Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
2 Pages12>

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Since69  
#1 Posted : Wednesday, August 22, 2012 5:16:57 PM(UTC)
MJD on the trade block?

How crazy-good would our offense be with a running threat like him? Especially in December...
millertime  
#2 Posted : Thursday, August 23, 2012 12:47:04 PM(UTC)
First of all, we al know that there is 0% chance Ted Thompson will give up a high pick for MJD (only 27 years old).

But, hypothetically speaking, I'd like to see what you guys think. So answer these questions..

1. What would you give up for MJD (NFL leading rusher last season)?

2. How would he change our offense?

3. Which other players in the NFL would you give up a first (or multiple picks) round pick for?

Go!
millertime  
#3 Posted : Thursday, August 23, 2012 12:52:04 PM(UTC)
1. I would give up a first round pick. He would make our offense the greatest all-time.

Pros:
Can block, catch, and get the tough yards. He will be in his prime for 3 more years, and average frist round picks have contracts of 4-5 years. Seems like taking an All-Pro for 3 years make more sense than grabbing a rookie who may or may not turn out for 5 years. Will dominate in winter.

Cons: Takes away salary cap space from more important positions (defense, offensive line). Takes the ball out of A-Rod's hands more often. Has a lot of mileage. Smart, but opinionated player.

2. See above.

3. Players I'd give up two first round picks for: Joe Thomas, Pierre-Paul, Revis, Calvin Johnson.
zombieslayer  
#4 Posted : Thursday, August 23, 2012 12:57:47 PM(UTC)
Nothing. Don't want him.

He'll take plays away from Aaron Rodgers and take $$$ away from our D, which already is bad.
QCHuskerFan  
#5 Posted : Thursday, August 23, 2012 2:14:58 PM(UTC)
I would give up nothing. He's a RB. He's disposable in today's NFL. Teams don't run the ball to win games. They run the ball to slow the pass rush because you win by throwing the ball. The top 5 rushing teams last year were Broncos, Texans, Panthers, Vikings, and Eagles. The worst rushing team last year was the Super Bowl Champion Giants. This is not the 1970's. Rushing yards is just not that critical.

I told a Bear fan last winter that I couldn't wait till they paid big money to Forte. Big money RB's are a great way to screw up your Cap for years.

I would add Larry Fitzgerald to your list of players I might give up more than a First for.
nerdmann  
#6 Posted : Thursday, August 23, 2012 2:32:26 PM(UTC)
QCHuskerFan said: Go to Quoted Post
I would give up nothing. He's a RB. He's disposable in today's NFL. Teams don't run the ball to win games. They run the ball to slow the pass rush because you win by throwing the ball. The top 5 rushing teams last year were Broncos, Texans, Panthers, Vikings, and Eagles. The worst rushing team last year was the Super Bowl Champion Giants. This is not the 1970's. Rushing yards is just not that critical.

I told a Bear fan last winter that I couldn't wait till they paid big money to Forte. Big money RB's are a great way to screw up your Cap for years.

I would add Larry Fitzgerald to your list of players I might give up more than a First for.


Then again, it would be nice to have a guy who can run out the clock when we have a lead and/or produce in short yardage situations. But we might already have that guy. Or two.
porky88  
#7 Posted : Thursday, August 23, 2012 2:36:51 PM(UTC)
I'd give up a first rounder. The best offense under Mike McCarthy was 2009. The Packers had a 1,200-yard running back that season with Ryan Grant. There's no reason they couldn't duplicate that success with a quality runner. MJD is that type of player. I understand the skepticism, because of today's pass-happy NFL, but the idea that just one pure way wins Super Bowl is as ridiculous as suggesting that one pure way builds a Super Bowl winner.

MJD wouldn't be a detriment to the team. He'd help make the offense more efficient, especially in short yardage situations. The shotgun and five-wide sets on third and three just doesn't cut. MJD picks that up most of the time ala Ahman Green in '03. This keeps drives alive and keeps the ball in Aaron Rodgers' hands instead of punting it away and allowing Jay Cutler (or whomever) to go to work on a very mediocre defense.
dhpackr  
#8 Posted : Thursday, August 23, 2012 2:38:35 PM(UTC)
if Ted Thompson wanted MJD he could have simply drafted him.
zombieslayer  
#9 Posted : Thursday, August 23, 2012 3:02:24 PM(UTC)
QCHuskerFan said: Go to Quoted Post
I would give up nothing. He's a RB. He's disposable in today's NFL. Teams don't run the ball to win games. They run the ball to slow the pass rush because you win by throwing the ball. The top 5 rushing teams last year were Broncos, Texans, Panthers, Vikings, and Eagles. The worst rushing team last year was the Super Bowl Champion Giants. This is not the 1970's. Rushing yards is just not that critical.

I told a Bear fan last winter that I couldn't wait till they paid big money to Forte. Big money RB's are a great way to screw up your Cap for years.

I would add Larry Fitzgerald to your list of players I might give up more than a First for.


This ranks among the best posts ever.
beast  
#10 Posted : Thursday, August 23, 2012 3:19:15 PM(UTC)
millertime said: Go to Quoted Post
1. What would you give up for MJD (NFL leading rusher last season)?

2. How would he change our offense?

3. Which other players in the NFL would you give up a first (or multiple picks) round pick for?


1) Trade a 2nd and 3rd to get him (if that would work... probably wouldn't, but doesn't hurt to try)

2) MJD wouldn't help "our offense" because then we'd re-trade him to the Cardinals for 3-4 DE Calais Campbell.... and tell Campbell to go get the other team QBs... and tell the DL to go get the ball..

or maybe to the Broncos... MJD would keep defense honest going against Peyton and help Peyton strength his career... in return the Packers would get Von Miller for OLB ... and move Matthews or Perry to MLB... and the Packers could run a 2-3 dime defense a lot with Matthews, Miller and Perry as the 3 LBers.

basically help the defensive pass rush out... and the defense has a lot of big contracts coming up in another year... Raji, Matthews, Burnett, Pickett... also on offense there is Starks, Finley.... and I feel like I'm forgetting some... I think Lang resigned already right?
beast  
#11 Posted : Thursday, August 23, 2012 3:20:58 PM(UTC)
dhpackr said: Go to Quoted Post
if Ted Thompson wanted MJD he could have simply drafted him.


He took Hawk and Jennings before MJD ...

Can we trade Hawk for MJD? ...

then maybe trade MJD for a DL pass rusher in a year?
Since69  
#12 Posted : Thursday, August 23, 2012 3:52:11 PM(UTC)
Oh, look. A speculative thread about the Packers possibly acquiring MJD... Ten replies in 20 minutes... not bad. Just, uh, you know, go ahead and keep ignoring the eerily similar thread I started a full day ago... that's cool.

As for me, I'd love MJD here. Especially in December. I'd give a player and a pick. Maybe even a high pick. And I'm sure Jax could use some help at receiver...
Zero2Cool  
#13 Posted : Thursday, August 23, 2012 3:56:27 PM(UTC)
Since69 said: Go to Quoted Post
Oh, look. A speculative thread about the Packers possibly acquiring MJD... Ten replies in 20 minutes... not bad. Just, uh, you know, go ahead and keep ignoring the eerily similar thread I started a full day ago... that's cool.

As for me, I'd love MJD here. Especially in December. I'd give a player and a pick. Maybe even a high pick. And I'm sure Jax could use some help at receiver...


lmaoLOL
Since69  
#14 Posted : Thursday, August 23, 2012 4:11:14 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
lmaoLOL


It was more sarcastic than snarky, but thanks for the merge...
macbob  
#15 Posted : Sunday, August 26, 2012 2:29:26 PM(UTC)
What Zombie said. CB (as long as he holds onto the ball) should provide us sufficient running threat to make our play action passes effective.

zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
Nothing. Don't want him.

He'll take plays away from Aaron Rodgers and take $$$ away from our D, which already is bad.


nyrpack  
#16 Posted : Sunday, August 26, 2012 3:19:04 PM(UTC)
i will take my chances with benson, it doesnt cost anything !!
hardrocker950  
#17 Posted : Monday, August 27, 2012 2:46:07 AM(UTC)
QCHuskerFan said: Go to Quoted Post
I would give up nothing. He's a RB. He's disposable in today's NFL. Teams don't run the ball to win games. They run the ball to slow the pass rush because you win by throwing the ball. The top 5 rushing teams last year were Broncos, Texans, Panthers, Vikings, and Eagles. The worst rushing team last year was the Super Bowl Champion Giants. This is not the 1970's. Rushing yards is just not that critical.

I told a Bear fan last winter that I couldn't wait till they paid big money to Forte. Big money RB's are a great way to screw up your Cap for years.

I would add Larry Fitzgerald to your list of players I might give up more than a First for.


I would rather pass on this idea too. If CB can stay healthy and produce some threat in the running game, he is doing exactly what he is on the team for. No reason to spend insane amounts of cash for a player we don't need. Also consider that this OL is built around the passing game and short runs, I don't know how effectively they could utilize a RB of that type - not bashing them for it, just doesn't seem to fit this offense IMO.

Those funds can be spent in places that we need upgrades - such as quality pass rushers. Aside from Clay, the rest are not consistent enough. Also consider that we have guys like GJ that are nearing the end of their contract - I would rather keep players like him around.
RainX  
#18 Posted : Monday, August 27, 2012 11:02:22 AM(UTC)
MJD is easily worth a first rounder, but for what the Packers do on offense, backs like Benson, Green, and Saine will be more than adequate for the running game. All we need is someone who can keep opposing defenses honest, and Benson has shown he can be a workhorse back in that regard.

Packers have some big contracts coming up with Jennings, Rodgers, Raji, and Matthews nearing the end of their respective deals. We may need that first round pick to fill some holes because potentially, we may not be able to keep everybody. That doesn't even include guys like Saturday and Woodson who may not have a whole lot left in the tank in the next season or two. Receiver is really the only position imo right now, say a veteran like Driver retired, that the group wouldn't skip a beat as far as production. Can't say the same about the offensive line or secondary right now.

MJD would be a great pick up under the right circumstances, but Packers have bigger needs right now with their upcoming draft picks to give up a first rounder for a disgruntled RB who feels he's not getting paid enough.
Pack93z  
#19 Posted : Monday, August 27, 2012 11:11:10 AM(UTC)
It would not be about the cost of picks to acquire MJD or another top flight back at this point.. it would be all about cap management in the short and long term.

First.. we would not have the cap space short term to pay the man without backloading the contract.

Second.. it would only further cloud the juggling act that will be keeping talent beyond this season. If you are going to cough up a high pick or a package of picks.. you better keep him long term.

And he doesn't want to play out his contract short term.



I wish the Packers would draft a back almost every year.. roll the dice and use them up in the first couple of seasons, then allow them to walk when the contract years hit and they have taken a load of hits already. If you hit on a back and he is a blue chipper.. then maybe pay the man. Otherwise, much like Wolf and backup QB's.. keep cycling the talent through.
porky88  
#20 Posted : Monday, August 27, 2012 1:43:35 PM(UTC)
Pack93z said: Go to Quoted Post
It would not be about the cost of picks to acquire MJD or another top flight back at this point.. it would be all about cap management in the short and long term.

First.. we would not have the cap space short term to pay the man without backloading the contract.

Second.. it would only further cloud the juggling act that will be keeping talent beyond this season. If you are going to cough up a high pick or a package of picks.. you better keep him long term.

And he doesn't want to play out his contract short term.



I wish the Packers would draft a back almost every year.. roll the dice and use them up in the first couple of seasons, then allow them to walk when the contract years hit and they have taken a load of hits already. If you hit on a back and he is a blue chipper.. then maybe pay the man. Otherwise, much like Wolf and backup QB's.. keep cycling the talent through.

This is a great point. I overlooked the contract demand of MJD. He's worth a first rounder, but only if you can fit his contract into the grand scheme of things. For example, I much rather have Greg Jennings long-term than MJD.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
rabidgopher04 (3h) : It sure is quiet in Packersland right now. Very unfamiliar feeling.
yooperfan (13h) : The Packers have played the same game over the years.Teams just don't want to tip their hand.
Smokey (19-Jan) : Patriots playing the "Is Brady injured game", so open and transparent, NOT !
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : YEAH LETS GO!! Psst where are we going?
Zero2Cool (19-Jan) : LETS GO!!!
Mucky Tundra (18-Jan) : Fans wondered what he was smoking
Mucky Tundra (18-Jan) : Funny talk about Watkins, LeRoy Butler suggested a trade for him a few years ago on FB
Zero2Cool (17-Jan) : Report: Landry wants Davante Adams-type deal -
Zero2Cool (17-Jan) : Packers bring in Sammy Watkins, you will ALL shite your pants
buckeyepackfan (17-Jan) : How long till we here the fire alarms go off in the middle of the night !!!
buckeyepackfan (17-Jan) : cheatin' bastards!!!! :)
Zero2Cool (16-Jan) : Patriots have no end to what they'll do for a win!
Zero2Cool (16-Jan) : RB Leonard Fournette was involved in a minor accident today when his car was rear-ended.
Zero2Cool (16-Jan) : Packers safeties coach Darren Perry interviewing with Texans
Zero2Cool (15-Jan) : Damarious Randall has hand surgery
Cheesey (15-Jan) : Man, talk about dumb luck. The Saints defense on that last play looked like the Packers D.
Zero2Cool (15-Jan) : "Skol Vikings!" It is the team's Viking war chant ... Inspired by Iceland's national soccer team
Zero2Cool (15-Jan) : Packers not playing sure makes playoff weekend less tense.
Nonstopdrivel (15-Jan) : I am slowly recovering from cardiac arrest. What an ending. What a freaking ending!
Mucky Tundra (15-Jan) : DONT BLOW THIS NEW ORLEANS
Smokey (14-Jan) : The"CHAT" is very open !
Zero2Cool (14-Jan) : Damn Saints giving them the game
Nonstopdrivel (14-Jan) : Mariota just ran up the white flag.
Zero2Cool (14-Jan) : Titans OL not too good without Conklin
KRK (13-Jan) : Schwartz defense looking very porous
Nonstopdrivel (13-Jan) : Get yo asses in the chat room, mofrackers!
Smokey (13-Jan) : YES, CHAT
Nonstopdrivel (13-Jan) : Anyone going to be in the chat room for the game?
Nonstopdrivel (13-Jan) : As much as I'd love to experience playoff football, I'm not interested in paying that kind of money to go by myself.
Rockmolder (13-Jan) : Are you thinking about going?
Nonstopdrivel (13-Jan) : Last I checked, there are still tickets available. And they're not too bad: $145 on up.
Nonstopdrivel (13-Jan) : The temps around here are dropping fast and the wind is kicking up. I wonder if that will favor Philly.
Rockmolder (13-Jan) : You'd hope that something will happen before march and the FA window opening.
beast (12-Jan) : I believe the Packers did file a grievance to get the non-2017 signing bonus money back, but I haven't heard when the grievance will be heard
Rockmolder (11-Jan) : In terms of bonus money and that $4.2 million cap hit in 2018.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
11m / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

10h / Around The NFL / Rockmolder

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / isocleas2

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / warhawk

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / TheKanataThrilla

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / isocleas2

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / Nonstopdrivel

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

15-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

Headlines