Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
3 Pages<123>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline nerdmann  
#16 Posted : Sunday, November 20, 2011 10:26:25 AM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Select Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,191
Applause Received: 787
Grant is the starter, because they want to give props to him as a veteran. Starks has surpassed him. Green and Saine are better than Grant too, imo. They just haven't gotten their shots yet. Not saying that because I have a mancrush. Only because it's true.
Offline evad04  
#17 Posted : Sunday, November 20, 2011 12:39:20 PM(UTC)
evad04

Rank: Rookie
Joined: 8/10/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 77
Applause Received: 144
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Grant is the starter, because they want to give props to him as a veteran.

This is total speculation. I'm fine with it, but as long as we all agree it's speculation.

Quote:
Starks has surpassed him.

Agreed. Though Grant has always been a player who seems to heat up with more carries. The one time this year he was given the load, he rushed it 19 times for 92 yards.

Quote:
Green and Saine are better than Grant too, imo. They just haven't gotten their shots yet. Not saying that because I have a mancrush. Only because it's true.

You saying it's true doesn't make it true. What evidence is there for either of these guys being better than Rodgers?
Offline go.pack.go.  
#18 Posted : Sunday, November 20, 2011 12:44:28 PM(UTC)
go.pack.go.

Rank: Registered
Joined: 11/12/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 44
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Green and Saine are better than Grant too, imo. They just haven't gotten their shots yet.


That's like saying Matt Flynn is better than Rodgers, he just hasn't gotten a shot yet. You can't say they're better unless you have seen them in a starting role. Brandon Saine hasn't even seen the field once in the NFL as a RB.
Offline nerdmann  
#19 Posted : Sunday, November 20, 2011 2:08:59 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Select Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,191
Applause Received: 787
go.pack.go. said: Go to Quoted Post
That's like saying Matt Flynn is better than Rodgers, he just hasn't gotten a shot yet. You can't say they're better unless you have seen them in a starting role. Brandon Saine hasn't even seen the field once in the NFL as a RB.



To clarify, they haven't gained as many yards in the NFL as Grant, but I believe their skill sets are superior. Hows that? Based upon empirical observation of them in action.
Offline Dexter_Sinister  
#20 Posted : Sunday, November 20, 2011 2:21:03 PM(UTC)
Dexter_Sinister

Rank: Registered
Joined: 6/12/2010(UTC)
Applause Given: 292
Applause Received: 266
Fast isn't the same as good.

It looks like if Saine gets any action it will be filling in for Starks.
Offline nerdmann  
#21 Posted : Sunday, November 20, 2011 2:24:59 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Select Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,191
Applause Received: 787
Dexter_Sinister said: Go to Quoted Post
Fast isn't the same as good.

It looks like if Saine gets any action it will be filling in for Starks.



They are both faster than Grant, but that's not the only way they're better.
Offline go.pack.go.  
#22 Posted : Sunday, November 20, 2011 2:31:03 PM(UTC)
go.pack.go.

Rank: Registered
Joined: 11/12/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 44
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
They are both faster than Grant, but that's not the only way they're better.


Please elaborate on the other ways that they are "better".
Offline nerdmann  
#23 Posted : Sunday, November 20, 2011 2:45:15 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Select Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,191
Applause Received: 787
go.pack.go. said: Go to Quoted Post
Please elaborate on the other ways that they are "better".



Receiving, pass pro, cutting, not running into the pile.
Offline go.pack.go.  
#24 Posted : Sunday, November 20, 2011 2:48:32 PM(UTC)
go.pack.go.

Rank: Registered
Joined: 11/12/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 44
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Receiving, pass pro, cutting, not running into the pile.


Ryan Grant is actually pretty good in pass pro IMO. And I would comment on how good Alex Green and Brandon Saine are at that too but I haven't seen enough of Green and I haven't even seen Saine on the field.
Offline nerdmann  
#25 Posted : Sunday, November 20, 2011 2:52:12 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Select Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,191
Applause Received: 787
go.pack.go. said: Go to Quoted Post
Ryan Grant is actually pretty good in pass pro IMO. And I would comment on how good Alex Green and Brandon Saine are at that too but I haven't seen enough of Green and I haven't even seen Saine on the field.



I think if Grant was that good at pass pro, he'd be in on third down. I don't think they take him out because he's the "starter."
Offline RainX  
#26 Posted : Sunday, November 20, 2011 3:08:33 PM(UTC)
RainX

Rank: Rookie
Joined: 12/15/2008(UTC)
Applause Received: 5
He's going to get some increased playing time now. Starks is probably going to be out for at least a few weeks.
Offline cheeseheads123  
#27 Posted : Sunday, November 20, 2011 3:14:06 PM(UTC)
cheeseheads123

Rank: Member
Joined: 9/28/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 79
Applause Received: 153
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Grant is the starter, because they want to give props to him as a veteran. Starks has surpassed him. Green and Saine are better than Grant too, imo. They just haven't gotten their shots yet. Not saying that because I have a mancrush. Only because it's true.

You must really hate grant lol
Offline nerdmann  
#28 Posted : Sunday, November 20, 2011 3:32:46 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Select Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,191
Applause Received: 787
cheeseheads123 said: Go to Quoted Post
You must really hate grant lol



I love Grant. He's a great backup. Glad we have him now.
I think Levens was better than Grant, just due to his vision, although I think Levens was also a better receiver out of the backfield and could get to the corner better. I think the high percentage offense and screens that Levens ran made him look better than guys like Starks.
Offline zombieslayer  
#29 Posted : Sunday, November 20, 2011 3:53:31 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
I love Grant. He's a great backup. Glad we have him now.
I think Levens was better than Grant, just due to his vision, although I think Levens was also a better receiver out of the backfield and could get to the corner better. I think the high percentage offense and screens that Levens ran made him look better than guys like Starks.


And Jim Taylor was better than both of them. It's such a crying shame we can't have Jim Taylor as our RB. Dammit! ](*,) ](*,) ](*,)
Offline DakotaT  
#30 Posted : Sunday, November 20, 2011 4:02:59 PM(UTC)
DakotaT

Rank: Honored Member
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 755
Applause Received: 1,526
What we averaging a game running the ball 65-70. Wake me up when we have a problem. All this does is keeps Starks fresh for the stretch run.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (13h) : ctrl + f5 to see gooder tablet layout
gbguy20 (23-Apr) : woops
gbguy20 (23-Apr) : oh LOL
Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : u started a thread for another site seeking fans an writers :)
gbguy20 (23-Apr) : welp, i don't even know what you are referring to zero. So yes, it must have been an accident :)
Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : thanks, hectic right now tho
dhazer (22-Apr) : 1-0 pens
dhazer (22-Apr) : kevin you got pens
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : gbguy20 - assuming you created that by accident lol
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Early Thanksgiving!! haha
Smokey (20-Apr) : Sorry to hear about your Turkey encounter. The bird was killed and tenderized ? Clean it, pluck it , and freeze it. Tastey Eating roasted !
Zero2Cool (20-Apr) : Schedule will be available tomorrow.
Smokey (20-Apr) : Eagles to sign TEBOW !
Mucky Tundra (19-Apr) : TEBOW
Zero2Cool (17-Apr) : Wow, the site is freaking smoking fast
Smokey (17-Apr) : Gilbert, \_/ !!
Smokey (17-Apr) : Zero, drink one shot with me pal !
Smokey (17-Apr) : Who will drink with me ? \_/
Smokey (17-Apr) : \_/, Cheers !
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : you did it!
Mucky Tundra (16-Apr) : i guess the packernews link really was buggy
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : lol oops... those should be img and img not im and url... nm im tired bed time
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : each tag has to have a closing tag . [img]url[/url] like that
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : When a link takes over the whole post, it's because the link tags were not terminated properly.
Mucky Tundra (16-Apr) : Plus I couldn't understand why a direct copy+paste was linking somewhere else entirely...that link took over the whole post
Mucky Tundra (16-Apr) : oh okay. I was sort of panicking thinking it was something wrong with my computer
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : the packersnews stuff carries junk with it that you have to remove sometimes
Mucky Tundra (16-Apr) : hey Zero, thanks. Was it something wrong with the site or something on my end?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Darryn Colledge To Retire. NOOOOO!!!!
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Maybe we should lower the registration fee's to get them folks signed up an posting!!
Smokey (15-Apr) : GUESTS, JOIN US AND BECOME MEMBERS !
Smokey (15-Apr) : Red Bull gives you wings !
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : nah, i had wings today
Smokey (14-Apr) : Isn't everyone enjoying a large healthy salad ?
Smokey (13-Apr) : Spieth wins Masters with -18 score.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2015 Schedule
Sunday, Sep 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Sep 20 @ 7:30 PM
SEAHAWKS
Monday, Sep 28 @ 7:30 PM
CHIEFS
Sunday, Oct 4 @ 3:25 PM
at 49ers
Sunday, Oct 11 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Oct 18 @ 3:25 PM
CHARGERS
Sunday, Oct 25 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Sunday, Nov 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Broncos
Sunday, Nov 8 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Sunday, Nov 15 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 22 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Thursday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
BEARS
Thursday, Dec 3 @ 7:25 PM
at Lions
Sunday, Dec 13 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Sunday, Dec 20 @ 3:05 PM
at Raiders
Sunday, Dec 27 @ 3:25 PM
at Cardinals
Sunday, Jan 3 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS

Recent Topics
8m / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

13m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Bigbyfan

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

23-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

23-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / warhawk

23-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

21-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa


Tweeter