Packers drive chart against Colts

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated! Login or Register.

2 Pages12 >

Options

View

Previous Topic Next Topic

Zero2Cool		#1 Posted : Tuesday, October 9, 2012 9:53:35 AM(UTC)
Rank: Legend Posts: 25,675 Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC) Location: Green Bay, WI Applause Given: 1,846 Applause Received: 2,004		Previously I said they had two drives under 30 seconds. I was penalizing them for a drive incorrectly. Here are four of the three and outs they had. Code: 0:21 GB 43 3 6 Punt 0:50 GB 32 3 1 Punt 0:52 GB 20 3 -1 Punt 0:58 GB 20 3 -8 Punt Four drives that ate up just over 3 minutes!! :50 drive 1-10-GB 32 (10:20) (Shotgun) 20-A.Green left tackle to GB 33 for 1 yard (93-D.Freeney). 2-9-GB 33 (9:49) (Shotgun) 12-A.Rodgers pass incomplete short right to 80-D.Driver. 3-9-GB 33 (9:42) (Shotgun) 12-A.Rodgers pass incomplete short left to 87-J.Nelson. :21 drive 1-10-GB 43 (1:17) (Shotgun) 12-A.Rodgers pass short right to 30-J.Kuhn pushed ob at GB 49 for 6 yards (50-J.Freeman). 2-4-GB 49 (1:12) (Shotgun) 12-A.Rodgers pass incomplete short right to 87-J.Nelson. 3-4-GB 49 (1:07) (Shotgun) 12-A.Rodgers pass incomplete short right to 88-J.Finley (38-S.Brown). :58 drive 1-10-GB 20 (11:06) 12-A.Rodgers pass incomplete short left to 89-Ja.Jones. 2-10-GB 20 (11:03) (Shotgun) 12-A.Rodgers sacked at GB 15 for -5 yards (90-C.Redding). 3-15-GB 15 (10:28) (Shotgun) 12-A.Rodgers scrambles left end to GB 17 for 2 yards. 12-A.Rodgers pass incomplete short left to 88-J.Finley. PENALTY on GB-12-A.Rodgers, Illegal Forward Pass, 5 yards, enforced at GB 17. :52 drive 1-10-GB 20 (:18) (Shotgun) 12-A.Rodgers pass incomplete short left to 18-R.Cobb. PENALTY on IND-32-C.Vaughn, Defensive Holding, 5 yards, enforced at GB 20 - No Play. 1-10-GB 25 (:15) (Shotgun) 20-A.Green up the middle to GB 23 for -2 yards (55-J.Hickman). END QUARTER 3 2-12-GB 23 (15:00) (Shotgun) 12-A.Rodgers pass incomplete deep middle to 84-D.Williams. 3-12-GB 23 (14:57) (Shotgun) 12-A.Rodgers sacked at GB 19 for -4 yards (93-D.Freeney). Got Shotgun anyone?
		-- Where is the REPLY button? -- Click here and find the LATEST Packers News!
		WWW Facebook Twitter
Post received 1 applause.		Wade on 10/9/2012(UTC)
User Profile View All Posts by User View Applause
Sponsor
Forum Guidelines

play2win		#2 Posted : Tuesday, October 9, 2012 10:02:46 AM(UTC)
Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick Posts: 2,783 Joined: 3/29/2012(UTC) Location: Milwaukee Applause Given: 1,076 Applause Received: 725		12 pass plays to 2 run plays in 4, uh, drives... only 3 minutes??? Wow. This Packers offense OWES their defense. Big time. Balance. We are completely out of balance. Keep this up and Rodgers will get injured. We'll then have to use Graham Harrell, and you know what? We'll win, because we were forced to run the frickin' football.


User Profile View All Posts by User View Applause

Zero2Cool		#3 Posted : Tuesday, October 9, 2012 10:03:42 AM(UTC)
Rank: Legend Posts: 25,675 Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC) Location: Green Bay, WI Applause Given: 1,846 Applause Received: 2,004		On the :21 drive, Nelson and Finley were both credited with drops.
		-- Where is the REPLY button? -- Click here and find the LATEST Packers News!
		WWW Facebook Twitter

User Profile View All Posts by User View Applause

play2win		#4 Posted : Tuesday, October 9, 2012 10:08:23 AM(UTC)
Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick Posts: 2,783 Joined: 3/29/2012(UTC) Location: Milwaukee Applause Given: 1,076 Applause Received: 725		Both Finley and Nelson are tied for 5th in the NFL for drops with 4 each. http://hosted.stats.com/...p;range=NFL&rank=232


User Profile View All Posts by User View Applause

nerdmann		#5 Posted : Tuesday, October 9, 2012 10:24:36 AM(UTC)
Rank: Super Bowl MVP Posts: 6,931 Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC) Applause Given: 2,306 Applause Received: 577		Time of possession is a WCO concept. Apparently it's a matter of complete indifference in the Run and Shoot.
		“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”


User Profile View All Posts by User View Applause

Wade		#6 Posted : Tuesday, October 9, 2012 2:34:56 PM(UTC)
Rank: All Pro Posts: 5,768 Joined: 8/1/2009(UTC) Location: nowhere of importance Applause Given: 630 Applause Received: 648		IMO, the problem isn't the pass/run ratio. It's the shotgun/non-shotgun ratio.
		None of the above. It wouldn't have been a wasted vote. Obama and Romney -- Those were the wasted votes.
		BLOG
Post received 1 applause.		Gaycandybacon on 10/10/2012(UTC)
User Profile View All Posts by User View Applause

macbob		#7 Posted : Tuesday, October 9, 2012 5:11:50 PM(UTC)
Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick Posts: 1,700 Joined: 10/12/2008(UTC) Applause Given: 260 Applause Received: 226		Originally Posted by: Wade IMO, the problem isn't the pass/run ratio. It's the shotgun/non-shotgun ratio. Wade, I agree a lot with the shotguns being a problem. Using ESPN for the play-by-play, in the Colts game, Mike McCarthy mixed it up pretty well in the first quarter, with 8 plays from the running formation and 6 from the shotgun. That changed dramatically beginning in the second quarter: 17 of the 19 plays run were from the shotgun. 3rd qtr: 12 of 17 plays run from the shotgun. 4th qtr: 11 of the 15 plays were from the shotgun. So, after the first quarter only 11 of our 51 plays were from a running formation, the other 40 were from the shotgun. But I would argue it's really both. You have to run it enough to make the LBs, etc respect your play action fakes, which slows down the pass rush and freezes the LBs--helping your receivers get open by opening up the middle of the field. Houston in the Mon night game gave a clinic on running the ball from under center, then running a play-action pass. I just hope Mike McCarthy is taking notes during the film study for this week's opponent.


Post received 2 applause.		Wade on 10/9/2012(UTC), Zero2Cool on 10/9/2012(UTC)
User Profile View All Posts by User View Applause

Wade		#8 Posted : Tuesday, October 9, 2012 5:44:02 PM(UTC)
Rank: All Pro Posts: 5,768 Joined: 8/1/2009(UTC) Location: nowhere of importance Applause Given: 630 Applause Received: 648		Originally Posted by: macbob Wade, I agree a lot with the shotguns being a problem. Using ESPN for the play-by-play, in the Colts game, Mike McCarthy mixed it up pretty well in the first quarter, with 8 plays from the running formation and 6 from the shotgun. That changed dramatically beginning in the second quarter: 17 of the 19 plays run were from the shotgun. 3rd qtr: 12 of 17 plays run from the shotgun. 4th qtr: 11 of the 15 plays were from the shotgun. So, after the first quarter only 11 of our 51 plays were from a running formation, the other 40 were from the shotgun. But I would argue it's really both. You have to run it enough to make the LBs, etc respect your play action fakes, which slows down the pass rush and freezes the LBs--helping your receivers get open by opening up the middle of the field. Houston in the Mon night game gave a clinic on running the ball from under center, then running a play-action pass. I just hope Mike McCarthy is taking notes during the film study for this week's opponent. Good detail here, macbob. I'm glad people like you and Kevin are willing to go back and look things up so lazy, shoot-from-the-hipsters like me can continue to lazily shoot from the hip.
		None of the above. It wouldn't have been a wasted vote. Obama and Romney -- Those were the wasted votes.
		BLOG

User Profile View All Posts by User View Applause

gbguy20		#9 Posted : Tuesday, October 9, 2012 10:16:55 PM(UTC)
Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick Posts: 2,240 Joined: 8/28/2009(UTC) Applause Given: 203 Applause Received: 280		Mccarthy essentially gave up on the run the minute Cedric went down. Granted, Alex Green was f*cking terrible on all but 1 play so during the game I didn't hold it against him too much. I was going to end it with "but damn those numbers," but when u look at Alex Green's number before his long run....you just want to say "damn those numbers" about those too. IDK, I can't hold it against him THIS WEEK.
		call me Dan


User Profile View All Posts by User View Applause

macbob		#10 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2012 5:06:05 PM(UTC)
Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick Posts: 1,700 Joined: 10/12/2008(UTC) Applause Given: 260 Applause Received: 226		Originally Posted by: gbguy20 Mccarthy essentially gave up on the run the minute Cedric went down. Granted, Alex Green was f*cking terrible on all but 1 play so during the game I didn't hold it against him too much. I was going to end it with "but damn those numbers," but when u look at Alex Green's number before his long run....you just want to say "damn those numbers" about those too. IDK, I can't hold it against him THIS WEEK. What about Kuhn? There were other options besides Green than the one Mike McCarthy chose (abandon the run). Kuhn's not going to break a 40 yarder, but he can pound it inside and can be a good lead-in to a play-action pass. For someone who says he wants to run the ball, Mike McCarthy abandons the run incredibly quickly (and in the case of the Seattle game before the first play was run).



User Profile View All Posts by User View Applause

gbguy20		#11 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2012 8:39:32 PM(UTC)
Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick Posts: 2,240 Joined: 8/28/2009(UTC) Applause Given: 203 Applause Received: 280		Originally Posted by: macbob What about Kuhn? There were other options besides Green than the one Mike McCarthy chose (abandon the run). Kuhn's not going to break a 40 yarder, but he can pound it inside and can be a good lead-in to a play-action pass. For someone who says he wants to run the ball, Mike McCarthy abandons the run incredibly quickly (and in the case of the Seattle game before the first play was run). I disagree that Kuhn is the guy to make the defenses respect the play fake. I fully agree with your second statement.
		call me Dan


User Profile View All Posts by User View Applause

zombieslayer		#12 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2012 9:13:55 PM(UTC)
Rank: Most Valuable Player Posts: 9,919 Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC) Location: San Francisco Applause Given: 778 Applause Received: 495		I'd second bringing in Kuhn. Yes, he'll not break the big one, but at least he'll make the defenders sore after the game.
		My man Donald Driver (thanks to Pack93z for the pic) 2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty.
		WWW

User Profile View All Posts by User View Applause

nerdmann		#13 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2012 9:40:19 PM(UTC)
Rank: Super Bowl MVP Posts: 6,931 Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC) Applause Given: 2,306 Applause Received: 577		Originally Posted by: zombieslayer I'd second bringing in Kuhn. Yes, he'll not break the big one, but at least he'll make the defenders sore after the game. Green deserves a shot. Remember, he led the nation in per carry average at Hawaii. Dude also paid his dues on ST, which cost him his rookie year after an ugly knee injury. He deserves it. Maybe Mike McCarthy will start calling some screens... (I think Green would look really good running those "Randall Cobb/Percy Harvin/Darrin Sproles/Reggie Bush" type plays out of the backfield.)
		“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”


User Profile View All Posts by User View Applause

Porforis		#14 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2012 9:58:38 PM(UTC)
Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick Posts: 2,738 Joined: 8/22/2009(UTC) Location: Milwaukee, WI Applause Given: 168 Applause Received: 333		Originally Posted by: Wade IMO, the problem isn't the pass/run ratio. It's the shotgun/non-shotgun ratio. Personally, I think it's an issue with the points scored/points allowed ratio.



User Profile View All Posts by User View Applause

RajiRoar		#15 Posted : Wednesday, October 10, 2012 10:46:46 PM(UTC)
Rank: 3rd Round Draft Pick Posts: 1,103 Joined: 9/30/2009(UTC) Applause Given: 38 Applause Received: 218		i'm not sold on Green.. but he may be our best option at this point. Hawaii has a very non-NFL style offense. so really it's up how how well he's been coached since then. we know what we have with Starks which is "meh".. (i'd personally like to see him bulk up that 6'2 frame because he looked like a WR in our SB run.)
		MintBaconDrivel Dec, 11, 2012 - FOREVER!


User Profile View All Posts by User View Applause

Rss Feed

Users browsing this topic
Guest

2 Pages12 >

Forum Jump

You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Error

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Forum Guidelines

Notification