Welcome Guest! You can login or register.
Login or Register.
#1
Posted
:
Friday, October 12, 2012 1:51:42 PM(UTC)
Joined: 7/17/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 287
Applause Received: 348
Is Bulaga playing hurt? My gut feeling says he is, and he will come around. However, I am more worried about Sherrod. I have heard little about him lately and wondering if anyone has any update (I looked could not find one) on where he is at?
Two big time Ted draft picks that have a major factor in the future of this team.
#2
Posted
:
Friday, October 12, 2012 2:28:16 PM(UTC)
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
RaiderPride said: 
Is Bulaga playing hurt? My gut feeling says he is, and he will come around. However, I am more worried about Sherrod. I have heard little about him lately and wondering if anyone has any update (I looked could not find one) on where he is at?
Two big time Ted draft picks that have a major factor in the future of this team.
RP - Sherrod had a pretty brutal broken leg injury last year and is still not even on the 53-man roster. We're all praying for a speedy recovery. It's apparent we can really use his services.
And yes, Bulaga is playing hurt.
#3
Posted
:
Saturday, October 13, 2012 5:08:26 PM(UTC)
Joined: 11/12/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 50
If I'm not mistaken, Bulaga is playing with Tendinitis in his knee. I don't have an update on Sherrod.
#4
Posted
:
Saturday, October 13, 2012 10:03:12 PM(UTC)
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,856
Applause Received: 1,477
go.pack.go. said: If I'm not mistaken, Bulaga is playing with Tendinitis in his knee. I don't have an update on Sherrod.
That's because there AREN'T any updates on Sherrod. I've been keeping my eyes peeled.
Not a good sign.
#5
Posted
:
Saturday, October 13, 2012 10:43:05 PM(UTC)
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA
Applause Given: 3,574
Applause Received: 1,031
nerdmann said: That's because there AREN'T any updates on Sherrod. I've been keeping my eyes peeled.
Not a good sign.
I obviously don't know the specifics, but I've said this for some time now. It would probably be best for both Sherrord and Quarless to go on IR and come back 100% no questions with full confidence next season. It's just my opinion, but I feel like that would give them their best chance of success.
#6
Posted
:
Saturday, October 13, 2012 10:44:19 PM(UTC)
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
Quote:
The PUP list rule states that Sherrod must now sit out the first six games of the regular season. Then, there is a three-week window for Sherrod to begin practicing. After his first practice, the Packers then have three weeks to decide whether to activate him to the 53-man roster or keep him on PUP for the entire season.
So let's hope Sherrod can play this season. I haven't heard anything either, Nerd.
#7
Posted
:
Sunday, October 14, 2012 1:58:07 AM(UTC)
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,856
Applause Received: 1,477
ESPNQuote:On Thursday, Packers coach Mike McCarthy said Zombo “is getting close,” Quarless “seems to be pretty close” and Sherrod is “probably a little further away.”
#8
Posted
:
Sunday, October 14, 2012 9:05:47 AM(UTC)
Joined: 8/18/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 3
Applause Received: 5
I'm guessing we won't see much of Sherrod until next year. Which is a shame because we could use all the help we can get on the 0-Line.
#9
Posted
:
Sunday, October 14, 2012 9:22:18 AM(UTC)
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 8
Applause Received: 83
Even if Sherrod does come back don't expect him to start off the bat. The kid has barely any experience & has been injured over a year now we can't force him right away.
#10
Posted
:
Sunday, October 14, 2012 10:30:50 AM(UTC)
Joined: 11/12/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 50
shield4life said: Even if Sherrod does come back don't expect him to start off the bat. The kid has barely any experience & has been injured over a year now we can't force him right away.
Yeah I doubt he would play much even if he did come back (barring injury to another player). I'd say that for him to win a starting spot, he'll have to be healthy for an entire training camp and battle it out with Newhouse.
#11
Posted
:
Sunday, October 14, 2012 1:58:41 PM(UTC)
Joined: 8/15/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 338
Applause Received: 820
Coach said Sherrod is further away than the other guys coming back.
#12
Posted
:
Sunday, October 14, 2012 3:20:56 PM(UTC)
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,856
Applause Received: 1,477
Brian CarriveauQuote:Kind of interesting that it was Greg Van Roten and not Andrew Datko that was promoted from the Packers practice squad.
#13
Posted
:
Sunday, October 14, 2012 9:07:43 PM(UTC)
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
Bulaga blocked pretty well today. Actually, the whole OL blocked pretty well today.
had time.
#14
Posted
:
Monday, October 15, 2012 7:18:12 AM(UTC)
Joined: 12/15/2008(UTC)
Location: Eau Claire. WI
Applause Received: 61
Well the Packers have until Week 9 to pretty much evaluate and activate Sherrod to the 53 man roster before either IRing him or releasing him since he's on the PUP. Shouldn't be too long for Zombo and Quarless to be activated after next week's game since they'll be eligible to come off the PUP.
#15
Posted
:
Monday, October 15, 2012 1:27:05 PM(UTC)
Joined: 10/5/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 681
Applause Received: 900
nerdmann said: Brian CarriveauQuote:Kind of interesting that it was Greg Van Roten and not Andrew Datko that was promoted from the Packers practice squad.
I thought the same thing. I was surprised they move Van Roten up over an OT or grabbing a FA or PS player on another team... if Saines injury is serious, then we might need to get another healthy RB.
#16
Posted
:
Tuesday, October 16, 2012 2:27:55 PM(UTC)
Joined: 8/13/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 147
Applause Received: 237
I think Datko needs time to develop and get past his injuries. I wouldn't be surprised to see Ted Thompson pick another LT in this draft if a good one fell. I hope Bulaga can get healthy, I don't think he is. He's a hard worker and a young player so I can't see him slipping like he has this year for any other reason.
#17
Posted
:
Wednesday, October 17, 2012 11:22:24 AM(UTC)
Joined: 8/28/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 497
Applause Received: 568
#18
Posted
:
Wednesday, October 17, 2012 1:26:27 PM(UTC)
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA
Applause Given: 3,574
Applause Received: 1,031
Due to the widely variable numbers of pass attempts in the image above, the numbers can be misleading. I'd rather see them standardized in terms of percentages of pressures allowed. It's not unexpected that someone with 61 more pass protection plays to give up more pressures.
#19
Posted
:
Wednesday, October 17, 2012 8:36:06 PM(UTC)
Joined: 8/28/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 497
Applause Received: 568
doddpower said: Due to the widely variable numbers of pass attempts in the image above, the numbers can be misleading. I'd rather see them standardized in terms of percentages of pressures allowed. It's not unexpected that someone with 61 more pass protection plays to give up more pressures.
If you look at the chart a bit more closely, and do some decuctive reasoning, you will find that it is organized by percentages.
#20
Posted
:
Wednesday, October 17, 2012 9:13:52 PM(UTC)
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA
Applause Given: 3,574
Applause Received: 1,031
gbguy20 said: If you look at the chart a bit more closely, and do some decuctive reasoning, you will find that it is organized by percentages.
LOL, I'm not going to spend that much time staring at football stats to reason out what I'm looking for. Effective communication of data is paramount. I want to see a column showing the percentages. I (and most others) don't want to reason out how the data is arranged. That's silly. I have to do those types of things enough on the job. Since there is no link or no information about who put those numbers together, I'm not going to look at it with anything more than a cursory view. If I cared enough, I would bounce those numbers into Excel and calculate the percentages myself, but alas, I do not, mostly because I'm sure several others that get paid to do so already have.
Users browsing this topic
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.