Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
2 Pages<12

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
dfosterf  
#21 Posted : Monday, October 22, 2012 3:40:35 PM(UTC)
buckeyepackfan said: Go to Quoted Post
Jarret Bush will be The Packers DPOY!!!!!!!
LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL
Lord help us!!!

Packers getting real young real fast in the defensive backfield.

Hopefully they are just to young to realize they're not suppose to be able to do the job.

Next Man Up.


Now I'm scared. If we are going to rely on Bush for anything in the defensive backfield. we are in real trouble, imo.

Bring in the new guy.

Bush couldn't cover a drunk fisherman fallin' out of the boat if Jarrett was the friggin' ocean.


I still feel good. Maybe no more 3 man rush and other such silliness.








Zero2Cool  
#22 Posted : Monday, October 22, 2012 3:54:12 PM(UTC)
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Same shoulder?


Same collarbone as the one Woodson broke in the Super Bowl.
mi_keys  
#23 Posted : Monday, October 22, 2012 5:18:45 PM(UTC)
Just once can we catch a fucking break with the health of our players? One game without significant injuries?
User is suspended until 5/28/2018 11:54:40 AM(UTC) DakotaT  
#24 Posted : Monday, October 22, 2012 5:26:18 PM(UTC)
Does this mean we won't be getting all those defensive holding calls for 5 yards and a first down? I personally like when our young players get to cut their teeth. Fortunately, our offense is starting to play lights out again, so lets not get too emotional over our 36 year old slow, but smart safety having to sit out six weeks.
nerdmann  
#25 Posted : Monday, October 22, 2012 6:34:14 PM(UTC)
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
Does this mean we won't be getting all those defensive holding calls for 5 yards and a first down? I personally like when our young players get to cut their teeth. Fortunately, our offense is starting to play lights out again, so lets not get too emotional over our 36 year old slow, but smart safety having to sit out six weeks.


Long as Shields isn't "more significant than previously disclosed."
Gaycandybacon  
#26 Posted : Monday, October 22, 2012 10:39:43 PM(UTC)
Next man up boys. Next man up. Time to test this teams adversity again, like always. ;)
Zero2Cool  
#27 Posted : Tuesday, October 23, 2012 4:57:50 AM(UTC)
Charles Woodson on the sideline will be able to help the plethora of young defensive backs. This is a blessing in disguise, even though he's one of two favorite Packers.

Woodson will instruct the kids how to do things and then six weeks will expire and he'll say, ughh, here boys, watch daddy show ya how it's done for another Super Bowl run!!
musccy  
#28 Posted : Tuesday, October 23, 2012 5:19:47 AM(UTC)
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
Does this mean we won't be getting all those defensive holding calls for 5 yards and a first down? I personally like when our young players get to cut their teeth. Fortunately, our offense is starting to play lights out again, so lets not get too emotional over our 36 year old slow, but smart safety having to sit out six weeks.


This.

From an organizational standpoint it's a blessing in that it reveals just how valuable these players are to the team. With Cullen, we learned the hard way. With these two we learn the hard way, but with the potential of them returning and stop any bleeding from their absence, or we learn if their absense is really that important on the cusp of some important contractual decisions.
RainX  
#29 Posted : Tuesday, October 23, 2012 5:29:51 AM(UTC)
Woodson may only have another season or so after this one with the Pack anyways, so this will give the team some longer term idea how good the defense will be without one of it's main veteran leaders for awhile. It's a good thing Ted Thompson spent pretty heavily on defensive depth in the draft, because we've sure needed it with the injuries the team has suffered so far. I don't forsee the team putting Woodson on IR because of this if he's only going to miss six weeks.
TwinkieGorilla  
#30 Posted : Tuesday, October 23, 2012 5:31:16 AM(UTC)
Yeah, you know...this might be sacrilege but I was thinking this is unfortunate but possibly a blessing in disguise. Woodson's been in the league at least a year longer than I think he should be. He's been gambling constantly on "Not getting caught" since he can't stop "Getting beat" and I'll be curious to see what these younger, quicker guys are able to do. Woodson's too big a name to ever not start if he's healthy, even if it's his wisdom which trumps his ball play these days.
wpr  
#31 Posted : Tuesday, October 23, 2012 5:51:02 AM(UTC)
TwinkieGorilla said: Go to Quoted Post
Yeah, you know...this might be sacrilege but I was thinking this is unfortunate but possibly a blessing in disguise. Woodson's been in the league at least a year longer than I think he should be. He's been gambling constantly on "Not getting caught" since he can't stop "Getting beat" and I'll be curious to see what these younger, quicker guys are able to do. Woodson's too big a name to ever not start if he's healthy, even if it's his wisdom which trumps his ball play these days.


Sir Charles is 36 I can't see him being on the team until the end of his contract. (2 more years. $9 mil per season plus incentives.)

You can't say he is too big of a name not to start. Ted was perfectly willing to let 'ol No 4 part his rump on the bench.

My guess is that this is Woodson's final year.
PackFanWithTwins  
#32 Posted : Tuesday, October 23, 2012 6:01:21 AM(UTC)
TwinkieGorilla said: Go to Quoted Post
Yeah, you know...this might be sacrilege but I was thinking this is unfortunate but possibly a blessing in disguise. Woodson's been in the league at least a year longer than I think he should be. He's been gambling constantly on "Not getting caught" since he can't stop "Getting beat" and I'll be curious to see what these younger, quicker guys are able to do. Woodson's too big a name to ever not start if he's healthy, even if it's his wisdom which trumps his ball play these days.


This Woodson getting beat is really not true, when going back and watching. And the penalties are nothing new either. Woodson has always been penalized, so was Al. Woody has never been a speed defender, he has always been, a get in their face, disrupt them off the line, and get his hands on the receiver CB. Much of the thing today is with the Zone coverages we play, and the way the broadcasts show. What we see is a receiver catching the ball, and Woodson making a tackle and assume that Woodson was on the coverage. when actually he wasn't but he was there to clean up.

The other week against Indy, Woodson was being criticized for the loss. When I went back and watched, Woodson wasn't on coverage on most of the plays, He was credited for 4 completions, and 3 of them you couldn't cover any better.

Zero2Cool  
#33 Posted : Tuesday, October 23, 2012 6:10:37 AM(UTC)
PFF has Woodson as the 43rd Safety in the NFL. Behind #9 Jerron McMillian and #34 Morgan Burnett.
Porforis  
#34 Posted : Tuesday, October 23, 2012 6:21:05 AM(UTC)
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
You can't say he is too big of a name not to start. Ted was perfectly willing to let 'ol No 4 part his rump on the bench.


We had Aaron Rodgers ready to go. Our other SSs are M.D. Jennings and Sean Richardson, and Woody doesn't play Safety half the time anyways. Not the same situation, and none of our other corners or safeties have the all-around utility that Woodson has. Replaceable? Of course. With no dropoff in performance? Not necessarily. I guess we'll see.
wpr  
#35 Posted : Tuesday, October 23, 2012 7:07:55 AM(UTC)
Porforis said: Go to Quoted Post
We had Aaron Rodgers ready to go. Our other SSs are M.D. Jennings and Sean Richardson, and Woody doesn't play Safety half the time anyways. Not the same situation, and none of our other corners or safeties have the all-around utility that Woodson has. Replaceable? Of course. With no dropoff in performance? Not necessarily. I guess we'll see.




It is the same thing. The comment was that Woodson is too big of a name to sit. My point was a name that was bigger than Woodson was going to be sat down. No one said the replacements are as close in ability as Rodgers was to Favre. No one expected Rodgers to do so well his first year as a starter. It was simply time to move on. Will they play the same rover spot as Woodson? Probably not. Will they excel in so many areas as Woodson? probably not. Is Woodson too big to sit? No.
PackerTraxx  
#36 Posted : Tuesday, October 23, 2012 7:22:47 AM(UTC)
Hate to see it...have to deal with it...hope he comes back healthy this year and that it's a blessing in desquise.
zombieslayer  
#37 Posted : Tuesday, October 23, 2012 9:41:57 AM(UTC)
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
This Woodson getting beat is really not true, when going back and watching. And the penalties are nothing new either. Woodson has always been penalized, so was Al. Woody has never been a speed defender, he has always been, a get in their face, disrupt them off the line, and get his hands on the receiver CB. Much of the thing today is with the Zone coverages we play, and the way the broadcasts show. What we see is a receiver catching the ball, and Woodson making a tackle and assume that Woodson was on the coverage. when actually he wasn't but he was there to clean up.

The other week against Indy, Woodson was being criticized for the loss. When I went back and watched, Woodson wasn't on coverage on most of the plays, He was credited for 4 completions, and 3 of them you couldn't cover any better.



Thank you Twins.

I remember seeing the same thing - a perfect pass that NOBODY could have defended, and Woodson being there to mop up after other people.
play2win  
#38 Posted : Tuesday, October 23, 2012 9:43:29 AM(UTC)
TwinkieGorilla said: Go to Quoted Post
Yeah, you know...this might be sacrilege but I was thinking this is unfortunate but possibly a blessing in disguise. Woodson's been in the league at least a year longer than I think he should be. He's been gambling constantly on "Not getting caught" since he can't stop "Getting beat" and I'll be curious to see what these younger, quicker guys are able to do. Woodson's too big a name to ever not start if he's healthy, even if it's his wisdom which trumps his ball play these days.


This is kind of where I am leaning on Woodson going down for 6 weeks. Respectfully, the guy isn't getting any faster, and actually is losing speed. We've all seen it, and it is understandable with a 36 y/o CB. His raw, innate football sense in game situations is like few - no others. That is what has made him so valuable to our team, and this Packers defense, even to this day. I will be thrilled to see him come back from his injury to contribute on what I think will be a better, deeper secondary heading towards the playoffs.

Woodson's injury and 6 week absence is going to create opportunities for many players, like Heyward, House and McMillian, who I think will be seeing far more expanded roles. Add to that MD Jennings and Sean Richardson should be able to see more time actually playing in games. Richardson's biggest asset at Vanderbilt alongside Heyward was his play at the line of scrimmage, with 18 TFL and 3 Sacks. Capers may find a use for the kid.

This injury will also create opportunities for the staff to better assess the younger talent that they have on the roster. We may find Woodson's eventual replacement in these next 6 weeks or more. If in fact he's already on the roster, finding that out would have to be considered a positive. Have to figure, Woodson is so gifted from the raw ability, innate sense standpoint, we may never find a quote-unquote "replacement." We may find we will have to adjust, or, how to adjust our approach with different combinations on D. Again, I consider this a positive too.

I hope Wooodson sees that he can still contribute to the team by participating more as a mentor in the film room and on the sidelines for the younger players while he is healing, as opposed to what I've heard (yesterday on 1250am) as being a more hands off approach by him. If he chooses to actively mentor these players, it would be about as professional as can be. If he stays away, that might kind of suck. He knows retirement is fast approaching. I would hope he decides to mentor these players as best he can, for his team. I think $11M should buy that as a part of his deal, professionally speaking.

I should add, the guy is wired differently from most. I do think his intent by laying back with some of these guys is for them to learn on their own. That I get. I just hope he shows up to help these guys out a bit while he is rehabbing.
Zero2Cool  
#39 Posted : Wednesday, October 24, 2012 5:32:42 AM(UTC)
Aaron Rodgers said it's the same shoulder Charles Woodson hurt during the Super Bowl and also said he wouldn't be surprised to see him back after just four weeks.
Cheesey  
#40 Posted : Wednesday, October 24, 2012 11:37:00 AM(UTC)
This will give us a chance to see how the young guys fare. If they do great, i can see Woodson spending the end of the year warming the bench, as emergency protection.
If the guys fail, then he will be put back in ASAP.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages<12
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (5m) : "Aaron Rodgers is keeping Mike McCarthy employed the same way AJ Green keeps Andy Dalton employed.” - @LeBatardShow
Zero2Cool (1h) : King, Kendricks and Bennett.
gbguy20 (2h) : which packers sat during the anthem?
Porforis (12h) : Noooo, not Goode!
Zero2Cool (16h) : The #Packers place Brett Goode on IR and re-sign LS Taybor Pepper
Zero2Cool (16h) : Packers signing Ulrick John to active roster off Cardinals practice squad today, according to a source
Porforis (16h) : Agreed. HOW ABOUT THEM PACKERS?!
greengold (16h) : i.e. keep politics out of football!
greengold (16h) : Let the players who want to honor the flag along with the vast majority of fans do so. Don't celebrate those who don't.
greengold (16h) : Rule, practice, suggestion? Whatever supposedly changed in 2009. Go back to the way it was. Let the players who want to honor the flag an
Zero2Cool (16h) : Roethlisberger regrets Steelers' decision to skip anthem
Zero2Cool (16h) : Chmura: "#Packers by 10-14. The Bears already played their good game. I have absolutely no fear for Thursday's game."
Zero2Cool (16h) : The NFL Rulebook does not mention the anthem.
Zero2Cool (16h) : There is no rule.
greengold (17h) : The NFL needs to enforce the rule or get rid of the rule.
greengold (17h) : Players stood for the National Anthem long before 2009. There just was no *rule* requiring them to stand.
steveishere (17h) : How many fans are in the restroom taking a dump or in line for nachos during anthem. Same people probably mad at players
Porforis (18h) : Yup.
Zero2Cool (18h) : You know why
Porforis (18h) : NFL players weren't even on the field for the anthem until 2009 - Why all of a sudden is not participating such a big deal?
Zero2Cool (19h) : Former Seahawks/Packers HC Mike Holmgren on President Trump: “He’s uninformed”.
steveishere (20h) : Funny how you were apparently fine with seeing guys who abuse women or do/sell drugs out there but god forbid they kneel lol
steveishere (20h) : you had 1 foot out the door since Favre left anyways... bye
dhazer (20h) : well so much for watching Packer games, I saw the 3 sitting on the bench and i turned the channel to the race, No more NFL games for me
beast (25-Sep) : Who are the longshots? Jags? Saints? Redskins? and who?
SINCITYCHEEZE (25-Sep) : Buckeye closing in on 4 Longshots in Pickem today....Son you need to hook me up we could make a killing on some parlays next weekend. Lol
beast (25-Sep) : Bears ran it 60% of the time...
beast (24-Sep) : Bears tried hard to give it away, but Steelers couldn't take it
Mucky Tundra (24-Sep) : Lot of injuries :(
Zero2Cool (24-Sep) : OUT for the Packers: WR Randall Cobb S Kentrell Brice CB Davon House LB Jake Ryan LB Nick Perry T David Bakhtiari DT Mike Daniels
beast (24-Sep) : Ravens/Jags must be a FF nightmare, as ol' TEs who never score, had 4 of the 6 TDs
beast (24-Sep) : Bears beating Steelers at halftime.
beast (24-Sep) : https://sports.vice.com/en_us/article/yp89dj/stephen-a-smith-points-out-nfls-paid-patriotism-problem
beast (24-Sep) : I just read that it wasn't until the NFL started getting paid by the DoD (in 2009), that players were on the sidelines for the Anthem. (I ca
Zero2Cool (24-Sep) : apparently it was comon to stay in lockeroom years ago
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
6m / Around The NFL / wpr

12m / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / MintBaconDrivel

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

10h / Around The NFL / Barfarn

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

17h / GameDay Threads / nerdmann

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines