Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
3 Pages<123>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline zombieslayer  
#11 Posted : Thursday, October 11, 2012 10:41:46 AM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
Thank you Yerko. I completely forgot to say NO MORE 3 MAN RUSH!!!!
Offline Zero2Cool  
#12 Posted : Thursday, October 11, 2012 10:45:54 AM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,492
Applause Received: 4,029
Yerko said: Go to Quoted Post
2. More 3+ pass rushers, no more > 3 man pass rushers.


Those stupid less than/greater than symbols always one up me! Pac-Man eats the bigger number right? So you're saying no more greater than three man pass rushes?


I don't mind them too much, like once or twice a game. It's seeing them over and over again that kill the Packers. I'd vote Yes to never seeing them again without much hesitation though.

thanks Post received 1 applause.
Porforis on 10/11/2012(UTC)
Offline Yerko  
#13 Posted : Thursday, October 11, 2012 11:27:41 AM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 10/15/2008(UTC)
Location: Chicago, IL
Applause Given: 212
Applause Received: 381
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
Those stupid less than/greater than symbols always one up me! Pac-Man eats the bigger number right? So you're saying no more greater than three man pass rushes?


I don't mind them too much, like once or twice a game. It's seeing them over and over again that kill the Packers. I'd vote Yes to never seeing them again without much hesitation though.



Hmm, good question...its been awhile. (Thought I was using it right)

Wrong: > 3
Correction (?): No more 3 > man pass rushes

If not, I give up. [palm]
Offline Zero2Cool  
#14 Posted : Thursday, October 11, 2012 11:30:38 AM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,492
Applause Received: 4,029
I think it would be no more < 3 man rushes?
Code:

if(iRush > 3) 
{ 
Console.WriteLine("GOOD!"); 
} 
else 
{ 
Console.WriteLine("BAD"); 
}
Offline GermanGilbert  
#15 Posted : Thursday, October 11, 2012 11:44:11 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Joined: 11/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 55
Applause Received: 112
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
I think it would be no more < 3 man rushes?
Code:

if(iRush > 3) 
{ 
Console.WriteLine("GOOD!"); 
} 
else 
{ 
Console.WriteLine("BAD"); 
}


I'd say it should be "no more <= 3 man rushes" as 3 man rushes are bad either.
Offline Zero2Cool  
#16 Posted : Thursday, October 11, 2012 11:47:46 AM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,492
Applause Received: 4,029
That's what the code says, lol. If it's MORE than 3, good, if not more than 3, bad. That includes 3 man, 2 man, 1 man and no man. :)
Offline GermanGilbert  
#17 Posted : Thursday, October 11, 2012 11:53:43 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Joined: 11/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 55
Applause Received: 112
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
That's what the code says, lol. If it's MORE than 3, good, if not more than 3, bad. That includes 3 man, 2 man, 1 man and no man. :)


The code yes, but not the question above the code [grin1]
Offline Zero2Cool  
#18 Posted : Thursday, October 11, 2012 11:58:37 AM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,492
Applause Received: 4,029
GermanGilbert said: Go to Quoted Post
The code yes, but not the question above the code [grin1]


oooh I see! I was only thinking about the code lol
Offline Rios39  
#19 Posted : Thursday, October 11, 2012 12:50:27 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Joined: 8/9/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 30
Packers OL by pressure allowed:

1.Saturday-5 2.Sitton-6 3.Lang-7 4.Newhouse-8 5.Bulaga-24


If anyone really think Newhouse is struggled they need a gut check. The entire interior line has been doing pretty good when you consider the amount of attempts they've been up against. Bulagao, however has to get better. His numbers are horrible that's where a lot of the initial pressure is coming from.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
zombieslayer on 10/11/2012(UTC)
Offline zombieslayer  
#20 Posted : Thursday, October 11, 2012 1:34:38 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
Rios39 said: Go to Quoted Post
Packers OL by pressure allowed:

1.Saturday-5 2.Sitton-6 3.Lang-7 4.Newhouse-8 5.Bulaga-24


If anyone really think Newhouse is struggled they need a gut check. The entire interior line has been doing pretty good when you consider the amount of attempts they've been up against. Bulagao, however has to get better. His numbers are horrible that's where a lot of the initial pressure is coming from.


Rios - That's why I would like to see a RB or TE step up and chip block. Bulaga may need some help.

Thanks for the numbers.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
Smokey (24m) : Did u fire up the crock pot ?
Smokey (25m) : Jolly good show ole chap ! LOL
Cheesey (26m) : Smokey! Darn spell check! LOL!
Cheesey (27m) : Hey smiley! Just saw your shout out! How bout them Packers!
Smokey (43m) : Hello Cheesey !
GoPack1984 (3h) : I hope not. Please be something like 41-28 Packers.
uffda udfa (3h) : I agree with Chmura. This looks like a double 40 burger.
uffda udfa (3h) : The hug on the sidelines?
uffda udfa (4h) : What seemed so emotional?
Zero2Cool (4h) : No, but I am curious why that seemed so emotional. I might be reading into it too much.
uffda udfa (4h) : Anyone ever get confused looking at Alex Van Pelt thinking it's MM?
uffda udfa (6h) : I hope they aren't going to dial it down believing in destiny .
Zero2Cool (6h) : Jason Wilde: Packers "feel like a team of destiny"
uffda udfa (8h) : They'll need all the Julio Joneses they can get.
Zero2Cool (8h) : Chmura: "I'll tell you this: Atlanta's going to score 40 points. They are. The #Packers are going to have to score 41."
Zero2Cool (13h) : Damn-Falcons coach Dan Quinn tells reporters that WR Julio Jones (foot) will be limited this week but will be “ready to rock” on Sunday.
Zero2Cool (13h) : Packers defense has a red zone INT in each of the last 3 games... Hyde with two of them. (One being the clutch 4thQ INT vs DET in Week 17)
Zero2Cool (15h) : Randall Cobb, Damarious Randall, Quentin Rollins, James Starks, Clay Matthews, Ty Montgomery & Jared Cook. OUT
Zero2Cool (15h) : Packers inactive list when they lost 33-32 to the Falcons week 8.
Zero2Cool (16h) : There is no emphasis, it's just a little bit of info. Take it or leave it. No harm.
Smokey (16h) : Zero, I believe that you and some others place too much emphasis upon data. no harm intended.
Zero2Cool (16h) : It’s the 1st time since 1970 all 4 conference championship teams finished the regular season on winning streaks of 4+ games
TheKanataThrilla (16h) : Salt mine. Love it.
TheKanataThrilla (16h) : The refs kept that game close. We should have blown them out early.
DarkaneRules (16h) : Hyde and Gunter are special and I'm hopeful D Ran gets back to where he can be
mi_keys (17h) : That whole forum is a salt mine. It's beautiful.
Zero2Cool (17h) : Burnett's back up, Kentrell Brice lead team in tackles.
uffda udfa (22h) : Hilarious reading below. I like Carter. Only guy who gets it.
uffda udfa (22h) : http://boards.dallascowboys.com/topic/71647-so-we-are-supposed-to-believe/#entry3978081
uffda udfa (23h) : Great news.
Zero2Cool (16-Jan) : Jordy has "legitimate hope" to play, per @RobDemovsky.
Zero2Cool (16-Jan) : Packers had one call on defense if called, no issue, wans't called. I didn't watch OL so dunno. I watched WR's
Zero2Cool (16-Jan) : Dallas OL had some holds weren't called and 2 defensive holds, not called.
uffda udfa (16-Jan) : I think the Pi vs just a holding call is a legit complaint. Terrible call.
GoPack1984 (16-Jan) : Dallas can't complain about the officials. They got away with so many defensive holding calls.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
1m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

30m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

42m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

53m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / RaiderPride

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

3h / Fantasy Sports Talk / rabidgopher04

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Rick12

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Rick12

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

11h / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool


Packers Headlines