Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
12 Pages123>»
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline DakotaT  
#1 Posted : Monday, March 5, 2012 5:09:31 PM(UTC)

Rank: Honored Member
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 783
Applause Received: 1,576
Am I just a dumbass, or would signing Carl Nicks from the Saints to play LG and sliding TJ Lang to center solve our anemic running attack? I would rather pay a 27 year old All Pro big bucks than a questionable pro bowl center big bucks.

Flame away.
Offline Wade  
#2 Posted : Monday, March 5, 2012 5:17:39 PM(UTC)

Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 8/1/2009(UTC)
Location: nowhere of importance
Applause Given: 788
Applause Received: 793
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
Am I just a dumbass, or would signing Carl Nicks from the Saints to play LG and sliding TJ Lang to center solve our anemic running attack? I would rather pay a 27 year old All Pro big bucks than a questionable pro bowl center big bucks.

Flame away.


I actually think you have a good idea here.

Don't let it go to your head, though. You're still from North Dakota.
[grin1]

Offline nerdmann  
#3 Posted : Monday, March 5, 2012 5:37:15 PM(UTC)

Rank: Select Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,864
Applause Received: 914
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
Am I just a dumbass, or would signing Carl Nicks from the Saints to play LG and sliding TJ Lang to center solve our anemic running attack? I would rather pay a 27 year old All Pro big bucks than a questionable pro bowl center big bucks.

Flame away.


Has Lang played C before? It does sound vaguely familiar. I'm all for it though if he could do it. I like Lang. I'm a Lang guy.
Offline porky88  
#4 Posted : Monday, March 5, 2012 5:58:07 PM(UTC)

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2012Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2013Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2014

Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 4/26/2007(UTC)
Applause Given: 245
Applause Received: 487
Do you really want to get into a bidding war with Jerry Jones? Dallas is going all in on Carl Nicks, but in the perfect world, Nicks and Sitton would give the Packers the best guard tandem in football. Frankly, I think Nicks is the best guard in football and Sitton is obviously among the best. It makes sense, but once again, the Packers probably want to avoid a bidding war with Dallas. Chris Myers comes with a lot less fanfare, but he's a very reliable player, and signing him would probably be a more efficient move.
Offline TheKanataThrilla  
#5 Posted : Monday, March 5, 2012 6:17:31 PM(UTC)

Rank: Member
Canada
Joined: 9/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 302
Applause Received: 255
I actually love the idea of going after Nicks. I know the Saints are really in a bad spot not having the ability to protect him and Drew. But... I hate going down this route, but does Nicks want to come to GB unless we open up the Brinks truck? I know that Ted doesn't want to overpay, but I really do question how many FAs want to come to Green Bay unless there is a big payday in it for them.
Offline Stevetarded  
#6 Posted : Monday, March 5, 2012 6:49:38 PM(UTC)

Rank: Registered
Joined: 9/28/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 63
I don't really think 8.5m/year is worth the difference between Nicks and Lang
Offline TheKanataThrilla  
#7 Posted : Monday, March 5, 2012 7:29:25 PM(UTC)

Rank: Member
Canada
Joined: 9/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 302
Applause Received: 255
Stevetarded said: Go to Quoted Post
I don't really think 8.5m/year is worth the difference between Nicks and Lang


Isn't Wells looking at around $8M as well? Not sure what dollar range Myers is looking for. I guess the question is whether it is better to pay top G money and have a below average C, or have an above average C, but a serviceable G.

Offline Stevetarded  
#8 Posted : Monday, March 5, 2012 8:31:04 PM(UTC)

Rank: Registered
Joined: 9/28/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 63
TheKanataThrilla said: Go to Quoted Post
Isn't Wells looking at around $8M as well? Not sure what dollar range Myers is looking for. I guess the question is whether it is better to pay top G money and have a below average C, or have an above average C, but a serviceable G.



I doubt he's looking for that much. Nick Mangolds contract which made him the highest paid C paid him avg 7m/year.
Offline zombieslayer  
#9 Posted : Monday, March 5, 2012 8:42:00 PM(UTC)

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
porky88 said: Go to Quoted Post
Do you really want to get into a bidding war with Jerry Jones? Dallas is going all in on Carl Nicks, but in the perfect world, Nicks and Sitton would give the Packers the best guard tandem in football. Frankly, I think Nicks is the best guard in football and Sitton is obviously among the best. It makes sense, but once again, the Packers probably want to avoid a bidding war with Dallas. Chris Myers comes with a lot less fanfare, but he's a very reliable player, and signing him would probably be a more efficient move.


Heh. This makes me think of 2005. Ted Thompson's not gonna spend big money on two Guards.
Offline porky88  
#10 Posted : Monday, March 5, 2012 10:12:38 PM(UTC)

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2012Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2013Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2014

Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 4/26/2007(UTC)
Applause Given: 245
Applause Received: 487
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
Heh. This makes me think of 2005. Ted Thompson's not gonna spend big money on two Guards.

Except that, Myers is coming off a Pro Bowl caliber season. He’s a far superior player to Adrian Klemm and Matt O’Dwyer. I think it’s 2006. Remember, Ted Thompson signed Marquand Manuel (bust), Charles Woodson (hit), and Ryan Pickett (hit) that off-season. I’m not suggesting he’ll break the bank for big name players, but I think Green Bay is going to be active. My spider sense is just tingling for whatever reason.

thanks Post received 1 applause.
evad04 on 3/5/2012(UTC)
Offline nerdmann  
#11 Posted : Monday, March 5, 2012 10:58:46 PM(UTC)

Rank: Select Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,864
Applause Received: 914
We really only "NEED" one player. We will get more, but we're not far from where we need to be, which is dominant on both sides of the ball.
Offline dhazer  
#12 Posted : Tuesday, March 6, 2012 6:19:42 AM(UTC)

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2013Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2009PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 72
Applause Received: 270
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
We really only "NEED" one player. We will get more, but we're not far from where we need to be, which is dominant on both sides of the ball.



Umm are you saying the one player can play the whole defense? And why are people saying our running game is so bad, 4.2 and 4.3 yards per attempt is a bad running game? The problem is we didn't even attempt to run the ball. Our Average when you take away Rodgers is 4.07 what more do you guys want?

The top four had 315 attempts for 1281 yards. You take away the 30 attempts mostly short yardage for Kuhn and the average jumps to 4.22 yards.

But I guess those are only facts they don't matter, our running game sucked.

Offline Porforis  
#13 Posted : Tuesday, March 6, 2012 6:22:22 AM(UTC)

Rank: Veteran Member
United States
Joined: 8/22/2009(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Applause Given: 203
Applause Received: 401
I don't know why people think our running attack is so terrible. It's not, it's above average.

What is more critical for our success, to run better or to keep Aaron Rodgers upright?
thanks Post received 1 applause.
zombieslayer on 3/6/2012(UTC)
Offline Zero2Cool  
#14 Posted : Tuesday, March 6, 2012 6:33:48 AM(UTC)

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Premier Member
United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,139
Applause Received: 2,884
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
We really only "NEED" one player. We will get more, but we're not far from where we need to be, which is dominant on both sides of the ball.


Sweet, one player? What player is going to fix both the drops on offense and the piss poor tackling on defense? I say Packers should sign said player to a life time contract, NOW!
Offline Zero2Cool  
#15 Posted : Tuesday, March 6, 2012 6:38:57 AM(UTC)

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Premier Member
United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,139
Applause Received: 2,884
Porforis said: Go to Quoted Post
I don't know why people think our running attack is so terrible. It's not, it's above average.

What is more critical for our success, to run better or to keep Aaron Rodgers upright?


The running game is as good as it's ever going to get because the Packers do not run that often. Even Mike McCarthy has implied his run play selection is predictable.

Solidify the offensive line and the offense is just dandy.
Find some motivation for the defense as a whole to tackle better and the defense is just dandy.


I really only see two main problems with the Packers. Failure to catch in critical situations (e.g. first down opportunities) and the defense being soft at tackling. I think these two items can be improved during the off season.

I would say lack of pass rush is the Packers biggest issue on defense, but if they can't tackle, what's the point? lol
thanks Post received 1 applause.
cheeseheads123 on 3/6/2012(UTC)
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
Similar Topics
Secret to Packers' success? Re-sign stars, avoid free agents (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by nerdmann 6/14/2015 2:58:41 PM(UTC)
Packers sign 17 rookie free agents (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by greengold 5/8/2015 12:20:19 PM(UTC)
Value of undrafted free agents (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by Zero2Cool 5/2/2015 2:32:00 PM(UTC)
Free agents often not worth the money, Ron Wolf says (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by MintBaconDrivel 4/28/2015 12:18:00 PM(UTC)
When to overpay for free agents (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by Zero2Cool 4/16/2015 2:58:06 PM(UTC)
Mike McCarthy says focus is on draft, not other free agents (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by buckeyepackfan 3/23/2015 12:59:49 AM(UTC)
Michael Crabtree, Tramon Williams among the top free agents left (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by nerdmann 3/15/2015 3:53:42 PM(UTC)
Free agents you like? (that packers will not sign) (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by Laser Gunns 2/16/2015 1:22:18 AM(UTC)
Would You Return? (Free Agents) (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by nerdmann 1/19/2015 9:44:28 AM(UTC)
2015 Green Bay Packers free agents (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by MintBaconDrivel 1/5/2015 6:13:11 AM(UTC)
Packers prefer compensatory picks over unrestricted free agents (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by Zero2Cool 4/3/2014 4:49:45 AM(UTC)
Packers continue to not pursue free agents from other teams (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by wpr 3/14/2014 10:09:08 AM(UTC)
How many tier 1 or high tier 2 free agents does GB need to sign? (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by Wade 1/31/2014 10:41:00 AM(UTC)
Packers Free Agents: Top 10 to Re-Sign (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by wpr 1/22/2014 6:37:30 AM(UTC)
Starter Pack: Must-sign free agents (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by wpr 1/15/2014 6:41:18 AM(UTC)
Packers free agents for 2014 (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by MintBaconDrivel 1/6/2014 8:15:34 AM(UTC)
Free Agents, who do you want brought back (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by steveishere 12/12/2013 8:13:21 AM(UTC)
Packers Have Three Free Agents in for Workouts (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by macbob 9/10/2013 5:39:52 PM(UTC)
2014 Packers free agents: who will walk? who will stay? (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by MintBaconDrivel 6/2/2013 9:18:35 AM(UTC)
2013 Packers undrafted free agents (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by beast 4/27/2013 4:58:22 PM(UTC)
How important are Veteran Free Agents today (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by Pack93z 4/1/2013 7:41:49 AM(UTC)
Packers don't tender restricted free agents Francois, Zombo, Crabtree (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by MintBaconDrivel 3/12/2013 9:38:00 AM(UTC)
2013 Free Agents (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by nerdmann 3/8/2013 2:48:22 PM(UTC)
Comparing Free agents (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by wpr 2/16/2013 7:33:54 AM(UTC)
Packer Free Agents for 2013 an 2014 seasons (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by Zero2Cool 1/14/2013 6:43:20 PM(UTC)
2012 Packers Free Agents (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by CaliforniaCheez 1/17/2012 9:04:50 AM(UTC)
Top 5 Undrafted Free Agents Most Likely to Make the Roster (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by wpr 8/27/2011 2:59:30 PM(UTC)
Packers sign seven draft choices, two undrafted free agents (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by Zero2Cool 7/29/2011 3:52:32 PM(UTC)
Best of the Undrafted Free Agents (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by Pack93z 7/20/2011 9:04:12 AM(UTC)
Should The Packers Re-Sign All Their Unrestricted Free Agents? (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by wpr 6/23/2011 8:06:46 PM(UTC)
12 Pages123>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (3h) : Matt Blanchard?
Zero2Cool (16h) : Doubt any QB is cut before Thursday. I want to see more of Matt and Brett.
Smokey (30-Aug) : Why be a guest, come join us today !
Zero2Cool (30-Aug) : Hyde is the injury I'm most concerned about. Cobby fine.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

Road To Super Bowl 50
Sunday, Sep 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Sep 20 @ 7:30 PM
SEAHAWKS
Monday, Sep 28 @ 7:30 PM
CHIEFS
Sunday, Oct 4 @ 3:25 PM
at 49ers
Sunday, Oct 11 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Oct 18 @ 3:25 PM
CHARGERS
Sunday, Oct 25 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Sunday, Nov 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Broncos
Sunday, Nov 8 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Sunday, Nov 15 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 22 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Thursday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
BEARS
Thursday, Dec 3 @ 7:25 PM
at Lions
Sunday, Dec 13 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Sunday, Dec 20 @ 3:05 PM
at Raiders
Sunday, Dec 27 @ 3:25 PM
at Cardinals
Sunday, Jan 3 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / CaliforniaCheez

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / CaliforniaCheez

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mikesecure

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

30-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Barfarn

30-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

30-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann


Tweeter