Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Rios39  
#1 Posted : Monday, October 1, 2012 11:07:50 PM(UTC)
As of right now I would say the Bears are the team to beat in the north. lol and we all know the vikings will come down to earth when facing some tough teams.

The Packers did beat the bears, which matters but I would say taking defense/offense consistency into account the Packers haven't played as well as the Bears have in those phases all 4 games. Lots of time to get better though, it wasn't till week 6 or 7 for the Packers till they started firing on all cylinders offensively in 2010.
Rios39  
#2 Posted : Monday, October 1, 2012 11:11:50 PM(UTC)
On second thought, the Vikings did beat the 49ers. But, even a blind squirrel finds a nut now and then lol
gbguy20  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, October 2, 2012 5:13:34 AM(UTC)
Da Bears

you people sure do talk funny
Wade  
#4 Posted : Tuesday, October 2, 2012 8:40:02 AM(UTC)
If 1 = outstanding/dominant/excellent, 2 = good/dependable/sufficient, and 3 is fair/mediocre/undependable, and 4= bad/awful/sucks.
QB:
1. Packers. 2A. Detroit 2B. Bears 2C. Vikings.

RB
1A. Vikings. 1B. Bears. 2. Packers. 3 Lions

WR/TE:
1. Green Bay. 2. Detroit. 3A. Bears. 3B. Vikings.

OL:
2A. Minnesota. 2B Detroit. 3A Packers. 4. Bears.

DL:
1. Detroit. 2A. Minnesota. 2B Bears. 3. Packers.

LB:
2A Green Bay. 2B. Bears. 2C. Minnesota. 2D. Detroit.

DB.
2A. Green Bay. 2B. Bears. 2C. Minnesota. 3. Detroit.

ST.
1A. Green Bay. 1B. Minnesota 2. Bears. 4. Detroit.

Coaching -- head:
1. Green Bay. 3A Minnesota. 3B. Bears. 3C. Detroit.

Coaching -- assistant:
2A. Green Bay. 2B. Chicago. 3A Minnesota. 3B. Detroit.

With 4 points given for a 1, 3 for a 2, 2 for a 3, and 1 for a 4, with QB counted twice, that leaves possible points being between 10 and 40:

Division prediction based on first four games:

First place: GB 34 pts. Percentage of possible: 85%. Projected record: 11-5.
Second place: Chi 30 points. Percentage of possible: 75%. Projected record: 10-6.
Third place: Minn 29 pts. Percentage of possible: 72.5%. Projected record: 9-7.
Fourth place: Detroit. 27 pts. Percentage of possible: 67.5% Projected record: 8-8.
Zero2Cool  
#5 Posted : Tuesday, October 2, 2012 8:50:15 AM(UTC)
Adrian Peterson as my running back, I'd rather Ponder over Cutler.
nyrpack  
#6 Posted : Tuesday, October 2, 2012 4:25:35 PM(UTC)
Wade said: Go to Quoted Post
If 1 = outstanding/dominant/excellent, 2 = good/dependable/sufficient, and 3 is fair/mediocre/undependable, and 4= bad/awful/sucks.
QB:
1. Packers. 2A. Detroit 2B. Bears 2C. Vikings.

RB
1A. Vikings. 1B. Bears. 2. Packers. 3 Lions

WR/TE:
1. Green Bay. 2. Detroit. 3A. Bears. 3B. Vikings.

OL:
2A. Minnesota. 2B Detroit. 3A Packers. 4. Bears.

DL:
1. Detroit. 2A. Minnesota. 2B Bears. 3. Packers.

LB:
2A Green Bay. 2B. Bears. 2C. Minnesota. 2D. Detroit.

DB.
2A. Green Bay. 2B. Bears. 2C. Minnesota. 3. Detroit.

ST.
1A. Green Bay. 1B. Minnesota 2. Bears. 4. Detroit.

Coaching -- head:
1. Green Bay. 3A Minnesota. 3B. Bears. 3C. Detroit.

Coaching -- assistant:
2A. Green Bay. 2B. Chicago. 3A Minnesota. 3B. Detroit.

With 4 points given for a 1, 3 for a 2, 2 for a 3, and 1 for a 4, with QB counted twice, that leaves possible points being between 10 and 40:

Division prediction based on first four games:

First place: GB 34 pts. Percentage of possible: 85%. Projected record: 11-5.
Second place: Chi 30 points. Percentage of possible: 75%. Projected record: 10-6.
Third place: Minn 29 pts. Percentage of possible: 72.5%. Projected record: 9-7.
Fourth place: Detroit. 27 pts. Percentage of possible: 67.5% Projected record: 8-8.


somebody did there homework, lol good job though !!
wpr  
#7 Posted : Tuesday, October 2, 2012 5:38:09 PM(UTC)
lot of hard work Wade. Well done young man. With Gold as the K and Hester on returns you can never count the Bears out. I know you have them "good".
Rios39  
#8 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 3:54:11 PM(UTC)
Packers looking very weak still. At the same time the Vikings and Bears are dominating. It's frustrating the Packers have yet to take that step into a legit consistent team under McCarthy. Way too mean peaks and valleys
zombieslayer  
#9 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 4:00:56 PM(UTC)
Rios39 said: Go to Quoted Post
Packers looking very weak still. At the same time the Vikings and Bears are dominating. It's frustrating the Packers have yet to take that step into a legit consistent team under McCarthy. Way too mean peaks and valleys


My wife is at the sports bar. I keep getting txt's from her saying "da Bears scored again!"

Geez. I wish I could be sending txt's to someone saying "the Packers scored again!"
Zero2Cool  
#10 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:28:16 PM(UTC)
Adrian Peterson I think is one of three players who can single handedly change a game. Dude is a train. Vikings and Bears both look like superior teams than the Packers, even though the Packers beat the Bears. It looks like that game was just an off game.
Formo  
#11 Posted : Tuesday, October 9, 2012 7:20:33 PM(UTC)
The OP in this thread makes me smile.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Smokey (3h) : Join us in Packershome and be part of the discussion today .
Zero2Cool (22h) : Elizabeeth ... good bye
Zero2Cool (22h) : Saturday, August 19, 2017
Zero2Cool (22h) : That's dedicated spammng!
Nonstopdrivel (23h) : For some reason, I had to flush my DNS cache to access this site from my laptop today.
Nonstopdrivel (23h) : I prefer toads to frogs, Smokey, thank you very much.
Rockmolder (19-Feb) : My girlfriends says thanks, Rourke.
Smokey (19-Feb) : Nonstopdrivel that you most likely say to all the frogs you meet .
Nonstopdrivel (19-Feb) : Rockmolder's avatar is so fucking sexy.
gbguy20 (19-Feb) : never seen the interview before. tough to listen to. can't believe it was 7 years ago
gbguy20 (19-Feb) : just watched a nick Collins tribute on yourube. the end featured an interview with nick reflecting on his injury
buckeyepackfan (17-Feb) : Saints De'Vante Harris nothing but a POS!!!!! Look up his tweetes on Florida killings!!
Nonstopdrivel (17-Feb) : They're laying new gas line near my house. The trucks are all from a company in Madison.
Smokey (14-Feb) : 2018 Hall o Fame Game/Aug.2,2018/Ravens vs Bears
Zero2Cool (13-Feb) : Based off 2017 records, Packers have toughest schedule for 2018
Smokey (13-Feb) : Wow, tough new 2018 Packer Schedule !
Zero2Cool (12-Feb) : I don't know anything about him though. He good? Bad?
Zero2Cool (12-Feb) : Free Agent CB David Amerson ... bring him in!
Smokey (11-Feb) : Coffee time .
Smokey (11-Feb) : Watching girls olympic Hockey.
Rockmolder (10-Feb) : They'd have to give up half their draft. Cousins seems more likely.
Rockmolder (10-Feb) : I've read that somewhere. Wasn't anything more than speculation. Can't imagine it'll happen.
Smokey (10-Feb) : Might Denver trade with Cleveland for the #1 draft pick ?
Cheesey (10-Feb) : Zero is having fun yanking some chains!LOL!
Porforis (9-Feb) : KAPERNICK! jay kay
Zero2Cool (9-Feb) : Sign Case Keenum, trade Aaron Rodgers. Bring us a winner! (haha0
Zero2Cool (9-Feb) : in other words, it wasn't going against the salary cap, that's the point here.
Zero2Cool (9-Feb) : Favre wasn't offered $25 to stay retired! My lord, he was offered 10 year merchandising deal.
Zero2Cool (9-Feb) : Packers should be leaders, not followers. Set the trend, don't be the trend.
Zero2Cool (9-Feb) : Just because 49ers overpaid, doesn't mean other teams should be stupid.
gbguy20 (9-Feb) : wouldn't hurt the cap, just the bottom line. we offered favre 25 mill to stay retired.
gbguy20 (9-Feb) : or get him to take a team friendly number now while promising him a massive marketing contract in retirement to make up for it
gbguy20 (9-Feb) : jimmy g set the record after 7 starts. you really think Rodgers value goes down? sign him now and make it cap friendly for the next 2 years. get him for 28.5 per now instead of 34 per year a year or 2
Zero2Cool (9-Feb) : He has multiple years left, he can wait until final year, like the process goes
Zero2Cool (9-Feb) : he didn't play like a Superstar vs Panthers, he doesn't deserve new deal.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

4h / Random Babble / Smokey

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

17-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Rockmolder

16-Feb / Around The NFL / Cheesey

15-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

14-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

13-Feb / Football Familiarity / Smokey

12-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

11-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

8-Feb / Random Babble / Smokey

8-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

8-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

Headlines