Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
4 Pages123>»

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
play2win  
#1 Posted : Tuesday, October 9, 2012 5:39:26 AM(UTC)
I'm thinking we need to make a trade. Raji going down has exposed a huge weakness on our DL. As much as I like Ryan Pickett, he is getting up there and simply cannot take the same rep load the younger Raji does. What do you guys think? I'm kind of hoping Ted pulls the trigger on a deal here soon.

As mentioned prior to the draft, we are still relatively deep at WR and TE compared to many teams in the league.
Zero2Cool  
#2 Posted : Tuesday, October 9, 2012 5:43:21 AM(UTC)
Mike Neal is back, so no. Until he proves he's a complete bust by getting injured again or being ineffective, you don't trade. You don't make one position weaker to help another position. WR is the Packers strength and the star is already injured there.
yooperfan  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, October 9, 2012 5:48:56 AM(UTC)
I say no.
I doubt we would get anybody in return who would actually bolster our roster.
Player for player trades are quite rare anyway.
play2win  
#4 Posted : Tuesday, October 9, 2012 5:55:03 AM(UTC)
I would trade Finley in about 8 seconds to add another wide body NT. Doesn't have to be a world beater, just someone else to eat up blockers for our LBs. Especially with us facing HOU Sunday.
PackFanWithTwins  
#5 Posted : Tuesday, October 9, 2012 6:16:38 AM(UTC)
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
I'm thinking we need to make a trade. Raji going down has exposed a huge weakness on our DL. As much as I like Ryan Pickett, he is getting up there and simply cannot take the same rep load the younger Raji does. What do you guys think? I'm kind of hoping Ted pulls the trigger on a deal here soon.

As mentioned prior to the draft, we are still relatively deep at WR and TE compared to many teams in the league.


I don't think so. Pickett doesn't need to carry the snap load that Raji did. He only needs to carry about 50% of the total defensive snaps, if even that much. With the return of Neal, who looked pretty good in his first game back combined with Worthy, Daniels, Wilson. Put Pickett on the nose when we are in a true 3 man line which isnt' very often, and use him sparringly in 2 man formations.

The time is for the rushers to do what they were drafted for. The only time that I would really have concern is if we get into a goal-line situation when we actually used both Pickett and Raji at the same time.
play2win  
#6 Posted : Tuesday, October 9, 2012 8:01:32 AM(UTC)
I really liked what Neal did last week, and unfortunately, Daniels was inactive. As a fan, I'm not comfortable with us being so lean on DL depth, especially after last season, and especially at NT.
zombieslayer  
#7 Posted : Tuesday, October 9, 2012 8:11:28 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
Mike Neal is back, so no. Until he proves he's a complete bust by getting injured again or being ineffective, you don't trade. You don't make one position weaker to help another position. WR is the Packers strength and the star is already injured there.


This. Neal was impressive in his first week back. He's only gonna get better.

Raji will be back for the Playoffs.
PackFanWithTwins  
#8 Posted : Tuesday, October 9, 2012 10:41:37 AM(UTC)
Only if they can get JJ.
Pack93z  
#9 Posted : Tuesday, October 9, 2012 10:45:34 AM(UTC)
Why trade if we can pick up a Daniel Muir as a street free agent? IMO, he was as consistent as we had in the preseason.

No, we should not trade for a lineman unless we get real value and fits a three four. Real value meaning a young guy the can be part of the answer for a couple of years. That market isn't there..

Pack93z  
#10 Posted : Tuesday, October 9, 2012 10:47:27 AM(UTC)
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
Only if they can get JJ.


Yep.. waiting for a scenario to be thrown out there. JJ for JJ.. or how about JJ for Woodson.. lol.

That could get me on another small pet peeve that I have of Ted Thompson, his reluctance to draft kids from Wisconsin. LOL.
Zero2Cool  
#11 Posted : Tuesday, October 9, 2012 10:55:47 AM(UTC)
Packers drafted 32nd so ... getting J.J. Watt wasn't really gonna happen, lol. Wisconsin doesn't have any solid players for the NFL, other than OL.

Watt has 8.5 sacks in 5 games, had only 5.5 all last season. Hmm ...
Pack93z  
#12 Posted : Tuesday, October 9, 2012 11:33:27 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
Packers drafted 32nd so ... getting J.J. Watt wasn't really gonna happen, lol. Wisconsin doesn't have any solid players for the NFL, other than OL.

Watt has 8.5 sacks in 5 games, had only 5.5 all last season. Hmm ...


Did I say Watt.. no Watt wasn't dropping to us. But the Badgers only produce Lineman? Really.

Hmmm. currently in the NFL.

7 Offensive lineman.

5 Tight Ends , one next week which will be exploiting us. Daniels.

4 Defensive Lineman, One next week which will be haunting us.. lol.

3 Linebackers

2 Quarterbacks , One has beaten us this year already.

2 Fullbacks

2 Safeties

2 Wide Receivers

1 Punter

Which college last year produced the most draft picks? That is right, the Badgers. lol.
Zero2Cool  
#13 Posted : Tuesday, October 9, 2012 11:43:26 AM(UTC)
Pack93z said: Go to Quoted Post
Did I say Watt.. no Watt wasn't dropping to us.


The thread is about DL. Packers play against his team. I used him as a reference point because of such. No where did I say you or anyone said the Packers should have drafted him. Often times, I think of things that perhaps others may as well, so I throw it down in the post because I have an inquiring mind. This way, if someone else also wondered similarly (what position was Watt picked?), they do not need to do the research as I just posted it.

Currently in the NFL, is not being a solid contributor. When it comes to the line, yes, but skilled positions like RB and QB and WR and CB and S ... not so much. I almost throw TE in there with the line. Badgers provide the grunt guys, the touch SOB's that are no nonsense.

That's not a knock on Wisconsin so no need to get all defensive here. I'm a Badger threw and through and threw.
Pack93z  
#14 Posted : Tuesday, October 9, 2012 11:47:13 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post


That's not a knock on Wisconsin so no need to get all defensive here. I'm a Badger threw and through and threw.


Not being defensive.. just illustrating a point here. Mostly in a zestful rebuttal to your comment.

I care little about skill guys, unless you are discussing elite talents that impact otherwise they are just another player.. if you take care of the line of scrimmage, the rest will take care of itself.


Pack93z  
#15 Posted : Tuesday, October 9, 2012 11:49:22 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post


Watt has 8.5 sacks in 5 games, had only 5.5 all last season. Hmm ...


Another point here, so for those wondering ( [grin1] ).. part time player last season as a rookie figuring out the NFL.. this year a full time player that has figured out that not all guys sell out on every play. He does.. so addition to his talent he is going full tilt every snap. That is a shame on the bulk of NFL players.

steveishere  
#16 Posted : Tuesday, October 9, 2012 11:59:59 AM(UTC)
Pack93z said: Go to Quoted Post

2 Quarterbacks , One has beaten us this year already.


*
Zero2Cool  
#17 Posted : Tuesday, October 9, 2012 12:07:50 PM(UTC)
Pack93z said: Go to Quoted Post
Another point here, so for those wondering ( [grin1] ).. part time player last season as a rookie figuring out the NFL.. this year a full time player that has figured out that not all guys sell out on every play. He does.. so addition to his talent he is going full tilt every snap. That is a shame on the bulk of NFL players.



He is a beast, no question. A DL version of Clay Matthews III.

As for you QB one beat us this year. Funny, I didn't know any of the referee's from that game played QB and were from Wisconsin.
Pack93z  
#18 Posted : Tuesday, October 9, 2012 12:34:32 PM(UTC)
steveishere said: Go to Quoted Post
*


Well played.. and yes. *

But as I was once taught early in playing games.. it is what it is.


And your record, at the end of the day, is your record. No what ifs or should have been.

Zero2Cool  
#19 Posted : Tuesday, October 9, 2012 12:50:15 PM(UTC)
Pack93z said: Go to Quoted Post
Well played.. and yes. *

But as I was once taught early in playing games.. it is what it is.


And your record, at the end of the day, is your record. No what ifs or should have been.



](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,)
Pack93z  
#20 Posted : Tuesday, October 9, 2012 1:07:59 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,)


It is a matter of focus or attention.

We can, as fans or a team, either accept the hosing and work to offset the future effects in the future of what we can control, or allow it to consume and define us.

It sucks.. it did then, it will tomorrow that we should be 3-2 and not 2-3. But come December we can either be 10-3 and minimize that effect of that bullshit call. Or we can continue to point to it, and have it a focus come December again.

I used to torture myself with the past.. and allowed it to affect me going forward. Why. Screw it.. it is what it is. Next.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages123>»
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
beast (8h) : Packers can't catch Eagles so it doesn't directly effect our playoff chances.
Nonstopdrivel (8h) : yoffs?
Nonstopdrivel (8h) : So . . . could in theory be a severe sprain. Which might still sideline him for the rest of the season, but perhaps he'd be back for the pla
Zero2Cool (9h) : That's regarding Carson Wentz
Zero2Cool (9h) : @AlbertBreer Doctors determined with manual test there was damage to ACL, extent unknown until MRI tomorrow.
Zero2Cool (9h) : Read reports that's what is feared and yes, you're right, usually if that's the fear = done
Nonstopdrivel (9h) : MRI would me mostly a formality. He walked off on his own power, so possibly just a sprain? But I doubt it.
Nonstopdrivel (9h) : Provocative tests on scene are pretty sensitive. If they fear his ACL is torn, it probably is.
Zero2Cool (9h) : He has an ACL? I only heard there were running tests ... tomorrow.
Nonstopdrivel (9h) : Depends on which Nick Foles arises from the ashes. If it's the 2013 Foles, Eagles could still be a powerhouse.
gbguy20 (9h) : carson wentz torn acl. is that good or bad for our playoff chances?
nerdmann (13h) : It's definitive, Davante is BETTER than Janis.
Zero2Cool (14h) : can't believe some don't want Adams re-signed... what is wrong with you!!
Zero2Cool (14h) : @WesHod The #Packers turned to Davante Adams several times during the final series and he came through each time. The evolution of a playmak
buckeyepackfan (18h) : Packer Fans will take over Stadium today!
Zero2Cool (18h) : @AaronNagler Packers just took the field to cheers. No Browns fans here to boo yet.
buckeyepackfan (18h) : DILLY DILLY!
Zero2Cool (18h) : Williams though, to answer your question :D
Zero2Cool (18h) : First snap of the day don't mean didly
Zero2Cool (18h) : Starting? who cares?
Zero2Cool (18h) : Browns getting 1st win
dhazer (18h) : who is starting at rb today ?
buckeyepackfan (19h) : Perry innactive! Fackrell & Biegal step up today!
Zero2Cool (19h) : Both undrafted rookies, Lenzy Pipkins and Donatello Brown, are active for the #Packers. They join Randall, House and Hawkins as the active c
buckeyepackfan (20h) : GO! PACK! GO!
buckeyepackfan (20h) : GAMEDAY! #assesagainstthewall!
buckeyepackfan (20h) : GOOD MORNING PACKER FANS!
buckeyepackfan (20h) : Yes Packers will be done if they lose today.
beast (20h) : Packers might be done even if they go undefeated the rest of the way ,so any loss and they're out of playoff chase
dhazer (21h) : If GB loses today should mean end of TT and MM. The Browns are going for perfect season
gbguy20 (21h) : if we lose today are we done?
Zero2Cool (10-Dec) : Rodgers also lines up LB during practices. Fun they does have
buckeyepackfan (10-Dec) : Pipkin & Brown!!!! = Packer Win!!! BOOK IT!!!!
Cheesey (10-Dec) : GO Arvy, beat Namy! Lol!
wpr (9-Dec) : GO ARMY BEAT NAVY
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Nonstopdrivel

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

21h / Fantasy Sports Talk / dhazer

10-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

9-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Nonstopdrivel

Headlines