Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
6 Pages«<23456>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
User is suspended until 7/18/2016 1:25:29 AM(UTC) DakotaT  
#46 Posted : Monday, May 7, 2012 6:23:31 PM(UTC)

Rank: Honored Member
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 758
Applause Received: 1,541
vikesrule said: Go to Quoted Post
Fran Tarkenton....



Geez that's a long time ago. I don't think I even had pubes then.

Offline zombieslayer  
#47 Posted : Monday, May 7, 2012 7:42:30 PM(UTC)

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
And the last Minnesota Viking league MVP is ???????????????????

Zombie, you have to use the sarcasm smiley for the sake of the dumbasses. [grin1]


I whapped myself on the forehead. How obvious does my sarcasm have to be? Oh yeah, wasn't VR a teacher in his non-retired years? That would explain it.

My word. The Green Bay Packers have NEVER scored 500+ points. Then Aaron Rodgers leads us to 560 points and people are bitching about our O.

That's equivalent of a rock star bitching about only having 15 hot groupies a night. Where's the 16th? God dammit! Where's the 16th?
Offline Dexter_Sinister  
#48 Posted : Monday, May 7, 2012 8:50:04 PM(UTC)

Rank: Registered
Joined: 6/12/2010(UTC)
Applause Given: 292
Applause Received: 266
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
I whapped myself on the forehead. How obvious does my sarcasm have to be? Oh yeah, wasn't VR a teacher in his non-retired years? That would explain it.

My word. The Green Bay Packers have NEVER scored 500+ points. Then Aaron Rodgers leads us to 560 points and people are bitching about our O.

That's equivalent of a rock star bitching about only having 15 hot groupies a night. Where's the 16th? God dammit! Where's the 16th?


The offense could easily have been better without even improving the running game.

Just cut the drops in half.

Rodgers could have completed 72.3% of his passes (Single season league record) had 51 TDs (single season league record) 3 picks (single season league record) and a rating in the 130s (beating the single season league record he set anyway).

I don't think many people understand how incredible of a season he had. He had one of the best single seasons of all time. At least top 6. And definitely best in the super bowl era.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
nerdmann on 5/7/2012(UTC)
Offline zombieslayer  
#49 Posted : Monday, May 7, 2012 9:15:50 PM(UTC)

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
Yup, and if we added runs, we wouldn't have scored 560 points. Not the O's fault that the D couldn't get sacks or tackle people.

Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy realize this. That's why we went D in the draft and we didn't waste any picks on the running game.
Offline Zero2Cool  
#50 Posted : Tuesday, May 8, 2012 5:12:12 AM(UTC)

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Premier Member
United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,124
Applause Received: 2,784
<-- meet the 16th.
Offline Dexter_Sinister  
#51 Posted : Tuesday, May 8, 2012 5:33:19 PM(UTC)

Rank: Registered
Joined: 6/12/2010(UTC)
Applause Given: 292
Applause Received: 266
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
Yup, and if we added runs, we wouldn't have scored 560 points. Not the O's fault that the D couldn't get sacks or tackle people.

Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy realize this. That's why we went D in the draft and we didn't waste any picks on the running game.


I would say the drops hurt us more than the D.
Offline PackerTraxx  
#52 Posted : Wednesday, May 9, 2012 8:36:45 AM(UTC)

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/13/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 46
Applause Received: 173
...especially in the Playoff game.
Offline zombieslayer  
#53 Posted : Wednesday, May 9, 2012 12:43:44 PM(UTC)

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
That D completely relied on takeaways. Against the Giants, we got one INT and no forced fumbles and promptly lost, allowing 37 points.

How is it the O's fault when the D allows 37 points?
Offline Wade  
#54 Posted : Wednesday, May 9, 2012 12:51:52 PM(UTC)

Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 8/1/2009(UTC)
Location: nowhere of importance
Applause Given: 783
Applause Received: 792
I want to see every play a running play ...

... but only if our RB is Kate Becksindale and she's wearing the shorts from that picture.
Offline Zero2Cool  
#55 Posted : Wednesday, May 9, 2012 1:01:37 PM(UTC)

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Premier Member
United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,124
Applause Received: 2,784
I think it matters little who the running back is as long as Aaron Rodgers is the quarterback ... he'll get 4 yards more a carry on average.
Offline Wade  
#56 Posted : Wednesday, May 9, 2012 1:22:00 PM(UTC)

Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 8/1/2009(UTC)
Location: nowhere of importance
Applause Given: 783
Applause Received: 792
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
I think it matters little who the running back is as long as Aaron Rodgers is the quarterback ... he'll get 4 yards more a carry on average.


But if it's Kate, who cares about what Aaron Rodgers does or does not do?

[grin1]

Offline play2win  
#57 Posted : Wednesday, May 9, 2012 1:23:59 PM(UTC)

Rank: Registered
United States
Joined: 3/29/2012(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee
Applause Given: 1,076
Applause Received: 724
I'm with Wade. Who cares if we run the ball... or, about football for that matter...?
Offline PackerTraxx  
#58 Posted : Wednesday, May 9, 2012 3:03:05 PM(UTC)

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/13/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 46
Applause Received: 173
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
That D completely relied on takeaways. Against the Giants, we got one INT and no forced fumbles and promptly lost, allowing 37 points.

How is it the O's fault when the D allows 37 points?


Because the O had 8 dropped passes and turned the ball over 4 times. Those stopped drives and gave the Giants a short field. Granted our D was weak, but with the O's performance(or lack there of) I'm surprised the D kept us in it til the 4th quarter.

Offline Cheesey  
#59 Posted : Wednesday, May 9, 2012 3:10:17 PM(UTC)

Rank: Honored Member
United States
Joined: 7/28/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 426
Applause Received: 598
Rios39 said: Go to Quoted Post
Yeah imagine how good rodgers would have it when defenses are selling out to stop a consistent ground attack on 3rd and short situations. I find a lot of it is line play, we need to push the pile.


True, and being able to use up the clock instead of fast passing drives takes the ball away from the other team's offense.
Offline zombieslayer  
#60 Posted : Wednesday, May 9, 2012 3:17:56 PM(UTC)

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
PackerTraxx said: Go to Quoted Post
Because the O had 8 dropped passes and turned the ball over 4 times. Those stopped drives and gave the Giants a short field. Granted our D was weak, but with the O's performance(or lack there of) I'm surprised the D kept us in it til the 4th quarter.



Yeah, we already discussed this though. I'm in agreement about the drops. Had the D done their job, we would have won the game. Had our receivers caught Aaron's passes, we would have won the game.

The Giants were the hungrier team. I think we were looking past them.

That said, I'm thinking in the grand scheme of things. #1 O. #19 D. Doesn't take a genius to figure out which one needs the most improvement.

As for Wade, we're usually in agreement about babes. However, Ms. Kate doesn't do it for me as much as some of the others he has the hots for.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
6 Pages«<23456>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (1-Aug) : Do. It!
Zero2Cool (1-Aug) : Embrace the awesome. Do it!
gbguy20 (31-Jul) : IM SO UNDECIDED
gbguy20 (31-Jul) : I want to upgrade, but I have 2 partitions set up right now, and i don't really want to undo all of that. and i don't want to keep it either
Zero2Cool (31-Jul) : Fun. Took a few tweaks, but I like it. Upgraded work laptop too.
gbguy20 (31-Jul) : how is it? still sitting on my download.
Zero2Cool (30-Jul) : Windows. 10. Baby!
Zero2Cool (29-Jul) : Get it going!
gbguy20 (29-Jul) : press conferences galore today and yesterday, new jersey unveiled WHAT ARE WE EVEN TALKING ABOUT
gbguy20 (29-Jul) : First practice is tomorrow, why have i seen literally no talk about this on the forum?
Zero2Cool (25-Jul) : Steelers August 23 game vs. Green Bay moved to 1 p.m.
Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : I was saying before it would be awesome if he did a story a week on YouTube or something.
Cheesey (22-Jul) : They should make a DVD of just stories from the "Favre years". It would be awesome!
Zero2Cool (19-Jul) : That was really awesome. I wish more stories were told.
Zero2Cool (18-Jul) : Wanna watch it?
dhazer (18-Jul) : Packers all day including the ceremony tonight in chat
dhazer (18-Jul) : why doesnt this work
Smokey (18-Jul) : less posting = less abuse
gbguy20 (18-Jul) : smokey lives
Smokey (17-Jul) : Perfect ?
Zero2Cool (17-Jul) : Perfect time to clean the shouty boxy ;-)
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

Road To Super Bowl 50
Sunday, Sep 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Sep 20 @ 7:30 PM
SEAHAWKS
Monday, Sep 28 @ 7:30 PM
CHIEFS
Sunday, Oct 4 @ 3:25 PM
at 49ers
Sunday, Oct 11 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Oct 18 @ 3:25 PM
CHARGERS
Sunday, Oct 25 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Sunday, Nov 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Broncos
Sunday, Nov 8 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Sunday, Nov 15 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 22 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Thursday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
BEARS
Thursday, Dec 3 @ 7:25 PM
at Lions
Sunday, Dec 13 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Sunday, Dec 20 @ 3:05 PM
at Raiders
Sunday, Dec 27 @ 3:25 PM
at Cardinals
Sunday, Jan 3 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
51m / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / texaspackerbacker

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / musccy

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / musccy

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / musccy

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackerTraxx

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan


Tweeter