Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
4 Pages123>»

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Zero2Cool  
#1 Posted : Monday, October 15, 2012 7:22:03 AM(UTC)
Want to Chat Packers? Click GameDay Chat!

UserPostedImage
Green Bay Packers ( 3 - 3 )
  • Total Offense = 18th
  • Passing Offense = 14th
  • Rushing Offense = 23rd

  • Total Defense = 14th
  • Passing Defense = 18th
  • Rushing Defense = 17th

  • Points For = 25.7 (10th)
  • Points Against = 22.5 (14th)



UserPostedImage
St Louis Rams ( 3 - 3 )
  • Total Offense = 28th
  • Passing Offense = 27th
  • Rushing Offense = 16th

  • Total Defense = 7th
  • Passing Defense = 6th
  • Rushing Defense = 13th

  • Points For = 18.3 (27th)
  • Points Against = 18.5 (5th)
Zero2Cool  
#2 Posted : Wednesday, October 17, 2012 5:10:04 AM(UTC)
Surprised no one posted in nearly two days. Anyhow, I'm thinking ...

Packers 13
Rams 37



Hey, don't question me, it worked last week.
wpr  
#3 Posted : Wednesday, October 17, 2012 6:06:05 AM(UTC)
It sure depends on which GB team shows up.

The Good team
GB 45
StL 17

The Bad team
GB 35
StL 20
doddpower  
#4 Posted : Wednesday, October 17, 2012 9:11:59 AM(UTC)
Rams are 5th in points allowed, eh? That's impressive.
Wade  
#5 Posted : Wednesday, October 17, 2012 10:07:45 AM(UTC)
Hey, Rodgers....did you hear, everyone is saying that last week against Houston was a fluke. That you're still trying to figure out what's wrong this year.

[grin1] Hey...if it works, they can make Rodgers listen to Shannon Sharpe and Mike Florio before every game. [grin1]

Packers: Lots and lots.
Rams: Not much at all.
go.pack.go.  
#6 Posted : Wednesday, October 17, 2012 10:14:29 AM(UTC)
Great opportunity to come back out and put another W on the board. These next couple games before the bye should help us build up some momentum heading into the halfway mark of the season which will hopefully carry on into the playoffs (knock on wood).

Packers 27
Rams 13
Cheesey  
#7 Posted : Wednesday, October 17, 2012 11:21:55 AM(UTC)
I'm just hoping the Packers don't take the Rams lightly.
That could spell another Colts like disaster.
They have to keep their "foot on the gas" the whole rest of the season. Get up on a team, and don't let up.
gbguy20  
#8 Posted : Wednesday, October 17, 2012 11:25:48 AM(UTC)
can we get over .500 for the first time this year please?
Yerko  
#9 Posted : Wednesday, October 17, 2012 1:07:10 PM(UTC)
This game can very well depend on the injuries coming from last week. Regardless, I think the Packers will win this game but depending on who is available off injury will decide the comfort level of this game. I think the Packers are done overlooking opponents after the Colts disaster as well.

Our secondary has shown up against better receivers than what the Rams carry and when a team is effective at rushing the ball, the Packers front 7 show up.

Bradford has 6 touchdowns all season, Rodgers just threw for 6 touchdowns in 1 game.

Packers- 35
Rams- 14
Porforis  
#10 Posted : Wednesday, October 17, 2012 1:11:08 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
Surprised no one posted in nearly two days. Anyhow, I'm thinking ...

Packers 13
Rams 37



Hey, don't question me, it worked last week.


Probably still recovering from TD shots.

Packers 38, Rams 30. Rodgers for around 300 yards with 3 TDs and 1 INT, Green gets around 80 yards on 23 carries.
warhawk  
#11 Posted : Wednesday, October 17, 2012 2:27:03 PM(UTC)
Porforis said: Go to Quoted Post
Probably still recovering from TD shots.

Packers 38, Rams 30. Rodgers for around 300 yards with 3 TDs and 1 INT, Green gets around 80 yards on 23 carries.


Don't get me wrong I will take any win but I would be disappointed if we gave up 30 points. The Rams haven't scored anywhere near that all year except Washington who has one of the worst scoring defenses in the NFL.

i'm going with 31 to 17. That's more in the range of what the Rams have been able to produce on offense...scoring 6,14,17,19,23,and 31 against the Redskins.

I'm actually pumping up the Packers offense a little more leaning towards a desire to keep the offense rolling rather then falling back again. Important game to keep the O hot Sunday for their own confidence that they have turned the corner so to speak.

zombieslayer  
#12 Posted : Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:15:36 PM(UTC)
gbguy20 said: Go to Quoted Post
can we get over .500 for the first time this year please?


Yeah, really.

I'm not making any predictions because I've been jinxing us and when I don't say anything, we usually have better results. ](*,)

I will say though that the Rams' rush D is superb. Alex Green won't do much. They held the Cards' main dude to 33 yards on 14 carries and Reggie Bush got 17 yards on 12 carries.

However, their pass D is inadequate. If Ryan Tannehill can have one of his better games against this D, Aaron Rodgers should light them up. This is not me being gung ho pass. I'm just saying their rushing D is superb whereas their pass D is average to mediocre. So I'm expecting Mike McCarthy to let Aaron air it out.
dfosterf  
#13 Posted : Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:18:01 PM(UTC)
JAMES Jones!

Sorry, back to your regularly scheduled broadcasting, lol

Gaycandybacon  
#14 Posted : Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:23:40 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
Yeah, really.

I'm not making any predictions because I've been jinxing us and when I don't say anything, we usually have better results. ](*,)

I will say though that the Rams' rush D is superb. Alex Green won't do much. They held the Cards' main dude to 33 yards on 14 carries and Reggie Bush got 17 yards on 12 carries.

However, their pass D is inadequate. If Ryan Tannehill can have one of his better games against this D, Aaron Rodgers should light them up. This is not me being gung ho pass. I'm just saying their rushing D is superb whereas their pass D is average to mediocre. So I'm expecting Mike McCarthy to let Aaron air it out.


I think this will give Alex Green a chance to have a breakout game. Remember last week, when Arian Foster(1st or 2nd in the league rushing) was held to 29 yards. So obviously anything can happen. We just need to keep running that ball no matter what 18-25 carries is a winning fourmula for us.

I think it will be a close game, and lower score like the Seahawks game. 20-13 Pack
Gaycandybacon  
#15 Posted : Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:26:02 PM(UTC)
dfosterf said: Go to Quoted Post
JAMES Jones!

Sorry, back to your regularly scheduled broadcasting, lol



I hope he breaks Don Hustons record with 4 straight games with 2 TDs
Rios39  
#16 Posted : Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:48:15 PM(UTC)
No excuses to lose this game. We are a far superior team.
zombieslayer  
#17 Posted : Wednesday, October 17, 2012 4:20:11 PM(UTC)
Gaycandybacon said: Go to Quoted Post
I think this will give Alex Green a chance to have a breakout game. Remember last week, when Arian Foster(1st or 2nd in the league rushing) was held to 29 yards. So obviously anything can happen. We just need to keep running that ball no matter what 18-25 carries is a winning fourmula for us.

I think it will be a close game, and lower score like the Seahawks game. 20-13 Pack


I'd be happy with 25 carries for 30 yards. After all, it's the carries, not the yards that matter.

Green's gonna have a breakout game. It just won't happen against the Rams.
buckeyepackfan  
#18 Posted : Wednesday, October 17, 2012 5:20:29 PM(UTC)
Rios39 said: Go to Quoted Post
No excuses to lose this game. We are a far superior team.


Rams 3-3,Packers are 3-3, this seems to be the year of true parody.

Only 2 AFC teams have winning records after 6 weeks(that's just crazy).

Playing on the road is never easy, Rams play much better at home.

Packer Offense "on paper" looks to have the better talent, on defense not that much of a difference.
The young guys play the way they did last week then yes Packers should win this game, but with youth you don't get consistency, let's hope they build on last weeks successes.

Packers 31 - Rams 21
Gaycandybacon  
#19 Posted : Wednesday, October 17, 2012 5:44:06 PM(UTC)
buckeyepackfan said: Go to Quoted Post
Rams 3-3,Packers are 3-3, this seems to be the year of true parody.

Only 2 AFC teams have winning records after 6 weeks(that's just crazy).

Playing on the road is never easy, Rams play much better at home.

Packer Offense "on paper" looks to have the better talent, on defense not that much of a difference.
The young guys play the way they did last week then yes Packers should win this game, but with youth you don't get consistency, let's hope they build on last weeks successes.

Packers 31 - Rams 21


Usually, fresh bodies help tremendously ecspecially if they're young and eager to play. Perfect example was Mike Neal, where he steped in the lineup and improved our team.

If Sheilds can't go, I think House will fit in just nicely. He also was a front runner and looked promising before he got hurt.

The rookies haven't been horribly inconsistant, the whole defense just has to be in-sync.
buckeyepackfan  
#20 Posted : Wednesday, October 17, 2012 9:23:02 PM(UTC)
Gaycandybacon said: Go to Quoted Post
Usually, fresh bodies help tremendously ecspecially if they're young and eager to play. Perfect example was Mike Neal, where he steped in the lineup and improved our team.

If Sheilds can't go, I think House will fit in just nicely. He also was a front runner and looked promising before he got hurt.

The rookies haven't been horribly inconsistant, the whole defense just has to be in-sync.




I'm not complaining about their performances, but they are rookiea and mistakes have and will be made.

I was just trying to make the point that at this point in the season The Packers are not a far more superior team all around as The Rams.

Packers will be favored...Charles Woodson"WE ARE NOBODY'S UNDERDOG", love that comment.
Hopefully these young guys will continue to learn, if they do, by the end of the season the, far superior team, post will probably be true.

Packers | Casey Hayward might start in Week 7
Mon, 15 Oct 2012 19:06:57 -0700

If Green Bay Packers CB Sam Shields (shin) is unable to go in Week 7, CB Casey Hayward could move into the starting lineup. He had two interceptions in the Week 6 game against the Houston Texans.

Comment () | Share: | Source: ESPN.com - Kevin Seifert





Read more: http://www.kffl.com/team...ay-packers#ixzz29cXqdrz6
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages123>»
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Bigbyfan (17m) : Of course the Bears would be the ones to take my guy...
isocleas2 (39m) : Interesting
isocleas2 (39m) : Ward at #4
Zero2Cool (1h) : Bahahahhaha
Zero2Cool (1h) : In Madden.
Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers made a trade!!
beast (2h) : Na, they're going to trade this year's 1st to the Patriots for two 1st round picks (one next year and one this year).
Zero2Cool (2h) : Packers might draft Saquon Barkley
beast (4h) : He's actions said, he's going to tease the #1 pick choice as long as he can
Zero2Cool (5h) : How so? What did he say?
beast (5h) : John Dorsey is just messing with people now... which QB he'll take... I partly love it, partly annoyed by it.
Zero2Cool (5h) : You can make your NFL Pick's (Fantasy > NFL Pick'em)
Smokey (5h) : bye week is not listed in this forum's posting.
Zero2Cool (5h) : You don't follow the Pacers, do you?
gbguy20 (6h) : i must be missing something with the bye week comment
Smokey (7h) : Order your Pizza, Now !
Smokey (7h) : Packers
Smokey (7h) : Yes there is a bye week in the Pacers 2018 Schedule.
Zero2Cool (7h) : no charges? so the bomb was a dud??
Zero2Cool (7h) : No charges for WR Davis over LAX bomb joke
Cheesey (7h) : THE WRATH OF KHAN!!
Zero2Cool (7h) : damn caps
Zero2Cool (7h) : yEEHAW!!
Smokey (7h) : "DRAFT CHAT" Baby !
packerfanoutwest (10h) : Packers first pick will be lining up on with the defense
beast (11h) : If Packers trade up, they're grabbing James (or an ILB or CB) ;-P
beast (11h) : Sounds like Khan is moving the team to London in time.
packerfanoutwest (11h) : Here's an idea. Start a thread on who can pick the Packers #1 pick. Just make the pick only. No other comments.
Zero2Cool (12h) : This is NOT good
Zero2Cool (12h) : Shad Khan: I’m buying Wembley to keep the Jaguars stable in both London and Jacksonville
Zero2Cool (12h) : @AndrewBrandt Yes. The best GMs will leverage desperate teams tonight.
Zero2Cool (12h) : Today's Birthdays: StoicFire (30)
Zero2Cool (13h) : The Parlor is better than The Room.
beast (26-Apr) : I believe the Packers seriously want to trade up (if they can find a price they like), I'm guessing for Fitzpatrick or James (though one guy said Ward). But could also be one of the ILBers (Smith or E
Smokey (25-Apr) : Rumors are not money in the bank deals.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2018 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 9 @ 7:20 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Sep 16 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Sep 23 @ 12:00 PM
Redskins
Sunday, Sep 30 @ 12:00 PM
BILLS
Sunday, Oct 7 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Monday, Oct 15 @ 7:15 PM
49ERS
Sunday, Oct 28 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Nov 4 @ 7:20 PM
Patriots
Sunday, Nov 11 @ 12:00 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Nov 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Sunday, Nov 25 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Dec 2 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Dec 9 @ 12:00 PM
FALCONS
Sunday, Dec 16 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Dec 23 @ 12:00 PM
Jets
Sunday, Dec 30 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
57m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Barfarn

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

6h / Random Babble / Cheesey

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Bigbyfan

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

26-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

24-Apr / Around The NFL / dhazer

24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

24-Apr / Random Babble / Cheesey

Headlines