Green Bay Packers Forum
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
10 Pages«<56789>»
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Zero2Cool  
#121 Posted : Friday, May 11, 2012 1:39:05 PM(UTC)

Formo said: Go to Quoted Post
Indoor stadium =/= a dome. Not that I should expect your retarded rear to know the difference. =P


You're right, I have no clue what idotic dumbfuck abbreviation/symbol "=/=" is or is intended to be. Why the hell would you divide equal by equal?

You call me names and then don't explain the difference. Who's the fucking retard now?
Wade  
#122 Posted : Friday, May 11, 2012 1:47:53 PM(UTC)

Formo said: Go to Quoted Post
Yeah. Considering no general funds are to be used, I don't see how it would effect roads other then the legislation time spent on the Vikings bill.


Hehe...it's Friday...I'm not going to get drawn into my "opportunity cost" argument again.

Besides, as much as it's decided already, it really doesn't matter whether I'm right or wrong. [grin1]

wpr  
#123 Posted : Friday, May 11, 2012 2:12:10 PM(UTC)

Wade said: Go to Quoted Post
Hehe...it's Friday...I'm not going to get drawn into my "opportunity cost" argument again.

Besides, as much as it's decided already, it really doesn't matter whether I'm right or wrong. [grin1]



You are right. You are always right. (except on draft day.) [grin1]
Formo  
#124 Posted : Friday, May 11, 2012 2:31:53 PM(UTC)

Wade said: Go to Quoted Post
Hehe...it's Friday...I'm not going to get drawn into my "opportunity cost" argument again.

Besides, as much as it's decided already, it really doesn't matter whether I'm right or wrong. [grin1]



Certainly not trying to draw you into a discussion. We disagree fundamentally on a few things. My point is the Vikings bill doesn't take away money from funding for the roads. That's all.
Formo  
#125 Posted : Friday, May 11, 2012 2:37:00 PM(UTC)

Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
You're right, I have no clue what idotic dumbfuck abbreviation/symbol "=/=" is or is intended to be.


n00b

Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
Why the hell would you divide equal by equal?


omg fml

Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
You call me names and then don't explain the difference. Who's the fucking retard now?


Figured you were smart enough to know.

Dome:
UserPostedImage

Indoor stadium:
UserPostedImage

Notice the buildings' roofs.
wpr  
#126 Posted : Friday, May 11, 2012 2:55:42 PM(UTC)

Lucas Oil is a indoor stadium as their roof retracts. Ford Field is a domed stadium without a bubble on top since they have a stationary roof. My way of looking at it. You can call it anything you want.
gbguy20  
#127 Posted : Friday, May 11, 2012 3:06:38 PM(UTC)

Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
You're right, I have no clue what idotic dumbfuck abbreviation/symbol "=/=" is or is intended to be. Why the hell would you divide equal by equal?

You call me names and then don't explain the difference. Who's the fucking retard now?


I assume since we've gone over this already you're just trolling him now, but just in case...i'll explain it again.

=/= is the non-coders equivalent to the coders !=

when u see =/= picture this ≠
thanks Post received 1 applause.
Zero2Cool  
#128 Posted : Friday, May 11, 2012 3:22:28 PM(UTC)

Formo said: Go to Quoted Post
n00b



omg fml



Figured you were smart enough to know.


Notice the buildings' roofs.


Okay, but the Vikings new stadium will not have a retractable roof, like the one you pictured (Lucas Oil). So, wouldn't that mean it would be classified as a dome then?


btw, after the last post in this thread .... != means not equal, figured you were smart enough to know this.

Zero2Cool  
#129 Posted : Friday, May 11, 2012 3:25:55 PM(UTC)

wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
Lucas Oil is a indoor stadium as their roof retracts. Ford Field is a domed stadium without a bubble on top since they have a stationary roof. My way of looking at it. You can call it anything you want.


Honestly, I never gave a rats ass which way or the other until some clown acted tough with his internet muscles and decided to be a complete prick about it. Now ... I want to know the difference ... cuz I'm curious. If anything I would think ...

Dome - non-retractable roof
Indoor Stadium - retractable roof
Outdoor Stadium - where men play
Formo  
#130 Posted : Friday, May 11, 2012 7:00:53 PM(UTC)

wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
Lucas Oil is a indoor stadium as their roof retracts. Ford Field is a domed stadium without a bubble on top since they have a stationary roof. My way of looking at it. You can call it anything you want.


Domed stadium = a big round thing on top. You know.. Like a DOME.

And indoor stadium is something more like Lucas Oil field, regardless of the roof's mobility.

But that's just me.

Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
Honestly, I never gave a rats ass which way or the other until some clown acted tough with his internet muscles and decided to be a complete prick about it. Now ... I want to know the difference ... cuz I'm curious. If anything I would think ...

Dome - non-retractable roof
Indoor Stadium - retractable roof
Outdoor Stadium - where men play


I'm flattered you are impressed with my webrnet muscles. Just because you perceive my post as being 'a complete prick' doesn't mean I am. Just means I'm discussion semantics.
DakotaT  
#131 Posted : Friday, May 11, 2012 7:26:12 PM(UTC)

Formo, is there some kind of picture of what is being designed for the new stadium?
wpr  
#132 Posted : Friday, May 11, 2012 9:15:13 PM(UTC)

DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
Formo, is there some kind of picture of what is being designed for the new stadium?


Susie and Timmy are still working on the final proof.

UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool  
#133 Posted : Friday, May 11, 2012 10:30:39 PM(UTC)

Formo said: Go to Quoted Post
Domed stadium = a big round thing on top. You know.. Like a DOME.

And indoor stadium is something more like Lucas Oil field, regardless of the roof's mobility.

But that's just me.


So, you insult my intelligence because you can't make up your own mind? That's a complete prick thing to do. Don't worry, I won't double your membership fee for being a fucking dickhead.
gbguy20  
#134 Posted : Saturday, May 12, 2012 12:27:48 AM(UTC)

Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
Okay, but the Vikings new stadium will not have a retractable roof, like the one you pictured (Lucas Oil). So, wouldn't that mean it would be classified as a dome then?


btw, after the last post in this thread .... != means not equal, figured you were smart enough to know this.



Don't be so quick to say that.

http://profootballtalk.n...actable-roof-to-stadium/

Quote:
Wilfs may add retractable roof to stadium

Posted by Mike Florio on May 11, 2012, 7:39 PM EDT
Vikings Stadium AP

MDS pointed out earlier that the new Vikings stadium may host a Super Bowl.

Given the loose, non-binding quid pro quo that the NFL applies when a city/state coughs up big money for a new stadium, it would be a surprise if it doesn’t happen.

What would be a surprise — and a major one — is if the new stadium has a retractable roof. Approved via the Minnesota legislative process as a venue with a fixed lid, brothers Zygi and Mark Wilf suggested in a Friday session with reporters that the finished product may have the ability with the press of a button to go topless.

“Well if it’s snowing very, very hard we’ll open up the roof,” Zygi Wilf said, jokingly.

Asked if that means the new building will have a retractable roof, Zygi Wilf said, “Well, I don’t know.”

Mark Wilf was more candid. “We’re going to try to get the maximum number of features within the budgets. . . . We’re going to want to make it something special. And to the extent retractability can get there, we’re going to try to do it.”

And here’s where a cynic (I don’t know any) would say, “Sure, now that you’ve finagled more than $500 million in public money, you can justify spending the extra money that you didn’t have to devote to the project on a retractable roof.”

Then again, how cynical is it to think that the Wilfs didn’t make any serious noise about paying for a retractable roof before the stadium bill was approved because, if they had, plenty of lawmakers would have said, “Why not just spend the money it would take to add a retractable roof on the stadium itself and reduce the burden on the public?”

OK, it’s fairly cynical. There’s also a chance it’s fairly accurate.
wpr  
#135 Posted : Saturday, May 12, 2012 4:51:34 AM(UTC)

no way it has a lid. they will not cough up one nickle more than they have to on a building they don't own. My guess is they will sell the franchise before the first lease is even up.
DakotaT  
#136 Posted : Saturday, May 12, 2012 7:08:20 AM(UTC)

wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
no way it has a lid. they will not cough up one nickle more than they have to on a building they don't own. My guess is they will sell the franchise before the first lease is even up.


Yeah, I don't buy for a second that Zygi gives a shit about the Vikings and their fans. That team should be owned by a billionaire Minnesotan, or a group of Minnesotans.
vikesrule  
#137 Posted : Saturday, May 12, 2012 7:31:10 AM(UTC)

wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
no way it has a lid. they will not cough up one nickle more than they have to on a building they don't own. My guess is they will sell the franchise before the first lease is even up.


DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
Yeah, I don't buy for a second that Zygi gives a shit about the Vikings and their fans. That team should be owned by a billionaire Minnesotan, or a group of Minnesotans.


And now for today's forecast, from station WPR and affiliate station DAKT....

Partly cloudy with a 100% chance of dumbass.

Zero2Cool  
#138 Posted : Saturday, May 12, 2012 8:40:48 AM(UTC)

gbguy20 said: Go to Quoted Post


I'm not quick to say it. It was just something I read that a fixed roof was what was approved, not an open stadium nor a retractable roof. I don't know how these things work. The Packers haven't had to worry about needing a new stadium or relocating as back as I can remember.
wpr  
#139 Posted : Saturday, May 12, 2012 9:11:32 AM(UTC)

vikesrule said: Go to Quoted Post
And now for today's forecast, from station WPR and affiliate station DAKT....

Partly cloudy with a 100% chance of dumbass.




oh that hurts. sniff.
At least I don't follow a team with a jerk of an owner.UserPostedImage


Formo  
#140 Posted : Saturday, May 12, 2012 9:12:50 AM(UTC)

DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
Formo, is there some kind of picture of what is being designed for the new stadium?


Not yet. From what I'm hearing, they'll be crunching a bunch of designs in the next few weeks. I'm certain that in a month we'll have a good idea of what the new digs will entail.

Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
So, you insult my intelligence because you can't make up your own mind? That's a complete prick thing to do. Don't worry, I won't double your membership fee for being a fucking dickhead.


Making shit up again I see.

I know you want so badly to see the boogie man in my posts, and no matter how hard you try and call him out.. he's not going to come out. Simply because HE'S NOT THERE.

wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
no way it has a lid. they will not cough up one nickle more than they have to on a building they don't own. My guess is they will sell the franchise before the first lease is even up.


You say that with such certainty.. It's funny. The Wilfs are very much looking into a retractable roof. Now, I'm aware that doesn't mean it's going to have one.. but they have been really open with the public on their thoughts on having one.

DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
Yeah, I don't buy for a second that Zygi gives a shit about the Vikings and their fans. That team should be owned by a billionaire Minnesotan, or a group of Minnesotans.


lol Green color goggles you have on their, I see. If you watched the announcement presser with Zygi/Mark Wilf and the pro-stadium politicians, you would know he was really, REALLY passionate for the fans. Hell, the man has come down to PP.O's tailgate a few times to sing "SKOL VIKINGS" with us. Kiss my ass with your ignorant BS. [grin1]

Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
I'm not quick to say it. It was just something I read that a fixed roof was what was approved, not an open stadium nor a retractable roof. I don't know how these things work. The Packers haven't had to worry about needing a new stadium or relocating as back as I can remember.


What was approved was an indoor stadium, but also approved was the option for a retractable roof. But the costs of such roof would be all on the Vikings.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
10 Pages«<56789>»
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (1h) : Maybe we need a character max limit in posts. Holy damn.
The_Green_Ninja (18-Feb) : out of curiosity... did any ever by the Starr Favre and Rodgers photo... and has a good scanner?
uffda udfa (17-Feb) : NFL Network showing GB at Dallas. Packers programming all day.
uffda udfa (17-Feb) : Julius Peppers appears done with Packers per Demovsky.
Cheesey (16-Feb) : If the spot was so bad, he wouldnt still be going there.
uffda udfa (15-Feb) : Best of luck at your new fishing hole, Buck.
buckeyepackfan (15-Feb) : "they always do" "good luck with that" I said to him as I walked away and headed to my other favorite hole!
buckeyepackfan (15-Feb) : "Nah" he said , I'm much snarter than these fish, sooner or later they will start biting! They akways
buckeyepackfan (15-Feb) : "Maybe you should try another spot" I said to him each day.
buckeyepackfan (15-Feb) : Each day I asked him gow they were biting. "Not very well" was his reply each day
buckeyepackfan (15-Feb) : For the third day in a row, I went to my favorite fishing spot. The same guy was there everyday
uffda udfa (14-Feb) : Interesting. Why would he leave the team that has the greatest need at CB?
Zero2Cool (14-Feb) : Former Packers corner Bené Benwikere signs with Bengals, per report
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
14m / Announcements / Barfarn

47m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

53m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

54m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Feb / Community Welcome! / wpr

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

19-Feb / Around The NFL / uffda udfa

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Barfarn

17-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

17-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / warhawk

17-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

17-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / TedThompsonsShades


Packers Headlines