Green Bay Packers Forum
3 Pages<123>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline bboystyle  
#16 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 3:33:29 PM(UTC)
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
I think he's worse than mediocre. I was calling for him to be benched!

Just sayin'.


And Graham Harrell is going to do better? :laughs:
Offline nerdmann  
#17 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:25:15 PM(UTC)
bboystyle said: Go to Quoted Post
And Graham Harrell is going to do better? :laughs:


It would send a message: Pull your head out and play like a man, or go take a seat.

Really, how much worse would Harrell have been?
Offline Pack93z  
#18 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:32:04 PM(UTC)
bboystyle said: Go to Quoted Post
he didnt lead with his helmet. The way he hit him at an angle made it look like he lead with the helmet. but replay showed it was false. Even announcers said it was a bad call...



No it was a piss poor tackle attempt, first fundamental you teach kids... head to the side and crush them with the shoulder.

Yet he had time, squared him up and put his head down and speared him. That was not an incorrect call.

Yes we have had a string of games here with calls that went against us.. but really, every team every week that is in a close game can point to this call or that call. Screw that.. we shelled up in the second half and got whipped.

We have no one to blame but our own play. They have got to pick it up.
Offline zombieslayer  
#19 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:38:29 PM(UTC)
Aaron hasn't been really good this year.

Maybe [tt] should let the press know he called up Brett Favre to light a fire under [ar]'s butt.
Offline Pack93z  
#20 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:38:35 PM(UTC)
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
It would send a message: Pull your head out and play like a man, or go take a seat.

Really, how much worse would Harrell have been?


Are you kidding me.. lol. Rodgers played fine today.. not MVP level but fine. Want to yell, yell at the drops.. how many again were there?

Until we have a defense that can hold their own, we have to control the clock and we have to put the fear of the run into the defenses mind. We can run, we have shown we can run if we want to. That is the question, do we want to become a complete offense or try and buck the odds with one dimension.

Football is circular, the beauty of the game. Balanced teams are the consistent teams.. year in and out. It is not a mystery... we can do it. Balance on offense will help the defense.. it will help the oline and it will help the QB.

This season we have been best with balance.. it always comes back to the middle.. the balance.
thanks Post received 2 applause.
vikesrule on 10/7/2012(UTC), macbob on 10/7/2012(UTC)
Offline DarkaneRules  
#21 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:43:56 PM(UTC)
I think losing our offensive coordinator was more impacting than i thought it would be.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
Yerko on 10/7/2012(UTC)
Offline yooperfan  
#22 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:46:24 PM(UTC)
Pack93z said: Go to Quoted Post
Are you kidding me.. lol. Rodgers played fine today.. not MVP level but fine. Want to yell, yell at the drops.. how many again were there?

Until we have a defense that can hold there own, we have to control the clock and we have to put the fear of the run into the defenses mind. We can run, we have shown we can run if we want to. That is the question, do we want to become a complete offense or try and buck the odds with one dimension.

Football is circular, the beauty of the game. Balanced teams are the consistent teams.. year in and out. It is not a mystery... we can do it. Balance on offense will help the defense.. it will help the oline and it will help the QB.

This season we have been best with balance.. it always comes back to the middle.. the balance.


I doubt that the Packers will become a balanced football team with McCarthy calling the plays.
He keeps talking about a running game but he abandons the run game like an Italian cruise ship captain abandons ship.

Offline vikesrule  
#23 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:49:07 PM(UTC)
Pack93z said: Go to Quoted Post
Are you kidding me.. lol. Rodgers played fine today.. not MVP level but fine. Want to yell, yell at the drops.. how many again were there?

Until we have a defense that can hold their own, we have to control the clock and we have to put the fear of the run into the defenses mind. We can run, we have shown we can run if we want to. That is the question, do we want to become a complete offense or try and buck the odds with one dimension.

Football is circular, the beauty of the game. Balanced teams are the consistent teams.. year in and out. It is not a mystery... we can do it. Balance on offense will help the defense.. it will help the oline and it will help the QB.

This season we have been best with balance.. it always comes back to the middle.. the balance.



Pack93z is a wise man........and I won't even add my usual disclaimer "for a cheesehead"

Among other things, the man knows football.

Offline zombieslayer  
#24 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:50:27 PM(UTC)
vikesrule said: Go to Quoted Post
Pack93z is a wise man........and I won't even add my usual disclaimer "for a cheesehead"

Among other things, the man knows football.



He does.

And he's level-headed too. Unlike some of us. (Myself included, of course).
Offline K_Buz  
#25 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 6:21:51 PM(UTC)
I thought it was a penalty. I thought he lead with his head.
Offline macbob  
#26 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 8:00:38 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
I'd rather see Starks active than Green. He lacks big play, but hes consistently getting positive yards where Green would go backwards.


I don't think Starks inactive is due to running ability at all. Earlier this year he was blowing assignments (missing blitz pickups, going the wrong way on one play and leaving Rogers to scramble with it). I think Mike McCarthy is pissed that he didn't step up his effort when given the opportunity to replace Grant as the preiminent back in the offense.
Offline macbob  
#27 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 8:03:37 PM(UTC)
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Really, how much worse would Harrell have been?


He could go in for 1 play at the opponents goal line and fumble it away...

Offline Yerko  
#28 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 8:44:07 PM(UTC)
DarkaneRules said: Go to Quoted Post
I think losing our offensive coordinator was more impacting than i thought it would be.


Agreed. =d>
Offline blueleopard  
#29 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 8:55:03 PM(UTC)
Rodgers was excellent in the first half, but the run game also helped him because it kept IND honest.

Then all of a sudden, we lose Benson and then McCarthy goes apeshit with the bomb play calls. I don't see why he doesn't just simplify the gameplan like he did with his final season with Favre. I wanna go back to being the quick slant offense. It takes time, but that shit works.
Offline bboystyle  
#30 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 9:07:13 PM(UTC)
blueleopard said: Go to Quoted Post
Rodgers was excellent in the first half, but the run game also helped him because it kept IND honest.

Then all of a sudden, we lose Benson and then McCarthy goes apeshit with the bomb play calls. I don't see why he doesn't just simplify the gameplan like he did with his final season with Favre. I wanna go back to being the quick slant offense. It takes time, but that shit works.


umm benson ran for 20 yards on 7 carries,a whopping 2.9 avg. wouldnt consider that a run game at all that helped...
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Poppa San

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Poppa San

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT


Tweeter