Rank: Legend
 Posts: 24,647 Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC) Location: Green Bay, WI Applause Given: 1,642
Applause Received: 1,453
|
JSOnline is saying it's six years for $24 million, but I think they are in error. JSOnline wrote:Update: According to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, the deal is worth $24 million over six years with $13 million guaranteed. |
 Click here and find the LATEST Packers News! |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: 4th Round Draft Pick
Posts: 925
Joined: 9/28/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 36
Applause Received: 42
|
4 yr, $24M ($13M guaranteed) for Scott Wells.
4 yr, $25M ($14M guaranteed) for Chris Meyers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick
Posts: 1,941
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Lima, Ohio
Applause Given: 117
Applause Received: 245
|
Wells to St. Louis, Clifton a big ?, prob done, Sherrod a ?,
I hope ted has a plan, (sure he does), as of right now, A. Rodgers may be running for his life.
Wells for 6 mil a year, IMHO Ted should have been able to match that.
Oh well, time to sit back and see what developes. |
“"The preparation week is where you make your hay,You have to win the week first. That’s where a lot of the wins and losses come. It’s how you approach the week leading up to the game."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Pro Bowl
Posts: 3,710
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 30
Applause Received: 131
|
Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan  Wells to St. Louis, Clifton a big ?, prob done, Sherrod a ?,
I hope ted has a plan, (sure he does), as of right now, A. Rodgers may be running for his life.
Wells for 6 mil a year, IMHO Ted should have been able to match that.
Oh well, time to sit back and see what developes. This is reminding me of the Seattle team Ted Thompson and Holmgrem built in Seattle, they did good until their big name players started wanting big contracts and were let go elsewhere. Get ready folks it is starting already. I will admit Ted Thompson is good at building a team thru the draft but he is unproven on building a dynasty. |
 Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be :) |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: 4th Round Draft Pick
Posts: 925
Joined: 9/28/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 36
Applause Received: 42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: 4th Round Draft Pick
Posts: 925
Joined: 9/28/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 36
Applause Received: 42
|
Packers reached out to Wimbley |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: All Pro
Posts: 5,467
Joined: 8/1/2009(UTC)
Location: nowhere of importance
Applause Given: 442
Applause Received: 489
|
The Wells signing remind anyone of Jenkins' signing last year?
Last year everyone echoed the Packer party line that they couldn't afford to afford to overpay for Jenkins. And Jenkins ended up signing with Philly with a deal that was nowhere near "breaking the bank."
Now this year, the Packers again want to avoid overpaying Wells. And he signs for a deal which isn't particularly rich by 2012 standards for interior linemen.
Sometimes I think Ted tries to make too extra good a deal, and misses opportunities as a result. |
None of the above. It wouldn't have been a wasted vote. Obama and Romney -- Those were the wasted votes. |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: 7th Round Draft Pick
Posts: 88
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 5
Applause Received: 5
|
I for one is glad Ted didnt pay out 6 mill a year for Wells, I dont think he is worth that kinda of money and overpaying is a sign of desperation, we would most likely be able to get a servicable rookie center in rounds 3-5. There is still decent talent on the Center free agent market, though they all have questions, bring one in cheap short term and let them fight the draft choice for a starter spot.
The Kendall deal is also more that I would have expected Ted to pay out, but would have liked him as a rotational guy at maybe 3 mill a year.
|
blank |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: All Pro
Posts: 5,914
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1,668
Applause Received: 394
|
Originally Posted by: dhazer This is reminding me of the Seattle team Ted Thompson and Holmgrem built in Seattle, they did good until their big name players started wanting big contracts and were let go elsewhere. Get ready folks it is starting already. I will admit Ted Thompson is good at building a team thru the draft but he is unproven on building a dynasty.
Seattle went into the shitter when they GOT RID, of Ted Thompson. |
It's not whether you get knocked down, it's whether you get back up again. |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: 3rd Round Draft Pick
Posts: 1,348
Joined: 9/28/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 63
|
Originally Posted by: dhazer This is reminding me of the Seattle team Ted Thompson and Holmgrem built in Seattle, they did good until their big name players started wanting big contracts and were let go elsewhere. Get ready folks it is starting already. I will admit Ted Thompson is good at building a team thru the draft but he is unproven on building a dynasty.
It's starting already? Why didn't it start when guys like Jennings, Jordy, Sitton, and Tramon needed contracts? |
blank |
 Post received 3 applause.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Most Valuable Player
Posts: 9,919
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
|
Originally Posted by: Wade The Wells signing remind anyone of Jenkins' signing last year?
Last year everyone echoed the Packer party line that they couldn't afford to afford to overpay for Jenkins. And Jenkins ended up signing with Philly with a deal that was nowhere near "breaking the bank."
Now this year, the Packers again want to avoid overpaying Wells. And he signs for a deal which isn't particularly rich by 2012 standards for interior linemen.
Sometimes I think Ted tries to make too extra good a deal, and misses opportunities as a result. I'm still convinced that what went wrong in 2011 was we lost Cullen Jenkins and got nobody to replace him. |
My man Donald Driver  (thanks to Pack93z for the pic) 2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty.    |
Post received 2 applause.
|
|
|
|
Rank: All Pro
Posts: 5,914
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1,668
Applause Received: 394
|
Originally Posted by: zombieslayer I'm still convinced that what went wrong in 2011 was we lost Cullen Jenkins and got nobody to replace him. We had Neal, but he shit himself. |
It's not whether you get knocked down, it's whether you get back up again. |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Most Valuable Player
Posts: 9,919
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
|
Originally Posted by: nerdmann We had Neal, but he shit himself. Yeah. Neal played 7 games and got 0 sacks. Wow. I just noticed the Jenkins in 11 games last year got more sacks than our entire DL combined in 2012. No pressure from the DL killed our D. |
My man Donald Driver (thanks to Pack93z for the pic) 2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Hall of Famer
Posts: 11,692 Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC) Location: Germany Applause Given: 365
Applause Received: 263
|
Originally Posted by: dhazer I will admit Ted Thompson is good at building a team thru the draft but he is unproven on building a dynasty. Who exactly in this league do you think is proven on building a dynasty? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Most Valuable Player
Posts: 9,919
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
|
Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel Who exactly in this league do you think is proven on building a dynasty?
I know you're asking Hazer, but I'll reply with that Pats guy (I think it's Kraft). He built the last one. Right now, our biggest threat are the Giants. Their D kicks ass. The stats are misleading because they're injury prone and always seem to get healthy in time for the Playoffs. Their D was superb last year, but rated as average because of injuries. Once they got healthy, they started dominating. So that Giants guy too. |
My man Donald Driver (thanks to Pack93z for the pic) 2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Users browsing this topic |
|
Guest
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.