Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
12 Pages123>»
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline DakotaT  
#1 Posted : Monday, March 5, 2012 5:09:31 PM(UTC)
DakotaT

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Posts: 7,247
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 622
Applause Received: 1,296

Am I just a dumbass, or would signing Carl Nicks from the Saints to play LG and sliding TJ Lang to center solve our anemic running attack? I would rather pay a 27 year old All Pro big bucks than a questionable pro bowl center big bucks.

Flame away.

Edited by moderator Thursday, February 21, 2013 11:48:47 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

UserPostedImage
Sponsor
Offline Wade  
#2 Posted : Monday, March 5, 2012 5:17:39 PM(UTC)
Wade

Rank: All Pro

Posts: 5,762
Joined: 8/1/2009(UTC)
Location: nowhere of importance

Applause Given: 629
Applause Received: 647

Originally Posted by: DakotaT Go to Quoted Post
Am I just a dumbass, or would signing Carl Nicks from the Saints to play LG and sliding TJ Lang to center solve our anemic running attack? I would rather pay a 27 year old All Pro big bucks than a questionable pro bowl center big bucks.

Flame away.


I actually think you have a good idea here.

Don't let it go to your head, though. You're still from North Dakota.
Big Grin

None of the above. It wouldn't have been a wasted vote. Obama and Romney -- Those were the wasted votes.
Offline nerdmann  
#3 Posted : Monday, March 5, 2012 5:37:15 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Posts: 6,888
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,295
Applause Received: 572

Originally Posted by: DakotaT Go to Quoted Post
Am I just a dumbass, or would signing Carl Nicks from the Saints to play LG and sliding TJ Lang to center solve our anemic running attack? I would rather pay a 27 year old All Pro big bucks than a questionable pro bowl center big bucks.

Flame away.


Has Lang played C before? It does sound vaguely familiar. I'm all for it though if he could do it. I like Lang. I'm a Lang guy.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Offline porky88  
#4 Posted : Monday, March 5, 2012 5:58:07 PM(UTC)
porky88

Rank: Pro Bowl

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2012Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2013Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2014

Posts: 3,029
Joined: 4/26/2007(UTC)

Applause Given: 177
Applause Received: 335

Do you really want to get into a bidding war with Jerry Jones? Dallas is going all in on Carl Nicks, but in the perfect world, Nicks and Sitton would give the Packers the best guard tandem in football. Frankly, I think Nicks is the best guard in football and Sitton is obviously among the best. It makes sense, but once again, the Packers probably want to avoid a bidding war with Dallas. Chris Myers comes with a lot less fanfare, but he's a very reliable player, and signing him would probably be a more efficient move.
Offline TheKanataThrilla  
#5 Posted : Monday, March 5, 2012 6:17:31 PM(UTC)
TheKanataThrilla

Rank: 5th Round Draft Pick

Canada
Posts: 559
Joined: 9/8/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 125
Applause Received: 85

I actually love the idea of going after Nicks. I know the Saints are really in a bad spot not having the ability to protect him and Drew. But... I hate going down this route, but does Nicks want to come to GB unless we open up the Brinks truck? I know that Ted doesn't want to overpay, but I really do question how many FAs want to come to Green Bay unless there is a big payday in it for them.
"Stumbling from one disaster to another" Lost Together (Blue Rodeo)
Offline Stevetarded  
#6 Posted : Monday, March 5, 2012 6:49:38 PM(UTC)
Stevetarded

Rank: 3rd Round Draft Pick

Posts: 1,348
Joined: 9/28/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 63

I don't really think 8.5m/year is worth the difference between Nicks and Lang
blank
Offline TheKanataThrilla  
#7 Posted : Monday, March 5, 2012 7:29:25 PM(UTC)
TheKanataThrilla

Rank: 5th Round Draft Pick

Canada
Posts: 559
Joined: 9/8/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 125
Applause Received: 85

Originally Posted by: Stevetarded Go to Quoted Post
I don't really think 8.5m/year is worth the difference between Nicks and Lang


Isn't Wells looking at around $8M as well? Not sure what dollar range Myers is looking for. I guess the question is whether it is better to pay top G money and have a below average C, or have an above average C, but a serviceable G.

"Stumbling from one disaster to another" Lost Together (Blue Rodeo)
Offline Stevetarded  
#8 Posted : Monday, March 5, 2012 8:31:04 PM(UTC)
Stevetarded

Rank: 3rd Round Draft Pick

Posts: 1,348
Joined: 9/28/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 63

Originally Posted by: TheKanataThrilla Go to Quoted Post
Isn't Wells looking at around $8M as well? Not sure what dollar range Myers is looking for. I guess the question is whether it is better to pay top G money and have a below average C, or have an above average C, but a serviceable G.



I doubt he's looking for that much. Nick Mangolds contract which made him the highest paid C paid him avg 7m/year.
blank
Offline zombieslayer  
#9 Posted : Monday, March 5, 2012 8:42:00 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Most Valuable Player

Posts: 9,919
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco

Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495

Originally Posted by: porky88 Go to Quoted Post
Do you really want to get into a bidding war with Jerry Jones? Dallas is going all in on Carl Nicks, but in the perfect world, Nicks and Sitton would give the Packers the best guard tandem in football. Frankly, I think Nicks is the best guard in football and Sitton is obviously among the best. It makes sense, but once again, the Packers probably want to avoid a bidding war with Dallas. Chris Myers comes with a lot less fanfare, but he's a very reliable player, and signing him would probably be a more efficient move.


Heh. This makes me think of 2005. Ted Thompson's not gonna spend big money on two Guards.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)

2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. Ted Thompson Mike McCarthy Aaron Rodgers
Offline porky88  
#10 Posted : Monday, March 5, 2012 10:12:38 PM(UTC)
porky88

Rank: Pro Bowl

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2012Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2013Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2014

Posts: 3,029
Joined: 4/26/2007(UTC)

Applause Given: 177
Applause Received: 335

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer Go to Quoted Post
Heh. This makes me think of 2005. Ted Thompson's not gonna spend big money on two Guards.

Except that, Myers is coming off a Pro Bowl caliber season. He’s a far superior player to Adrian Klemm and Matt O’Dwyer. I think it’s 2006. Remember, Ted Thompson signed Marquand Manuel (bust), Charles Woodson (hit), and Ryan Pickett (hit) that off-season. I’m not suggesting he’ll break the bank for big name players, but I think Green Bay is going to be active. My spider sense is just tingling for whatever reason.

thanks Post received 1 applause.
evad04 on 3/5/2012(UTC)
Offline nerdmann  
#11 Posted : Monday, March 5, 2012 10:58:46 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Posts: 6,888
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,295
Applause Received: 572

We really only "NEED" one player. We will get more, but we're not far from where we need to be, which is dominant on both sides of the ball.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Offline dhazer  
#12 Posted : Tuesday, March 6, 2012 6:19:42 AM(UTC)
dhazer

Rank: Pro Bowl

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2013Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2009PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2013

Posts: 3,897
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 45
Applause Received: 190

Originally Posted by: nerdmann Go to Quoted Post
We really only "NEED" one player. We will get more, but we're not far from where we need to be, which is dominant on both sides of the ball.



Umm are you saying the one player can play the whole defense? And why are people saying our running game is so bad, 4.2 and 4.3 yards per attempt is a bad running game? The problem is we didn't even attempt to run the ball. Our Average when you take away Rodgers is 4.07 what more do you guys want?

The top four had 315 attempts for 1281 yards. You take away the 30 attempts mostly short yardage for Kuhn and the average jumps to 4.22 yards.

But I guess those are only facts they don't matter, our running game sucked.

UserPostedImage

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be :)
Offline Porforis  
#13 Posted : Tuesday, March 6, 2012 6:22:22 AM(UTC)
Porforis

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

United States
Posts: 2,738
Joined: 8/22/2009(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee, WI

Applause Given: 168
Applause Received: 333

I don't know why people think our running attack is so terrible. It's not, it's above average.

What is more critical for our success, to run better or to keep Aaron Rodgers upright?
UserPostedImage
thanks Post received 1 applause.
zombieslayer on 3/6/2012(UTC)
Offline Zero2Cool  
#14 Posted : Tuesday, March 6, 2012 6:33:48 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Rank: Legend

Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Posts: 25,635
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI

Applause Given: 1,835
Applause Received: 1,991

Originally Posted by: nerdmann Go to Quoted Post
We really only "NEED" one player. We will get more, but we're not far from where we need to be, which is dominant on both sides of the ball.


Sweet, one player? What player is going to fix both the drops on offense and the piss poor tackling on defense? I say Packers should sign said player to a life time contract, NOW!

UserPostedImage
Click here and find the LATEST Packers News!
Offline Zero2Cool  
#15 Posted : Tuesday, March 6, 2012 6:38:57 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Rank: Legend

Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Posts: 25,635
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI

Applause Given: 1,835
Applause Received: 1,991

Originally Posted by: Porforis Go to Quoted Post
I don't know why people think our running attack is so terrible. It's not, it's above average.

What is more critical for our success, to run better or to keep Aaron Rodgers upright?


The running game is as good as it's ever going to get because the Packers do not run that often. Even Mike McCarthy has implied his run play selection is predictable.

Solidify the offensive line and the offense is just dandy.
Find some motivation for the defense as a whole to tackle better and the defense is just dandy.


I really only see two main problems with the Packers. Failure to catch in critical situations (e.g. first down opportunities) and the defense being soft at tackling. I think these two items can be improved during the off season.

I would say lack of pass rush is the Packers biggest issue on defense, but if they can't tackle, what's the point? lol

UserPostedImage
Click here and find the LATEST Packers News!
thanks Post received 1 applause.
cheeseheads123 on 3/6/2012(UTC)
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
12 Pages123>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error



Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DarkaneRules

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / earthquake

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

7h / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / MintBaconDrivel

24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / porky88

24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / packman82

24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / musccy

24-Jul / Random Babble / wpr

24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool


Tweeter

Copyright © 2006-2014 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.