do to build a winner. No sir, that was not said at all!

You are super observant!


Can you tell I'm getting tired of this ignorant bullshit??
Offline Formo  
#23 Posted : Friday, October 14, 2011 2:18:19 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 8/12/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 216
Applause Received: 159
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post

Building a winner starts with the GM putting in place the right guy at Quarterback. That is step 1 and the Vikings have never learned that. It is incredible the amount of wasted talent that has gone through that franchise because they didn't have the great player at the number 1 position.

Packer fans should consider themselves the luckiest fvckers on the planet.


I agree with both paragraphs.

I've been ok with the Chilly regime because he helped bring a lot of talent to the franchise, most of whom Vikings fan still enjoy. But one of his mistakes was NOT getting the QB spot taken care of ASAP. T-Jack could be a good enough excuse except for the fact that he was drafted in the worst possible way and Chilly stuck with him far too long. Most of us Viking fans are hoping that Ponder will be a solid career QB for us.
Offline zombieslayer  
#24 Posted : Friday, October 14, 2011 2:57:52 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
Vikings aren't such a bad model. Their year was 2009. They had the 2nd best team in the NFL. The Saints were the best team by a field goal in OT. And Formo agrees with me on this, but I think had Henderson not been injured, they beat the Saints in that game. Both the Saints and the Vikings were better than the Colts that year.

Now the problem with that model is obvious. They didn't have the depth that we did. Injuries to their DBs and OL killed them and their DL which was once a wall got old.

DakotaT is right - the first piece should always be the QB and you build a team around that first piece.

Ted Thompson is fully aware that Aaron Rodgers is his bread and butter. Check his drafts. Last two seasons, our first round picks have been OTs to protect our investment. Every season we draft a WR to give him weapons.

I can tell you right now what our 2012 draft will look like. In the first two rounds, an OL will be drafted. We'll also pick up yet another WR. In the 4th through 7th rounds, we'll take another OL. Everything else will be depth unless Ted Thompson can find a steal.
Online macbob  
#25 Posted : Friday, October 14, 2011 3:18:05 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2013Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2016PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2012FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2014

Joined: 10/12/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 372
Applause Received: 323
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
Okay, wow moving posts is a biotch. This is my thinking of how to build a successful NFL team.

Owner - priority one should be winning and putting a winning product on the field

General Manager - cares not about fans opinions only about acquiring the best talent. must not be afraid to make a big move to put team over the top.

Head Coach - teacher first, coach second.
Offensive Coordinator - teacher first, coach second.
Defensive Coordinator - teacher first, coach second.
Special Teams - not named Shawn Slocum


Solid scouting staff for college talent, keep logs on files until the player hits 32'ish.
Only overspend in free agency/trade if it is for a player whom will put your team "over the top"
Get rid of players a year EARLY rather than a year LATE


If you remove economics from decisions such as hiring a coach because he has a big name, or a player cuz of their name, etc ... I think this is the foundation most teams TRY to emulate, but fail.


Of course this is just my own BRIEF opinion.





Z2C-I'd add a few more (lessons learned from the Mike Sherman era):

1) Have a separate GM & HC. GM duties can distract from HC duties during regular season. Best to split those two than combine them into one.

2) Trade down in the draft more than you trade up in the draft. You can get screwed up by continually trading up in the draft and ending with fewer draft picks as a result--you're OK as long as you hit those picks (BJ Sanders) AND you don't have injuries, because you lose the depth behind your starters when you're doing that. Only trade up after you've stocked the team with sufficient depth at most/all positions (such as trading up to get CM3).

Offline Methodikal  
#26 Posted : Friday, October 14, 2011 4:02:21 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 5/17/2011(UTC)
Applause Given: 19
Applause Received: 6
Do the opposite of the Vikings = winner.
Offline Rockmolder  
#27 Posted : Sunday, October 16, 2011 7:04:53 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2010

Netherlands
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 245
Applause Received: 384
Methodikal said: Go to Quoted Post
Do the opposite of the Vikings = winner.


That'd actually make you the Buccaneers or Bengals. Suck of a the greater portion of your history, have an amazing season or 4 and win/nearly win a SB and then slide back into mediocrity.

That might actually be easier than being a Vikes fan, since those purple bastards get your hope up every year only to fall flat on their face.

That said, trading AP and Jared Allen might be a somewhat ok idea from a performance if your truly believe that you're completely rebuilding. If you believe that you're not going to win in the next five years, you might as well fetch as much for those players now that you still can and get building through the draft.

That said, there's one huge point that everyone seems to be overlooking here...

Every NFL team is run with one thing in mind. Profit. Players like Peterson and Allen are why, next to the real fans who stick to their team no matter what, the Vikings are still selling tickets, jerseys etc. It'd be very unwise to just trade away your moneycows at this point.

Maybe they would be better off in 3 years if they traded both of them... Or maybe they'll be stuck with a team full of no-name players. It's a pretty big gamble.
Offline Zero2Cool  
#28 Posted : Sunday, October 16, 2011 7:38:36 AM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,499
Applause Received: 4,035
Trading those two only works if you are able to draft talent. If you're not able to, you should be fired anyway.
Offline Zero2Cool  
#29 Posted : Monday, October 17, 2011 9:09:20 AM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,499
Applause Received: 4,035
Brandon Lloyd was traded to the St. Louis Rams. Kind off seeing a team get rid of one of its best players. Although, it's a good move for both Brandon Lloyd and the Broncos. He was not going to resign with Denver, especially with Tim Tebow at QB. Brandon is a good deep threat WR and Tebow does not have the arm strength to get it deep.
Offline DoddPower  
#30 Posted : Monday, October 17, 2011 9:49:55 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2016FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2015

United States
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA
Applause Given: 3,417
Applause Received: 941
Rockmolder said: Go to Quoted Post
That'd actually make you the Buccaneers or Bengals. Suck of a the greater portion of your history, have an amazing season or 4 and win/nearly win a SB and then slide back into mediocrity.

That might actually be easier than being a Vikes fan, since those purple bastards get your hope up every year only to fall flat on their face.

That said, trading AP and Jared Allen might be a somewhat ok idea from a performance if your truly believe that you're completely rebuilding. If you believe that you're not going to win in the next five years, you might as well fetch as much for those players now that you still can and get building through the draft.

That said, there's one huge point that everyone seems to be overlooking here...

Every NFL team is run with one thing in mind. Profit. Players like Peterson and Allen are why, next to the real fans who stick to their team no matter what, the Vikings are still selling tickets, jerseys etc. It'd be very unwise to just trade away your moneycows at this point.

Maybe they would be better off in 3 years if they traded both of them... Or maybe they'll be stuck with a team full of no-name players. It's a pretty big gamble.


I understand your point, but I would have to imagine they would get some big names in the draft, especially with several 1sts. Fans catch on to big time rookies quickly. Tebow was a leading Jersey selling not too long ago, although to be fair not many college players have careers like him. But still, hopefully my point came across.

With that being said, I could see trading JA, but not AP. It just seems too unlikely, unless they can somehow acquire Luck.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages<1234>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (2h) : Falcons have officially placed DL Adrian Clayborn on IR
Zero2Cool (3h) : Why? What's the difference? Can you cook same meals with one?
hardrocker950 (3h) : Get a pressure cooker and your crock pot will collect dust lol
Zero2Cool (3h) : Bill Vinovich is our ref. You might remember him from 4th and 26.
Smokey (4h) : They were chicken livers, and they are fabulous . LOL
uffda udfa (4h) : Not if Matt Ryan puts up a 40 passer rating. :) The last two were unfavorable conditions. This is dome time.
Cheesey (4h) : Smokey, went to fire up the crock pot to slow cook some chicken gizzards, it burned out!
Zero2Cool (5h) : Aaron Rodgers' passer rating in his 4 career games at the Georgia Dome: 114.5, 136.8, 117.0, 125.5.
Zero2Cool (9h) : from Rob Reischel @robreischel
Zero2Cool (9h) : Rodgers has played in 2 NFC Championship games. QB ratings were 56.7 and 55.9. That's won't cut it Sunday
Porforis (9h) : Have to fill the 24/7 news cycle with something.
Smokey (10h) : True, Zero
Zero2Cool (10h) : Rodgers didn't draw it up, it was selected from options. Duh.
uffda udfa (11h) : Zeke Elliott tired of domestic violence investigation. NFL moving forward now.
Smokey (17h) : Did u fire up the crock pot ?
Smokey (17h) : Jolly good show ole chap ! LOL
Cheesey (17h) : Smokey! Darn spell check! LOL!
Cheesey (17h) : Hey smiley! Just saw your shout out! How bout them Packers!
Smokey (17h) : Hello Cheesey !
GoPack1984 (21h) : I hope not. Please be something like 41-28 Packers.
uffda udfa (21h) : I agree with Chmura. This looks like a double 40 burger.
uffda udfa (21h) : The hug on the sidelines?
uffda udfa (21h) : What seemed so emotional?
Zero2Cool (21h) : No, but I am curious why that seemed so emotional. I might be reading into it too much.
uffda udfa (21h) : Anyone ever get confused looking at Alex Van Pelt thinking it's MM?
uffda udfa (23h) : I hope they aren't going to dial it down believing in destiny .
Zero2Cool (23h) : Jason Wilde: Packers "feel like a team of destiny"
uffda udfa (16-Jan) : They'll need all the Julio Joneses they can get.
Zero2Cool (16-Jan) : Chmura: "I'll tell you this: Atlanta's going to score 40 points. They are. The #Packers are going to have to score 41."
Zero2Cool (16-Jan) : Damn-Falcons coach Dan Quinn tells reporters that WR Julio Jones (foot) will be limited this week but will be “ready to rock” on Sunday.
Zero2Cool (16-Jan) : Packers defense has a red zone INT in each of the last 3 games... Hyde with two of them. (One being the clutch 4thQ INT vs DET in Week 17)
Zero2Cool (16-Jan) : Randall Cobb, Damarious Randall, Quentin Rollins, James Starks, Clay Matthews, Ty Montgomery & Jared Cook. OUT
Zero2Cool (16-Jan) : Packers inactive list when they lost 33-32 to the Falcons week 8.
Zero2Cool (16-Jan) : There is no emphasis, it's just a little bit of info. Take it or leave it. No harm.
Smokey (16-Jan) : Zero, I believe that you and some others place too much emphasis upon data. no harm intended.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
6m / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

11m / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Dulak

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / warhawk

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

3h / Around The NFL / Smokey

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

21h / Fantasy Sports Talk / rabidgopher04


Packers Headlines