Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
2 Pages12>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline K_Buz  
#1 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:01:05 PM(UTC)
K_Buz

Rank: Member
Joined: 8/17/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6
Applause Received: 41
Woodson is done...D-O-N-E...DONE.

The guy came into Green Bay and gave us some good years, but you can stick a fork in him now. He's a liability out there.
Sponsor
Offline Pack93z  
#2 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:07:31 PM(UTC)
Pack93z

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

Rank: Select Member
United States
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Applause Given: 408
Applause Received: 1,110
K_Buz said: Go to Quoted Post
Woodson is done...D-O-N-E...DONE.

The guy came into Green Bay and gave us some good years, but you can stick a fork in him now. He's a liability out there.


As a corner, I agree, but as a safety.. I will disagree.

I would say against quality receivers, Wayne is one of them, his man on man coverage days are over.

But there is much football left in that cat. A ton.
Offline zombieslayer  
#3 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:37:11 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
Wait. How did Woodson get the goat of that game? He's been doing pretty well this year so far. In the first four games, he's got 1.5 sacks, 1 INT, and a forced fumble. Hardly stats of someone you'd want to retire.

Wayne beat us all. He was the savior of that game for the Colts (although hats off to Luck as well for not giving up after getting beaten up in the first half pretty badly). It wasn't Woodson's fault.
Offline yooperfan  
#4 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:38:59 PM(UTC)
yooperfan

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2014

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Ishpeming Michigan
Applause Given: 839
Applause Received: 402
K_Buz said: Go to Quoted Post
Woodson is done...D-O-N-E...DONE.

The guy came into Green Bay and gave us some good years, but you can stick a fork in him now. He's a liability out there.


I agree he looked slow old and cold in the Giants game last year.
He looks even slower this year.


Offline Zero2Cool  
#5 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:40:10 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Premier Member
United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,047
Applause Received: 2,499
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
Wait. How did Woodson get the goat of that game? He's been doing pretty well this year so far. In the first four games, he's got 1.5 sacks, 1 INT, and a forced fumble. Hardly stats of someone you'd want to retire.

Wayne beat us all. He was the savior of that game for the Colts (although hats off to Luck as well for not giving up after getting beaten up in the first half pretty badly). It wasn't Woodson's fault.


I think he had three passes defense too where he almost picked them. Maybe two?
Offline Pack93z  
#6 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:43:18 PM(UTC)
Pack93z

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

Rank: Select Member
United States
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Applause Given: 408
Applause Received: 1,110
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
I think he had three passes defense too where he almost picked them. Maybe two?


And he got away with at least a handful of defensive holding down the field.. one in the end zone.

My opinion, the Packers should have sat Williams or Shield on Wayne with a bracket over the top of Woodson someplace within the game when it was apparent he was killing them. However he even when two defender were near him he was catching the rock.. impressive catches I may add.
Offline zombieslayer  
#7 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:52:13 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
I think he had three passes defense too where he almost picked them. Maybe two?


Well, he would have had one INT if it wasn't for two of our defenders crashing into each other like we're the 3 Stooges.
Offline Zero2Cool  
#8 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:55:24 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Premier Member
United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,047
Applause Received: 2,499
Pack93z said: Go to Quoted Post
And he got away with at least a handful of defensive holding down the field.. one in the end zone.

My opinion, the Packers should have sat Williams or Shield on Wayne with a bracket over the top of Woodson someplace within the game when it was apparent he was killing them. However he even when two defender were near him he was catching the rock.. impressive catches I may add.


My choice ... Casey Hayward. I think he got the pick covering Reggie Wayne, lol.
Offline DakotaT  
#9 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 6:02:57 PM(UTC)
DakotaT

Rank: Honored Member
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 747
Applause Received: 1,520
With Wood you have to subtract the defensive holding calls from his big plays and calculate if you still have a great player. And I think the answer is no. You now have a once elite player that is two steps slower and is not worth the money we are paying him. There's two things I'm positive of: he cannot play corner outside on an island, and he can't even cover 2/3 of the area that Nick Collins could. We have regressed. Woodson to me is now a situational player - he should be in the subpackages and we should be getting McMillian more playing time.
Offline shield4life  
#10 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 6:10:38 PM(UTC)
shield4life

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Montreal
Applause Given: 3
Applause Received: 28
We need a lot more help then I had thought this off season!
Offline StoicFire  
#11 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 7:26:16 PM(UTC)
StoicFire

Rank: Registered
Joined: 10/19/2010(UTC)
Location: Bloomington, IN
Applause Given: 29
Applause Received: 54
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
With Wood you have to subtract the defensive holding calls from his big plays and calculate if you still have a great player. And I think the answer is no. You now have a once elite player that is two steps slower and is not worth the money we are paying him. There's two things I'm positive of: he cannot play corner outside on an island, and he can't even cover 2/3 of the area that Nick Collins could. We have regressed. Woodson to me is now a situational player - he should be in the subpackages and we should be getting McMillian more playing time.


I still think Woodson can play, just not spectacularly in all of the situations we put him in. He may settle into the safety role fairly well with time, but as of right now I think he's playing it a little too aggressively.

I do agree though, that he is probably not worth the money we are paying him. I wouldn't be surprised if there was some kind of contract restructuring down the road.
Offline stevegb  
#12 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 7:45:55 PM(UTC)
stevegb

Rank: Member
Joined: 10/30/2006(UTC)
Applause Given: 15
Applause Received: 16
We haven't been beaten that badly by one receiver since that play-off game where Plaxico Burress beat us.
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#13 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 9:27:38 PM(UTC)
PackFanWithTwins

Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 17
Applause Received: 551
Pack93z said: Go to Quoted Post
And he got away with at least a handful of defensive holding down the field.. one in the end zone.

My opinion, the Packers should have sat Williams or Shield on Wayne with a bracket over the top of Woodson someplace within the game when it was apparent he was killing them. However he even when two defender were near him he was catching the rock.. impressive catches I may add.


Defensive Holding BS. It is called defense. Every single one of those plays he "got away with". There was just as much contact from the receiver as from Woodson. FYI. It is just as illegal for the offensive player as it is for the defensive play.

Wayne was covered and making plays on everybody. Williams, shields, Woody, Burnett you name the DB.
Offline nerdmann  
#14 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 10:10:00 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Select Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,144
Applause Received: 772
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
Defensive Holding BS. It is called defense. Every single one of those plays he "got away with". There was just as much contact from the receiver as from Woodson. FYI. It is just as illegal for the offensive player as it is for the defensive play.

Wayne was covered and making plays on everybody. Williams, shields, Woody, Burnett you name the DB.


I'd really like to see them clear up the pass interference rules.
Offline play2win  
#15 Posted : Monday, October 8, 2012 8:20:18 AM(UTC)
play2win

Rank: Registered
United States
Joined: 3/29/2012(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee
Applause Given: 1,076
Applause Received: 725
K_Buz said: Go to Quoted Post
Woodson is done...D-O-N-E...DONE.

The guy came into Green Bay and gave us some good years, but you can stick a fork in him now. He's a liability out there.


I am starting to have some of the same feelings about Charles Woodson. I think he is not as good at S as he is playing CB. Throw in his loss of speed to cover, and what have we got with him? I love the guy and respect the hell out of what he has brought to our team. However, his play is on the downside, and it is apparent. How many INTs has he dropped this year? More than 5? It is somewhere around there. He is holding way more because he no longer has the recovery speed. I think this is pretty plain to see.

We may need younger, faster playing speed at S opposite Morgan Burnett.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
26m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

51m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

29-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

29-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / OlHoss1884

29-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest


Tweeter