Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
3 Pages<123>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline bboystyle  
#16 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 3:33:29 PM(UTC)
bboystyle

Rank: Member
Joined: 10/12/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 22
Originally Posted by: nerdmann Go to Quoted Post
I think he's worse than mediocre. I was calling for him to be benched!

Just sayin'.


And Graham Harrell is going to do better? :laughs:
blank
Offline nerdmann  
#17 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:25:15 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Select Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,081
Applause Received: 756
Originally Posted by: bboystyle Go to Quoted Post
And Graham Harrell is going to do better? :laughs:


It would send a message: Pull your head out and play like a man, or go take a seat.

Really, how much worse would Harrell have been?
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Offline Pack93z  
#18 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:32:04 PM(UTC)
Pack93z

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

Rank: Select Member
United States
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Applause Given: 408
Applause Received: 1,104
Originally Posted by: bboystyle Go to Quoted Post
he didnt lead with his helmet. The way he hit him at an angle made it look like he lead with the helmet. but replay showed it was false. Even announcers said it was a bad call...



No it was a piss poor tackle attempt, first fundamental you teach kids... head to the side and crush them with the shoulder.

Yet he had time, squared him up and put his head down and speared him. That was not an incorrect call.

Yes we have had a string of games here with calls that went against us.. but really, every team every week that is in a close game can point to this call or that call. Screw that.. we shelled up in the second half and got whipped.

We have no one to blame but our own play. They have got to pick it up.
I think when there's enough will and aggression, there's no shortage of talent either.

UserPostedImage
Offline zombieslayer  
#19 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:38:29 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
Aaron hasn't been really good this year.

Maybe [tt] should let the press know he called up Brett Favre to light a fire under [ar]'s butt.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)

2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. [tt] [mm] [ar]
Offline Pack93z  
#20 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:38:35 PM(UTC)
Pack93z

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

Rank: Select Member
United States
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Applause Given: 408
Applause Received: 1,104
Originally Posted by: nerdmann Go to Quoted Post
It would send a message: Pull your head out and play like a man, or go take a seat.

Really, how much worse would Harrell have been?


Are you kidding me.. lol. Rodgers played fine today.. not MVP level but fine. Want to yell, yell at the drops.. how many again were there?

Until we have a defense that can hold their own, we have to control the clock and we have to put the fear of the run into the defenses mind. We can run, we have shown we can run if we want to. That is the question, do we want to become a complete offense or try and buck the odds with one dimension.

Football is circular, the beauty of the game. Balanced teams are the consistent teams.. year in and out. It is not a mystery... we can do it. Balance on offense will help the defense.. it will help the oline and it will help the QB.

This season we have been best with balance.. it always comes back to the middle.. the balance.
I think when there's enough will and aggression, there's no shortage of talent either.

UserPostedImage
thanks Post received 2 applause.
vikesrule on 10/7/2012(UTC), macbob on 10/7/2012(UTC)
Offline DarkaneRules  
#21 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:43:56 PM(UTC)
DarkaneRules

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/15/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 224
Applause Received: 383
I think losing our offensive coordinator was more impacting than i thought it would be.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
thanks Post received 1 applause.
Yerko on 10/7/2012(UTC)
Offline yooperfan  
#22 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:46:24 PM(UTC)
yooperfan

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2014

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Ishpeming Michigan
Applause Given: 807
Applause Received: 397
Originally Posted by: Pack93z Go to Quoted Post
Are you kidding me.. lol. Rodgers played fine today.. not MVP level but fine. Want to yell, yell at the drops.. how many again were there?

Until we have a defense that can hold there own, we have to control the clock and we have to put the fear of the run into the defenses mind. We can run, we have shown we can run if we want to. That is the question, do we want to become a complete offense or try and buck the odds with one dimension.

Football is circular, the beauty of the game. Balanced teams are the consistent teams.. year in and out. It is not a mystery... we can do it. Balance on offense will help the defense.. it will help the oline and it will help the QB.

This season we have been best with balance.. it always comes back to the middle.. the balance.


I doubt that the Packers will become a balanced football team with McCarthy calling the plays.
He keeps talking about a running game but he abandons the run game like an Italian cruise ship captain abandons ship.

Offline vikesrule  
#23 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:49:07 PM(UTC)
vikesrule

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/4/2007(UTC)
Applause Given: 60
Applause Received: 193
Originally Posted by: Pack93z Go to Quoted Post
Are you kidding me.. lol. Rodgers played fine today.. not MVP level but fine. Want to yell, yell at the drops.. how many again were there?

Until we have a defense that can hold their own, we have to control the clock and we have to put the fear of the run into the defenses mind. We can run, we have shown we can run if we want to. That is the question, do we want to become a complete offense or try and buck the odds with one dimension.

Football is circular, the beauty of the game. Balanced teams are the consistent teams.. year in and out. It is not a mystery... we can do it. Balance on offense will help the defense.. it will help the oline and it will help the QB.

This season we have been best with balance.. it always comes back to the middle.. the balance.



Pack93z is a wise man........and I won't even add my usual disclaimer "for a cheesehead"

Among other things, the man knows football.

Offline zombieslayer  
#24 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:50:27 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
Originally Posted by: vikesrule Go to Quoted Post
Pack93z is a wise man........and I won't even add my usual disclaimer "for a cheesehead"

Among other things, the man knows football.



He does.

And he's level-headed too. Unlike some of us. (Myself included, of course).
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)

2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. [tt] [mm] [ar]
Offline K_Buz  
#25 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 6:21:51 PM(UTC)
K_Buz

Rank: Member
Joined: 8/17/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6
Applause Received: 41
I thought it was a penalty. I thought he lead with his head.
Offline macbob  
#26 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 8:00:38 PM(UTC)
macbob

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2013PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2012FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2014

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 10/12/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 342
Applause Received: 284
Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool Go to Quoted Post
I'd rather see Starks active than Green. He lacks big play, but hes consistently getting positive yards where Green would go backwards.


I don't think Starks inactive is due to running ability at all. Earlier this year he was blowing assignments (missing blitz pickups, going the wrong way on one play and leaving Rogers to scramble with it). I think Mike McCarthy is pissed that he didn't step up his effort when given the opportunity to replace Grant as the preiminent back in the offense.
UserPostedImage
Offline macbob  
#27 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 8:03:37 PM(UTC)
macbob

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2013PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2012FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2014

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 10/12/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 342
Applause Received: 284
Originally Posted by: nerdmann Go to Quoted Post
Really, how much worse would Harrell have been?


He could go in for 1 play at the opponents goal line and fumble it away...

UserPostedImage
Offline Yerko  
#28 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 8:44:07 PM(UTC)
Yerko

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 10/15/2008(UTC)
Location: Chicago, IL
Applause Given: 168
Applause Received: 289
Originally Posted by: DarkaneRules Go to Quoted Post
I think losing our offensive coordinator was more impacting than i thought it would be.


Agreed. =d>
UserPostedImage
Offline blueleopard  
#29 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 8:55:03 PM(UTC)
blueleopard

Rank: Member
Joined: 8/22/2008(UTC)
Applause Received: 78
Rodgers was excellent in the first half, but the run game also helped him because it kept IND honest.

Then all of a sudden, we lose Benson and then McCarthy goes apeshit with the bomb play calls. I don't see why he doesn't just simplify the gameplan like he did with his final season with Favre. I wanna go back to being the quick slant offense. It takes time, but that shit works.
Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings
Offline bboystyle  
#30 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 9:07:13 PM(UTC)
bboystyle

Rank: Member
Joined: 10/12/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 22
Originally Posted by: blueleopard Go to Quoted Post
Rodgers was excellent in the first half, but the run game also helped him because it kept IND honest.

Then all of a sudden, we lose Benson and then McCarthy goes apeshit with the bomb play calls. I don't see why he doesn't just simplify the gameplan like he did with his final season with Favre. I wanna go back to being the quick slant offense. It takes time, but that shit works.


umm benson ran for 20 yards on 7 carries,a whopping 2.9 avg. wouldnt consider that a run game at all that helped...
blank
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

4-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DarkaneRules

3-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Rockmolder

3-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / dhazer

3-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

3-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

2-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

2-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

2-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / warhawk

28-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan


Tweeter