Welcome Guest! You can login or register.
Login or Register.
#1
Posted
:
Monday, October 15, 2012 7:22:03 AM(UTC)
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,803
Applause Received: 4,990
Want to Chat Packers? Click
GameDay Chat!
Green Bay Packers ( 3 - 3 ) - Total Offense = 18th
- Passing Offense = 14th
- Rushing Offense = 23rd
- Total Defense = 14th
- Passing Defense = 18th
- Rushing Defense = 17th
- Points For = 25.7 (10th)
- Points Against = 22.5 (14th)
St Louis Rams ( 3 - 3 ) - Total Offense = 28th
- Passing Offense = 27th
- Rushing Offense = 16th
- Total Defense = 7th
- Passing Defense = 6th
- Rushing Defense = 13th
- Points For = 18.3 (27th)
- Points Against = 18.5 (5th)
#2
Posted
:
Wednesday, October 17, 2012 5:10:04 AM(UTC)
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,803
Applause Received: 4,990
Surprised no one posted in nearly two days. Anyhow, I'm thinking ...
Packers 13
Rams 37
Hey, don't question me, it worked last week.
#3
Posted
:
Wednesday, October 17, 2012 6:06:05 AM(UTC)
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 4,866
Applause Received: 2,491
It sure depends on which GB team shows up.
The Good team
GB 45
StL 17
The Bad team
GB 35
StL 20
#4
Posted
:
Wednesday, October 17, 2012 9:11:59 AM(UTC)
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA
Applause Given: 3,743
Applause Received: 1,113
Rams are 5th in points allowed, eh? That's impressive.
#5
Posted
:
Wednesday, October 17, 2012 10:07:45 AM(UTC)
Joined: 8/1/2009(UTC)
Location: nowhere of importance
Applause Given: 891
Applause Received: 923
Hey, Rodgers....did you hear, everyone is saying that last week against Houston was a fluke. That you're still trying to figure out what's wrong this year.
[grin1] Hey...if it works, they can make Rodgers listen to Shannon Sharpe and Mike Florio before every game. [grin1]
Packers: Lots and lots.
Rams: Not much at all.
#6
Posted
:
Wednesday, October 17, 2012 10:14:29 AM(UTC)
Joined: 11/12/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 50
Great opportunity to come back out and put another W on the board. These next couple games before the bye should help us build up some momentum heading into the halfway mark of the season which will hopefully carry on into the playoffs (knock on wood).
Packers 27
Rams 13
#7
Posted
:
Wednesday, October 17, 2012 11:21:55 AM(UTC)
Joined: 7/28/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1,170
Applause Received: 1,298
I'm just hoping the Packers don't take the Rams lightly.
That could spell another Colts like disaster.
They have to keep their "foot on the gas" the whole rest of the season. Get up on a team, and don't let up.
#8
Posted
:
Wednesday, October 17, 2012 11:25:48 AM(UTC)
Joined: 8/28/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 607
Applause Received: 684
can we get over .500 for the first time this year please?
#9
Posted
:
Wednesday, October 17, 2012 1:07:10 PM(UTC)
Joined: 10/15/2008(UTC)
Location: Chicago, IL
Applause Given: 219
Applause Received: 396
This game can very well depend on the injuries coming from last week. Regardless, I think the Packers will win this game but depending on who is available off injury will decide the comfort level of this game. I think the Packers are done overlooking opponents after the Colts disaster as well.
Our secondary has shown up against better receivers than what the Rams carry and when a team is effective at rushing the ball, the Packers front 7 show up.
Bradford has 6 touchdowns all season, Rodgers just threw for 6 touchdowns in 1 game.
Packers- 35
Rams- 14
#10
Posted
:
Wednesday, October 17, 2012 1:11:08 PM(UTC)
Joined: 8/22/2009(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Applause Given: 445
Applause Received: 830
Zero2Cool said: 
Surprised no one posted in nearly two days. Anyhow, I'm thinking ...
Packers 13
Rams 37
Hey, don't question me, it worked last week.
Probably still recovering from TD shots.
Packers 38, Rams 30. Rodgers for around 300 yards with 3 TDs and 1 INT, Green gets around 80 yards on 23 carries.
#11
Posted
:
Wednesday, October 17, 2012 2:27:03 PM(UTC)
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 2
Applause Received: 344
Porforis said: 
Probably still recovering from TD shots.
Packers 38, Rams 30. Rodgers for around 300 yards with 3 TDs and 1 INT, Green gets around 80 yards on 23 carries.
Don't get me wrong I will take any win but I would be disappointed if we gave up 30 points. The Rams haven't scored anywhere near that all year except Washington who has one of the worst scoring defenses in the NFL.
i'm going with 31 to 17. That's more in the range of what the Rams have been able to produce on offense...scoring 6,14,17,19,23,and 31 against the Redskins.
I'm actually pumping up the Packers offense a little more leaning towards a desire to keep the offense rolling rather then falling back again. Important game to keep the O hot Sunday for their own confidence that they have turned the corner so to speak.
#12
Posted
:
Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:15:36 PM(UTC)
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
gbguy20 said: 
can we get over .500 for the first time this year please?
Yeah, really.
I'm not making any predictions because I've been jinxing us and when I don't say anything, we usually have better results. ](*,)
I will say though that the Rams' rush D is superb. Alex Green won't do much. They held the Cards' main dude to 33 yards on 14 carries and Reggie Bush got 17 yards on 12 carries.
However, their pass D is inadequate. If Ryan Tannehill can have one of his better games against this D,

should light them up. This is not me being gung ho pass. I'm just saying their rushing D is superb whereas their pass D is average to mediocre. So I'm expecting

to let Aaron air it out.
#13
Posted
:
Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:18:01 PM(UTC)
Joined: 8/19/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 228
Applause Received: 478
JAMES Jones!
Sorry, back to your regularly scheduled broadcasting, lol
#14
Posted
:
Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:23:40 PM(UTC)
Joined: 9/17/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 146
Applause Received: 187
zombieslayer said: 
Yeah, really.
I'm not making any predictions because I've been jinxing us and when I don't say anything, we usually have better results. ](*,)
I will say though that the Rams' rush D is superb. Alex Green won't do much. They held the Cards' main dude to 33 yards on 14 carries and Reggie Bush got 17 yards on 12 carries.
However, their pass D is inadequate. If Ryan Tannehill can have one of his better games against this D,

should light them up. This is not me being gung ho pass. I'm just saying their rushing D is superb whereas their pass D is average to mediocre. So I'm expecting

to let Aaron air it out.
I think this will give Alex Green a chance to have a breakout game. Remember last week, when Arian Foster(1st or 2nd in the league rushing) was held to 29 yards. So obviously anything can happen. We just need to keep running that ball no matter what 18-25 carries is a winning fourmula for us.
I think it will be a close game, and lower score like the Seahawks game. 20-13 Pack
#15
Posted
:
Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:26:02 PM(UTC)
Joined: 9/17/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 146
Applause Received: 187
dfosterf said: 
JAMES Jones!
Sorry, back to your regularly scheduled broadcasting, lol
I hope he breaks Don Hustons record with 4 straight games with 2 TDs
#16
Posted
:
Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:48:15 PM(UTC)
Joined: 8/9/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 30
No excuses to lose this game. We are a far superior team.
#17
Posted
:
Wednesday, October 17, 2012 4:20:11 PM(UTC)
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
Gaycandybacon said: 
I think this will give Alex Green a chance to have a breakout game. Remember last week, when Arian Foster(1st or 2nd in the league rushing) was held to 29 yards. So obviously anything can happen. We just need to keep running that ball no matter what 18-25 carries is a winning fourmula for us.
I think it will be a close game, and lower score like the Seahawks game. 20-13 Pack
I'd be happy with 25 carries for 30 yards. After all, it's the carries, not the yards that matter.
Green's gonna have a breakout game. It just won't happen against the Rams.
#18
Posted
:
Wednesday, October 17, 2012 5:20:29 PM(UTC)
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Lima, Ohio
Applause Given: 951
Applause Received: 985
Rios39 said: 
No excuses to lose this game. We are a far superior team.
Rams 3-3,Packers are 3-3, this seems to be the year of true parody.
Only 2 AFC teams have winning records after 6 weeks(that's just crazy).
Playing on the road is never easy, Rams play much better at home.
Packer Offense "on paper" looks to have the better talent, on defense not that much of a difference.
The young guys play the way they did last week then yes Packers should win this game, but with youth you don't get consistency, let's hope they build on last weeks successes.
Packers 31 - Rams 21
#19
Posted
:
Wednesday, October 17, 2012 5:44:06 PM(UTC)
Joined: 9/17/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 146
Applause Received: 187
buckeyepackfan said: 
Rams 3-3,Packers are 3-3, this seems to be the year of true parody.
Only 2 AFC teams have winning records after 6 weeks(that's just crazy).
Playing on the road is never easy, Rams play much better at home.
Packer Offense "on paper" looks to have the better talent, on defense not that much of a difference.
The young guys play the way they did last week then yes Packers should win this game, but with youth you don't get consistency, let's hope they build on last weeks successes.
Packers 31 - Rams 21
Usually, fresh bodies help tremendously ecspecially if they're young and eager to play. Perfect example was Mike Neal, where he steped in the lineup and improved our team.
If Sheilds can't go, I think House will fit in just nicely. He also was a front runner and looked promising before he got hurt.
The rookies haven't been horribly inconsistant, the whole defense just has to be in-sync.
#20
Posted
:
Wednesday, October 17, 2012 9:23:02 PM(UTC)
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Lima, Ohio
Applause Given: 951
Applause Received: 985
Gaycandybacon said: 
Usually, fresh bodies help tremendously ecspecially if they're young and eager to play. Perfect example was Mike Neal, where he steped in the lineup and improved our team.
If Sheilds can't go, I think House will fit in just nicely. He also was a front runner and looked promising before he got hurt.
The rookies haven't been horribly inconsistant, the whole defense just has to be in-sync.
I'm not complaining about their performances, but they are rookiea and mistakes have and will be made.
I was just trying to make the point that at this point in the season The Packers are not a far more superior team all around as The Rams.
Packers will be favored...Charles Woodson"WE ARE NOBODY'S UNDERDOG", love that comment.
Hopefully these young guys will continue to learn, if they do, by the end of the season the, far superior team, post will probably be true.
Packers | Casey Hayward might start in Week 7
Mon, 15 Oct 2012 19:06:57 -0700
If Green Bay Packers CB Sam Shields (shin) is unable to go in Week 7, CB Casey Hayward could move into the starting lineup. He had two interceptions in the Week 6 game against the Houston Texans.
Comment () | Share: | Source: ESPN.com - Kevin Seifert
Read more:
http://www.kffl.com/team...ay-packers#ixzz29cXqdrz6
Users browsing this topic
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.