Green Bay Packers Forum
6 Pages<12345>»
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Porforis  
#31 Posted : Friday, September 28, 2012 9:44:24 AM(UTC)
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
never ever ever. Even if I have Alzheimers I will remember THAT game. Just like I remember the Don Denkinger screw up in 85.


What about the wild playoff game where neither team could stop the other, a misfire on a TD pass in OT, followed by "It's not a facemask as long as you hit him hard enough to jar the ball loose" horseshit?

UserPostedImage
Offline Zero2Cool  
#32 Posted : Friday, September 28, 2012 9:50:05 AM(UTC)
I think the NFL released an apology regarding the '09 Wild Card Playoff game. I'm not 100% positive.
Offline Porforis  
#33 Posted : Friday, September 28, 2012 10:04:45 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
I think the NFL released an apology regarding the '09 Wild Card Playoff game. I'm not 100% positive.


My recollection was that they stated that the call was correct, because a facemask penalty cannot be committed while the ball is loose, even though the impact caused the fumble in the first place.

Either way, the only reason that game was more traumatic to me was because it was so up and down the entire game and it was a playoff game. Here, the Packers still have tons of football to play and I do believe they turn this around and make the Saints wish the commish would have just suspended everyone.
Offline ohiopackerfan  
#34 Posted : Friday, September 28, 2012 10:27:21 PM(UTC)
I'm calling in to work so I can watch this game!!![aiee]
Offline wpr  
#35 Posted : Saturday, September 29, 2012 5:59:38 AM(UTC)
Porforis said: Go to Quoted Post
What about the wild playoff game where neither team could stop the other, a misfire on a TD pass in OT, followed by "It's not a facemask as long as you hit him hard enough to jar the ball loose" horseshit?


yeah I remember that one too. for some reason I wasn't quiet as upset by the call over the long haul. I suppose I figure if the refs threw the flag they would have moved AZ back 165 from the spot they recovered the ball.
Offline Packfan87  
#36 Posted : Saturday, September 29, 2012 10:10:15 AM(UTC)
I'm really excited about this game. I think it will tell us a lot about the Packers as a team. The Saints offense will provide a good test for our defense, and the Saints D will give our offense a chance to break out to their full potential. If we can hold them to 21 points or under think we win this game, and I'll be convinced that our D is the real deal.

Saints -21
Packers - 31
thanks Post received 1 applause.
nerdmann on 9/29/2012(UTC)
Offline PackerTraxx  
#37 Posted : Saturday, September 29, 2012 12:38:25 PM(UTC)
I hope last week's game has a positive effect on the Packers(inspirational dissatisfaction), not the other way around. NO, in spite of all the trials and tribulations and their record, is still a dangerous team. I want most to see the D keep improving and the Oline get their heads out of their bungholes.
Offline ntharp06  
#38 Posted : Sunday, September 30, 2012 12:14:20 PM(UTC)
The idea that Brees and the Saints will go 0-4 to start the year is really hard for me to handle. It's also hard to think that the Packers will lose given what has taken place since last Monday. However, being that the game is at Lambeau, I am hoping we can pull this off. As long as the defense plays as well as they have been with the rush and seeing continued improvement from Woodson at safety, the odds are in our favor. Just get the offensive line on the same field as the rest of the team and things look good.
Offline subin  
#39 Posted : Sunday, September 30, 2012 1:24:41 PM(UTC)
So how many posts do I need to get in the gameday chat? Does this count as a post?!
Offline Blitz  
#40 Posted : Sunday, September 30, 2012 1:28:55 PM(UTC)
I have to believe this snafu happened for a reason. Also hoping something is learned from it.

1st) Pull far ahead early & stay there.

2nd) Have more than enough wins to confirm Playoff bye & homefield advantage.

3rd) Any future potential game winning Hail Mary passes are to now be knocked out of the end zone.
Offline Wade  
#41 Posted : Sunday, September 30, 2012 3:54:37 PM(UTC)
3rd and 17...capers rushes 3....shit shit shit!
Offline DakotaT  
#42 Posted : Sunday, September 30, 2012 3:58:22 PM(UTC)
Wade said: Go to Quoted Post
3rd and 17...capers rushes 3....shit shit shit!


Yeah, I've had enough of Capers. Guru my ass. Fucking playing an accurate QB like this and you don't bring any heat? To make things worse, we have a bunch of young guys in the secondary just cutting their teeth.

Offline istanbulpacker  
#43 Posted : Sunday, September 30, 2012 4:11:51 PM(UTC)
Yeah, Dakota.

It seems to go both ways. D plays like shit....Capers is the goat. Next week the D plays well and he is all of a sudden brilliant again. I don't doubt his ability but call it old-age....I think he is starting to lose it. I still miss Fritz Shurmur.
Offline DakotaT  
#44 Posted : Sunday, September 30, 2012 4:16:43 PM(UTC)
istanbulpacker said: Go to Quoted Post
Yeah, Dakota.

It seems to go both ways. D plays like shit....Capers is the goat. Next week the D plays well and he is all of a sudden brilliant again. I don't doubt his ability but call it old-age....I think he is starting to lose it. I still miss Fritz Shurmur.


I wouldn't be one to call Capers brilliant until he shuts down a prolific offense. We have a young defense that needs to gel. I just don't believe in rushing only three, ever - especially against a QB as good as Brees.
Offline nerdmann  
#45 Posted : Sunday, September 30, 2012 4:56:39 PM(UTC)
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
I wouldn't be one to call Capers brilliant until he shuts down a prolific offense. We have a young defense that needs to gel. I just don't believe in rushing only three, ever - especially against a QB as good as Brees.


We went up against a very good offense today.

This offense got a huge break from the replay claiming that replay was a complete pass, which kept their scoring drive alive.

They also got handed that ugly fumble by Harrell.

Other than that, they looked pretty decent, against that very good offense.

There was that bizarre "miscommunication" where Shields let Colston get deep and seemingly quite a few plays wide open over the middle. But they played well enough to win comfortably.

The problem once again, was on the OFFENSE.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
6 Pages<12345>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
26m / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Yerko

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / OlHoss1884


Tweeter