Join Our Green Bay Packers Interactive Community!

We have been providing fans with the best source of Packers information since 2006!
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
2 Pages<12
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline warhawk  
#16 Posted : Thursday, October 25, 2012 10:43:27 AM(UTC)
warhawk

Rank: 3rd Round Draft Pick

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)

Applause Received: 215

Originally Posted by: steveishere Go to Quoted Post
It's been consistent enough. They aren't going to be putting pressure in the QBs face on every play and especially not when teams are using extra protection. If the other team is using extra blockers and the pressure isn't getting there it's still a win because some of their weapons are being taken away. The pressure has overall looked really good this year to me.


It's also a win when teams back off the vertical game and go to more 3 step drops, quick screens to the outside, and to their running backs out of the backfield.

We got burned on one big quick outside screen last week but I would much rather see teams try to beat us like this then like it was last year when they were lighting the DB's up downfield and converting way to many 20+ yard plays.

The only time I see that now is when Capers goes to that stupic 3 man rush.

"The train is leaving the station."
thanks Post received 1 applause.
Pack93z on 10/25/2012(UTC)
Offline Rios39  
#17 Posted : Thursday, October 25, 2012 10:48:12 AM(UTC)
Rios39

Rank: 5th Round Draft Pick

Joined: 8/9/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 30

Originally Posted by: warhawk Go to Quoted Post
It's also a win when teams back off the vertical game and go to more 3 step drops, quick screens to the outside, and to their running backs out of the backfield.

We got burned on one big quick outside screen last week but I would much rather see teams try to beat us like this then like it was last year when they were lighting the DB's up downfield and converting way to many 20+ yard plays.

The only time I see that now is when Capers goes to that stupic 3 man rush.



should never be getting beat over the top in a 3 man rush. If you play a sound zone coverage aspect a 3 man rush is a decent play for 3rd and forever. I wouldn't get carried away with it though. I'm one of those guys that likes a 4 man rush minimum. If it's a 3 man rush I'd like it to be a surprise element like a safety or linebacker coming from another area.
blank
Offline PackerTraxx  
#18 Posted : Thursday, October 25, 2012 12:28:13 PM(UTC)
PackerTraxx

Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick

Joined: 8/13/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 18
Applause Received: 127

The important thing is that it is better than last year. The good thing is that it should continue to get better as our young player gain experience.
Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?
Offline Zero2Cool  
#19 Posted : Thursday, November 8, 2012 11:14:22 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Rank: Legend

Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI

Applause Given: 1,895
Applause Received: 2,093

Where they at now?
UserPostedImage
Offline gbguy20  
#20 Posted : Thursday, November 8, 2012 12:02:00 PM(UTC)
gbguy20

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Joined: 8/28/2009(UTC)

Applause Given: 203
Applause Received: 285

Green Bay is leading the league with 28 sacks. Wow.

Offtopic but we are currently tied for 4th in interceptions, but 7 behind the leader. Waaaaaay down the list in forced fumbles. We also have 0 defensive touchdowns, while Chicago has 7.
call me Dan
Offline doddpower  
#21 Posted : Thursday, November 8, 2012 1:31:25 PM(UTC)
DoddPower

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2011

United States
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA

Applause Given: 1,967
Applause Received: 473

Originally Posted by: gbguy20 Go to Quoted Post
Green Bay is leading the league with 28 sacks. Wow.

Offtopic but we are currently tied for 4th in interceptions, but 7 behind the leader. Waaaaaay down the list in forced fumbles. We also have 0 defensive touchdowns, while Chicago has 7.



Hasn't Chicago only played one team with a winning record, and lost BIG time to them (the Packers)? I think their schedule is about to get much more difficult. Hopefully they won't keep up their dominant defense performance. They are elite this season for sure, but I certainly expect (hope) them to come back down to earth over the remainder of the season.
thanks Post received 2 applause.
nerdmann on 11/8/2012(UTC), wpr on 11/8/2012(UTC)
 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages<12
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2014, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.243 seconds.

Notification

Icon
Error

Tweeter

Recent Topics
13m / Random Babble / Gilligan

24m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Rockmolder

1h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Smokey

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DarkaneRules

6h / Around The NFL / Smokey

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

8h / Random Babble / Cheesey

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

9h / Random Babble / Cheesey

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / pkrjones

13h / Super Bowl Talk / wpr

13h / Random Babble / wpr


Copyright © 2006-2014 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.