Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
7 Pages«<23456>»
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Zero2Cool  
#31 Posted : Monday, October 1, 2012 1:07:11 PM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,503
Applause Received: 4,049
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
One negative I will attribute to Rodgers is that his receivers ALL teem to have trouble catching his passes consistently, for whatever reason.


This isn't a Packers issues alone, its an NFL issue, same with tackling. He does not get a pass on this.
Offline nerdmann  
#32 Posted : Monday, October 1, 2012 1:22:11 PM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,406
Applause Received: 1,420
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
This isn't a Packers issues alone, its an NFL issue, same with tackling. He does not get a pass on this.


If it's happening with other teams, then maybe it's the balls they're using.

Don't they have a new rule now where you can't break the balls in before the game or something? Or is that just the K-Ball?
Offline Zero2Cool  
#33 Posted : Monday, October 1, 2012 1:32:58 PM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,503
Applause Received: 4,049
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
If it's happening with other teams, then maybe it's the balls they're using.

Don't they have a new rule now where you can't break the balls in before the game or something? Or is that just the K-Ball?


Offenses are allowed to break in 'their balls' pregame, but the kicking K-Ball is not. That's at least to what I got from Aaron Rodgers comments last week.

Wiki - While NFL teams are allowed to practice with regular game balls, a "K" Ball is the term used by special teams for a brand new ball, not used until kickoff - hence the term K-Ball.

Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/...all_in_NFL#ixzz2857V7SJn
Offline nyrpack  
#34 Posted : Monday, October 1, 2012 5:34:30 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Location: long island, ny
Applause Given: 8
Applause Received: 113
blueleopard said: Go to Quoted Post
You're the one who made the goddamn post, and now you're changing your own subject. Sit down.

I'm simply saying what Rodgers did today wasn't all that great. It wouldn't even be a comeback if he didn't throw that bonehead interception.

Ryan led his team well within FG range with no timeouts. So he forced it to his bigplay WR. At least he had the balls to take a chance. With Rodgers you'll just see him running around, waiting to get raped by Bruce Irvin.

I'm not at all saying that Ryan is the better QB. Rodgers is, by far. But taking a lead with 8 minutes left to do so is far from qualifying as a clutch score. Much needed, but not clutch. Clutch is when you simply take the game away. Ryan and Brady did it today. Even Griffin did it today. We've also seen Brett doing it for more than a decade.

Aaron's two only clutch wins came against Chicago on that pass to Jennings and the :58 second drive that led to Crosby beating NYG last year.


you dont need to be clutch, as far as last year because he buried teams from the get go, ill take 15-1 over clutch comebacks anytime !!
thanks Post received 1 applause.
nerdmann on 10/1/2012(UTC)
Offline blueleopard  
#35 Posted : Tuesday, October 2, 2012 1:59:29 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Joined: 8/22/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 169
Game-winning drives are a notch on every quarterback's belt because, simply put, they prove you're clutch.

You're down by five with 1:37 remaining at your own 17 on 3rd and 12. The QB is the one calling the shots. He is the one rallying his troops to give their team the final chance at victory. None of that crap in the past 3 quarters matters.

It's the same as getting into the post-season. Once you're in, the shit that you did in the regular season goes out the window.

With your back up against the wall, which QB do you want to lead your team?

Rodgers is getting there. Brees, Brady, Manning. They all have that.

Even with the odds of a pick, I'll still take Favre.

Take your 15-1 seasons. If I went 9-7 and won the Super Bowl, I'll take that instead.
Offline nerdmann  
#36 Posted : Tuesday, October 2, 2012 10:27:21 AM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,406
Applause Received: 1,420
blueleopard said: Go to Quoted Post
Game-winning drives are a notch on every quarterback's belt because, simply put, they prove you're clutch.

You're down by five with 1:37 remaining at your own 17 on 3rd and 12. The QB is the one calling the shots. He is the one rallying his troops to give their team the final chance at victory. None of that crap in the past 3 quarters matters.

It's the same as getting into the post-season. Once you're in, the shit that you did in the regular season goes out the window.

With your back up against the wall, which QB do you want to lead your team?

Rodgers is getting there. Brees, Brady, Manning. They all have that.

Even with the odds of a pick, I'll still take Favre.

Take your 15-1 seasons. If I went 9-7 and won the Super Bowl, I'll take that instead.


So let's say your QB goes 15-1 and has a good team, so he's not in position to have many comeback opportunities. How do you judge whether he's clutch?

Best third down %age in the history of the game might be of interest.
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#37 Posted : Tuesday, October 2, 2012 10:46:05 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 26
Applause Received: 962
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
So let's say your QB goes 15-1 and has a good team, so he's not in position to have many comeback opportunities. How do you judge whether he's clutch?

Best third down %age in the history of the game might be of interest.


This has been a point that drives me nuts.

Eli is so clutch because he has so many 4th qtr comebacks and Rodgers doesn't.

Well, I ask, why does Eli always need to comeback in the first place? Isn't it better to be ahead so you don't need to come back? Almost 37% of Eli's wins are comebacks. I think I would prefer crappy comeback count and be able to watch from the side or hand the ball off to eat clock to preserve the win.
Offline Zero2Cool  
#38 Posted : Tuesday, October 2, 2012 10:56:01 AM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,503
Applause Received: 4,049
Sure, Eli Manning is a clutch QB, I'm fine with that. As nerdmann would say, he's got 2 'rings'.

I'd rather have a QB who dominates all four quarters than just shows up for the fourth.


And yet some people still think its a swipe at Aaron Rodgers because he's not clutch or doesn't have a lot of 4th quarter comebacks ... I dunno.

Eli Manning
W 69 L 50 .580

Aaron Rodgers
W 41 L 21 .661

Shrug
Offline nerdmann  
#39 Posted : Tuesday, October 2, 2012 10:58:04 AM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,406
Applause Received: 1,420
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
Sure, Eli Manning is a clutch QB, I'm fine with that. As nerdmann would say, he's got 2 'rings'.

I'd rather have a QB who dominates all four quarters than just shows up for the fourth.


And yet some people still think its a swipe at Aaron Rodgers because he's not clutch or doesn't have a lot of 4th quarter comebacks ... I dunno.

Eli Manning
W 69 L 50 .580

Aaron Rodgers
W 41 L 21 .661

Shrug


Eli's overrated, imo. BUT, he does have two rings.

I'd consider him over Peyton, but then again I'm crazy.
Offline zombieslayer  
#40 Posted : Tuesday, October 2, 2012 11:49:26 AM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Eli's overrated, imo. BUT, he does have two rings.

I'd consider him over Peyton, but then again I'm crazy.


Peyton is better in regular season. Eli is way better in post-season. Brett Favre has a better record than Peyton in post-season because Favre can carry a team on his back (or lose a game all by himself). Peyton can't do that.

Eli is clutch in post-season. I hate the guy. But historically, he has been clutch in post-season.

Now if you look at Aaron Rodgers in post-season, he's 4-2 so far. The first game he lost, he had a 121.4 rating, which should have been good enough for a win in 99% of Playoff games. Problem was, our D stunk and allowed Kurt Warner to have a similar performance.

2010 of course we won a SB and Aaron got SB MVP.

2011, he laid down a turd against the Giants. But so did Brett. I think the Giants have our number in post-season. Today's Giants are our Cows of the 90s. If we're gonna win it all, it's best if we avoid playing them.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
7 Pages«<23456>»
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
beast (37m) : BOOM!!!!
buckeyepackfan (40m) : TICK, TICK, TICK ????
GoPack1984 (1h) : It's NFC Championship day! Go Pack Go!!!!
uffda udfa (4h) : The Boss picks the Falcons: [TWITTER]788447079446130688[/TWITTER]
uffda udfa (4h) : Is there a prediction thread somewhere on the forum for the Falcons game?
uffda udfa (4h) : Lookout porous Falcons secondary!
Zero2Cool (5h) : uh oh'
uffda udfa (5h) : Jordy, Davante and GMO all playing tomorrow.
uffda udfa (9h) : MM is such a creature of habit that this is going to upset his apple cart.
uffda udfa (9h) : Waited 2 hours than bused 125 miles to Milwaukee.
uffda udfa (9h) : Fog forces Packers to alter flight to Atlanta.
uffda udfa (9h) : Hoping Max McCaffery is the next Adam Thielen and right soon.
uffda udfa (10h) : Everyone knew Tate got away with OPI and even he said so.
uffda udfa (10h) : http://www.packershome.com/forum/posts/m218900-UN-Fucking-Believable#post218900
uffda udfa (10h) : Golden Tate pushed off big time in Seattle. I said it then.
Zero2Cool (10h) : Max McCaffrey Added to Roster, J.C. Tretter Subtracted
Zero2Cool (10h) : Read what I said about Hail Mary plays and referees letting players play. Got it? Good.
Zero2Cool (10h) : I absolutely would not. Don't dare presume to speak for me. WTF.
uffda udfa (10h) : Had it been other way around I would've been screaming and so would u.
uffda udfa (11h) : It's just true. I try hard to see it and tell it like it is. Was OPI.
Zero2Cool (13h) : which is of course ok, i just personally see it as weird.
Zero2Cool (14h) : Just odd that a Packers fan points out when Packers perceived to get away with something, yet ignore opponent. Weird.
Zero2Cool (14h) : Packers added RB Christine Michael (back) to the injury report as questionable
uffda udfa (14h) : Not diminishing anything. He got away with OPI. Didn't notice before. Was in airport.
Zero2Cool (16h) : Bahahahahahahha GO PACK GO!!!!
Zero2Cool (16h) : when you're buying your Super Bowl LI Champion gear, be critical of that too!
Zero2Cool (16h) : keep trying to diminish what the Packers have done and ...
Zero2Cool (16h) : one... that's just how it goes. They let the players play. But go ahead
Zero2Cool (16h) : Everyone knows on the hail mary type passes, those little shoves won't be called. Think replacement refs 2012. So, no did not get away with
Dulak (16h) : ya I think they mentioned that U U ... but you see this alot - even in the dallas game they pushed off at least 1 time (they as in dallas)
uffda udfa (23h) : Just rewatched Cobbs hail mary catch in slo mo...he should've been flagged for OPI. Got away with one.
uffda udfa (21-Jan) : Nope. I like Gus.
beast (21-Jan) : Did you want Anthony Lynn as HC? Cushion Bradley was going to follow Lynn where ever.
uffda udfa (21-Jan) : Gus Bradley is new DC in SD/LA. I would've loved to had him here in Green Bay.
uffda udfa (21-Jan) : It's just fine.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
15m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Dulak

23m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

44m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

46m / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / The_Green_Ninja

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / flep

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / hardrocker950

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / luigis


Packers Headlines