Join Our Green Bay Packers Interactive Community!

We have been providing fans with the best source of Packers information since 2006!
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
7 Pages<1234>»
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline warhawk  
#11 Posted : Wednesday, October 17, 2012 2:27:03 PM(UTC)
warhawk

Rank: 3rd Round Draft Pick

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 227

Originally Posted by: Porforis Go to Quoted Post
Probably still recovering from TD shots.

Packers 38, Rams 30. Rodgers for around 300 yards with 3 TDs and 1 INT, Green gets around 80 yards on 23 carries.


Don't get me wrong I will take any win but I would be disappointed if we gave up 30 points. The Rams haven't scored anywhere near that all year except Washington who has one of the worst scoring defenses in the NFL.

i'm going with 31 to 17. That's more in the range of what the Rams have been able to produce on offense...scoring 6,14,17,19,23,and 31 against the Redskins.

I'm actually pumping up the Packers offense a little more leaning towards a desire to keep the offense rolling rather then falling back again. Important game to keep the O hot Sunday for their own confidence that they have turned the corner so to speak.

"The train is leaving the station."
Offline zombieslayer  
#12 Posted : Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:15:36 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Most Valuable Player

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco

Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495

Originally Posted by: gbguy20 Go to Quoted Post
can we get over .500 for the first time this year please?


Yeah, really.

I'm not making any predictions because I've been jinxing us and when I don't say anything, we usually have better results. Brick wall

I will say though that the Rams' rush D is superb. Alex Green won't do much. They held the Cards' main dude to 33 yards on 14 carries and Reggie Bush got 17 yards on 12 carries.

However, their pass D is inadequate. If Ryan Tannehill can have one of his better games against this D, Aaron Rodgers should light them up. This is not me being gung ho pass. I'm just saying their rushing D is superb whereas their pass D is average to mediocre. So I'm expecting Mike McCarthy to let Aaron air it out.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)

2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. Ted Thompson Mike McCarthy Aaron Rodgers
Offline dfosterf  
#13 Posted : Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:18:01 PM(UTC)
dfosterf

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

United States
Joined: 8/19/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 205
Applause Received: 428

JAMES Jones!

Sorry, back to your regularly scheduled broadcasting, lol

UserPostedImage
damn skippy I'm an owner. I currently own a full .00001924537805515393 % of the Green Bay Packers.



Offline Gaycandybacon  
#14 Posted : Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:23:40 PM(UTC)
Gaycandybacon

Rank: 4th Round Draft Pick

United States
Joined: 9/17/2012(UTC)
Location: Hanover Park, IL

Applause Given: 145
Applause Received: 178

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer Go to Quoted Post
Yeah, really.

I'm not making any predictions because I've been jinxing us and when I don't say anything, we usually have better results. Brick wall

I will say though that the Rams' rush D is superb. Alex Green won't do much. They held the Cards' main dude to 33 yards on 14 carries and Reggie Bush got 17 yards on 12 carries.

However, their pass D is inadequate. If Ryan Tannehill can have one of his better games against this D, Aaron Rodgers should light them up. This is not me being gung ho pass. I'm just saying their rushing D is superb whereas their pass D is average to mediocre. So I'm expecting Mike McCarthy to let Aaron air it out.


I think this will give Alex Green a chance to have a breakout game. Remember last week, when Arian Foster(1st or 2nd in the league rushing) was held to 29 yards. So obviously anything can happen. We just need to keep running that ball no matter what 18-25 carries is a winning fourmula for us.

I think it will be a close game, and lower score like the Seahawks game. 20-13 Pack
Offline Gaycandybacon  
#15 Posted : Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:26:02 PM(UTC)
Gaycandybacon

Rank: 4th Round Draft Pick

United States
Joined: 9/17/2012(UTC)
Location: Hanover Park, IL

Applause Given: 145
Applause Received: 178

Originally Posted by: dfosterf Go to Quoted Post
JAMES Jones!

Sorry, back to your regularly scheduled broadcasting, lol



I hope he breaks Don Hustons record with 4 straight games with 2 TDs
thanks Post received 1 applause.
wpr on 10/17/2012(UTC)
Offline Rios39  
#16 Posted : Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:48:15 PM(UTC)
Rios39

Rank: 5th Round Draft Pick

Joined: 8/9/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 30

No excuses to lose this game. We are a far superior team.
blank
Offline zombieslayer  
#17 Posted : Wednesday, October 17, 2012 4:20:11 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Most Valuable Player

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco

Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495

Originally Posted by: Gaycandybacon Go to Quoted Post
I think this will give Alex Green a chance to have a breakout game. Remember last week, when Arian Foster(1st or 2nd in the league rushing) was held to 29 yards. So obviously anything can happen. We just need to keep running that ball no matter what 18-25 carries is a winning fourmula for us.

I think it will be a close game, and lower score like the Seahawks game. 20-13 Pack


I'd be happy with 25 carries for 30 yards. After all, it's the carries, not the yards that matter.

Green's gonna have a breakout game. It just won't happen against the Rams.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)

2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. Ted Thompson Mike McCarthy Aaron Rodgers
Offline buckeyepackfan  
#18 Posted : Wednesday, October 17, 2012 5:20:29 PM(UTC)
buckeyepackfan

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2012Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2014

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Lima, Ohio

Applause Given: 350
Applause Received: 457

Originally Posted by: Rios39 Go to Quoted Post
No excuses to lose this game. We are a far superior team.


Rams 3-3,Packers are 3-3, this seems to be the year of true parody.

Only 2 AFC teams have winning records after 6 weeks(that's just crazy).

Playing on the road is never easy, Rams play much better at home.

Packer Offense "on paper" looks to have the better talent, on defense not that much of a difference.
The young guys play the way they did last week then yes Packers should win this game, but with youth you don't get consistency, let's hope they build on last weeks successes.

Packers 31 - Rams 21
Enjoy the ride – It kicks and just keeps on kickin’. "Stats are for Losers"
Offline Gaycandybacon  
#19 Posted : Wednesday, October 17, 2012 5:44:06 PM(UTC)
Gaycandybacon

Rank: 4th Round Draft Pick

United States
Joined: 9/17/2012(UTC)
Location: Hanover Park, IL

Applause Given: 145
Applause Received: 178

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan Go to Quoted Post
Rams 3-3,Packers are 3-3, this seems to be the year of true parody.

Only 2 AFC teams have winning records after 6 weeks(that's just crazy).

Playing on the road is never easy, Rams play much better at home.

Packer Offense "on paper" looks to have the better talent, on defense not that much of a difference.
The young guys play the way they did last week then yes Packers should win this game, but with youth you don't get consistency, let's hope they build on last weeks successes.

Packers 31 - Rams 21


Usually, fresh bodies help tremendously ecspecially if they're young and eager to play. Perfect example was Mike Neal, where he steped in the lineup and improved our team.

If Sheilds can't go, I think House will fit in just nicely. He also was a front runner and looked promising before he got hurt.

The rookies haven't been horribly inconsistant, the whole defense just has to be in-sync.
Offline buckeyepackfan  
#20 Posted : Wednesday, October 17, 2012 9:23:02 PM(UTC)
buckeyepackfan

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2012Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2014

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Lima, Ohio

Applause Given: 350
Applause Received: 457

Originally Posted by: Gaycandybacon Go to Quoted Post
Usually, fresh bodies help tremendously ecspecially if they're young and eager to play. Perfect example was Mike Neal, where he steped in the lineup and improved our team.

If Sheilds can't go, I think House will fit in just nicely. He also was a front runner and looked promising before he got hurt.

The rookies haven't been horribly inconsistant, the whole defense just has to be in-sync.




I'm not complaining about their performances, but they are rookiea and mistakes have and will be made.

I was just trying to make the point that at this point in the season The Packers are not a far more superior team all around as The Rams.

Packers will be favored...Charles Woodson"WE ARE NOBODY'S UNDERDOG", love that comment.
Hopefully these young guys will continue to learn, if they do, by the end of the season the, far superior team, post will probably be true.

Packers | Casey Hayward might start in Week 7
Mon, 15 Oct 2012 19:06:57 -0700

If Green Bay Packers CB Sam Shields (shin) is unable to go in Week 7, CB Casey Hayward could move into the starting lineup. He had two interceptions in the Week 6 game against the Houston Texans.

Comment () | Share: | Source: ESPN.com - Kevin Seifert





Read more: http://www.kffl.com/team...ay-packers#ixzz29cXqdrz6
Enjoy the ride – It kicks and just keeps on kickin’. "Stats are for Losers"
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
7 Pages<1234>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Tweeter

Recent Topics
5m / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / RaiderPride

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / macbob

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / macbob

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Since69

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

19-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

19-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

19-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

18-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / luigis

18-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins