Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Pack93z  
#1 Posted : Wednesday, September 5, 2012 1:46:23 PM(UTC)
Can't say the owners are hurting in these dire economic times.

Ol' Ziggy is smiling someplace.. public kicks in a ton of money, yet his bottom line increases 22%.

Quote:

Dallas, New England are most valuable NFL franchises

Mammas, feel free to let your babies grow up to be owners of mediocre NFC East franchises. The Dallas Cowboys and Washington Redskins again are near the front of Forbes' NFL team valuations despite a long run of ineptitude that has seen the division rivals combine for three playoff wins in the past 16 years.

Jerry Jones' Cowboys are valued at $2.1 billion, well ahead of the New England Patriots ($1.64 billion). Owner Daniel Snyder's Washington Redskins are the third-most valuable team at $1.6 billion.

The Cowboys and Redskins demonstrate that on-field success isn't necessarily an indicator of off-field financial power. Of the nine franchises with the highest values, only two (New England and the fourth-ranked New York Giants) have won Super Bowls in the past 15 years. More successful teams like the Green Bay Packers, Baltimore Ravens and Pittsburgh Steelers occupy the middle part of the Forbes list.

Full list here.

1. Dallas Cowboys, $2.1 billion, up 14% over last year

Factoring in the royalties from Jerry Jones' pizza rap song, the total ticks up to $2,000,000,006.17.

3. Washington Redskins, $1.64 billion, up 3%

The few remaining Snyder apologists always hide behind the "but he's a good businessman" argument. Six Flags, the gameday experience at FedEx Field and stagnant 2012 growth would be to disagree. No other team in the top half of the rankings had such a low percentage in value change. Not to worry; Snyder is used to knowing what it's like to not grow.

10. Green Bay Packers, $1.162 billion, up 7%

The Packers, the only publicly-owned NFL franchise, recently offered a sale of "stock" (really a sliver of a fraction of a percentage share of the team) to the public. It was a rousing success, showing that public offerings aren't dead yet, Facebook.

22. Minnesota Vikings, $975 million, up 22%

The Vikes had the highest percentage jump in the league. Minnesota residents should be proud that their $498 million contribution to the new stadium is paying such dividends.
Pack93z  
#2 Posted : Wednesday, September 5, 2012 1:58:33 PM(UTC)
I think this is a more important ranking in terms of teams that need to change the way they are ran.

UserPostedImage
Wade  
#3 Posted : Thursday, September 6, 2012 7:17:35 AM(UTC)
I wonder how real estate added into these calculations. And I wonder what the values would have been had such real estate not been gov't subsidized.

Ahem.
Pack93z  
#4 Posted : Thursday, September 6, 2012 7:32:35 AM(UTC)
Wade said: Go to Quoted Post
I wonder how real estate added into these calculations. And I wonder what the values would have been had such real estate not been gov't subsidized.

Ahem.


Minne...


UserPostedImage


Agreed... and it is simply larger than that. We the people of this land are watching this country consume itself more and more via the hand of the politicians and oil.. yet we continue to willingly subsidize and allow these professional sports leagues reap record profits off our backs.

From Antitrust exemptions to funding for their building and infrastructures.. we continue to give to them, then again at the ticker window and buying their retail products. Talk about screwed up.

Even the "publicly owned" Packers with non revenue earning stock, what do we really as a public gain from owning the franchise? Past controlling that they stay.. not too damn much.

I wanna stick my head in the sand, because damn sometimes we humans just don't make much sense.
Formo  
#5 Posted : Thursday, September 6, 2012 10:59:28 AM(UTC)
You guys must be pissed about the new stadium, eh? With the revenue the Vikings will be able to capture with it you won't be able to claim how they 'share' in your team's revenue. Hey, no frets, though. You can always go back to the tried, tiring, and loutish empty Super Bowl trophy case angle.
Zero2Cool  
#6 Posted : Thursday, September 6, 2012 11:33:32 AM(UTC)
Formo said: Go to Quoted Post
You guys must be pissed about the new stadium, eh? With the revenue the Vikings will be able to capture with it you won't be able to claim how they 'share' in your team's revenue. Hey, no frets, though. You can always go back to the tried, tiring, and loutish empty Super Bowl trophy case angle.


Actually, we worry about things like Super Bowl victories, not revenue. :-({|=
Formo  
#7 Posted : Thursday, September 6, 2012 11:56:43 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
Actually, we worry about things like Super Bowl victories, not revenue. :-({|=


You might.

But I've fielded my fair share of arguments here on how my team takes money from your team to stay afloat.
Zero2Cool  
#8 Posted : Thursday, September 6, 2012 12:04:45 PM(UTC)
Formo said: Go to Quoted Post
You might.

But I've fielded my fair share of arguments here on how my team takes money from your team to stay afloat.


That's what superior teams do, they help out the little guy. You're welcome, but that's about the most you'll get from me on that subject because I know little to nothing about the revenue sharing.

What I do know is the Packers won Super Bowl XLV and that, for me, supersedes the other stuff.
Wade  
#9 Posted : Thursday, September 6, 2012 2:04:59 PM(UTC)
Formo said: Go to Quoted Post
You might.

But I've fielded my fair share of arguments here on how my team takes money from your team to stay afloat.


I could actually care less about how the teams split up their money.

My objection (as you know) is in what I see as "taxpayer-financed"-subsidies to organizations that claim to be worth hundreds of millions or billions of dollars, yet have a return to investment too low to get market-based financing. Put the "Value" numbers together with the income numbers Shawn posted, and only the Cowboys and the Patriots represent a decent return on investment.

And if you adjust for stadium subsidies via sales taxes/diversions of lottery revenues from other uses, etc., you get even more disgusting results.

If I was Jerry Jones or Bob Kraft I wouldn't want to subsidize those other losers. But I'm not either one -- so they can spend their money on those losers or on solid gold shower faucets for all I care.




Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (31m) : McCarthy wants all of his free agents back. Perry has delivered when healthy.
Zero2Cool (31m) : McCarthy says #Packers would love to have Eddie Lacy back.
Zero2Cool (31m) : McCarthy on LB Nick Perry: “Nick’s a hell of a football player”
Zero2Cool (1h) : Exactly
Zero2Cool (1h) : I don't think names matter to the Packers in free-agency, film does. - @jasonjwilde
Zero2Cool (2h) : NFL sets 2017 salary cap at $167 million
Zero2Cool (4h) : Who?
FLORIDA PACKER88 (16h) : Davon house on the way out with Jacksonville
Zero2Cool (16h) : Revis is gonna be available
Zero2Cool (23h) : Chiefs cut Jamaal Charles after 9 years in KC
Zero2Cool (28-Feb) : The Vikings will not exercise the 2017 option on RB Adrian Peterson’s contract. He'll be an unrestricted free agent.
Zero2Cool (27-Feb) : Mike Mayock says this is one of the best defensive drafts he's ever seen, especially at DE, CB & S.
Smokey (27-Feb) : Yellow as the background color for such blocks as Lambeau Field & Lombardi Ave & Recent Topics & Fan Shout .
Zero2Cool (27-Feb) : and thanks FP88 ... glad you enjoy it. :-)
Zero2Cool (27-Feb) : Finally, got my avatar back! Weird!
Zero2Cool (27-Feb) : FP88, :-) its okay. Smokey, yellow where?
FLORIDA PACKER88 (27-Feb) : Didnt realize how much I needed this site in my life until it wasn't available haha! Looks great Zero!
Zero2Cool (26-Feb) : Click the Clear link to force new files to load for style.
Smokey (26-Feb) : A little yellow for contrast maybe ?
Zero2Cool (26-Feb) : Thanks. Took about 16-20 hours.
wpr (26-Feb) : looks great.
Zero2Cool (25-Feb) : avatars aren't displaying
Zero2Cool (25-Feb) : plain look
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
19m / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / jlyons043

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / FLORIDA PACKER88

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

7h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Smokey

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

13h / Around The NFL / Smokey

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

28-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

28-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines