Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
9 Pages«<45678>»

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
zombieslayer  
#101 Posted : Saturday, March 17, 2012 10:33:10 AM(UTC)
Wade said: Go to Quoted Post
The Wells signing remind anyone of Jenkins' signing last year?

Last year everyone echoed the Packer party line that they couldn't afford to afford to overpay for Jenkins. And Jenkins ended up signing with Philly with a deal that was nowhere near "breaking the bank."

Now this year, the Packers again want to avoid overpaying Wells. And he signs for a deal which isn't particularly rich by 2012 standards for interior linemen.

Sometimes I think Ted tries to make too extra good a deal, and misses opportunities as a result.


I'm still convinced that what went wrong in 2011 was we lost Cullen Jenkins and got nobody to replace him.
nerdmann  
#102 Posted : Saturday, March 17, 2012 11:04:02 AM(UTC)
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
I'm still convinced that what went wrong in 2011 was we lost Cullen Jenkins and got nobody to replace him.


We had Neal, but he shit himself.
zombieslayer  
#103 Posted : Saturday, March 17, 2012 11:15:34 AM(UTC)
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
We had Neal, but he shit himself.


Yeah. Neal played 7 games and got 0 sacks.

Wow. I just noticed the Jenkins in 11 games last year got more sacks than our entire DL combined in 2012. No pressure from the DL killed our D.
Nonstopdrivel  
#104 Posted : Saturday, March 17, 2012 2:02:44 PM(UTC)
dhazer said: Go to Quoted Post
I will admit Ted Thompson is good at building a team thru the draft but he is unproven on building a dynasty.

Who exactly in this league do you think is proven on building a dynasty?
zombieslayer  
#105 Posted : Saturday, March 17, 2012 5:10:12 PM(UTC)
Nonstopdrivel said: Go to Quoted Post
Who exactly in this league do you think is proven on building a dynasty?


I know you're asking Hazer, but I'll reply with that Pats guy (I think it's Kraft). He built the last one.

Right now, our biggest threat are the Giants. Their D kicks ass. The stats are misleading because they're injury prone and always seem to get healthy in time for the Playoffs. Their D was superb last year, but rated as average because of injuries. Once they got healthy, they started dominating. So that Giants guy too.
porky88  
#106 Posted : Saturday, March 17, 2012 6:45:37 PM(UTC)
Wade said: Go to Quoted Post
The Wells signing remind anyone of Jenkins' signing last year?

Last year everyone echoed the Packer party line that they couldn't afford to afford to overpay for Jenkins. And Jenkins ended up signing with Philly with a deal that was nowhere near "breaking the bank."

Now this year, the Packers again want to avoid overpaying Wells. And he signs for a deal which isn't particularly rich by 2012 standards for interior linemen.

Sometimes I think Ted tries to make too extra good a deal, and misses opportunities as a result.

Ted Thompson's philosophy has always been to let go of a player one year too soon than one year too late. I think he's doing the same here. He’s done it with Marco Rivera, Mike Wahle, Corey Williams, and Brett Favre.

We’ll see what happens here. The problem isn’t that Green Bay let Wells walk. It’s that there's no other alternative on the roster. Letting Jenkins go was a calculated risk. They overvalued Mike Neal. They know they have a major hole here. There are few decent options out there. Guys that have been hit or miss for much of their careers, but I don’t think they hold EDS in the same regard they held Mike Neal.
nerdmann  
#107 Posted : Saturday, March 17, 2012 7:47:19 PM(UTC)
Well they do have Lang on the roster. As for Neal, injuries happen. We saw that in '10 even moreso.

Sure, Neal had an injury history. But so did Jenkins, and he was 31.
Dexter_Sinister  
#108 Posted : Sunday, March 18, 2012 11:10:20 AM(UTC)
porky88 said: Go to Quoted Post
Ted Thompson's philosophy has always been to let go of a player one year too soon than one year too late. I think he's doing the same here. He’s done it with Marco Rivera, Mike Wahle, Corey Williams, and Brett Favre.

We’ll see what happens here. The problem isn’t that Green Bay let Wells walk. It’s that there's no other alternative on the roster. Letting Jenkins go was a calculated risk. They overvalued Mike Neal. They know they have a major hole here. There are few decent options out there. Guys that have been hit or miss for much of their careers, but I don’t think they hold EDS in the same regard they held Mike Neal.


Wahle was a cap casualty due to Sherman's mismanagement. Thompson said he wasn't happy that he had to let Wahle go. Who actually did play well for several more years. It doesn't fit the pattern.

Brett left. He wasn't let go. He doesn't count either.

Kampman has had major knee issues since he left. He could be considered as fitting that pattern.
porky88  
#109 Posted : Sunday, March 18, 2012 5:27:47 PM(UTC)
Dexter_Sinister said: Go to Quoted Post
Wahle was a cap casualty due to Sherman's mismanagement. Thompson said he wasn't happy that he had to let Wahle go. Who actually did play well for several more years. It doesn't fit the pattern.

Brett left. He wasn't let go. He doesn't count either.

Kampman has had major knee issues since he left. He could be considered as fitting that pattern.

That’s a good point on Kampman. I don't want to rehash the whole Brett Favre debacle, but if the Packers wanted Favre, he would've played for Green Bay.

Frankly, many Packer fans overstated Wahle’s play in Carolina. He was adequate for the most part, with the exception of his first season, where he was very good. However, nowhere near the caliber player he was for the Packers, in my assessment.

Dexter_Sinister  
#110 Posted : Sunday, March 18, 2012 7:01:10 PM(UTC)
porky88 said: Go to Quoted Post
That’s a good point on Kampman. I don't want to rehash the whole Brett Favre debacle, but if the Packers wanted Favre, he would've played for Green Bay.

Frankly, many Packer fans overstated Wahle’s play in Carolina. He was adequate for the most part, with the exception of his first season, where he was very good. However, nowhere near the caliber player he was for the Packers, in my assessment.



I don't want to rehash the whole thing but as far as coming back, the un-retirement was as fake as the retirement. He didn't change his mind, it was all part of a plan. Probably Chilly's plan. I don't think Favre is smart enough to come up with it.

After the roster was set, Favre timed it to drop 12 mil on the cap and put them over the roster limit. Normally that would force a free release. Ted went to the NFL and got an exemption and had cap room for Favre.Ted said OK, come on in. That is when Favre backed off and said, it won't work and he would accept a trade to anybody. Because he knew they would never trade him to MN or give him a free release if he was under contract. Which ran through 2011.

He never wanted to retire, he never wanted to come back to Green Bay. He wanted out. He was never going to play for Green Bay. No matter what. Between the '06 and '07 seasons, he wanted out and demanded a trade too Minnesota. The retirement and un-retirement were part of that plan. Even the entire '07 season was part of that plan.

gbguy20  
#111 Posted : Sunday, March 18, 2012 7:22:46 PM(UTC)
Dexter_Sinister said: Go to Quoted Post
I don't want to rehash the whole thing but as far as coming back, the un-retirement was as fake as the retirement. He didn't change his mind, it was all part of a plan. Probably Chilly's plan. I don't think Favre is smart enough to come up with it.

After the roster was set, Favre timed it to drop 12 mil on the cap and put them over the roster limit. Normally that would force a free release. Ted went to the NFL and got an exemption and had cap room for Favre.Ted said OK, come on in. That is when Favre backed off and said, it won't work and he would accept a trade to anybody. Because he knew they would never trade him to MN or give him a free release if he was under contract. Which ran through 2011.

He never wanted to retire, he never wanted to come back to Green Bay. He wanted out. He was never going to play for Green Bay. No matter what. Between the '06 and '07 seasons, he wanted out and demanded a trade too Minnesota. The retirement and un-retirement were part of that plan. Even the entire '07 season was part of that plan.




this guy
User is suspended until 5/28/2018 11:54:40 AM(UTC) DakotaT  
#112 Posted : Sunday, March 18, 2012 8:43:14 PM(UTC)
Dexter_Sinister said: Go to Quoted Post
I don't want to rehash the whole thing but as far as coming back, the un-retirement was as fake as the retirement. He didn't change his mind, it was all part of a plan. Probably Chilly's plan. I don't think Favre is smart enough to come up with it.

After the roster was set, Favre timed it to drop 12 mil on the cap and put them over the roster limit. Normally that would force a free release. Ted went to the NFL and got an exemption and had cap room for Favre.Ted said OK, come on in. That is when Favre backed off and said, it won't work and he would accept a trade to anybody. Because he knew they would never trade him to MN or give him a free release if he was under contract. Which ran through 2011.

He never wanted to retire, he never wanted to come back to Green Bay. He wanted out. He was never going to play for Green Bay. No matter what. Between the '06 and '07 seasons, he wanted out and demanded a trade too Minnesota. The retirement and un-retirement were part of that plan. Even the entire '07 season was part of that plan.



It still pisses me off that Goodell didn't rack up the Queens on tampering charges.
Nonstopdrivel  
#113 Posted : Monday, March 19, 2012 6:36:45 AM(UTC)
Dexter_Sinister said: Go to Quoted Post
He never wanted to retire, he never wanted to come back to Green Bay. He wanted out.

While I don't necessarily disagree with you in any one particular, do you have any theories as to why that might have been? Favre was worshiped as no man in the NFL has ever been worshiped. Why did he want out? Was he as sick of the circus as the rest of the NFL (and even some Packers fans) were?
wpr  
#114 Posted : Monday, March 19, 2012 6:57:08 AM(UTC)
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
It still pisses me off that Goodell didn't rack up the Queens on tampering charges.


yeah he was a bit gutless on that one.
Zero2Cool  
#115 Posted : Monday, March 19, 2012 7:10:02 AM(UTC)
Nonstopdrivel said: Go to Quoted Post
While I don't necessarily disagree with you in any one particular, do you have any theories as to why that might have been? Favre was worshiped as no man in the NFL has ever been worshiped. Why did he want out? Was he as sick of the circus as the rest of the NFL (and even some Packers fans) were?


I don't believe that Brett Favre want out of Green Bay after 2006. Perhaps after the Raiders didn't give the Packers a chance to match or better the Patriots offer for Randy Moss he was pissed off and said it to family/friends?

Brett retired because the Packers pressured him for an answer, because they were confident he would return. All parties involved have stated this as well so I believe it to be true. Even Brett Favre said that was why they pushed the issue.

How long ago did all this happen again? lol I think this stuff has been said already...
Zero2Cool  
#116 Posted : Monday, March 19, 2012 7:11:10 AM(UTC)
Quote:
2. Winner: Packers.

G.M. Ted Thompson rarely makes a big splash in free agency. The biggest exception came in 2006, when at the very public urging of quarterback Brett Favre the team signed cornerback Charles Woodson.

Other than that, the Packers under Thompson take a very conservative approach, building through the draft and using free agency on a limited basis, with low-cost talent addressing specific needs.

It’s not sexy this time of year. But this isn’t the time of year when championships are won. Unlike downtrodden organizations (such as the Packers themselves in 1993, when Reggie White chose Green Bay from a long list of suitors), the Packers don’t need to do anything to fire up the fan base or breathe life into the franchise.

It’s the right approach for this specific team. The Packers have won, once again, by doing nothing.
Nonstopdrivel  
#117 Posted : Monday, March 19, 2012 7:24:08 AM(UTC)
You and your necros recently. [neener]
nerdmann  
#118 Posted : Monday, March 19, 2012 7:26:59 AM(UTC)
Nonstopdrivel said: Go to Quoted Post
While I don't necessarily disagree with you in any one particular, do you have any theories as to why that might have been? Favre was worshiped as no man in the NFL has ever been worshiped. Why did he want out? Was he as sick of the circus as the rest of the NFL (and even some Packers fans) were?


Ever since Favre's dad died he never had anyone to keep him grounded. With the passing of Big Irv, Favre only had his wife and his agent, and all they did was whisper in his ear how great he was.

Favre's ego was already out of control from the time Ray Rhodes handed control of the team over to him and Mike Sherman did nothing to reel that in. That was Ted Thompson's main task at the time. Favre could no longer dictate to the GM what players to acquire and he could no longer dictate to offensive or team philosophy.

He still could and DID change plays in the huddle. Until Ted started getting rid of the "Favre loyalists," like William Henderson among others. Fact is Favre was and is a spiteful little bitch and he viewed himself as greater and more important than the franchise.

Personally, I further hypothesize that Ted and the Packers' security knew that Favre was being blackmailed due to off the field behavior into purposely throwing those ridiculous interceptions in the playoffs. The problem was that it would be difficult to get rid of Favre, which is of course what we saw transpire. Anyway, this further level of conspiracy theory, while quite apparent to myself needn't be taken into account in order to see the overall point about Favre. The main point about Favre's ego stands, regardless of the added conspiracy theory.
Nonstopdrivel  
#119 Posted : Monday, March 19, 2012 7:30:13 AM(UTC)
I am always surprised at the bile and venom some of you spew against Favre. I don't like the guy -- he's not the kind of person I get along with, so he would rub me the wrong way on the screen or in real life. But while I find him irritating, some of you truly loathe the man. The vehemence with which you express it impresses me.
Zero2Cool  
#120 Posted : Monday, March 19, 2012 7:34:06 AM(UTC)
Nonstopdrivel said: Go to Quoted Post
I am always surprised at the bile and venom some of you spew against Favre. I don't like the guy -- he's not the kind of person I get along with, so he would rub me the wrong way on the screen or in real life. But while I find him irritating, some of you truly loathe the man. The vehemence with which you express it impresses me.


As for the topic, I suppose Brett Favre is a free agent ... lol ... I think some flipped on Favre much like one does to a scorned partner. Favre was my 2nd favorite behind Barry Sanders. After the Greta Van whatever interview, it made it hard for me to pull for him as a "person", but as a player he was always exciting ... which wasn't always a good thing if he was on the team you rooted for.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
9 Pages«<45678>»
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
beast (6h) : Packers can't catch Eagles so it doesn't directly effect our playoff chances.
Nonstopdrivel (6h) : yoffs?
Nonstopdrivel (6h) : So . . . could in theory be a severe sprain. Which might still sideline him for the rest of the season, but perhaps he'd be back for the pla
Zero2Cool (6h) : That's regarding Carson Wentz
Zero2Cool (6h) : @AlbertBreer Doctors determined with manual test there was damage to ACL, extent unknown until MRI tomorrow.
Zero2Cool (7h) : Read reports that's what is feared and yes, you're right, usually if that's the fear = done
Nonstopdrivel (7h) : MRI would me mostly a formality. He walked off on his own power, so possibly just a sprain? But I doubt it.
Nonstopdrivel (7h) : Provocative tests on scene are pretty sensitive. If they fear his ACL is torn, it probably is.
Zero2Cool (7h) : He has an ACL? I only heard there were running tests ... tomorrow.
Nonstopdrivel (7h) : Depends on which Nick Foles arises from the ashes. If it's the 2013 Foles, Eagles could still be a powerhouse.
gbguy20 (7h) : carson wentz torn acl. is that good or bad for our playoff chances?
nerdmann (11h) : It's definitive, Davante is BETTER than Janis.
Zero2Cool (12h) : can't believe some don't want Adams re-signed... what is wrong with you!!
Zero2Cool (12h) : @WesHod The #Packers turned to Davante Adams several times during the final series and he came through each time. The evolution of a playmak
buckeyepackfan (16h) : Packer Fans will take over Stadium today!
Zero2Cool (16h) : @AaronNagler Packers just took the field to cheers. No Browns fans here to boo yet.
buckeyepackfan (16h) : DILLY DILLY!
Zero2Cool (16h) : Williams though, to answer your question :D
Zero2Cool (16h) : First snap of the day don't mean didly
Zero2Cool (16h) : Starting? who cares?
Zero2Cool (16h) : Browns getting 1st win
dhazer (16h) : who is starting at rb today ?
buckeyepackfan (16h) : Perry innactive! Fackrell & Biegal step up today!
Zero2Cool (17h) : Both undrafted rookies, Lenzy Pipkins and Donatello Brown, are active for the #Packers. They join Randall, House and Hawkins as the active c
buckeyepackfan (18h) : GO! PACK! GO!
buckeyepackfan (18h) : GAMEDAY! #assesagainstthewall!
buckeyepackfan (18h) : GOOD MORNING PACKER FANS!
buckeyepackfan (18h) : Yes Packers will be done if they lose today.
beast (18h) : Packers might be done even if they go undefeated the rest of the way ,so any loss and they're out of playoff chase
dhazer (19h) : If GB loses today should mean end of TT and MM. The Browns are going for perfect season
gbguy20 (19h) : if we lose today are we done?
Zero2Cool (10-Dec) : Rodgers also lines up LB during practices. Fun they does have
buckeyepackfan (10-Dec) : Pipkin & Brown!!!! = Packer Win!!! BOOK IT!!!!
Cheesey (10-Dec) : GO Arvy, beat Namy! Lol!
wpr (9-Dec) : GO ARMY BEAT NAVY
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Nonstopdrivel

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

19h / Fantasy Sports Talk / dhazer

10-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

9-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Nonstopdrivel

Headlines