Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
2 Pages12>

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
K_Buz  
#1 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:01:05 PM(UTC)
Woodson is done...D-O-N-E...DONE.

The guy came into Green Bay and gave us some good years, but you can stick a fork in him now. He's a liability out there.
Pack93z  
#2 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:07:31 PM(UTC)
K_Buz said: Go to Quoted Post
Woodson is done...D-O-N-E...DONE.

The guy came into Green Bay and gave us some good years, but you can stick a fork in him now. He's a liability out there.


As a corner, I agree, but as a safety.. I will disagree.

I would say against quality receivers, Wayne is one of them, his man on man coverage days are over.

But there is much football left in that cat. A ton.
zombieslayer  
#3 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:37:11 PM(UTC)
Wait. How did Woodson get the goat of that game? He's been doing pretty well this year so far. In the first four games, he's got 1.5 sacks, 1 INT, and a forced fumble. Hardly stats of someone you'd want to retire.

Wayne beat us all. He was the savior of that game for the Colts (although hats off to Luck as well for not giving up after getting beaten up in the first half pretty badly). It wasn't Woodson's fault.
yooperfan  
#4 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:38:59 PM(UTC)
K_Buz said: Go to Quoted Post
Woodson is done...D-O-N-E...DONE.

The guy came into Green Bay and gave us some good years, but you can stick a fork in him now. He's a liability out there.


I agree he looked slow old and cold in the Giants game last year.
He looks even slower this year.


Zero2Cool  
#5 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:40:10 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
Wait. How did Woodson get the goat of that game? He's been doing pretty well this year so far. In the first four games, he's got 1.5 sacks, 1 INT, and a forced fumble. Hardly stats of someone you'd want to retire.

Wayne beat us all. He was the savior of that game for the Colts (although hats off to Luck as well for not giving up after getting beaten up in the first half pretty badly). It wasn't Woodson's fault.


I think he had three passes defense too where he almost picked them. Maybe two?
Pack93z  
#6 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:43:18 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
I think he had three passes defense too where he almost picked them. Maybe two?


And he got away with at least a handful of defensive holding down the field.. one in the end zone.

My opinion, the Packers should have sat Williams or Shield on Wayne with a bracket over the top of Woodson someplace within the game when it was apparent he was killing them. However he even when two defender were near him he was catching the rock.. impressive catches I may add.
zombieslayer  
#7 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:52:13 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
I think he had three passes defense too where he almost picked them. Maybe two?


Well, he would have had one INT if it wasn't for two of our defenders crashing into each other like we're the 3 Stooges.
Zero2Cool  
#8 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:55:24 PM(UTC)
Pack93z said: Go to Quoted Post
And he got away with at least a handful of defensive holding down the field.. one in the end zone.

My opinion, the Packers should have sat Williams or Shield on Wayne with a bracket over the top of Woodson someplace within the game when it was apparent he was killing them. However he even when two defender were near him he was catching the rock.. impressive catches I may add.


My choice ... Casey Hayward. I think he got the pick covering Reggie Wayne, lol.
User is suspended until 5/28/2018 11:54:40 AM(UTC) DakotaT  
#9 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 6:02:57 PM(UTC)
With Wood you have to subtract the defensive holding calls from his big plays and calculate if you still have a great player. And I think the answer is no. You now have a once elite player that is two steps slower and is not worth the money we are paying him. There's two things I'm positive of: he cannot play corner outside on an island, and he can't even cover 2/3 of the area that Nick Collins could. We have regressed. Woodson to me is now a situational player - he should be in the subpackages and we should be getting McMillian more playing time.
shield4life  
#10 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 6:10:38 PM(UTC)
We need a lot more help then I had thought this off season!
StoicFire  
#11 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 7:26:16 PM(UTC)
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
With Wood you have to subtract the defensive holding calls from his big plays and calculate if you still have a great player. And I think the answer is no. You now have a once elite player that is two steps slower and is not worth the money we are paying him. There's two things I'm positive of: he cannot play corner outside on an island, and he can't even cover 2/3 of the area that Nick Collins could. We have regressed. Woodson to me is now a situational player - he should be in the subpackages and we should be getting McMillian more playing time.


I still think Woodson can play, just not spectacularly in all of the situations we put him in. He may settle into the safety role fairly well with time, but as of right now I think he's playing it a little too aggressively.

I do agree though, that he is probably not worth the money we are paying him. I wouldn't be surprised if there was some kind of contract restructuring down the road.
stevegb  
#12 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 7:45:55 PM(UTC)
We haven't been beaten that badly by one receiver since that play-off game where Plaxico Burress beat us.
PackFanWithTwins  
#13 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 9:27:38 PM(UTC)
Pack93z said: Go to Quoted Post
And he got away with at least a handful of defensive holding down the field.. one in the end zone.

My opinion, the Packers should have sat Williams or Shield on Wayne with a bracket over the top of Woodson someplace within the game when it was apparent he was killing them. However he even when two defender were near him he was catching the rock.. impressive catches I may add.


Defensive Holding BS. It is called defense. Every single one of those plays he "got away with". There was just as much contact from the receiver as from Woodson. FYI. It is just as illegal for the offensive player as it is for the defensive play.

Wayne was covered and making plays on everybody. Williams, shields, Woody, Burnett you name the DB.
nerdmann  
#14 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 10:10:00 PM(UTC)
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
Defensive Holding BS. It is called defense. Every single one of those plays he "got away with". There was just as much contact from the receiver as from Woodson. FYI. It is just as illegal for the offensive player as it is for the defensive play.

Wayne was covered and making plays on everybody. Williams, shields, Woody, Burnett you name the DB.


I'd really like to see them clear up the pass interference rules.
play2win  
#15 Posted : Monday, October 8, 2012 8:20:18 AM(UTC)
K_Buz said: Go to Quoted Post
Woodson is done...D-O-N-E...DONE.

The guy came into Green Bay and gave us some good years, but you can stick a fork in him now. He's a liability out there.


I am starting to have some of the same feelings about Charles Woodson. I think he is not as good at S as he is playing CB. Throw in his loss of speed to cover, and what have we got with him? I love the guy and respect the hell out of what he has brought to our team. However, his play is on the downside, and it is apparent. How many INTs has he dropped this year? More than 5? It is somewhere around there. He is holding way more because he no longer has the recovery speed. I think this is pretty plain to see.

We may need younger, faster playing speed at S opposite Morgan Burnett.
play2win  
#16 Posted : Monday, October 8, 2012 8:21:38 AM(UTC)
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
I am starting to have some of the same feelings about Charles Woodson. I think he is not as good at S as he is playing CB. Throw in his loss of speed to cover, and what have we got with him? I love the guy and respect the hell out of what he has brought to our team. However, his play is on the downside, and it is apparent. How many INTs has he dropped this year? More than 5? It is somewhere around there. He is holding way more because he no longer has the recovery speed. I think this is pretty plain to see.

We may need younger, faster playing speed at S opposite Morgan Burnett.


It doesn't help that he is the highest paid player on the Packers at over $11M this year.
Pack93z  
#17 Posted : Monday, October 8, 2012 8:50:08 AM(UTC)
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
Defensive Holding BS. It is called defense. Every single one of those plays he "got away with". There was just as much contact from the receiver as from Woodson. FYI. It is just as illegal for the offensive player as it is for the defensive play.

Wayne was covered and making plays on everybody. Williams, shields, Woody, Burnett you name the DB.


Hey.. I don't like the rules in the NFL these days at all.. but they are what they are. You cannot pin the receivers arm to his body or grab his jersey coming out of the break. Those are clear.

I love the way he plays the game, I really do. But the rules, currently in the NFL favor the receiver and the passing game. I wish the officials would call pass interference more evenly, but it never has been.

All I am saying is that Woodson has limitations at this point, but he is far from done. I do not like him being matched up against great receivers and up. I think he has to use the entire bag of tricks to stay with the receivers because he physically can't match their moves and breaks in and out of the routes.
PackFanWithTwins  
#18 Posted : Monday, October 8, 2012 9:06:30 AM(UTC)
Pack93z said: Go to Quoted Post
Hey.. I don't like the rules in the NFL these days at all.. but they are what they are. You cannot pin the receivers arm to his body or grab his jersey coming out of the break. Those are clear.

I love the way he plays the game, I really do. But the rules, currently in the NFL favor the receiver and the passing game. I wish the officials would call pass interference more evenly, but it never has been.

All I am saying is that Woodson has limitations at this point, but he is far from done. I do not like him being matched up against great receivers and up. I think he has to use the entire bag of tricks to stay with the receivers because he physically can't match their moves and breaks in and out of the routes.


Yes the rules are what they are. It is illegal for offensive players to initiate contact and push to gains separation. And that applies from the snap of the ball, until the pass is touched. Every play, that is what happened.
Pack93z  
#19 Posted : Monday, October 8, 2012 10:12:21 AM(UTC)
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
Yes the rules are what they are. It is illegal for offensive players to initiate contact and push to gains separation. And that applies from the snap of the ball, until the pass is touched. Every play, that is what happened.


I will have to agree to disagree, was there some contact from Wayne, yes. But anything outside of the normal, which applies to the even the Packers receivers, I didn't see it.

I did see Wayne catch a ball with Woodson baring his right arm and miss one in the endzone with his arm pinned down.
dhazer  
#20 Posted : Monday, October 8, 2012 5:52:32 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
Wait. How did Woodson get the goat of that game? He's been doing pretty well this year so far. In the first four games, he's got 1.5 sacks, 1 INT, and a forced fumble. Hardly stats of someone you'd want to retire.

Wayne beat us all. He was the savior of that game for the Colts (although hats off to Luck as well for not giving up after getting beaten up in the first half pretty badly). It wasn't Woodson's fault.


Watch the game again folks. This isn't going against you Zombie, but the reason Woodson was on Wayne alot in the second half was because Wayne made Williams look like a high school cornerback.

Wayne had 7 of his catches in the 2nd half and 5 of those were on there last drive.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Bigbyfan (15m) : Of course the Bears would be the ones to take my guy...
isocleas2 (37m) : Interesting
isocleas2 (37m) : Ward at #4
Zero2Cool (1h) : Bahahahhaha
Zero2Cool (1h) : In Madden.
Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers made a trade!!
beast (2h) : Na, they're going to trade this year's 1st to the Patriots for two 1st round picks (one next year and one this year).
Zero2Cool (2h) : Packers might draft Saquon Barkley
beast (4h) : He's actions said, he's going to tease the #1 pick choice as long as he can
Zero2Cool (5h) : How so? What did he say?
beast (5h) : John Dorsey is just messing with people now... which QB he'll take... I partly love it, partly annoyed by it.
Zero2Cool (5h) : You can make your NFL Pick's (Fantasy > NFL Pick'em)
Smokey (5h) : bye week is not listed in this forum's posting.
Zero2Cool (5h) : You don't follow the Pacers, do you?
gbguy20 (6h) : i must be missing something with the bye week comment
Smokey (7h) : Order your Pizza, Now !
Smokey (7h) : Packers
Smokey (7h) : Yes there is a bye week in the Pacers 2018 Schedule.
Zero2Cool (7h) : no charges? so the bomb was a dud??
Zero2Cool (7h) : No charges for WR Davis over LAX bomb joke
Cheesey (7h) : THE WRATH OF KHAN!!
Zero2Cool (7h) : damn caps
Zero2Cool (7h) : yEEHAW!!
Smokey (7h) : "DRAFT CHAT" Baby !
packerfanoutwest (10h) : Packers first pick will be lining up on with the defense
beast (11h) : If Packers trade up, they're grabbing James (or an ILB or CB) ;-P
beast (11h) : Sounds like Khan is moving the team to London in time.
packerfanoutwest (11h) : Here's an idea. Start a thread on who can pick the Packers #1 pick. Just make the pick only. No other comments.
Zero2Cool (12h) : This is NOT good
Zero2Cool (12h) : Shad Khan: I’m buying Wembley to keep the Jaguars stable in both London and Jacksonville
Zero2Cool (12h) : @AndrewBrandt Yes. The best GMs will leverage desperate teams tonight.
Zero2Cool (12h) : Today's Birthdays: StoicFire (30)
Zero2Cool (13h) : The Parlor is better than The Room.
beast (26-Apr) : I believe the Packers seriously want to trade up (if they can find a price they like), I'm guessing for Fitzpatrick or James (though one guy said Ward). But could also be one of the ILBers (Smith or E
Smokey (25-Apr) : Rumors are not money in the bank deals.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2018 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 9 @ 7:20 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Sep 16 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Sep 23 @ 12:00 PM
Redskins
Sunday, Sep 30 @ 12:00 PM
BILLS
Sunday, Oct 7 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Monday, Oct 15 @ 7:15 PM
49ERS
Sunday, Oct 28 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Nov 4 @ 7:20 PM
Patriots
Sunday, Nov 11 @ 12:00 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Nov 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Sunday, Nov 25 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Dec 2 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Dec 9 @ 12:00 PM
FALCONS
Sunday, Dec 16 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Dec 23 @ 12:00 PM
Jets
Sunday, Dec 30 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
55m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Barfarn

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5h / Random Babble / Cheesey

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Bigbyfan

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

26-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

24-Apr / Around The NFL / dhazer

24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

24-Apr / Random Babble / Cheesey

Headlines